Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

6/1/2013 NBA Playoffs, Eastern Conference Finals - Game Thread #6: Pacers Vs. Heat

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 6/1/2013 NBA Playoffs, Eastern Conference Finals - Game Thread #6: Pacers Vs. Heat



    CLEAR EYES
    FULL HEARTS

    GOLD SWAGGER



    -VS-



    Game Time Start: 8:30 PM ET
    Where: The Fieldhouse, Indianapolis, IN
    Officials: M. McCutchen, T. Brothers, J. Phillips, Z. Zarba

    Television:
    Radio: WFNI 1070 AM / WAXY 790 AM, WRTO 98.3 FM / ESPN Radio
    Media Notes: Indiana Notes, Miami Notes
    NBA Feeds: NBA Audio League Pass (available free to NBA All-Access members)


    REMINDER: Per PD policy, please do not share a link to, describe how to search for, request a link to, or request a PM about streaming video of a NBA game that is not coming directly through the NBA. Not even in a "wink-wink, nudge-nudge, know-what-I-mean" round-about sort of way. Thank you


    2
    59-39
    Home: 37-12
    3
    77-19
    Away: 34-13
    June 3 - 8:30 PM
    GAME 7
    HIBBERT
    WEST
    GEORGE
    WILD CARD!
    HILL
    BOSH
    DJANGO
    JAMES
    WADE
    CHALMERS


    PACERS
    Danny Granger - left knee surgery (out)



    HEAT
    Chris Anderson - caged (out)




    What Adjustments Should the Pacers Make Before Game 6?

    Following a Game 5 loss where we witnessed LeBron James enter complete dominance
    mode, the Indiana Pacers are staring at elimination as they head home for a Game 6.
    Now, the Pacers will need two consecutive victories against the defending champions for
    a chance at a title against the San Antonio Spurs.

    Great players sometimes have a way of “getting theirs” regardless of what opponents can
    draw up to stop them. Despite the solid defensive efforts of Paul George on the perimeter
    and Roy Hibbert providing help at the rim, the entire Heat attack started and ended with
    LeBron for much of the game. This was evident through his 30 points and 6 assists, and
    trickled down to increased production from Udonis Haslem. In the third quarter, when
    LeBron scored or assisted on 25 of the Heat’s points, he was essentially unstoppable.
    Still, to best position his team for a Game 6 victory, Frank Vogel will have to make a
    few tactical adjustments. While the Pacers may not be able to stop James, there are ways
    that the Pacers can force Miami out of its comfort zone and limit LeBron’s dominance.

    We asked some of the contributors to this site to offer their takes on what adjustments
    Indiana can make.

    Here are those responses.

    Put Miami Bigs in Foul Trouble

    A large part of Miami’s offensive effectiveness in this series has been a result of its big
    men providing enough spacing for LeBron and Dwyane Wade to operate. With Chris Bosh
    and Udonis Haslem being able to operate further away from the rim, the floor opens up
    for Miami’s ball handlers to create in space. David West and Roy Hibbert were forced into
    committing with help defense in the paint caused by LeBron’s penetration in Game 5,
    which allowed Haslem to make a living in the mid-range game. With Bosh and Haslem
    both in the lineup, help defense comes at a price.

    However, the Heat are not particularly deep when it comes to big men. After Haslem and
    Bosh, the remaining options are Chris Andersen, Joel Anthony, and a completely washed
    up Rashard Lewis. While Andersen has been effective, he provides zero spacing and needs
    to work almost exclusively around the rim. If the Pacers can get Udonis Haslem or Chris
    Bosh in foul trouble, big issues arise for the Heat. With smaller lineups featuring Shane
    Battier at power forward and Andersen at center, the spacing that is so crucial to the
    Heat’s attack is seriously compromised. At the same time, the Pacers create a huge
    advantage on the offensive end with Battier forced into guarding David West in the post.
    To do this, Indiana needs to look to attack Bosh and Haslem early, either in the post or
    through a heavy dosage of pick and roll. West and Hibbert are good enough where this
    should hardly be an inconvenience. The Heat have proven to be very good at what they
    do, but they lack the depth they need to do it once you dig into their bench.
    – Mark Evans

    No Reinventing the Wheel

    We’re 99 games into the season, so there will be no reinventing of the wheel to be done
    here. The key will be the guards, and at the risk of being reductionist, George Hill and
    Lance Stephenson need to come out aggressively.

