Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

COVID-19

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Reminds me of the "bomb shells" Mueller was dumped on Trump. Keep trying though. You only have a couple months left...before he beats the H out of Biden.

    It's funny people are so stupid from being locked in due to this virus, they cannot think straight. They assume that Trump knew everything we know now back in early February. SMH. Nobody knew it was going to be this bad on February 7th. He may have said it was bad but so was H1N1. So are a lot of diseases coming out of China including SARS. Fact is, nobody in America had it at the time and there had not been a global pandemic for 100 years. Revisionists working OT.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
      I've said it before, just imagine if he and his little task force would have come out and been honest about the severity of this virus and called for a patriotic nationwide make a mask movement, show how to make a mask with simple T-shirt. Put out how to videos on different mask types. Put a hold on all the disposable masks being sold at the stores, and ordered them to be donated to the local hospitals. Called for all the clothing manufactures to start making masks. We might of had a shot to starve this virus in the first couple of months. He could have demonized China all he wanted, called it China Flu,Kung Flu. Whatever he wants. He would have gone down as one of the greatest Presidents ever. Now he will go down as the biggest failure of a President ever. He will be hated and mocked for the rest of his days, and cheered when he passes.

      Edit: I know the Surgeon General put out a t-shirt mask video, but it was very hard to follow. Barely workable mask, I tried it and it kept coming undone or wouldn't stay in place. There so many other ways to make an effective mask with out needing sewing skills.
      Well, his experts were not recommending masks at the time. And people want him to listen to his experts. So what's a man to do?

      The fact is, the US should have had the manufacturing capacity to make N95 masks and dish them out to everyone like South Korea did with their KF94 mask. If you were not paying attention, South Korea had about the lowest death rate in the world and I think it was because of "real" masks. But we didn't have the manufacturing because both parties, starting with Bill Clinton, abandoned our workers. Unions are a mess. Trump is trying to bring back manufacturing and he's the first US president to even try that.

      The masks people in the US are wearing may or may not help but if the virus is airborne, which I think is now proven, those masks have maybe a 40% at best effectiveness and don't extrapolate that to mean it would reduce infections 40%.

      Edit: It's funny. Let's say you have the option of drinking Barcardi 151 or plain old 80 proof. You figure, like masks that are maybe 40% effective, 80 proof is a lot safer. I can go about my business drinking what I want and as long as it's not 151 I'm good.
      Last edited by BlueNGold; 09-09-2020, 05:32 PM.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post
        I knew the media would start in later in the year running up to the election.
        that naughty media he willingly spent hours talking to on the record, on tape

        Comment


        • Originally posted by dal9 View Post

          that naughty media he willingly spent hours talking to on the record, on tape
          I heard nothing that should be a concern with anyone educated on the context and timing of it all.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post

            I heard nothing that should be a concern with anyone educated on the context and timing of it all.
            what about the fact that his own dni (known marxist dan coats) thought that the russians had something on him

            Comment


            • The description of the severity was comparable to the flu of 1918. That is what a high ranking official told him. That was not conveyed in February. So if I guess if you like being lied to then he is your man. Come hell or high water he is what he is.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Gamble1 View Post
                The description of the severity was comparable to the flu of 1918. That is what a high ranking official told him. That was not conveyed in February. So if I guess if you like being lied to then he is your man. Come hell or high water he is what he is.
                So you are saying, based on what Trump said, he knew this was going to be a global pandemic killing a million or more people in early February? That he didn't think this might be another SARS or H1N1 which is also spread through the air...and while serious didn't amount to much...thus no reason to spread panic? That he knew more and better information than Fauci who even weeks later in late February said people could go to the movies, malls, etc., and change nothing about their behavior at that time? Is there a conspiracy that Trump hid this from the medical community? I'm just trying to understand the thought process here and hope I'm not wading throught Trump hate.


                Comment


                • Originally posted by dal9 View Post

                  what about the fact that his own dni (known marxist dan coats) thought that the russians had something on him
                  I don't think you understand the nuanced relationship conservatives have with Trump. Let me help you out. They don't like him either. They ride whatever horse they need to, to stay in power.

                  Comment


                  • First thing a leader is supposed to do in a public health crises is tell the truth. Give the public up to date information so they act accordingly. He lied back then and kept lying to save his ***. He still to this day downplays the virus and holds potential super spreader events with no distancing or required masks. He makes fun of Biden when he wears a mask and tells reporters to take their masks off at press gaggles. It’s obvious why his gullible followers never fully bought into the public health measures which has led to where we are today: a living hell.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by CJ Jones View Post
                      First thing a leader is supposed to do in a public health crises is tell the truth. Give the public up to date information so they act accordingly. He lied back then and kept lying to save his ***. He still to this day downplays the virus and holds potential super spreader events with no distancing or required masks. He makes fun of Biden when he wears a mask and tells reporters to take their masks off at press gaggles. It’s obvious why his gullible followers never fully bought into the public health measures which has led to where we are today: a living hell.
                      So you are claiming that Trump knew back in February that this would be a global pandemic and not another H1N1 or SARS scare? That in early February, he had perfect information that this would be a once in a century event? And you are claiming that Trump hid this information from Fauci since we all know Fauci is completely open and honest and accurate....and Fauci was saying it was no big deal weeks later...saying people didn't need to even social distance? IOW, you have a conspiracy here, right?

