Luck so far

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • OlBlu
    Banned
    • Dec 2011
    • 3288

    Re: Luck so far

    Originally posted by bunt
    Exactly. And once they leave, it's very unlikely they come back. If they want this to be the premier Pacers forum, and they want to keep it that way, they need to do something besides sitting on their hands. Banning me or having others like yourself or travmil leave will come back and bite the moderators hard.
    So complain to them and give them an example where I broke the forum rules. If you have no examples, get over yourselves. I don't want anyone to leave but I'm not going anywhere either....

    Comment

    • bunt
      Member
      • Jun 2010
      • 354

      Re: Luck so far

      Originally posted by OlBlu
      So complain to them and give them an example where I broke the forum rules. If you have no examples, get over yourselves. I don't want anyone to leave but I'm not going anywhere either....
      Well if it was against forum rules to post blatant lies over and over you'd go bye bye. Apparently it's not so I have to resort to calling you out for lying and reminding you about it when you try to skip past.

      I'd really like to go back to not posting and just observing but until you stop trolling and lying...

      Comment

      • OlBlu
        Banned
        • Dec 2011
        • 3288

        Re: Luck so far

        Originally posted by bunt
        Well if it was against forum rules to post blatant lies over and over you'd go bye bye. Apparently it's not so I have to resort to calling you out for lying and reminding you about it when you try to skip past.

        I'd really like to go back to not posting and just observing but until you stop trolling and lying...
        Which make you, not me, the troll. I haven't lied about anything. You wouldn't accept any proof from me so the problem is with you, not me.... you can crawl back under your troll rock now...

        Comment

        • bunt
          Member
          • Jun 2010
          • 354

          Re: Luck so far

          Originally posted by OlBlu
          Which make you, not me, the troll. I haven't lied about anything. You wouldn't accept any proof from me so the problem is with you, not me.... you can crawl back under your troll rock now...
          Haha I admit I'm trolling you, but not the entire board. That's the difference. Go back and prove each of my bullets points in post #415 if you're not lying or trolling. But see, we've been down that road and you can't or won't.

          Carry on...

          Comment

          • xBulletproof
            I have a Member
            • Jun 2010
            • 4671

            Re: Luck so far

            Travmil's sig explained very well why you should be banned. It's a set of rules you're breaking.

            If you're aware you're doing it, you're a troll. If you're not aware you're just the dumbest human being on earth. Either way, nobody should have to be subjected to such stupidity.

            Comment

            • OlBlu
              Banned
              • Dec 2011
              • 3288

              Re: Luck so far

              Originally posted by bunt
              Haha I admit I'm trolling you, but not the entire board. That's the difference. Go back and prove each of my bullets points in post #415 if you're not lying or trolling. But see, we've been down that road and you can't or won't.

              Carry on...
              I have, you just won't accept the proof.... I did the same thing for the offshore betting but I think the mods cracked down on his "dumbass" comments. He is very quiet now. If you admit you are a troll, they should just ban you and be done with it but that is just me..... I may have an opinion but I let the mods be the mods and I try to follow their guidelines....

              Comment

              • OlBlu
                Banned
                • Dec 2011
                • 3288

                Re: Luck so far

                Originally posted by xBulletproof
                Travmil's sig explained very well why you should be banned. It's a set of rules you're breaking.

                If you're aware you're doing it, you're a troll. If you're not aware you're just the dumbest human being on earth. Either way, nobody should have to be subjected to such stupidity.
                Wow, this is getting good. Dumbest human being on earth and stupid. Nothing I have said is stupid at all and I back it up with stats and facts. You just don't like what I try to show you..... Am I off of ignore now?

                Comment

                • speakout4
                  Member
                  • Aug 2006
                  • 3710

                  Re: Luck so far

                  The reason for mod intervention is that every thread disintegrates into conflict and nastiness and never progresses to any kind of meaningful discussion.

                  So mods while you clearly can't see an overt violation of the rules the spirit of this board is violated with every thread pertaining to the colts. If you let this continue you may as well kiss the Colt board goodbye. You seem to be confused as to how to handle this because you can't be pleased with this board as it is.

