Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Ben Roethlisberger accused of sexual assault by another woman

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Ben Roethlisberger accused of sexual assault by another woman

    Originally posted by ChicagoJ View Post
    Here's an interesting, footnoted and documented alternative view:

    http://ludwig.squarespace.com/politi...lisberger.html

    Popular culture has, of course, convicted Ben of rape. But is that the right conclusion? While its true that we'll never really know what happened, then should we all be grasping for a conclusion, any conclusion?


    That's the way society roles though "Innocent until proven guilty" only matters in the court of law.

    In the public opinion if you're accused you're guilty. Not fair but it is what it is.

    Comment


    • Re: Ben Roethlisberger accused of sexual assault by another woman

      Originally posted by ilive4sports View Post
      Wow, things must be different in PA then. I'd have to get a real good fake ID to get into a bar. They just swipe everyones here.

      And bad judgement, how would Ben have known she wasn't 21. I mean she's 20, can you tell the difference between 20 and 21? I'm 20 now, but have been told since I was 18 that I look older than 21.

      In no way am I defending what Ben did, but just these things are rather easy to mix up.
      Did she look 28?

      I'm guessing that 3/4 of college students in general are under 21. Maybe its 2/3 instead of 3/4, but that's not the point.

      Why is he at a college bar in a college town and obviously looking for p*$$*? Of course he knew it was a strong possibility that many of the the women in the bar were underage. Duh!! Isn't that the whole point of a 28 year old millionaire hanging out in a college bar in a college town in the first place. That's still bad judgment.
      Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
      Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
      Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
      Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
      And life itself, rushing over me
      Life itself, the wind in black elms,
      Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

      Comment


      • Re: Ben Roethlisberger accused of sexual assault by another woman

        Originally posted by ilive4sports View Post
        Wow, things must be different in PA then. I'd have to get a real good fake ID to get into a bar. They just swipe everyones here.

        And bad judgement, how would Ben have known she wasn't 21. I mean she's 20, can you tell the difference between 20 and 21? I'm 20 now, but have been told since I was 18 that I look older than 21.

        In no way am I defending what Ben did, but just these things are rather easy to mix up.
        The beach bars here in Jacksonville swipe everyone, but most bars you are allowed in if you are under 21 you just need a wrist band that indicates you are not 21.

        Comment


        • Re: Ben Roethlisberger accused of sexual assault by another woman

          Originally posted by ChicagoJ View Post
          Did she look 28?

          I'm guessing that 3/4 of college students in general are under 21. Maybe its 2/3 instead of 3/4, but that's not the point.

          Why is he at a college bar in a college town and obviously looking for p*$$*? Of course he knew it was a strong possibility that many of the the women in the bar were underage. Duh!! Isn't that the whole point of a 28 year old millionaire hanging out in a college bar in a college town in the first place. That's still bad judgment.
          It is not often I agree with you 99.99% of the time.

          The only thing I do not agree w in regard to you is that he will be traded (just an opinion, I know). I personally think they will give him the chance to re-build his image, just because he has done so much good for the franchise.

          That said, I would not be surprised at all if he was traded.

          Comment


          • Re: Ben Roethlisberger accused of sexual assault by another woman

            Oh no, they've said he won't be traded (this summer). I've backed off that opinion but I'm not sure I ever confirmed that on here.

            He better produce a helluva winning record when he returns next season (or hope that Dixon doesn't get the team off to a 4-0 start!)

            He'll definitely get the chance to rebuild his image during the 2010 season in Black and Gold.
            Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
            Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
            Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
            Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
            And life itself, rushing over me
            Life itself, the wind in black elms,
            Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

            Comment


            • Re: Ben Roethlisberger accused of sexual assault by another woman

              Originally posted by ChicagoJ View Post
              ............. (or hope that Dixon doesn't get the team off to a 4-0 start!) ............
              Exactly what we were talking about at work today.

              4-0, offense running well, teammates respecting Dixon, fans rallying around Dixon, the media pimping Dixon ............ Week 5, Goodell says "OK Ben, you can play." WHat happens ??

              Comment


              • Re: Ben Roethlisberger accused of sexual assault by another woman

                Originally posted by PacerDude View Post
                Exactly what we were talking about at work today.