                      I realize people are sucking this latest information up like it's brand new news, but we've already been over all this. There was a great deal of speculation and unknowns leading up to mid March when things started to shift.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by CJ Jones View Post
                        First thing a leader is supposed to do in a public health crises is tell the truth. Give the public up to date information so they act accordingly. He lied back then and kept lying to save his ***. He still to this day downplays the virus and holds potential super spreader events with no distancing or required masks. He makes fun of Biden when he wears a mask and tells reporters to take their masks off at press gaggles. It’s obvious why his gullible followers never fully bought into the public health measures which has led to where we are today: a living hell.
                        By the time that interview was taken, Trump had shut down travel from China. Biden fought him on that and called Trump a racist for doing it. Trump declared a public health emergency. Trump setup a task force.

                        As for guidance on panic, Biden was out campaigning in South Carolin on Feb. 28th and told people not to panic over the virus. Everyone including Fauci, Cuomo, DeBlasio, Pelosi and Biden were playing down the virus in February.

                        Two full months later, on April 3rd Biden reversed on the travel ban. God knows how many people would be dead right now if Biden were president.

                        Trump ordered a travel ban from Europe on March 11th.

                        On March 22nd, Fauci was raving about how well Trump had led. Later Fauci said Trump was not distorting the truth.

                        How many waves of this stuff are we going to see before the election in less than 2 months? We saw the Russia hoax, the Mueller "bomb shells", the failed impeachment. Now the virus. The fact is, nobody could have predicted all this would happen back in February. I realize the media will cherry pick things to revise history and people want to get mad at Trump when Trump has actually done a lot of good.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post

                          I don't think you understand the nuanced relationship conservatives have with Trump. Let me help you out. They don't like him either. They ride whatever horse they need to, to stay in power.
                          this is like 85 year old dan coats who has apparently retired from public life you are talking about?

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post

                            So you are saying, based on what Trump said, he knew this was going to be a global pandemic killing a million or more people in early February? That he didn't think this might be another SARS or H1N1 which is also spread through the air...and while serious didn't amount to much...thus no reason to spread panic? That he knew more and better information than Fauci who even weeks later in late February said people could go to the movies, malls, etc., and change nothing about their behavior at that time? Is there a conspiracy that Trump hid this from the medical community? I'm just trying to understand the thought process here and hope I'm not wading throught Trump hate.

                            I think he downplayed it like he is on tape saying and I am saying atleast one high ranking official said that this was serious enough to compare it to the 1918 pandemic. You can draw whatever conclusion you want from that. My conclusion is that he knew at least that it was deadlier than the normal flu yet he consistently used that comparison for months after he knew it was deadlier than the flu. Sounds like a liar lying about the seriousness of the pandemic to me.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Gamble1 View Post
                              I think he downplayed it like he is on tape saying and I am saying atleast one high ranking official said that this was serious enough to compare it to the 1918 pandemic. You can draw whatever conclusion you want from that. My conclusion is that he knew at least that it was deadlier than the normal flu yet he consistently used that comparison for months after he knew it was deadlier than the flu. Sounds like a liar lying about the seriousness of the pandemic to me.
                              Have you ever considered that the facts were moving back in early February, there were many people with informed opinions that were not sounding an alarm, there were a lot people speculating? Perhaps one person was sounding the alarm and through that interview you hear part of that....but then another voice like Anthony Fauci's played down the virus and adjusted Trump and other people's views.

                              See this is a perfect example of the fog of war. In early February, nobody was predicting a global pandemic. There will always be people in this space crying wolf but they've been crying it for years. There is so much weight a president can give one voice.

                              Then combine that with the impeachment and failed attempt to remove Trump that had just wound up at the same time, the liberals were doing their best to distract the president. Had they not been driving that political impeachment forward it's feasible they would have been sounding the alarm themselves.

                              Personally, I blame Richard Burr. We know he misinformed people prior to selling his stock in mid February. He was the guy who knew about it IMO. He announced at a luncheon in late February that this was serious and that made big news...and from there people started getting more serious. But of course, the media doesn't care about Burr. They have a burr up their azz about Trump but it's not stopping him from stomping the H out of Biden.
                              Last edited by BlueNGold; 09-09-2020, 10:04 PM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X