Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

2016 Indianapolis Colts regular season thread - Here comes the pain!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: 2016 Indianapolis Colts regular season thread - Here comes the pain!

    I wasn't even talking about regular season. I only looked at PLAYOFF stats. Those were all good teams the Colts were playing so the defense played good enough to win most of the time.

    Comment


    • Re: 2016 Indianapolis Colts regular season thread - Here comes the pain!

      Originally posted by Cubs231721 View Post
      I need to look at some other opinions, but I saw that Bill Barnwell has Freeney with only a 40 percent chance of making the HOF and Mathis is listed in the 1 to 10 percent section of his article. I've heard multiple outlets discuss Reggie's chances of the HOF over the last couple years, and he was even considered to be on the fringe.
      I think the only one with a realistic shot is Edge. Obviously 18 is a shoe-in

      Comment


      • Re: 2016 Indianapolis Colts regular season thread - Here comes the pain!

        Originally posted by presto123 View Post
        I wasn't even talking about regular season. I only looked at PLAYOFF stats. Those were all good teams the Colts were playing so the defense played good enough to win most of the time.
        Teams consistently held onto the ball for much of the game, essentially shortening the game. They may not have scored a bunch of points, but they certainly controlled the game.

        TEN, @MiA, one of the NE games, @SD, quickly come to mind. Im sure there are other examples as well.

        Comment


        • Re: 2016 Indianapolis Colts regular season thread - Here comes the pain!

          Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
          Teams consistently held onto the ball for much of the game, essentially shortening the game. They may not have scored a bunch of points, but they certainly controlled the game.

          TEN, @MiA, one of the NE games, @SD, quickly come to mind. Im sure there are other examples as well.
          The Jets game(the last playoff game not the other two) also is another. And what made it worse is that timeout gaffe. We had the lead before that.

          Luck (no pun intended) matters sometimes the ball bounces your way other times it doesn't. For one year it went the Colts way sometimes you don't even get that.

          As for the HOF I would say Edge might've gotten in already had he stayed with the Colts but they didn't bring him back and he kind of faded away from people's minds after that.

          However he and Reggie are the best bets for HOF and should be shoe ins others that played here? Very good but not HOF worthy to me.

          Well there's Freeney but he's still playing so that won't be till later.
          Last edited by Basketball Fan; 09-17-2016, 06:59 PM.

          Comment


          • Re: 2016 Indianapolis Colts regular season thread - Here comes the pain!

            Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
            Teams consistently held onto the ball for much of the game, essentially shortening the game. They may not have scored a bunch of points, but they certainly controlled the game.

            TEN, @MiA, one of the NE games, @SD, quickly come to mind. Im sure there are other examples as well.

            You have a point, but you also have to admit that the Colts offense helped them control the game to a certain extent. Way more short drives or three and outs than the regular season.

            Comment


            • Re: 2016 Indianapolis Colts regular season thread - Here comes the pain!

              Originally posted by Basketball Fan View Post
              Really Jacksonville, Tennessee and Houston didn't suck then either?

              I would say Tennessee were good briefly during the McNair years early on in the AFC South but after that the Colts took over when Manning came into his own.

              I would say Houston and Jacksonville look a lot better than we do present day but those teams are defense first and aren't expecting a QB to do the heavy lifting like the Colts do for some inexplicable reason.
              You can see how the division stacks up historically in the second graphic down on 538's AFC South article:

              http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...not-this-year/

              Basically the graphic says that for the 2002-2009 period, the AFC South was the best division in terms of wins twice, second once, third once, fourth twice, and fifth twice. The AFC South had the best average finish of any division in football over that 8 year stretch.

              Since then, they've finished 7th or 8th 6 years in a row.

              Comment


              • Re: 2016 Indianapolis Colts regular season thread - Here comes the pain!

                Originally posted by Cubs231721 View Post
                You can see how the division stacks up historically in the second graphic down on 538's AFC South article:

                http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...not-this-year/

                Basically the graphic says that for the 2002-2009 period, the AFC South was the best division in terms of wins twice, second once, third once, fourth twice, and fifth twice. The AFC South had the best average finish of any division in football over that 8 year stretch.

