Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Tbird's 2014 offseason preview #1: Potential trade targets...some outside the box

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Tbird's 2014 offseason preview #1: Potential trade targets...some outside the box

    Originally posted by 90'sNBARocked View Post
    I would like us to pursue Kyle Lowery. UFA -Raptors

    I would also look to see if Milwaukee would be interested in Roy for Larry Sanders and fillers

    Dream scenario : Package George Hill, Solomon Hill, (cap relief picks for Rajon Rondo )
    No thanks re Sanders and Roy. I wouldn't have done that deal even if Sanders had a normal year. But now, it's beyond ugly. Also, I'm sensitive when it comes to dog abuse, and Sanders kept puppies out in the cold during Milwaukee winter with no food or water while being out of town. That's a messed up person in my view.

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Tbird's 2014 offseason preview #1: Potential trade targets...some outside the box

      Originally posted by Wylder1324 View Post
      Someone I haven't seen mentioned is Goran Dragic. I think if PHX is serious about locking up Bledsoe then they will move Dragic. Yes they played well at times together this past season but I don't think PHX can afford to be paying 2 PGs starter $. He isn't known as a lock-down defender but he isn't a liability either. Definitely fits the bill of a top flight PG that can create for himself or others and can shoot it from deep.
      "At times" is an understatement. They looked great together. IMO, if they move one of them, it's for some superstar like Love. Otherwise why not just keep both.

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Tbird's 2014 offseason preview #1: Potential trade targets...some outside the box

        Originally posted by Pacergeek View Post
        If Minnesota loses Love, they can start Pekovich and Dieng. Not sure if they are in a hurry to trade him
        Yep. A nice enough fit, especially with Pekovic improving his shooting range last year. They need an Ibaka type next to Pekovic. Dieng is not that, but he provides some of what Ibaka does.

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Tbird's 2014 offseason preview #1: Potential trade targets...some outside the box

          For me, targeting and acquiring Conley would literally move the team forward, especially if Memphis would take George Hill to replace him.

          Conley was key to allowing Oden to look as good as he did. He knows how to feed a relatively slow player in the low post and can penetrate when required. He also plays serviceable defense.

          Losing Hill would be addition by subtraction in that I believe that his court vision is too limited on offense to be effective with our unstructured simplistic offense, while he might fit in with Memphis better than he has here.

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Tbird's 2014 offseason preview #1: Potential trade targets...some outside the box

            Mike Conley is not going anywhere. The Grizzlies would sooner trade Marc Gasol.

            It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

            Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
            Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
            NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Tbird's 2014 offseason preview #1: Potential trade targets...some outside the box

              Man some of you... First it is McGee, now its let's replace our center, the defensive anchor on a 50+ win team with an unproven second year big man... Championship move for sure... Nothing says we're committed to the cause than making knee jerk moves such as this one...

              I get the frustration with Roy but cmon people... Let's remain rational here...
              Abba Zaba, your my only friend.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Tbird's 2014 offseason preview #1: Potential trade targets...some outside the box

                Originally posted by Sparhawk View Post
                Gorgui Dieng is tops on my list to try and get via trade. That would free up trading Hibbert. I'd have Dieng starting day 1.

                Reggie Jackson should be on that list too. He wants to start, and he's primed for a Bledsoe type breakout season.

                Aaron Affalo is one guy I'd like to get if the Pacers don't keep Lance.

                http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=qyvad2v Then just get a 3rd team involved that wants Lance, and work a way to get Affalo.

                Reggie Jackson
                Aaron Affalo
                PG24
                West
                Dieng

                Watson
                Hill
                Corey Brewer
                Cope
                Kendrick Perkins


                That could spell winner to me. I think that can get the Pacers over the hump.

                Why? Affalo is the type of shooter the Pacers have needed for a few years now. A lights out shooter. Brewer gives the Pacers what they haven't had for awhile either. A legitimate backup wing defender (who's offensive game has come around a little bit). Reggie Jackson could be a better defender than Hill and won't have issues against quicker guards....also primed for a breakout year. Would allow Hill to go to a 6th man role, where I think he'll find more success coming off the bench as a sg rather than playing pg, where he's stressed he's not a pg. Dieng is athletic and will allow the Pacers to run more than that can with slow bigs West and Hibbert.

                Perkins expires allowing the Pacers to re-sign Jackson.
                Adding Afflalo would give us a lot more defensive flexibility at the perimeter and would allow us to have George play the 2nd best wing/backcourt player the opponent has to offer in the playoffs which should allow him to remain very effective on defense, while conserving more energy for offense.

                Also Afflalo would give us a player in the backcourt who can should real nicely from downtown, something absolutely ESSENTIAL for this team (whether we stick with our inside-out game or switch to a more wing-focused offense).

                Problem is: WTF would Orlando want from us that's actually interesting for them and doesn't cripple us in the process?
                2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Tbird's 2014 offseason preview #1: Potential trade targets...some outside the box

                  Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
                  Teague is awful, I tease all my friends who played with him in AAU about it. They think he is a god because he made it. I try to point out he is damn good but not for the NBA.

