Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Pacers Digest mock draft 2013 FINAL, POST 1 UPDATED

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 24
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 9 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 template Next
  • #271
    Re: Pacers Digest mock draft 2013

    Here's the full list:

    http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/draft...ks-first-round

    1. Cleveland Cavaliers
    The pick: Nerlens Noel, Kentucky Wildcats


    When you're picking No. 1 and thinking of taking a guy with a major injury, "Sam Bowie" comes to mind. The thought here was to take the top shot blocker and pair him with Kyrie Irving, whose passing ability instantly makes Noel a better offensive player. -- Dave Telep




    2. Orlando Magic
    The pick: Ben McLemore, Kansas Jayhawks


    I offered Dave Nikola Vucevic for Tyler Zeller to move from No. 2 to No. 1, then tried to trade down. If Orlando is forced to stay put, I prefer McLemore to Trey Burke because of the possibility of an Eric Bledsoe deal. I think PG will be an easier need to fill. -- Kevin Pelton



    3. Washington Wizards
    The pick: Anthony Bennett, UNLV Rebels


    Bennett's ability to rebound and shoot from the perimeter as a PF will translate nicely to a team with outstanding young guards John Wall and Bradley Beal. With Bennett and Beal spacing the floor, Wall will get to the basket more easily. -- Fran Fraschilla




    4. Charlotte Bobcats
    The pick: Victor Oladipo, Indiana Hoosiers


    Oladipo might be a bad fit if he cannot become a serious scoring option, considering Michael Kidd-Gilchrist is an offensive liability. Oladipo could be a special defensive talent and with MKG gives Charlotte the future best wing defensive duo in the league. -- David Thorpe



    5. Phoenix Suns
    The pick: Michael Carter-Williams, Syracuse Orange


    The Suns get a player with upside who can contribute right away. Carter-Williams has the size and the length to allow Phoenix to play with a big backcourt with Dragic, although he'll need to improve his perimeter shooting considerably for that vision to be realized. -- Amin Elhassan



    6. New Orleans Pelicans
    The pick: Otto Porter, Georgetown Hoyas


    New Orleans takes advantage of Porter's slide and selects a guy who is both the best player available AND fits a need. Porter's size, feel and defensive versatility fits the Pelicans, who are building their culture around hard workers. -- A.E.



    7. Sacramento Kings
    The pick: Trey Burke, Michigan Wolverines


    I love adding the sweet-shooting Burke to this team of gunners, especially because Burke is the true point guard that they need. His leadership will help build a winning culture. Burke can make the Kings' talented but troubled roster better in a few different ways. -- D.T.



    8. Detroit Pistons
    The pick: C.J. McCollum, Lehigh Mountain Hawks


    I was a little disappointed with my selection (No offense, C.J.) given that my top four guard selections are all off the board and the Pistons are desperate for backcourt help. I do like McCollum's versatility as a scorer/playmaker. --F.F.



    9. Minnesota Timberwolves
    The pick: Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, Georgia Bulldogs


    Minnesota's shopping list is obvious -- a young shooting guard, preferably with size, preferably a good shooter. Caldwell-Pope fits the bill, and given how well he rates statistically, this was an easy choice with McCollum off the board. -- K.P.



    10. Portland Trail Blazers
    The pick: Alex Len, Maryland Terrapins


    This was the first "value pick" of our draft. There are many who think he's No. 1 for the Cavs and other teams. But he slid and Portland needed a big. It was a solid meshing of need and potential for a team ready to take that chance, especially at No. 10. -- D.T..



    11. Philadelphia 76ers
    The pick: Cody Zeller, Indiana Hoosiers


    This pick took seconds to make. The 76ers have all kinds of frontcourt questions. They need someone they can trust and Zeller is tougher than advertised. He's the best of the Zellers. All the more reason to believe he's a guy who plays immediately in Philly. -- D.T.



