Re: What movie did you last watch?
Anchorman 2.
I laughed hard.
Anchorman 2.
I laughed hard.
Spoiler:WTF was up with the 3rd code? I can ignore the absolute implausibility that the president and secret service would ignore protocol and allow others into the PEOC... even though that means the entire terrorist plot relied on an implausible scenario and gamble to work in the first place. Although arguably, although not said, possibly the backup plan was to initiate their plan in the Oval Office IF the president and staff didn't break protocol. Although they still needed to get to the PEOC one way or the other.
But the 3rd code.... The president ordered his staff to give up their portion of the code when the terrorists tortured them in front of the president. The president always claiming the terrorists would never get him to give up his 3rd portion of the code so they were safe to give up the first 2 parts. The terrorists had a plan to get the president's son in order to use him as leverage to get the president's code (though he didn't know that or think about it). But then 'Bruce Willis' rescues the son before the terrorists can find him. So that is out the window. BUT, what about torturing one of the president's staff in front of him? It's worked twice already so why not try that? Or how much torture can he stand himself? But wait.... the movie just cuts back to the PEOC and the terrorist has the 3rd code and the president doesn't look the worse for the wear.
What!!!??!!! Huh???? How did that just happen?
The entire movie would've played better for me if they would have just explained that with some plausible bit of artistic license. We can assume they somehow cracked the code by getting the other 2 parts and making the cracking simpler (even though that would be a stretch in reality). But it doesn't even tell us that or imply that. It doesn't show the president surprised that they don't need his 3rd code so his ordering his staff to give up their portions was a huge mistake. They could've claimed to had someone on the inside that put a backdoor in the system for the president's part of the code so they only needed the president to react as he did (and they expected) in ordering staff to give up their's thinking the president's was the key piece and they'd never get that when in reality his was the piece they didn't need.
But all this assuming goes out the window because we know an important part of the plan was to get the president's son. But in fact, they didn't need him!
They could've cut back to the PEOC and let us see a battered president and give us a reasonable assumption that he'd gave it up under torture. Or a psychological play about having his son when they didn't and forcing him to give it up that way. But noooooo....
Nothing...
What a glaring plot and one that really didn't have to be there. Surely SOMEONE when writing or making this movie had to think: How do they get that 3rd code? ...they just forgot to tell us!!! It might be on the cutting room floor somewhere or on an X'ed out page in the script. I don't know... but it does rip you from the moment when there'd been so much emphasis on "Go ahead, tell them.... They'll NEVER get mine!".. and then BOOM... they got his when they need it with no explanation. Not even surprise from him they have it!
Spoiler:So this movie pretty much flushed the Wolverine Origins movie out of existence since the setting in that movie was not prior to WWII.
Comment