                4-0, offense running well, teammates respecting Dixon, fans rallying around Dixon, the media pimping Dixon ............ Week 5, Goodell says "OK Ben, you can play." WHat happens ??
                Ben goes out to a college bar, gets drunk...

                History has a bad way of repeating itself.

                Comment


                • Re: Ben Roethlisberger accused of sexual assault by another woman

                  Originally posted by ChicagoJ View Post
                  Oh no, they've said he won't be traded (this summer). I've backed off that opinion but I'm not sure I ever confirmed that on here.

                  He better produce a helluva winning record when he returns next season (or hope that Dixon doesn't get the team off to a 4-0 start!)

                  He'll definitely get the chance to rebuild his image during the 2010 season in Black and Gold.
                  FWIW I typed my previous post while having a few drinks.

                  I meant to say "It is not often I agree with you but in this instance I agree with you 99.00%"

                  Sorry if I came across as an ***.
                  _______________________

                  If they start off 4-0 and they bench Dixon, my guess is one of the 2 gets traded before the trade deadline.....

                  Comment


                  • Re: Ben Roethlisberger accused of sexual assault by another woman

                    didn't even know Nike endorsed Roethlisberger...

                    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...oethlisberger/

                    Nike stands by Roethlisberger
                    Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on April 28, 2010 8:45 PM ET
                    It's going to take more than sexual assault allegations originating from a nightclub's bathroom and an NFL suspension for Nike to drop Ben Roethlisberger as an endorser.

                    The shoe company confirmed last week that Roethlisberger remains part of their "roster of athletes," according to the New York Times. Roethlisberger has previously been used to sell the company's unfortunately named "Marauder" cleats.

                    No matter what you think happened in Milledgeville, we're a little surprised the shoe company still chooses to be associated with Roethlisberger. Even in the best of times, Roethlisberger is no Tiger Woods when it comes to selling product. Why bother?

                    Comment


                    • Re: Ben Roethlisberger accused of sexual assault by another woman

                      It boils down to money for Nike. They must belive it would cost them more to drop Ben than to keep him, simple as that.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Ben Roethlisberger accused of sexual assault by another woman

                        http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...weaks-big-ben/

                        Eminem tweaks Big Ben
                        Posted by Mike Florio on April 29, 2010 8:24 AM ET
                        The Jeff Ireland/Dez Bryant situation surely is causing plenty of nervous stomachs throughout the NFL. But one guy surely welcomes the development and the discussion it has sparked.

                        Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger has seen the situation nudge his suspension and the aftermath thereof out of the headlines.

                        But the Big Ben shibacle has hardly been forgotten. Especially with guys like Eminem paying homage to Roethlisberger's alleged lifestyle.

                        "I'd rather turn this club into a bar room brawl," Eminem "sings" in his latest offering, Recovery. "Get as rowdy as Roethlisberger in a bathroom stall."

                        Apparently, Mr. Mathers couldn't come up with a word that rhymes with "Roethlisberger."

                        Comment


                        • Re: Ben Roethlisberger accused of sexual assault by another woman

                          Roethlisberger spends weekend in clinic as Steelers QB derby begins; Sweed injured
                          Steelers Minicamp
                          Monday, May 03, 2010
                          By Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
                          Matt Freed/Post-Gazette
                          Steelers quarterback Byron Leftwich, above, took snaps with the first team for all five minicamp practices.

                          As three quarterbacks jockeyed in Steelers minicamp to take his place for at least the first four games of the season, Ben Roethlisberger spent the weekend in a clinic being evaluated per order of NFL commissioner Roger Goodell.

                          Roethlisberger's behavioral evaluation will take "days" according to a Steelers source rather than weeks. Depending on how that evaluation by specialists goes, he either could return to the team or be asked to return to the clinic for further evaluation.

                          Goodell, as part of the suspension he levied two weeks ago, ordered Roethlisberger to stay away from the Steelers' South Side facility until his mandated evaluation is complete. Once done, he may rejoin the team for its spring training and through training camp before the suspension starts.

                          The Steelers do not know when Roethlisberger might rejoin them for workouts. Coach Mike Tomlin ended a three-day required minicamp with a short workout Sunday, although it proved costly when star-crossed wide receiver Limas Sweed crumpled with an Achilles tendon injury to his left foot that appears serious.

