The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less


  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • I'm replying in the thread for this topic instead of tying up this one any more.


    • Damn Celtics I see you

      Imagine losing Kyrie/Horford and been able to do better than Pacers lol

      @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!


      • Originally posted by ksuttonjr76 View Post

        Bojan is a solid player...if he continues to improve his game like he did last year (tighter handles, using his size against smaller forwards-Bojan really is not a small player, take players off the dribble), Indiana would be stupid to let him walk. If anything, I would maybe experiment with TJ Warren at the starting SG.

        Sabonis (maybe)

        This is not a "terrible" lineup as long as Rubio lives up to his hype as a playmaking PG.
        KP said that Bojan can play some 2/3 in the lineup. I assume that it's not optimal, but as a stop gap option? I'm fine with it. At worst, we just run a smaller Guard rotation of Rubio ( or whoever ), Holiday and Sumner.
        Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.


        • Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
          Damn Celtics I see you

          Imagine losing Kyrie/Horford and been able to do better than Pacers lol

          I wouldn't be surprised if the Pacers are in on this.


            Originally posted by CJ Jones View Post

            Looks like the Celtics are getting Kemba which will likely make Rozier available and he reportedly wants to come here. Looks like a good match and heís Vicís buddy. Cut the check and then pray Scary Terry regains his 2018 playoff form.
            ya, interesting

            i don't know if i like him (rozier) as a starter, in fact i'm pretty sure i don't


            • Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
              And I donít know if anybody noticed but Pritchard kind of let JMV know that they asked New Orleans for Jrue Holiday but they wanted Myles in exchange (same thing for 4th pick).

              And they want us to believe they will trade for stars if available lol
              KP mentioned how important he thinks that having shotblockers and shooters is important to the makeup of the roster. I don't blame KP for not wanting to give up an asset that he values for Jrue.
              Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.


              • Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                KP mentioned how important he thinks that having shotblockers and shooters is important to the makeup of the roster. I don't blame KP for not wanting to give up an asset that he values for Jrue.
                depending on Jrue's contract, you gotta consider giving up Myles for him, especially with the Goga Era starting


                • Originally posted by dal9 View Post

                  depending on Jrue's contract, you gotta consider giving up Myles for him, especially with the Goga Era starting
                  So we can have Rubio and Turner, or just Jrue? I am keeping Turner


                  • Originally posted by dal9 View Post

                    depending on Jrue's contract, you gotta consider giving up Myles for him, especially with the Goga Era starting
                    You give them Myles for Jrue, celebrate that you got an all star for garbage and never look back.
                    @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!


                    • Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                      I think that your disdain for this FO is coloring any rumor that you see now that does not involve the Pacers.

                      Everyone knows that we need another Shot Creator option other than Dipo. I am a Defense first guy and would love Bev, but even I know that he's not a shot creator or someone that can properly run the offense to shift Dipo off the ball.
                      Beverly could be perfect next to Dipo and I love me some Rubio but he aint a shot creator either.
                      @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!


                      • Originally posted by Wage View Post
                        I'm a pretty sunshiney pro Pacers front office kind of guy usually, but you guys have to stop with this "Woe is me, we can't sign anyone because we are in Indiana" crap. Indiana isn't by itself a help in drawing guys in , but it isn't driving guys away either. How the team is run is what guys are looking at here, not its location on a map. Chicago is the 3rd largest market in the country and you don't hear about anyone going there. Charlotte is absolutely gorgeous as far as city and weather go, and you don't hear about anyone going there. 2 months ago you had to be the Lakers or Knicks to get a big fish. Now you have to be the Clippers or Nets. Hell, Minnesota is freaking miserable and they are more seriously linked with DLo than we are and they don't even have any cap space!

                        People don't want to come to Indiana because the team is boring, the coach is boring, the playstyle is boring, and we won't take risks that put us over the top. Some fans are cool with just being a good team that makes the playoffs, but big time free agents usually are not. That is why they won't return Pritch's calls. Because of the culture we have built here, not because the location.

                        Stop letting Simon and KP off the hook.
                        Ya, I agree. 10 years ago golden state was not a FA destination... they built through the draft and built themselves into a destination. It's mostly about the system and the success. Lakers/Knicks/Chi/Miami (all the "big hot markets)") have all struggled to land big FAs recently until LA landed LBJ recently. Miami did land the big three awhile back, but that was largely built upon drafting Dwayne Wade, so even there it started with the draft. I would even argue LA landed AD by trading it's drafted assets. It's less to do with market/location and more about what's going on in that franchise and how well they draft. The Bucks have never been a FA destination but while Giannis (who they drafted 15th) stays there they will be a FA destination. The Colts were terrible until Peyton got there (drafted), and then they became a FA destination.