                Since then, they've finished 7th or 8th 6 years in a row.
                Regardless even then it was a lock to win that division who really was a threat early on the Titans but the Colts pretty much owned the division during that time. They never really gave the Colts competition which looking back may have been a bad thing. I think divisions like the AFC North(except the Browns of course) produce tougher more postseason built teams because they are tougher games.

                Same with the NFC West currently. I think that being a soft team was fun to watch during the regular season but come postseason dealing with battle tested teams that didn't rest starters at the end and weren't so finesse wasn't a good matchup for the Colts the way they were built to be top heavy on offense.

                Comment


                • Re: 2016 Indianapolis Colts regular season thread - Here comes the pain!

                  Every year seemed like a combination of a perfect storm, and the Colts being extremely unlucky.

                  @Miami: Vandy misses potential game winning kick

                  Pitt: Nick Harper gets chased down by Big Ben, Vandy misses game winning kick

                  @SD: Darren Sproles and Mike Scifres (Punter) have the games of their lives. SD gets the ball first in OT

                  SD: Billy Volek has the game of his life. Marvin, Ricky Williams (remember him), and someone else fumbles inside SD 15.

                  NO: Hank Baskett smfh. Reggie and 18 with the rare miscommunication

                  NYJ: Jim Caldwell calls the dumbest TO in Colt history. Then Tim Jennings plays about 32 yds off Braylon Edwards for a completion that I could have made
                  Last edited by Ace E.Anderson; 09-17-2016, 08:51 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Re: 2016 Indianapolis Colts regular season thread - Here comes the pain!

                    Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post

                    SD: Billy Volek has the game of his life. Marvin, Ricky Williams (remember him), and someone else fumbles inside SD 15.

                    We were so ravaged by injuries that season, we had some dude named Kenton Keith at running back. Manning threw what should have been a touchdown pass to him in the end zone, but Keith bobbled it up into the air and it was intercepted.


                    The playoff losses to San Diego were the worst. Two huge flukes that were two wasted years of Manning's prime.

                    Comment


                    • Re: 2016 Indianapolis Colts regular season thread - Here comes the pain!

                      Originally posted by LuckSwagger View Post
                      We were so ravaged by injuries that season, we had some dude named Kenton Keith at running back. Manning threw what should have been a touchdown pass to him in the end zone, but Keith bobbled it up into the air and it was intercepted.


                      The playoff losses to San Diego were the worst. Two huge flukes that were two wasted years of Manning's prime.
                      It all came back to me when you said the name..smfh

                      Comment


                      • Re: 2016 Indianapolis Colts regular season thread - Here comes the pain!

                        Originally posted by Sollozzo View Post
                        Sanders was great when healthy, but I don't see how he could possibly get in when he essentially only played two full seasons.
                        I believe he missed more games than he ever played in.
                        Sure, he was a dominator when healthy but, he was like that badass sports car that was always in the shop for an extensive rebuild.

                        Comment


                        • Re: 2016 Indianapolis Colts regular season thread - Here comes the pain!

                          Originally posted by presto123 View Post
                          Not sure I totally agree with this. Looking at our playoff games during the Manning era, our defense usually held the opponents to probably an average of 20 per game. Now that's not incredible, but if the Manning offenses didn't consistently under-perform, they should have easily covered 20 points. I mean most of Manning's teams were top 3 in the league in scoring usually higher than #3. Our defense was not great, but not as bad as you remember. There were a couple seasons where defense was #1 and #2 in points allowed. Manning has to take a little of the blame.
                          Our defense was probably worse than we remember. It was embarrassing too many times. Once the entire league figured out how to beat the Colts, the Colts never adjusted. So defensive stats are deceptive. Teams could run on 3rd and long and get first down. And teams intentionally burned clock to keep Manning and company on the sidelines. And burning clock works great when the defense can't stop the run. And then Manning wasn't the greatest when the pressure was on... which there's a lot of pressure when you're getting minimal possessions per game and can't get the other team off the field as they chew up clock and play keep away. And all of that leads to the defense against the pass not looking too bad. But that is because nobody had to pass. And nobody had to take shots down the field either. Dink and dunk with an extra heavy dose of running was what teams did.... and it worked marvelously because not only did it keep Manning on the bench, but it put so much pressure on the Colts' offense to score every possession that every mistake was magnified.