                          Players will resume lifting weights and working out, but Tomlin has scheduled the next practice for May 18 as part of the allowed 14 organized team activities. If Roethlisberger's evaluation is completed, he could return to practice then.

                          "I have talked to him," Tomlin said. "I will continue to talk to him, and I don't have a crystal ball in regards to when he's going to be back in the facility. A lot of that has to do with the things he needs to do and of course the judgment of the commissioner."

                          Either way, Tomlin must select one of three quarterbacks to start the season in place of Roethlisberger. Byron Leftwich took snaps with the first team for all five minicamp practices, with Dennis Dixon second and Charlie Batch third.

                          Tomlin said all three are in the running but added he started with Leftwich because it was his first practices back with them after spending the past season with Tampa Bay.

                          "I wanted to give him as many opportunities to reacquaint him to this environment, some of the people that he works with in that group and so forth," Tomlin said. "The other guys will be given opportunities, no question.

                          "Byron is a sharp guy. He has reacquainted himself to our environment rather quickly, interacting with teammates, understanding the offensive concepts, being able to communicate those things. He's doing a nice job, as are the other guys. We got a long process here for the rest of the offseason. We're looking forward to watching those guys work and find rhythm with receivers and so forth, and just continuing to grow."

                          At some point, Tomlin will name a quarterback to start the season.

                          "There will be a time, but it won't be a time in the near future," he said "There's no need for it to be. The purpose of the offseason is to instruct. Organized team activity days are just that. They're for teaching."
                          Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10123...#ixzz0mswYxK8G

                          Comment


                          • Re: Ben Roethlisberger accused of sexual assault by another woman

                            Congressman: Big Ben is an 'Idiot'

                            Originally posted May 4th 2010 7:00 AM PDT by TMZ Staff

                            A respected member of the House of Representatives is finally taking a stand on an issue affecting the American people -- he thinks Ben Roethlisberger is an "idiot."


                            The Congressman making the statement is Rep. Tom Rooney (R -FL) -- who also happens to be the grandson of legendary Pittsburgh Steelers founder Art Rooney.

                            During a recent stop at a Florida high school, Tom was asked about his favorite football team -- to which he replied, "The Steelers, I have no choice ... but our quarterback is still an idiot."

                            How's that for politically correct?
                            Read more: http://www.tmz.com/#ixzz0mzDbFJIN

                            Comment


                            • Re: Ben Roethlisberger accused of sexual assault by another woman

                              He's going to be the cover story of SI

                              http://www.ehrlthepearl.com/2010/05/...-hangover.html

                              Comment


                              • Re: Ben Roethlisberger accused of sexual assault by another woman

                                Letter that Ben's attorney sent to Roger Goodell
                                The Roethlisberger Case: A postscript.

                                I've come into possession of the letter sent by David Cornwell, the attorney for Ben Roethlisberger, to the commissioner after Roger Goodell met with Roethlisberger in April and before Goodell issued his sanction against the Steelers quarterback for his loutish behavior. It's interesting to me for a couple of reasons. Goodell and Cornwell used to work together in the NFL office and are friendly; the letter has a familiar but legal tone to it befitting a lawyer comfortable giving frank advice and opinion to his former league peer.

                                Sports Illustrated's Jack McCallum has a Roethlisberger story in the magazine coming out this week, with the help of some fine SI reporting. When you read the piece, you'll understand, I think, why both Cornwell and Goodell thought this shouldn't be your garden-variety suspension, but rather a suspension paired with counseling.

                                The letter, dated April 15, reads in part:

                                Dear Commissioner Goodell:

                                I am confident that we share the same view of the men who play professional football. While the public sees men of extraordinary athletic prowess, rarely is there any acknowledgement of the years of physical and mental preparation or the commitment that is made merely to be in the position to compete on Sundays. This pervasive blind spot tends to cause the public and the media to focus primarily on the football player and not the man who plays football. But, we know better.

                                My view is that too often there is an inverse relationship between the player's talent and the man's ability to confront and overcome challenges of life away from the game. I have gotten to know Ben extremely well over the past year. Watching Ben off the field has given me great insight into why he has been so successful on it. Ben's rectilinear approach and his method of analysis -- processing things as a quarterback so that he is in control -- have served him well as a football player, but this singular focus is the primary reason that he is facing the challenges that he currently confronts. Life cedes control to no man.