                        Milwaukee is in the position its in because they swung the fences on a mid-level draft pick (Giannis), which is what I wish Indy would do. We continuously draft in the middle of the round... you need to gamble on a young "unicorn" level talent at that spot rather than go for the safe picks. At least occasionally. You can't constantly go for the safe pick at 15, sometimes you need to look at a Bol Bol and say you know what? F it, he's got question marks, but if he hits, he could be a franchise changer. And I'm not saying Bol Bol is a franchise-changer, but of all the guys that were available to us, he was the closest. We went with the safe pick, and I like the pick. Just saying that occasionally you gotta go with the ceiling pick. It took Giannis a good 4 years to reach that level of play, so you have to recognize superstar talent and then allow it to develop. PG was that type of pick, no one really knew who he was, he was a bit raw, but he was also the one guy a few scouts said could be a superstar down the road, and they were basically right.

                        So I guess at the end of the day I don't necessarily care if we're not a FA destination --- I prefer to build through the draft and I think history shows that's a way more consistent method of achieving a championship-level team than throwing together a bunch of superstar FAs. The Shaq/Kobe Lakers were still assembled initially by the draft. The Heat big 3 were largely started by drafting DWade. The Celtics big 3 were started by drafting Pierce. The Warriors were largely drafted and even though they attracted some big FAs, they didn't really need to. It all starts with the draft. Most of those championship teams originated by landing a superstar in the draft and then building around him.
                        Last edited by Kid Minneapolis; 06-27-2019, 01:06 PM.
                        There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.


                        • Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post

                          Beverly could be perfect next to Dipo and I love me some Rubio but he aint a shot creator either.
                          Crying about running an 80ís offense and then wants Pat Beverly, lol whatever


                          • I think why I'd be good with Rubio is he's the closest thing in today's game to a previous Pacer PG that actually took us to a Finals --- Mark Jackson. No one would ever confuse Jackson as a scorer/shooter, had the funkiest form you ever saw. But he could run an offense like nobody's business and he would occasionally hit a huge shot. Those Jackson-led Pacer teams could light up the scoreboard because Jackson was setting up all those shooters. Not saying Rubio is as good as Mark was, but he's along those same lines. It's been awhile since we had a guy who was brought in with the explicit purpose of setting other guys up instead of looking to score first. Compare their stats and styles, they are actually extremely similar.
                            Last edited by Kid Minneapolis; 06-27-2019, 01:12 PM.
                            There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.


                            • Originally posted by CJ Jones View Post

                              This should be a damn near fireable offense to a team that can not sign good free agents and must do their heavy lifting through trades and the draft. KP still has a few days left to redeem himself in my eyes otherwise Iíll be headed over to the dark side.
                              Unless there is a trade of an Expiring for another bigger Expiring Contract for some minor asset ( to help another Team reduce their Salary Cap but not impacting next season's Salary Cap ) or the Pacers getting a Player with a longer term contract that fits what the Pacers want in a Roster; then I am fine with the Pacers not trading CoJo or DC.

                              The one thing you have to remember is that Teams that wants Expiring Contracts PRIMARILY want to dump BAD LONG-TERM CONTRACTS for Players that they don't want anymore so that they can clear Salary Cap for the next season. The Pacers aren't likely to get solid Players on good contracts that won't impact this 2019-2020 Salary Cap.

                              Let me give you a relate-able example:

                              Who is the Pacer that all of you want to dump for next to nothing?

                              McBucket's $7+ mil per year contract that will be stuck on the books for another 2 seasons.

                              Do you want that type of Player added to the Pacers roster?

                              That type of Player ( more than likely ) is the type of contracts that the Pacers would have gotten for DC or CoJo.

                              And what would happen if we did make such a trade?

                              Critics of this FO would then move on to the next criticism and point out that the Pacers doesn't have enough Cap Space to pursue Free Agents after trading DC or CoJo.

                              I get that this FO is going to be "Damned if they do and damned if they don't"; but unless the Pacers received a total no-brainer offer for CoJo or DC, I am fine with how things turned out.
                              Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.