    12. Oklahoma City Thunder
    The pick: Steven Adams, Pittsburgh Panthers


    I was looking for a project big who could eventually replace Kendrick Perkins in the middle. I would have preferred Adams to Len if both players were available. I think Adams has superior upside and might be capable of contributing next season off the bench. -- K.P.



    13. Dallas Mavericks
    The pick: Kelly Olynyk, Gonzaga Bulldogs


    Some draft picks ooze long-term potential and some are ready to help immediately. Olynyk has the size, skills and smarts to help the Mavs right away. He can score around the basket and make jump shots. At worst, he adds solid frontcourt depth to a rebuilding team. -- F.F.



    14. Utah Jazz
    The pick: Shane Larkin, Miami (FL) Hurricanes


    Quickness is a huge asset on both ends of the court, and Larkin helps out Utah here. He's going to be very good in the pick-and-roll game with the team's young bigs and can play alongside Mo Williams as part of the second unit, giving the Jazz some punch in the second quarter. -- D.T.



    15. Milwaukee Bucks
    The pick: Rudy Gobert, Cholet Basket (France)


    In the grand scheme of things, Milwaukee isn't going anywhere as a franchise. Gobert represents a chance to look to the future as a talented but raw big with elite physical tools. He's a gamble, but a gamble is what the Bucks need. -- A.E.



    16. Boston Celtics
    The pick: Shabazz Muhammad, UCLA Bruins


    Much like Jared Sullinger last season, Muhammad is a player who fell out of favor with evaluators for all the things he isn't. Boston snatches him up for what he can do: score the ball, something the Celtics desperately need. -- A.E.



    17. Atlanta Hawks
    The pick: Gorgui Dieng, Louisville Cardinals


    Atlanta likely loses Josh Smith, so they need length and athleticism. Dieng should work immediately with Al Horford as an inside-outside threat, and the two of them can anchor a strong defense. Dieng provides cheap help, which allows them to spend money elsewhere. -- D.T.



    18. Atlanta Hawks
    The pick: Dennis Schroeder, Braunschweig (Germany)


    The Hawks need help everywhere. And with point guard Jeff Teague testing the market as a restricted free agent, help in the backcourt is imperative. Schroeder, who has drawn comparisons to Rajon Rondo, is a very good fit for new coach Mike Budenholzer. -- F.F.



    19. Cleveland Cavaliers
    The pick: Sergey Karasev, Triumph Lyubertsy (Russia)


    Having added Noel, the Cavaliers could still stand to get some help on the wing. Karasev could eventually settle in at either shooting guard or small forward depending how Cleveland builds its roster. His shooting and feel allows him to complement the Cavs' young stars. -- K.P.



    20. Chicago Bulls
    The pick: Jeff Withey, Kansas Jayhawks


    He'll easily assimilate to the Bulls' culture of defense and gives Tom Thibodeau another long rim protector. Three years ago, the kid couldn't score and now he's a viable player. He's an ideal role player because doesn't have the ego. Bulls brass can thank me later. -- D.T.



    21. Utah Jazz
    The pick: Reggie Bullock, North Carolina Tar Heels


    Good shooters tend to improve when they hit the NBA and carve out their niche with the big boys. Utah had a desire to address this, and Bullock's stroke is a major asset. Mix in his attention to detail on defense and he gives you more than your typical specialist. -- D.T.



    22. Brooklyn Nets
    The pick: Glen Rice Jr., Rio Grande Valley Vipers (NBDL)


    The Nets want immediate help off the bench, and with Dieng and Withey going ahead of them, along with the other wings in this range, that leaves Rice as the best option. His pro experience in the D-League should help Rice contribute quickly in the NBA. -- K.P.



    23. Indiana Pacers
    The pick: Isaiah Canaan, Murray State Racers


    There were "high fives" in the Fraschilla draft room when Canaan was available. It is not only an area of need for them, but to get a strong, quick, savvy point guard with NBA range at No. 23 is a steal. He could turn out to be as good as any playmaker in this draft. -- F.F.



