If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Hello everyone,
Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.
A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.
Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.
Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.
Rule #1
Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:
"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"
"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"
"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"
"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"
"He/she is just delusional"
"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"
"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"
"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "
In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.
We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.
Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.
That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.
A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.
There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.
Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.
In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.
Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.
If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!
All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.
Rule #2
If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.
The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.
The right places to do so are:
A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.
B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.
If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.
Rule #3
If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.
When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:
A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.
B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.
To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!
Rule #4
Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.
Rule #5
When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.
An example:
If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star
And I would put the pasted article in quotes like this.
Rule #6
We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.
The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.
Rule #7
Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.
It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).
We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).
However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.
Rule #8
We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.
Rule #9
Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.
Rule #10
We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.
Rule #11
Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
Do you guys have any ideas how we can get the 30 or so current Area 55 members to show up to more games? I know it was versus the Nets, but it was a Friday night and we were empty.
I get the same question every game from members I rarely see, "Where is your drum?" I should respond with, "It's been missing for months, but you never show up to notice."
Maybe we should talk to the suits. After these tickets run out we weed out the no shows, and then hold an audition where the hardcore fans are the judges. We pick new members and we get this section a-ROCKIN again
Maybe we should talk to the suits. After these tickets run out we weed out the no shows, and then hold an audition where the hardcore fans are the judges. We pick new members and we get this section a-ROCKIN again
When I proposed a cheering section in my past comments to the Pacers, I actually recommended that the spots be filled for only a few games at a time and even that certain game-to-game spots be filled by day-of-game tryouts.
BillS
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...
When I proposed a cheering section in my past comments to the Pacers, I actually recommended that the spots be filled for only a few games at a time and even that certain game-to-game spots be filled by day-of-game tryouts.
The Area 55 tix are doled out 7 or 8 games at a time. Originally that was so the suits could see who was coming and who wasn't and the idea was that the wasn'ts would be kicked out and new blood inserted. It hasn't been enforced, AFAIK. The Suits have been fair to some whose lack of attendance was unavoidable - illness, family problems etc. to their credit. They've probably been too nice though with a lot of people who have sort of just stopped coming.
On game day, Area 55 (i.e. Sections 101 and 102) gets supplemented by selections made by the Loud Crowd based on enthusiasm, so I've been told. Some of their selections have been good. Some not so good.
On a different not I did get the chance to have a meet and greet with BillS at the ram and if I might say so he is a very cool guy!
I don't care what El pacero and Duke say!
Indeed, BillS is a very cool guy. He was going to yell at me on here but decided against it. I appreciate it very much, and will try my best not to say any more stupid **** on here again (That's futile).
But seriously, agree with Kielbeze. BillS: great dude. Hopefully Area 55 is rowdy tomorrow to welcome our new coach!
Salutations, 55ers! Had to make this Newsletter a shorty due to work concerns and the big news about the Pacers coaching change. Still, there's stuff to relate, so here goes.
First off the major stuff: Monday night’s game with Toronto ushers in major changes for the Pacers. Wow! Who’da thunk it? Our boys now have a new coach! It’s former Pacers assistant, Frank Vogel. Yup, Jim O’Brien was let go in a surprise press conference given by Larry Bird that occurred at 4:00 P.M. Sunday afternoon So, sudden as a hammer drop, and after nearly 4 seasons of Jim O’Brien’s guidance, a new regime is now in place in Pacerland. Coach Vogel (ironically, “Vogel” is German for “Bird”) is now at the helm. What’s it all mean?
Our benefactor, Roy, maybe put it best:
“It’ll be a different atmosphere. Hopefully it’ll reenergize us to move forward.”
Roy, by the way, didn’t gloat or gush about O’Brien’s ouster. None of the players did. Roy was quick to point out that O’Brien’s departure has to be hard on a basically good man. Most people that knew Jim O’Brien liked and respected.him. Roy went on to say:
“I hate to see anybody lose their job. It’s going to be on all of us to get this thing turned around.”
For those of you that didn’t see it, you can watch Bird’s press conference here:
The decision to replace Jim O’Brien seems to have been solely Larry Bird’s. In his press conference, Bird said he had felt comfortable with O’Brien when the Pacers went out west for their recent road swing. Indeed Bird gave a statement endorsing O’Brien and denying any plans to replace him just before the western road trip started. While the road trip ended 0-4 for the Pacers, Bird said that the team had at least been competitive in 3 of the 4 games and still had no plans to make any changes. However, when the Pacers were badly manhandled at home by Orlando upon their return, Bird said that’s when he began to seriously think of replacing O’Brien.