                  Henson, Harkless and Burks would be the guys I like best on the list that are semi-attainable. My only worry with Henson is if he can stay healthy.
                  Aggreed on Harkless and Burks being atleast somewhat attainable, but I'm not so sure about Henson. What do we have that would actually interest the Bucks to trade one of their few pieces that has real value?
                  2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                  2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                  2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Tbird's 2014 offseason preview #1: Potential trade targets...some outside the box

                    Originally posted by Mourning View Post
                    Adding Afflalo would give us a lot more defensive flexibility at the perimeter and would allow us to have George play the 2nd best wing/backcourt player the opponent has to offer in the playoffs which should allow him to remain very effective on defense, while conserving more energy for offense.

                    Also Afflalo would give us a player in the backcourt who can should real nicely from downtown, something absolutely ESSENTIAL for this team (whether we stick with our inside-out game or switch to a more wing-focused offense).

                    Problem is: WTF would Orlando want from us that's actually interesting for them and doesn't cripple us in the process?
                    That's why you'd need a 3rd team. One that wants Lance, and something that Orlando covets.
                    First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Tbird's 2014 offseason preview #1: Potential trade targets...some outside the box

                      Originally posted by bballpacen View Post
                      Man some of you... First it is McGee, now its let's replace our center, the defensive anchor on a 50+ win team with an unproven second year big man... Championship move for sure... Nothing says we're committed to the cause than making knee jerk moves such as this one...

                      I get the frustration with Roy but cmon people... Let's remain rational here...

                      Dieng wouldn't come into immediately replace Hibbert, BUT in 2 years when Hibbert's contract is up then you have Hibbert's replacement. In 2 years, Dieng would have 3 years experience and still be on a rookie contract.

                      If Hibbert feels like Dieng is a threat to him, Hibbert can opt out after next season taking his wares wherever he wants and saves the Pacers 15 mil.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Tbird's 2014 offseason preview #1: Potential trade targets...some outside the box

                        Originally posted by Justin Tyme View Post
                        Dieng wouldn't come into immediately replace Hibbert, BUT in 2 years when Hibbert's contract is up then you have Hibbert's replacement. In 2 years, Dieng would have 3 years experience and still be on a rookie contract.

                        If Hibbert feels like Dieng is a threat to him, Hibbert can opt out after next season taking his wares wherever he wants and saves the Pacers 15 mil.
                        I dont mind bringing in a guy like Dieng to eventually replace Hibbert... But guys like Sparhawk are suggesting making this switch NEXT year... To me that is simply crazy and people who think this is a good idea should be institutionalized... The is no real candidate available that we could realistically bring in to make us better than if we stand pat... Maybe Side Show Bob but I dont know PDX wants to make that deal...
                        Abba Zaba, your my only friend.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Tbird's 2014 offseason preview #1: Potential trade targets...some outside the box

                          Originally posted by bballpacen View Post
                          I dont mind bringing in a guy like Dieng to eventually replace Hibbert... But guys like Sparhawk are suggesting making this switch NEXT year... To me that is simply crazy and people who think this is a good idea should be institutionalized... The is no real candidate available that we could realistically bring in to make us better than if we stand pat... Maybe Side Show Bob but I dont know PDX wants to make that deal...
                          How in the world is it crazy? Hibbert has been so inconsistent. How are you losing anything, save Dieng isn't going to get all mopey for not getting his touches. He just rebounds better than Hibbert and blocks the same amount of shots.
                          First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Tbird's 2014 offseason preview #1: Potential trade targets...some outside the box

                            Originally posted by Sparhawk View Post
                            How in the world is it crazy? Hibbert has been so inconsistent. How are you losing anything, save Dieng isn't going to get all mopey for not getting his touches. He just rebounds better than Hibbert and blocks the same amount of shots.
                            I mean if you wish to rest our championship aspirations on a second year, unproven big man, then go ahead... I am sure there is no real reason why Dieng was passed over by 20 something teams just one year ago... Oh right because no one wants a talented young big man that badly right..
                            Abba Zaba, your my only friend.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Tbird's 2014 offseason preview #1: Potential trade targets...some outside the box

                              Originally posted by bballpacen View Post
                              I mean if you wish to rest our championship aspirations on a second year, unproven big man, then go ahead... I am sure there is no real reason why Dieng was passed over by 20 something teams just one year ago... Oh right because no one wants a talented young big man that badly right..
                              Don't forget that Hibbert was not picked until #17. Draft position sometimes does not tell the whole story, as we've all seen many times.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: Tbird's 2014 offseason preview #1: Potential trade targets...some outside the box

                                Originally posted by bballpacen View Post
                                I mean if you wish to rest our championship aspirations on a second year, unproven big man, then go ahead... I am sure there is no real reason why Dieng was passed over by 20 something teams just one year ago... Oh right because no one wants a talented young big man that badly right..

                                That's so bogus. How many teams passed on Danny Granger, Paul George, and Lance Stephenson!?!?

                                Kawhi Leonard #15
                                Chandler Parsons #38
                                Eric Bledsoe #18
                                Jimmy Butler #30
                                Reggie Jackson #28
                                Nicola Vucevic #16
                                Keith Faried #22
                                Draymond Green #35

                                Just to mention a few players the last few drafts GM's passed on.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X