    24. New York Knicks
    The pick: Lucas Nogueira, Estudiantes (Brazil)


    The Knicks are now less athletic on the front line than almost any team. Lots of banged-up old men. Nogueira gives them a chance to add a player who can help them significantly down the road. That is more important than drafting for a specific need for the upcoming season. -- D.T.



    25. Los Angeles Clippers
    The pick: Allen Crabbe, California Golden Bears


    It remains to be seen what the Clippers' roster will look like opening night, but in the immortal words of Cotton Fitzsimmons, "you can never have too many shooters." Crabbe is one of the best shooters in the draft, and would fit in nicely as a spacer for the Clippers. -- A.E..



    26. Minnesota Timberwolves
    The pick: Giannis Antetokounmpo, Filathlitikos (Greece)


    Antetokounmpo is just 18, but he's already 6-foot-9 with playmaking skills to drool over. If small ball reigns in the NBA, he's got a good mentor in Andrei Kirilenko. -- A.E.



    27. Denver Nuggets
    The pick: Erick Green, Virginia Tech


    We don't know who the coach is, but it seems likely the Nuggets will still try to play ultrafast. Green is one of the top pace players in the draft, and he fills a need for Denver, who relies on the ageless Andre Miller more than they should. -- D.T.



    28. San Antonio Spurs
    The pick: Tony Mitchell, North Texas Mean Green


    This a great fit for both parties. The Spurs get another athletic young forward with a penchant for rebounding, and Mitchell gets a team that will nurture his prodigious talent in a professional environment and winning culture. -- F.F.



    29. Oklahoma City Thunder
    The pick: Grant Jerrett, Arizona Wildcats


    The Thunder can swing for the fences again with No. 29. Mitchell would be perfect here. After cursing Fran for taking Mitchell one pick earlier, I went with Jerrett, an intriguing yet raw prospect who combines shooting ability with rare athleticism for a stretch four. -- K.P.



    30. Phoenix Suns
    The pick: Ryan Kelly, Duke Blue Devils


    If not for the foot injury, Kelly would have shot his way into the first round. Kelly measured out at 6-11 3/4 at the combine. Who's going to pass on a high-character, intelligent player with a proven 3-point stroke? Kelly has NBA size as a stretch player and a desired skill. -- D.T.

    Comment

    • #272
      Re: Pacers Digest mock draft 2013

      Hehe, they also like Gobert for the Bucks. And they also allow Len to drop. And it's interesting how high Jerrett went here, I thought I was reaching a little at 42.

      I think ESPN should publish our mock, it wouldn't be all that different but a better read.

      Comment

      • #273
        Re: Pacers Digest mock draft 2013

        Originally posted by hackashaq View Post
        Hehe, they also like Gobert for the Bucks. And they also allow Len to drop. And it's interesting how high Jerrett went here, I thought I was reaching a little at 42.

        I think ESPN should publish our mock, it wouldn't be all that different but a better read.
        I think we have done pretty well, honestly. I have toyed with the idea of Ryan Kelly for both of the second round picks I've made (Sacramento & DC), it was interesting to see him sneak into the first round here. He seems like he could have a little Matt Bonner in him.

        Comment

        • #274
          Re: Pacers Digest mock draft 2013

          If Giannis is available, I really want the Pacers to take him. Who cares if they have to wait. They did with Plums, and he was supposed to be "ready".

          I've always seen Grant Jarrett mocked at the end of the 2nd round. Going in the first is a huge leap.
          First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

          Comment

          • #275
            Re: Pacers Digest mock draft 2013

            Originally posted by Sparhawk View Post
            If Giannis is available, I really want the Pacers to take him. Who cares if they have to wait. They did with Plums, and he was supposed to be "ready".

            I've always seen Grant Jarrett mocked at the end of the 2nd round. Going in the first is a huge leap.
            I've seen Chad Ford say that a few teams see Jerrett as an early 2nd prospect. But yep, overall he seems to be mocked late. He could be valuable as a mobile big 3pt shooter but he's years away.