After discussing his thoughts with the Pacers’ owner, Herb Simon, Bird was then given a green light by Simon to make whatever changes he thought best. Bird then opted to move forward without O’Brien as the Pacers coach.
Despite his past support, in his press conference, Bird did not hide his personal differences with some of O’Brien’s policies. He expressed frustration that many of the younger guys on the roster weren’t getting much playing time. He specifically mentioned here the situations of Tyler Hansborough, Paul George, and Lance Stephenson. Bird also expressed dislike for O’Brien’s policy of openly criticizing some of the youngsters in the press. Bird stated that he didn’t do that when he coached and didn’t like that sort of thing when he was a player. He indicated that he didn’t think it was an effective way to handle young players. While Bird stated that he preferred not to second guess O’Brien and allowed that sometimes a “tough love” approach like O’Brien’s might work with some people, he didn’t think it was worked with the younger Pacers. Here Bird specifically alluded to Roy Hibbert’s recent struggles.
With the coaching change, Bird stressed that he still expects the Pacers to be in the playoffs and expressed confidence that the players would accept Vogel and work toward getting the playoff goal accomplished. Bird also expressed confidence in where the franchise is right now.
After this news blockbuster, fans were introduced to Frank Vogel, who is now the youngest head coach in the NBA, at age 37. Vogel began by saying that he wished he could’ve been accepting the job under different circumstances. He openly thanked Jim O’Brien for the opportunity and indicated that O’Brien said only positive things to Vogel about his new job. Vogel also stated that he likes the team and had plenty of confidence that he, along with his assistant coaches, could get some positive results immediately.
When asked about what kind of changes he would be making, Vogel dodged the answer, telling everyone to simply "stay tuned." He did state that some things -- such as substitution patterns -- could and would see immediate changes. He said that other changes he had in mind would be harder and take longer to implement. These, he said, would be worked on as the season progressed. Vogel made a point of mentioning that he wanted to use Roy Hibbert’s versatility more; wanted to get him back to playing high level defense; and “fix” his jumper.
Coach Vogel stated that he was looking for “a seamless transition” regardless of the circumstances. He said he had faith in the both the team’s youth and its veterans, and stated that he already regrets that he wouldn’t be able to play all 15 of the players on the roster.
A big question about the firing had to do with whether or not Vogel had sufficient experience to fill O’Brien’s shoes. Vogel responded to this quickly by pointing out that he is not only in his 14th NBA season, but has worked at all levels of NBA game preparation. When asked if he thought head coaching was a different thing than assistant coaching, Vogel said only, "That’s what they say."
So Who Is Frank Vogel?
Here’s a quick summary:
Frank Vogel is a native of the South Jersey town of Wildwood Crest. He spent 3 years playing Division III basketball at Juniata College in New Jersey initially working towards a career in sports medicine. Vogel would have been a senior at Juniata in 1994-95, would have been the starting point guard there for the third year in a row, and would have spent his second season there as the team captain. Instead, during his senior year he transferred to Kentucky because he wanted to become a basketball coach.
Vogel was a big admirer of Rick Pitino’s coaching and that’s what sent him to the University of Kentucky. He didn’t feel that staying at tiny Juniata College was the most efficient way to accomplish his coaching goal. Vogel went to UK because he wanted to be around Rick Pitino, whose work ethic Vogel greatly admired.
“I knew if I just spent four years at a Division-3 school and graduated, that I’d probably have to work for 10 years at a small college level, probably the first couple years being part-time,” Vogel said. “I wanted to do basketball full time right out of college. I didn’t want to teach during the day and try to find some time to coach in the afternoon or something like that.”
So Vogel gave up his senior year at Juniata and went to Lexington, thinking if there was anywhere a coaching career could start, it would be there. It was a leap of faith, but it ultimately paid off.
When he got to Kentucky in August 1994, Vogel got off to a rocky start. His plan was to secure a position as a student manager for the basketball team, play JV basketball, and continue to work towards a biology degree. Prior to coming, he’d sent five letters to the Kentucky basketball program trying to find some sort of a job. He’d got back five form letters essentially saying ‘no thanks’ but telling him to contact the University’s equipment manager to see if any help was needed.
Vogel had once met Pitino at a Five-Star basketball camp in Pittsburgh, but the closest thing to reassurance that Vogel got from him at the time was an “if there’s anything we can do, let us know, but keep calling the equipment manager.”
After making the transfer and still not landing a job, Vogel began have regrets, thinking he’d thrown away his senior year. However, he remembered his prior meeting with Pitino and decided to visit with him again. Pitino remembered Vogel from the camp. Pitino also remembered that at the camp, he’d introduced Vogel to his associate head coach, one Jim O’Brien.
