Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

What Video game did you last play?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: What Video game did you last play?

    Madden 16

    I finally get one of the few wins in which I wasn't jobbed by the CPU and...


    Final Score Game Freeze

    Yet another game that doesn't count because it freezes after the game is over. I might have to start shutting the XBOX off with a second left, so the game will save. But that assumes that I want to continue playing this insufferable piece of garbage.
    Edit Signature

    Comment


    • Re: What Video game did you last play?

      Originally posted by Sparhawk View Post
      The easiest way is to go into buildings and pick locks. McCready really likes it when you pick locks. I finally got Cait's perk. Cait was probably the easiest. Deacon and Piper took hours to get.

      I tried my hand with Strong, but he hates everything I do. He hates power armor and lock picking. I switched him for Hancock. Really liking Hancock. Hancock really likes helping settlers out and doing good deeds for others.

      Still haven't gotten to Danse yet.
      Strong is a tough one because like you said he doesn't like power armor, picking locks, sneaking or anything like that as it is weak. He basically just hangs out at the Truck Stop with the rest of my companions. He did kill one of the settlers there. Oh well.

      Piper was the easiest for me. She loves good deeds and picking locks. Not a big fan of extortion, which went against my high charisma.

      I just roll around with McCready or Hancock.

      Comment


      • Re: What Video game did you last play?

        Originally posted by thewholefnshow31 View Post
        Strong is a tough one because like you said he doesn't like power armor, picking locks, sneaking or anything like that as it is weak. He basically just hangs out at the Truck Stop with the rest of my companions. He did kill one of the settlers there. Oh well.

        Piper was the easiest for me. She loves good deeds and picking locks. Not a big fan of extortion, which went against my high charisma.

        I just roll around with McCready or Hancock.
        I got Hancock now. Preston was so easy, just had to do settlement missions, and his perk is really cool. Codworth is also easy; he loves it when you mod weapons/armor. So just quicksave and keep doing it.

        I've got a lot of companion perks now. haha I haven't unlocked Danse, X6, Curie or Valentine since I haven't started the main mission. Will likely do some BoS quests to get Danse, and then start the main mission. I've done just about every side mission you can. Level 56 now. Still haven't done any base building which is calling to me.

        Really wish the creation kit has come out so I could get some cooler mods, not to mention new quests that people add.

        Almost feels like when I left the vault I was supposed to do something. You know that phenomenon when you enter a different room you forget what you were originally thinking about? Yeah, I've had that ever since I left the vault.
        Last edited by Sparhawk; 01-20-2016, 02:11 PM.
        First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

        Comment


        • Re: What Video game did you last play?

          Originally posted by Sparhawk View Post
          Almost feels like when I left the vault I was supposed to do something. You know that phenomenon when you enter a different room you forget what you were originally thinking about? Yeah, I've had that ever since I left the vault.
          This is me for FO3 and FO4. I think that speaks to a really great video game and open world, but I'm the kind of guy who will play FO4 for 2 days straight and then not touch my PS4 for a month, so it can be difficult to pick up where I left off.

          Comment


          • Re: What Video game did you last play?

            Originally posted by Dr. Hibbert View Post
            This is me for FO3 and FO4. I think that speaks to a really great video game and open world, but I'm the kind of guy who will play FO4 for 2 days straight and then not touch my PS4 for a month, so it can be difficult to pick up where I left off.
            It hurts games like this for me at my age. I love games I can play in my bursts, whether it be for 2 hours or 6 hours, but whenever I come back to them I know what I was doing. Ultimately it ruined Witcher 3. I walked away from that game one day and never went back because I felt like I would have no idea what I really was doing.


            Comment


            • Re: What Video game did you last play?

              Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
              It hurts games like this for me at my age. I love games I can play in my bursts, whether it be for 2 hours or 6 hours, but whenever I come back to them I know what I was doing. Ultimately it ruined Witcher 3. I walked away from that game one day and never went back because I felt like I would have no idea what I really was doing.
              Amen, and exactly same experience with Witcher 3. I mostly just play sports games, but I do like a good story and everyone was just raving, raving, raving so I finally broke down and bought that. I really, really tried to get into it in about 3 days worth of burst play. But nothing was grabbing me. Then I was out on a business trip, and tried to play one more time when I came back. Completely forgot what the story was, where I was supposed to go in the world, and how to do anything anyway.

              Heck, I lose my place in Grand Theft Auto all the time too, and just end up popping that in a few times a year when I wanna kill some time and just sandbox things. And ditto the Fallout experience for Shadow of Mordor, but I did have some fun with that before abandoning it. Combat was awesome.

              It just gets worse the older I get, I find. I think the only non-sports games to really grab me over the last 5 years have been: Last of Us / anything Naughty Dog does really, Max Payne 3, Bioshock Infinite, Arkham Asylum/City and Tomb Raider. Now I'm at a point where the only games I really get hyped for are Naughty Dog games or Rollercoaster Tycoon...