            Comment

            • #276
              Re: Pacers Digest mock draft 2013

              With the 46th pick in the 2013 NBA Draft, The Utah Jazz select: Myck Kabongo, Point Guard, University of Texas.


              Jazz Draft Recap:
              14th Pick: Shane Larkin PG
              21st Pick: Kelly Olynyk C/PF
              46th Pick: Myck Kabonga
              Garbage players get 1st round picks, (WTF)! All of the NBA must hate the Pacers! LOL

              Comment

              • #277
                Re: Pacers Digest mock draft 2013

                Via DraftExpress:

                #23: Rudy Gobert C International
                #53: Peyton Siva PG Louisville
                Smothered Chicken!

                Comment

                • #278
                  Re: Pacers Digest mock draft 2013

                  With the 47th pick in the 2013 NBA Draft, The Atlanta Hawks select: Pierre Jackson, Point Guard, Baylor.

                  Hawks still have 1 more selection coming up, so no recap yet.
                  Last edited by Sparhawk; 06-23-2013, 09:20 PM.
                  First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

                  Comment

                  • #279
                    Re: Pacers Digest mock draft 2013

                    2 48 Los Angeles Lakers (pacer4ever) is on the clock.
                    First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

                    Comment

                    • #280
                      Re: Pacers Digest mock draft 2013

                      This is who is left. From DraftExpress. I just had to do this for my pick. haha

                      # Player
                      36 Trevor Mbakwe PF
                      24 years old, Senior
                      6' 8" 236lbs.
                      Minnesota
                      43 Colton Iverson C
                      23 years old, Senior
                      7' 0" 263lbs.
                      Colorado State
                      44 Bojan Dubljevic PF/C
                      21 years old, International
                      6' 10" 242lbs.
                      Valencia
                      45 Matthew Dellavedova PG
                      22 years old, Senior
                      6' 4" 185lbs.
                      Saint Mary's
                      46 Arsalan Kazemi PF
                      23 years old, Senior
                      6' 8" 225lbs.
                      Oregon
                      47 Solomon Hill SF
                      22 years old, Senior
                      6' 7" 226lbs.
                      Arizona
                      48 Lorenzo Brown PG
                      22 years old, Junior
                      6' 5" 189lbs.
                      N.C. State
                      50 Nemanja Nedovic PG
                      22 years old, International
                      6' 4" 200lbs.
                      Lietuvos Rytas

                      # Player
                      51 Alex Abrines SG
                      19 years old, International
                      6' 5" 190lbs.
                      Barcelona
                      52 Phil Pressey PG
                      22 years old, Junior
                      5' 11" 177lbs.
                      Missouri
                      55 Marko Todorovic C
                      21 years old, International
                      6' 11" 240lbs.
                      Barcelona
                      56 Joffrey Lauvergne PF
                      21 years old, International
                      6' 11" 240lbs.
                      Partizan
                      57 B.J. Young PG/SG
                      20 years old, Sophomore
                      6' 3" 179lbs.
                      Arkansas
                      58 Peyton Siva PG
                      22 years old, Senior
                      6' 1" 181lbs.
                      Louisville
                      61 DeWayne Dedmon C
                      23 years old, Junior
                      6' 11" 239lbs.
                      USC
                      62 Richard Howell PF
                      22 years old, Senior
                      6' 7" 250lbs.
                      N.C. State
                      63 Brandon Davies C
                      21 years old, Senior
                      6' 10" 242lbs.
                      BYU
                      64 Michael Snaer SG
                      23 years old, Senior
                      6' 4" 185lbs.
                      Florida State
                      65 Brandon Paul SG
                      22 years old, Senior
                      6' 4" 201lbs.
                      Illinois
                      66 Vander Blue SG
                      20 years old, Junior
                      6' 5" 197lbs.
                      Marquette
                      68 Robert Covington PF
                      22 years old, Senior
                      6' 7" 209lbs.
                      Tennessee State
                      69 Carrick Felix SG
                      22 years old, Senior
                      6' 6" 203lbs.
                      Arizona State
                      70 Kenny Kadji PF
                      25 years old, Senior
                      6' 10" 242lbs.
                      Miami FL
                      71 Vitalis Chikoko C
                      22 years old, International
                      6' 9" 219lbs.
                      Trier
                      72 James Southerland SF
                      23 years old, Senior
                      6' 8" 221lbs.
                      Syracuse
                      73 Seth Curry SG
                      22 years old, Senior
                      6' 3" 179lbs.
                      Duke
                      74 D.J. Stephens PF
                      22 years old, Senior
                      6' 5" 187lbs.
                      Memphis
                      75 Adonis Thomas SF
                      20 years old, Sophomore
                      6' 6" 232lbs.
                      Memphis