“[Pitino] sent me to see Coach O’Brien,” Vogel said. When he did, OBrien said, “You know what, I could really use someone to help me out with the video equipment. Let me talk to Rick and we’ll see what we can do.”
Even here it took Vogel a bit of trickery to land the job.
“I lied my tail off about being a computer guy,” Vogel says now. “I was not a computer guy.” I said, ‘I’m pretty good … not great… but pretty good with computers.’ I didn’t know anything about computers. But I just basically made it my life to become one with this video-editing machine that they had, which at the time was the most cutting edge stuff you could find.”
Suddenly, Vogel was in the door with Kentucky. He spent the 1994-95 and 95-96 seasons there as a student manager, all the while helping out O’Brien with video tasks. After graduating in 1996, Vogel spent the 1996-97 season as the team’s video coordinator.
Early in Vogel’s video career, O’Brien gave him some advice. “You should learn this [video taping] stuff because you never know if [Pitino’s] going to go to the NBA in a couple years, and if you can use this stuff you make yourself marketable for a job with him.” Well, it happened just like that,” Vogel said.
On May 8, 1997, Pitino left Kentucky to become the head coach of the Boston Celtics. About a week later, Pitino offered Vogel the video coordinator’s position in Boston, and at the age of 24, Frank Vogel was in the NBA.
In the ensuing four years as the Celtics’ video coordinator, Vogel learned a great deal about being a member of an NBA staff. His role on that staff changed however on January 8, 2001, when Pitino resigned from the Celtics. At that point, O’Brien took over as the Celtics’ head coach and he elevated Vogel to the position of assistant coach, giving him added responsibilities in working with players.
“[O’Brien] gave me the opportunity to take what I’d been studying in film for four years and start applying it and start being a teacher rather than just relaying information to them,” Vogel said. “And that’s what I’d been it for all along. I really enjoy teaching the game and sharing what I know, and helping prepare guys. I love trying to motivate and inspire guys to be better, and work on individual things. I’m doing what I love – not just basketball, but I love teaching the game as well.”
Even though Pitino’s resignation meant another step up the ladder for Vogel, it was among the lowest moments in his professional career. Another one came three years later, when O’Brien handed in his resignation to Boston on January 27, 2004.
“I thought I was going to leave right then too, because I didn’t want to work for anyone but him,” Vogel said.
When O’Brien was hired as the head coach of the 76ers on April 21, 2004 the Celtics were in the middle of a first-round playoff series with Indiana. Four days later, after the Pacers had swept Boston in the series, O’Brien wasted no time in starting to assemble his new staff.
“The day we got knocked out of the playoffs, [O’Brien] called [Boston Executive Director of Basketball Operations] Danny Ainge the next morning and asked for permission to talk to Joe [Gallagher], Lester [Conner] and myself,” Vogel said. “That night he took us and our families all out to dinner in limos and offered us jobs.”
Vogel’s new role on the 76ers coaching staff was to provide O’Brien with all the information he needed about an opponent in order to prepare for a game. He worked with the Sixers’ staff of advance scouts and video coordinators to put together a presentation, which was then put to use when the coaches arrived at the office at 6 AM on the day of a game. When game time arrived, Vogel was perched at the left-most seat on the 76ers bench, next to the scorer’s table, barking instructions to the players.
Hiring Vogel for the assistant coaching position at Philadelphia was an easy decision for O’Brien to make.
“Frank’s an extremely hard worker and has become very astute at breaking down teams and understanding what it takes to win and to grow a basketball team,” O’Brien said. “He’s graduated to where he’s an assistant coach. He’s very, very valuable to what we are trying to do. I hope as long as I am a head coach, I can have him beside me.”
O’Brien only spent one season at Philadelphia. Although O’Brien took Philly to the playoffs at the end of the 2004-2005 season, he had differences with Philly’s GM, Billy King, and was replaced by Maurice Cheeks. When O’Brien left, Vogel left with him. First Vogel worked as an advance scout for the Lakers during the 2005-2006 season. Then, in 2006-2007, he did the same for the Wizards. When O’Brien was hired by the Pacers in 2007, Vogel reunited with his mentor at Indiana as an assistant coach. He toiled at this task until Bird lifted him to the position of interim coach.
So What Do We Look for with Vogel?
Well, as is evident from his biography, Frank Vogel is very much a Rick Pitino / Jim O’Brien protégé. So don’t expect radical changes in how the Pacers run their offense or set up their defensive schemes, at least not right away. It takes a lot of time to put a new offensive scheme in place and the Pacers can’t do that in the middle of an NBA season when they’re playing 2 or 3 games a week and can’t practice. Also, it’s not exactly clear that Vogel has a radically new offensive system up his sleeve even if he had the opportunity to implement one. Expect the O’Brien system that’s in place now to continue with perhaps some minor Vogel tweaking. The Pacers are still going to have a Jim O’Brien look to them for quite a while.