    Hill needs to be a scorer tonight. If Miami is not going trap or blitz the pick and roll,
    then he needs to turn the corner and attack the lane.He needs to put pressure on Miami’s
    defense, and he does that by scoring points.

    Stephenson, like Hill, needs to exploit the pick-and-roll defense, if the opportunity arises.
    But, more importantly, he has to push the ball. Coach Frank Vogel is constantly pleading
    for his team to play with pace, and that largely boils down to Lance. It seems that both
    he and his team need one or two of Stephenson’s full-court bull rushes to get their blood
    running. Otherwise, both Lance and the team tend towards timidity and indecision in their
    half-court offense.

    If the guards are spectators tonight, the Pacers will be spectators after tonight.
    – Tim Donahue

    Back Court Aggression

    By the time you reach Game 6...CONTINUE READING AT 8p9s

    Mike Prada: LeBron James 2.0 - Dominated in all facets in Game 5

    LeBron James said he "went back to his Cleveland days" to lead Miami to a Game 5
    win over Indiana, but a look at second-half film shows just how much he's evolved
    since then.


    After vanquishing the Indiana Pacers nearly all by himself in a 90-79 Game 5 victory,
    LeBron James declared that he "went back to his Cleveland days" to get the Miami Heat
    the win.

    He was speaking generally, of course. In Cleveland, James was forced to carry a subpar
    supporting cast all by himself. In this series, thanks to Dwyane Wade's nagging injuries
    and Chris Bosh's ineffective play against the massive Roy Hibbert, James has often been
    forced to carry a subpar supporting cast all by himself.

    But I'm going to take issue with James' statement in this respect. He didn't really go back
    to his Cleveland days to get this Game 5 win. He actually moved forward, carrying Miami
    while being deployed in a completely different way than he was several years ago.

    The LeBron James that dazzled in Cleveland was not the LeBron James we saw on
    Thursday night. LeBron 1.0 was succeeding at the top of the key, flashing the kind of
    playmaking skills and dribble-drive capability that few had ever seen in the league. But
    that LeBron James still managed to leave us a little unsatisfied. Why was someone that
    big and strong operating so far from the basket? Why couldn't he affect the game closer
    to the hoop?

    In this series, though, we've seen the full growth of LeBron James 2.0, a process that
    began last season. In Game 3, James parked himself on the low block and dominated
    Indiana from the post. In Game 5, though, he shifted to the pinch post, the area at the
    top of the key between the elbow and the three-point line. From there, he acted as the
    hub of the offense, both with his scoring and in other ways.

    By moving James to the pinch post, Miami was able to capitalize on his versatility. On a
    basic level, this got James easier shot attempts because he was a few steps closer to the
    rim. Here, he takes advantage of George Hill picking him up on a switch and gets to his
    left for a layup before Roy Hibbert can react.


    Here, James runs a pick and roll with Udonis Haslem from the elbow, and Paul George,
    scared that James will beat Indiana's help defense to the rim, goes under the screen,
    ceding an open 17-foot jumper.


    Here, James curls off a down screen by Chris Bosh, gets his shoulders by George and
    takes one step for the lefty layup.


    Finally, here's James starting in the high post, running a pick and roll with Dwyane Wade
    to force a switch and shooting over the shorter Lance Stephenson on a wing isolation.


    But putting James in the high post allowed him to affect the game in many more ways
    than scoring. Sure, it made it easier to get to the rim, but the real genius of James'
    second half was in his screening. James couldn't count on his teammates to step up on
    their own, and having him try to drive and dish to them wasn't working either, so he
    opened up chances by doing what most consider to be dirty work.

    Here's a compilation of James' screens in the second half.


    James got credit in the box score for some of these, but not for others. For example, he
    got no stats on this play at 7:28 of the fourth quarter despite initiating the play from the
    pinch post.


    ... screening for Norris Cole to drive.


    ... rolling quickly to the rim to receive a pass before George recovers.


    ... drawing Hibbert.


    ... and kicking out to Wade in a way that allows him to drive baseline past Lance
    Stephenson and to the rim.


    Wade was the only player that received any sort of credit in the box score for that
    sequence, but without James' versatility while operating in the pinch post, the play
    never would have developed.

    You see a similar story...CONTINUE READING AT SB NATION

    Dylan Murphy: Why Can LeBron Shoot Three-Pointers All Of A Sudden?