                      76 Ryan Kelly PF
                      22 years old, Senior
                      7' 0" 228lbs.
                      Duke
                      77 Augusto Cesar Lima PF
                      21 years old, International
                      6' 10" 234lbs.
                      Malaga
                      78 Philipp Neumann C
                      21 years old, International
                      6' 11" 240lbs.
                      Bamberg
                      79 Janis Timma SF
                      20 years old, International
                      6' 7" 226lbs.
                      Ventspils
                      80 Jack Cooley C
                      22 years old, Senior
                      6' 9" 244lbs.
                      Notre Dame
                      81 Zeke Marshall C
                      22 years old, Senior
                      7' 0" 235lbs.
                      Akron
                      82 Anthony Marshall PG/SG
                      22 years old, Senior
                      6' 3" 199lbs.
                      UNLV
                      83 Christian Watford PF
                      22 years old, Senior
                      6' 8" 229lbs.
                      Indiana
                      84 Jamelle Hagins PF
                      22 years old, Senior
                      6' 9" 230lbs.
                      Delaware
                      85 Amath M'Baye PF
                      23 years old, Junior
                      6' 9" 215lbs.
                      Oklahoma
                      86 Travis Releford SF
                      23 years old, Senior
                      6' 6" 204lbs.
                      Kansas
                      87 Elijah Johnson PG
                      22 years old, Senior
                      6' 2" 194lbs.
                      Kansas
                      First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

                      Comment

                      • #281
                        Re: Pacers Digest mock draft 2013

                        My issue is I am picking for the Lakers. Everyone I like Mike D wouldn't like lol. I think I would fire Mike lol.

                        Comment

                        • #282
                          Re: Pacers Digest mock draft 2013

                          Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
                          My issue is I am picking for the Lakers. Everyone I like Mike D wouldn't like lol. I think I would fire Mike lol.
                          Just go with BPA or something. This mock is going way to slow.
                          First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

                          Comment

                          • #283
                            Re: Pacers Digest mock draft 2013

                            The Lakers have no athletes that can run in Mike Ds system. We have decided to pick one of the best remaining athletes on the board. He is also a good shooter who can defend. He needs a bit of work but we feel he can become a solid 2 way player with the right development

                            The LA Lakers select Carrick Felix of Arizona St. one of the only guys left on the board that I like and Mike D would like to.

                            Comment

                            • #284
                              Re: Pacers Digest mock draft 2013

                              Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
                              The Lakers have no athletes that can run in Mike Ds system. We have decided to pick one of the best remaining athletes on the board. He is also a good shooter who can defend. He needs a bit of work but we feel he can become a solid 2 way player with the right development

                              The LA Lakers select Carrick Felix of Arizona St. one of the only guys left on the board that I like and Mike D would like to.
                              LOVE IT LOVE IT

                              Comment

                              • #285
                                Re: Pacers Digest mock draft 2013

                                With the 49th pick, the Bulls take Trevor Mbakwe, PF, Minnesota.
                                Senior at the University of Louisville.
                                Greenfield ---> The Ville

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 9 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 template Next
                                Working...
                                X