That said, with Vogel, we can expect to see some of the younger players getting more playing time. Also, it is anticipated that there will be less turmoil in the rotations. This probably means less playing time for James Posey, Travis Ford, and perhaps Mike Donleavy. Bird made it clear in his Sunday press conference that he wants to see more from the younger players. It is doubtful that a bright guy like Vogel will disregard this message.
And no, the goal of making the playoff hasn’t been scrapped. That’s still very much on Larry Bird’s and Coach Vogel’s agenda. This is Vogel’s opportunity to make a mark. If he can get us to the playoffs, his interim position might become permanent. Bird indicated as much in the press conference.
Tonight’s Game Frank Vogel could probably not have asked for a better opponent to begin against than the Toronto Raptors. Toronto is dead last in the Atlantic Division with a 13-35 record. Only Cleveland has worse numbers.
The Raptors are also in a massive slump. Saturday, they lost their 11th straight game to the Timberwolves. The 11 loss mark is their longest skid since the 2002-2003 season. In the game Saturday, their star, Andrea “The Magician” Bargnani, missed 19 shots - the most of his career, extended a January slump that he’s been in. Over his last 8 games, Bargnani is 56-for-159, or only 35.2 percent. Catching the Raptors at Conseco tonight is a terrific break for Frank Vogel.
By the way, in the Raptors earlier home loss on Monday to the Grizzlies, the Raptors ended a team shooting streak that began in February 1999. Prior to Monday, the Raptors had played 986 consecutive games with at least one successful 3-point shot – a current NBA record. Unfortunately on Monday the Raptors went 0-13 from 3-pointland. It was the first time in 12 years they failed knock in at least one shot from the arc.
The Raptors this record may not last very long. The Dallas Mavericks have been quietly following along the whole time. The Mavericks’ 3-point streak started a day later, on February 27, 1999, and theirs remains current at 981 consecutive games. Dallas can break the Raptor’s record in Boston on February 4th.
PTO Tonight! PTO Prez Brickyard has sent me an email advising that the regulars will be hoisting beers to an auspicious future for Coach Vogel in the Anthem parking lot before tonight's shoot around. I for one am there! The coaching change has to be analyzed and there's nothing like beer to stimulate analytical skills and trigger inspired thinking. Ought to be a good show. Show up early - like around 4:00 PM if you're interested. The PTO will be early because tonight at 5:00 Area 55 gets to go in early to see Roy participate in the pre-game shootaround.
Kudos to Barb Somes! Before departing, I wanted to point out that 55er Barb Somes got some press Sunday for two reasons. First, she was a major participant in T. J. Ford’s recent Coat Drive (T.J.’s a class guy!), donating 10 coats and netting in the process 20 Pacers tickets to our February 9th and 11th games. Barb donated the tickets to the Carmel police. Barb also got to comment on the coaching change at an interview on WTHR! Here’s the article:
Kudos to Devin Ellis! There was a Devin Ellis sighting at the Pacer’s away game in Chicago. Ellis is a familiar Area 55 loudmouth usually positioned in Row 8 in Section 101 waving a fathead with his gay buddy, Kyle Cranfill (not to imply anything by that, of course). It was only a quick TV glimpse, but there was Ellis, beer in hand, in Pacers gear wearing his familiar drunken grin at the Pacers’ road game with the Bulls in the United Center. It wasn’t Elvis, but it was still a sighting of a well-known and dangerously criminal Area 55 reprobate.
Well, that’s it for now. Let’s be extra-fired up tonight when Frank Vogel makes his debut. It’s time for our Pacers to feast on some tasty dinosaur meat!.
[QUOTE=IndyHoya;1151390]AREA 55 NEWS YOU CAN TAKE TO THE BANK!
PTO Tonight! PTO Prez Brickyard has sent me an email advising that the regulars will be hoisting beers to an auspicious future for Coach Vogel in the Anthem parking lot before tonight's shoot around. I for one am there! The coaching change has to be analyzed and there's nothing like beer to stimulate analytical skills and trigger inspired thinking. Ought to be a good show. Show up early - like around 4:00 PM if you're interested. The PTO will be early because tonight at 5:00 Area 55 gets to go in early to see Roy participate in the pre-game shootaround.
QUOTE]
And possibly after 6 as well, if we are able to leave and come back for Tip!
Join the PTO > http://www.facebook.com/#!/group.php?gid=147144471990&v=wall[/url]
Comment