                          We had some awful run defense to close out that 2006 season. And my recollection is, besides getting Sanders back for the playoffs, we also were compelled to sellout to stop the run after finishing the season so abysmally against the run. We had no choice because we'd be destroyed otherwise. And then lo and behold teams didn't take what we were giving them in the passing game and instead played into our hands by trying to run into a stacked box. ....And Sanders "The Eraser".... They just couldn't get past gameplanning to run all over the Colts. That got us as far as the AFCCG, and then that was out the window. But by then I think the gods decided we were owed one against the Patriots...

                          Sadly, we still didn't try and get away long term from the system that funneled teams right into the perfect gameplan to beat the Colts. We couldn't stop the run and hardly addressed that weakness for the Manning era, and teams flaunted it and took advantage of that.
                          Last edited by Bball; 09-18-2016, 01:05 AM.
                          Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                          ------

                          "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                          -John Wooden

                          Comment


                          • Re: 2016 Indianapolis Colts regular season thread - Here comes the pain!

                            Originally posted by idioteque View Post
                            Also, the penalties for celebrations have gotten out of hand. I saw the first quarter of the Broncos-Seahawks and some lineman got penalized for jumping up and down after a touchdown. I think he was facing an opposing player, but it didn't resemble taunting in the slightest, it was obviously just a gut reaction to a good play and the defender didn't even seem to notice it much less react. The penalty flew in the face of common sense.

                            Then, you penalize Antonio Brown for shaking his booty for about 4 seconds after a touchdown. Not a coordinated celebration with teammates, not taunting a defender. Why? Why is fun not allowed? The NFL is approaching "unwritten rules of baseball" level with this stuff. Which is fine if you want your audience to get older and older and turn off kids, I guess. I'm not calling for anything goes. But let the players have some fun. Part of the reason I like the NBA better is that they let the players be more self expressive. This is sports, not an argument before the Supreme Court. The NFL has gotten so hilariously sanctimonious and they take themselves way too seriously.
                            In all fairness, they penalized Brown for ******* Manti Te'o's girlfriend in the end zone.

                            Comment


                            • Re: 2016 Indianapolis Colts regular season thread - Here comes the pain!

                              The game where I feel the offense really let us down was that infamous Steelers game. We probably could have won it if we would have gone to Edge more instead of trying to beat Pitt in the air. Yes, Big Ben tackling Harper and Vanderjagt missing the kick were both unfortunate, but all they did was cancel out the two horrible breaks for the Steelers (the awful overturning of the Polamalalaoulaooualou interception and the fluke Bettis fumble when they were about to ice the game). The Steelers outplayed the Colts.

                              Comment


                              • Re: 2016 Indianapolis Colts regular season thread - Here comes the pain!

                                Originally posted by Sollozzo View Post
                                The game where I feel the offense really let us down was that infamous Steelers game. We probably could have won it if we would have gone to Edge more instead of trying to beat Pitt in the air. Yes, Big Ben tackling Harper and Vanderjagt missing the kick were both unfortunate, but all they did was cancel out the two horrible breaks for the Steelers (the awful overturning of the Polamalalaoulaooualou interception and the fluke Bettis fumble when they were about to ice the game). The Steelers outplayed the Colts.
                                I always thought that was the year that turned Peyton around a bit.

                                Prior to tha game, he was much more likely to try and win the game by himself by going downfield all game long. After that debacle, he began to trust and rely on the running game more IN the playoffs. We won the SB the very next season.

                                Though he still suffered a few unfortunate 1 and dones, he went 11-7 with 4 SB appearances after that game.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X