              Comment


              • Re: What Video game did you last play?

                Guys maybe it's just me but I'm not enjoying fallout4.

                I've no real idea what I'm supposed to be doing. Just jumping from person to person from place to place doing tedious tasks. Never mind the boring dialogue.

                Where do you get power armour? I literally have no idea.

                More likely that I just suck at this game but I really can't get into it. It's an ok game but certainly not worth the hype IMO.
                https://twitter.com/DrogsNavan

                Change is neither good or bad, it simply is.

                Comment


                • Re: What Video game did you last play?

                  Originally posted by IrishPacer View Post
                  Guys maybe it's just me but I'm not enjoying fallout4.

                  I've no real idea what I'm supposed to be doing. Just jumping from person to person from place to place doing tedious tasks. Never mind the boring dialogue.

                  Where do you get power armour? I literally have no idea.

                  More likely that I just suck at this game but I really can't get into it. It's an ok game but certainly not worth the hype IMO.
                  I felt the same way man. It was fun for a few days, but it got boring after that.

                  Comment


                  • Re: What Video game did you last play?

                    Originally posted by Miller_time04 View Post
                    I felt the same way man. It was fun for a few days, but it got boring after that.
                    I get sent to places here and there and you get sidetrack with tedious tasks and then you forget what you were originally supposed to do.

                    Poor graphics and extremely glitchy. Certainly didn't live up to the hype. It's a glorified scavenger hunt.
                    https://twitter.com/DrogsNavan

                    Change is neither good or bad, it simply is.

                    Comment


                    • Re: What Video game did you last play?

                      Originally posted by IrishPacer View Post
                      Guys maybe it's just me but I'm not enjoying fallout4.

                      I've no real idea what I'm supposed to be doing. Just jumping from person to person from place to place doing tedious tasks. Never mind the boring dialogue.

                      Where do you get power armour? I literally have no idea.

                      More likely that I just suck at this game but I really can't get into it. It's an ok game but certainly not worth the hype IMO.
                      You get power armor, like, RIGHT AWAY in that game actually. When you first encounter Preston Garvey at the museum. You're given power armor to fight a deathclaw, essentially.

                      Comment


                      • Re: What Video game did you last play?

                        Originally posted by Dr. Hibbert View Post
                        You get power armor, like, RIGHT AWAY in that game actually. When you first encounter Preston Garvey at the museum. You're given power armor to fight a deathclaw, essentially.
                        I'm well past that and I never got the power armour.

                        Ive seen videos of people on the roof with it but I never seemed to get that option. Instead I was on the balcony with Preston shooting at that deathclaw.
                        https://twitter.com/DrogsNavan

                        Change is neither good or bad, it simply is.

                        Comment


                        • Re: What Video game did you last play?

                          Originally posted by IrishPacer View Post
                          I'm well past that and I never got the power armour.

                          Ive seen videos of people on the roof with it but I never seemed to get that option. Instead I was on the balcony with Preston shooting at that deathclaw.
                          Preston should have told you to talk to Sturges in the building and he would ave explained the plan to get the power armor and kill the remaining raiders.

                          Most of the power armor I have found is by just exploring and finding military compounds throughout the common wealth. My X-01 power armor was found by just walking into a random building and then killing a few robots.

                          Comment


                          • Re: What Video game did you last play?

                            Originally posted by thewholefnshow31 View Post
                            Preston should have told you to talk to Sturges in the building and he would ave explained the plan to get the power armor and kill the remaining raiders.

                            Most of the power armor I have found is by just exploring and finding military compounds throughout the common wealth. My X-01 power armor was found by just walking into a random building and then killing a few robots.
                            Yeah; I actually found you were spoiled for power armor early on in the game. You get it in more or less the first real quest, you stumble across it in a few spots in the commonwealth (I found some old rusty armor early on in a wrecked military truck that I gave to my companion) and you get an upgrade early in the Brotherhood of Steel quest, which you can get to fairly early on in the game.

                            Comment


                            • Re: What Video game did you last play?

                              Originally posted by Dr. Hibbert View Post
                              Yeah; I actually found you were spoiled for power armor early on in the game. You get it in more or less the first real quest, you stumble across it in a few spots in the commonwealth (I found some old rusty armor early on in a wrecked military truck that I gave to my companion) and you get an upgrade early in the Brotherhood of Steel quest, which you can get to fairly early on in the game.
                              Yeah I have at least 10 suits now, and more than enough pieces of armor to complete all 10.

                              Comment


                              • Re: What Video game did you last play?

                                Originally posted by TinManJoshua View Post
                                Yeah I have at least 10 suits now, and more than enough pieces of armor to complete all 10.
                                I haven't counted, but yeah, it's between 10 and 20. I never even use the suits. I'm a stealthy character to rack up those bonuses. The suit only cramps my style.
                                First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X