                                Though I could not have predicted these specifics, I am not surprised that Ben is dealing with a challenge of personal development. His passion for football and the remarkable success resulting from his commitment to the game necessarily means that he has compromised his development in other areas. No person has unlimited capacity. I believe that Ben's challenge is to channel some of the energy he has committed to becoming an extraordinary player into becoming an equally extraordinary person.

                                While Ben's sexual activities may offend some, anyone would have been hard pressed to predict that Ben's actions would have resulted in such vicious and false allegations. Ben bears exclusive responsibility for the consequences of his choices, but that does not mean that these particular consequences were foreseeable. Whether it is in the privacy of a hotel room or in the more risky environment of a semi-public restroom, a false allegation of rape simply is not within the zone of the foreseeable consequences of consensual sex.

                                There are two prongs to the intended effect of discipline. One is to discourage repetition of the offending behavior. The other is to encourage behavior that is more consistent with accepted principles and/or established procedures. What Ben should not have done is abundantly clear. What he should have done differently remains elusive. None of the numerous people with whom I have discussed this matter has offered a tangible alternative to the choices that Ben made other than to suggest that Ben "make better choices" in the future.

                                I cannot fathom how a suspension or any other form of traditional discipline will help Ben make a better choice the next time he decides to have consensual sex. The difficulty that Ben had in articulating a distinction between the risks associated with private and semi-public sex is the product of the undeniable similarity between the Reno and Georgia accusations, even though one event occurred in the privacy of Ben's hotel room and the other in a semi-public bathroom.

                                As you consider your options, I hope you will focus on an approach that establishes a direct nexus between your response and the issue to which it responds. Whether I am considering these options as Ben's advocate or as the person who has had the privilege of engaging in frank discussions with you unburdened by our professional affiliations, I am unable to discern a link between a suspension and any useful lesson or message that would tend to alter Ben's conduct in the future.

                                This is one of the more challenging conduct issues that you have confronted because the fundamental issue does not involve an arrest or criminal charges. This is an issue of lifestyle and the need to develop the tools and a method for addressing the unique challenges and opportunities that flow from the stature and celebrity enjoyed by the men who play football. I trust Ben's private conversation with you gave you a glimpse into the difficulty he had in distinguishing who he is from what he does. The public and media have yet to master this distinction. In considering where all of this will lead us, I take comfort in knowing that Ben is not the first 28 year old man to confront the reality of his actions being inconsistent with his values. Luckily, most of us have the benefit of navigating the treacherous waters of maturation outside of the glare of the media and the public.

                                Following a recent disciplinary hearing, you and I discussed privately your commitment to address each case based on its unique set of facts, without regard for the rancor of the public and the press. I know your commitment remains unchanged. We have also discussed my view that under certain circumstances imposing traditional discipline following a meeting between you and a player tends to devalue the impact of your unique qualities as Commissioner. While your authority emanates from the NFL Constitution and Bylaws, your effectiveness is the product of your ability to connect with the men who play the game in a manner that neither of your predecessors enjoyed.

                                The nuanced and dynamic nature of the issues that got us here requires an equally nuanced and dynamic response. I look forward to continuing our discussions so that we can structure such an appropriate response.

                                Very truly yours,

                                DC

                                Postscript: Six days later, Goodell suspended Roethlisberger for a minimum of four and a maximum of six games, and ordered him to undergo counseling after a comprehensive behavioral evaluation, banning him from team activities until counselors allow him to rejoin the team. The evaluation is likely to be completed soon, but there's no telling when he'll be able to return to work with his teammates.

                                Once Goodell issued his sanction, Cornwell wrote the commissioner and thanked him and league attorneys Jeff Pash and Adolpho Birch for their "genuine concern for the well-being of the man in discharging your official functions. I appreciate your candor and accessibility throughout the process with Ben. In the end, we will be measured by whether we made a difference. You did your part and I am grateful.''

                                At a time when there's such animus between the league and those who contest cases with it, that's a refreshing conclusion to a contentious case.
                                Read More: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/201...#ixzz0n0TEolDZ
                                Get a free NFL Team Jacket and Tee with SI Subscription

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X