                  Comment

                  • kidthecat
                    Banned
                    • Feb 2005
                    • 332

                    Re: Luck so far

                    Originally posted by OlBlu
                    Green Bay is not a good defense. I had them in fantasy league and quickly dumped them. They are a bit better than last year but that is the biggest problem Green Bay has, the defense. Chicago is a good defense and you saw how they ate Luck up. I think RGIII would have better stats than Luck no matter how often they throw it because he adds a different dimension with his ability to run and he is just a more accurate passer with a much stronger arm than Luck. QBR is a ******** stat that is the only one you can find that ranks Luck high. I have seen no one but ESPN use it and announcers and television analysts do not use it. You have to be a top three QB once to be there for a long time. Luck has to be a top 25 QB first. RGIII is already in the top five. Yes, Washington has the much better team and they play in a tough division. I don't regret the Colts choice. I wouldn't want to have to see RGIII play behind that miserable line knowing it will take years to get better. Luck is not the choice that I regret. Bad franchises and the Colts are a bad franchise except for the Peyton years, always break down the team to rebuild. Good franchise just don't do that. They may come down a little for a year or two and then they are right back chasing a Super Bowl. Teams like New England, Green Bay, Pittsburgh and Baltimore stay close to the top all of the time. The reason is management. The Giants always tend to field a good team. The Colts are a mess right now and it is going to be years to rebuild it. By the time they get a defense and a line and replace the 25 or so players they need to replace, Luck will be long gone from the scene (and so will I) to be replaced by the next "sure thing".
                    Green Bay Packers: 13th in yards allowed and first in sacks.

                    Maybe you're confusing last year with this year. Their scoring defense is 18th, but by most metrics this is at least a decent defense.

                    The Bears are the number one defense, and Luck moved the ball pretty well on them. Not just a "good" defense, but number one. Yes, he threw a few picks, and I'm okay with that. Growing pains and all.

                    And before you dismiss QBR, maybe you should learn what it is. To me it is a far more complete evaluation than the traditional NFL passer rating, which itself has taken much criticism over the years.

                    The accuracy issues, as addressed before, mostly result from the play-calling. Yes, I see Luck throw balls too high, but that is easily corrected. He plays in a vertical offense, and RGIII does not. I won't call RGIII a dinker-and-dunker, but then again Brady has been accused of the same, and everyone knows how great he is. Different ways to move the ball. I do, however, expect Luck to drastically improve in the redzone.

                    You don't even acknowledge the undeniably *good* things about Luck, like the incredible clutchness, his *own* athleticism, and the fact the kid perseveres and never hangs his head despite playing behind probably the worst offensive line in the NFL, with a defense to challenge the o-line's own lack of talent. Instead you compare him to someone as negatively remembered as Jeff George. First of all, there is zero comparison -- that is just as asinine as it gets and reeks of some kind of grudge against the kid, who is by all accounts a standout character. And you "wonder" why people are upset.

                    Comment

                    • bunt
                      Member
                      • Jun 2010
                      • 354

                      Re: Luck so far

                      Originally posted by OlBlu
                      Wow, this is getting good. Dumbest human being on earth and stupid. Nothing I have said is stupid at all and I back it up with stats and facts. You just don't like what I try to show you..... Am I off of ignore now?
                      Lol, but mostly with outright lies and opinions. You haven't proven any of your many lies, you only try to dance around them.

                      Comment

                      • OlBlu
                        Banned
                        • Dec 2011
                        • 3288

                        Re: Luck so far

                        Originally posted by bunt
                        Lol, but mostly with outright lies and opinions. You haven't proven any of your many lies, you only try to dance around them.
                        No, I didn't dance around them at all. I posted proof for all. I can't help it if you are reading challenged....

                        Comment

                        • Suaveness
                          Member
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 13482

                          Re: Luck so far

                          I find it funny that somehow all of us are wrong and he is somehow the only one who is right on this subject. The odds aren't really in his favor. But of course, we are all Luck homers (that's his argument, correct?).
                          Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

                          Comment

                          • speakout4
                            Member
                            • Aug 2006
                            • 3710

                            Re: Luck so far

                            Is everyone getting an infraction or just me?

                            Comment

                            • Swingman
                              Member
                              • Sep 2005
                              • 848

                              Re: Luck so far

                              He's already admitted multiple times that he's only being a complete troll because he doesn't like that Manning is gone and Luck is somehow at fault for enabling that to happen and being his replacement.

                              Why he has taken it upon himself to harrass the forum is beyond me. No one here had anything to do with Manning not being a Colt anymore.

                              Comment

                              • OlBlu
                                Banned
                                • Dec 2011
                                • 3288

                                Re: Luck so far

                                Originally posted by speakout4
                                Is everyone getting an infraction or just me?
                                I wouldn't vote for you to get an infraction but I don't break the forum rules in any way. Perhaps the mods just get tired of hearing people complain about me because they don't agree with what I have to say... I am sure some did get infractions because they broke those rules. I don't recall that you ever resorted to calling names like they did.....

                                Comment

                                Working...