Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Kevin Love wants a trade

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Kevin Love wants a trade

    Originally posted by Richard_Skull View Post
    There's just no love for those small market teams.

    The Spurs and Thunder say hello

    Regardless I don't think its about the market as much as its the T-Pups and how poorly run they are.

    Kevin Love to me is like the last Kevin that was on the T-Pups: Kevin Garnett who would be ringless and considered a hollow stats guy had he spent his entire career in Minnesota.

    Personally I have no issue with him wanting to go elsewhere although I can see why the T-Pups fans would so he probably should've just waited till free agency and just bolted.

    However at least with a trade they would get something for him in return which I'm sure the Cavs and Raptors wish was an option with LeBron and Bosh.

    Originally posted by Dr. Awesome View Post
    I dislike the Lakers, so I am rooting for this trade to happen.

    Kevin Love is a hollow stats guy, would be a great second or third option, but not a main option. Kobe won't hold that title much longer so LA could get stuck in mediocrity with a move like this.

    Well considering the last trade that was similar to this with Pau Gasol and the Grizzlies with him being traded to the Lakers ended up giving the Lakers two more titles I think its possible it won't be a complete failure.

    I mean remember when Pau Gasol was ringless and couldn't win a playoff game either?
    Last edited by Basketball Fan; 05-18-2014, 03:54 PM.

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Kevin Love wants a trade

      Originally posted by Kstat View Post
      ESPN now reporting Love does not want to go to NY or LA, but Chicago or GSW.
      A Bulls package would surely have to include Noah right?

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Kevin Love wants a trade

        Originally posted by Grimp View Post
        A Bulls package would surely have to include Noah right?
        I'm guessing Butler and Boozer and a boatload of picks. Minnesota doesn't have the leverage to demand Noah.

        It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

        Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
        Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
        NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Kevin Love wants a trade

          Trade demands should be penalized. You sign a contract, guess what that means?

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Kevin Love wants a trade

            Originally posted by 1984 View Post
            Trade demands should be penalized. You sign a contract, guess what that means?
            Teams do fine players at least that's what I remembered from Kobe's trade demand years ago.

            Regardless I don't really have an issue with players who do this especially since teams don't care about players beyond the bottom line. I mean as soon as K. Love is expendable to them they will dump him might as well leave while you have some leverage. Fans will support such a decision too I mean we expect players to be totally loyal to the team but the fans don't have to be.

            I mean at least he's not going the LeBron route here the team knows what its dealing with.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Kevin Love wants a trade

              Originally posted by Kstat View Post
              I'm guessing Butler and Boozer and a boatload of picks. Minnesota doesn't have the leverage to demand Noah.
              But does Minn have to trade Love this off-season? Can they wait till 2015 trade deadline? Because if that is all Chicago is offering, no deal is what I'd say. Boozer? I'd push for Noah. If not, Butler and Taj.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Kevin Love wants a trade

                Originally posted by Grimp View Post
                A Bulls package would surely have to include Noah right?
                No way.. the rights to Nikola Mirotic the Bobcats pick and the Bulls pick plus maybe Butler and Boozer or Taj Gibson to match salaries. No way is a free agent to be worth Noah. I personally would have to think long and hard about who I would prefer. Noah is really underrated imo. Love is better but I think it is really close.

                Bulls have a lot of chips to trade so do the Lakers especially if Tuesday goes well.

                I don't blame Love Kahn disrespected him not offering the 5 year max. I said when that happened Love would be gone in 3 years due to Kahn.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Kevin Love wants a trade

                  Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
                  No way.. the rights to Nikola Mirotic the Bobcats pick and the Bulls pick plus maybe Butler and Boozer or Taj Gibson to match salaries. No way is a free agent to be worth Noah. I personally would have to think long and hard about who I would prefer. Noah is really underrated imo. Love is better but I think it is really close.

                  Bulls have a lot of chips to trade so do the Lakers especially if Tuesday goes well.

                  I don't blame Love Kahn disrespected him not offering the 5 year max. I said when that happened Love would be gone in 3 years due to Kahn.



                  Better hope Mirotic doesn't turn out like Darko. I don't know why he'd rather go to the Bulls. Rose is a question mark, and if you're trading Taj, Butler + picks for Love. It's just Love, Rose, Boozer, and Noah. Noah's got major mileage. At this point so does Rose. Boozer is old. But if you're the Bulls, I guess it's worth it for a caliber player like Love.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Kevin Love wants a trade

                    Originally posted by Grimp View Post
                    But does Minn have to trade Love this off-season? Can they wait till 2015 trade deadline? Because if that is all Chicago is offering, no deal is what I'd say. Boozer? I'd push for Noah. If not, Butler and Taj.
                    They can wait, but they'll get even less in return for a 3-month Kevin Love rental.

                    As it stands they can offer a full year of Kevin Love at least. The more they wait, the less they have to offer.

                    It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                    Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                    Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                    NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Kevin Love wants a trade

                      Originally posted by Sollozzo View Post
                      You'd be hard pressed to find a team in league history that has been irrelevant for as long as the TWolves have. No playoff appearance since 2004.
                      The Pacers in the 80s?

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Kevin Love wants a trade

                        Golden state missed the playoffs 12 straight seasons between 1995-2006.

                        It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                        Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                        Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                        NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Kevin Love wants a trade

                          I think he meant currently. In which case Sacramento is the closest, the last time they went the playoffs was 07.
                          Last edited by Eleazar; 05-18-2014, 06:40 PM.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Kevin Love wants a trade

                            Originally posted by A-Train View Post
                            No one's "game" translates to wins in Minnesota.
                            Unless your name is Wally Szczczerczzerbiack
                            https://soundcloud.com/geoclipse

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Kevin Love wants a trade

                              Originally posted by Eleazar View Post
                              I think he meant currently. In which case Sacramento is the closest, the last time they went the playoffs was 07.
                              He did say "league history".

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: Kevin Love wants a trade

                                Originally posted by Grimp View Post
                                Better hope Mirotic doesn't turn out like Darko. I don't know why he'd rather go to the Bulls. Rose is a question mark, and if you're trading Taj, Butler + picks for Love. It's just Love, Rose, Boozer, and Noah. Noah's got major mileage. At this point so does Rose. Boozer is old. But if you're the Bulls, I guess it's worth it for a caliber player like Love.
                                Mirotic isn't Darko, and he isn't anywhere close to Dirk. But when a player demands a trade to a select few teams you really aren't going to get close to full value. Mirotic has played with Rubio for a long time over seas so it makes sense.


                                Noah is still in his prime. I do agree that with his style he may not age very well. But for me, I would want Love to pair with Noah. They would be perfect fits for each other. The Bulls are in an interesting situation. I am really interested to see how this turns out. If I was the Wolves I would have already traded him. This demand was inevitable, but I don't know what teams would have offered last season for Love. Kahn really put the Wolves in a bad situation with the way he handled Love. That team is in a real pickle.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X