    In 2010-2011, LeBron James connected on 33.0% of his three-point attempts. In 2011
    -2012, that number jumped to 36.2%. This past regular season, it surged to 40.6%. In
    his recent piece on Grantland
    , Kirk Goldsberry attributed LeBron’s improvement (both
    in three-point field goal percentage and field goal percentage overall) to increased shot
    location efficiency – a greater emphasis on corner three-pointers and a re-distribution
    of mid-range shots to the three-point line and the areas closest to the hoop, in
    particular. And, naturally, we’ve seen this correlate with his career highs in shooting
    percentages both inside and beyond the arc.

    It’s easy to see why two-point shooting LeBron James’ efficiency has skyrocketed,
    especially in light of Goldsberry’s revelations – he’s taking easier shots closer to the
    hoop and mostly eliminating mid-range jumpers. But with three-point shooting LeBron,
    who has improved by seven percentage points over the last two seasons, there has to
    be something more there. A three-pointer is inefficient if it’s heavily contested or off-
    balance; driving at Roy Hibbert – despite being mere inches from the rim – is mostly
    a bad idea. It’s all a matter of shot location in context, which is to say how the shot
    was taken and defensed.

    Applying these two concepts to all of LeBron James’ three-pointers over the last three
    seasons helps to reveal the missing piece to explain his three-point shooting
    improvement: it’s always been a matter of balance.

    As a primary ball handler, LeBron’s three-point attempts occur in various play types:
    spot ups, isolations, pick-and-rolls, dribble handoffs, transition, off the dribble, and so
    on – which is to say that his shots vary in difficulty, and therefore technique. But it’s
    the great shooters who are able to minimize these departures and generally stick to
    basic shooting principles – land with parallel feet, stay on relative balance. It’s with
    this latter part, the balance, that LeBron James has typically struggled, and divided
    himself into two completely different three-point shooters: the balanced LeBron and
    the off-balance LeBron.

    LeBron James No. 1: On-Balance

    LeBron James is perfectly capable of shooting on-balance. Take a look at these freeze
    frames of James shooting a three against Memphis back in 2010: his feet are parallel,
    his hips remain squared up and he’s mostly perpendicular to the floor. Everything
    looks right.


    With no defender even remotely challenging, LeBron nails the shot.


    In fact, when LeBron James shoots it on-balance and uncontested, he’s more than a
    good three-point shooter; he’s a great three-point shooter. Over the last two seasons,
    he’s shot a scorching 59.5% (25-42) in these situations.

    Yet that begs another question: what about when James is under defensive siege?
    71.3% of his looks from distance since 2010 have been contested. And that shouldn’t
    come as a surprise for a player of his caliber, who is unlikely to find himself wide
    open all that often. Still, LeBron has proven himself capable of not deviating
    (technique-wise) in spite of pressure. We’ll use this shot against Houston from earlier
    this season as an example:


    Notice that all the same markers as his wide open look from above are present here.
    The feet, the lack of angular body distortion, the follow through. All of this with
    Chandler Parsons closing out with a hand up.


    So what about this LeBron? Though he’s not quite as lethal (contested shots are
    naturally more difficult), he’s still shooting a more than healthy 45.5% from deep over
    the past three seasons. In summary, here’s how insanely talented on-balance LeBron
    James is as a three-point shooter.


    Notice the spike in his on-balance/contested percentage this past season, as well as
    the ’10-’11 to ’11-’12 jump in on-balance/uncontested shots – more on that later.

    LeBron James No. 2: Off-Balance

    Off-balance LeBron James isn’t just one type of shooter. Analyzing his shots reveals
    multiple subsets containing similar elements, the most pervasive of which is an
    excessive backpedal.

    (Note: statistics were not compiled for each off-balance variation, but for off-balance
    shots on the whole.)

    1. Backpedaling LeBron

    It’s common for shooters to float backwards after landing on a jump shot. A shooter’s
    feet most often land in front of his takeoff spot, causing a slight backwards body lean.
    In the two examples of on-balance LeBron above, you might have noticed that he
    wasn’t completely perpendicular to the floor when he landed; his feet were slightly
    edged forward, his back somewhat tilting. This is completely natural on any jump shot,
    and lends itself to a slight backpedal to regain complete balance.

    An extended backpedal, however, is a clear indication of a serious balance problem.
    Here’s LeBron missing a shot against Orlando earlier this season in which he backs
    away rather quickly. Be sure to keep your eyes on LeBron instead of the ball after he
    releases the shot.


    The backpedal is not a root problem in itself; it’s symptomatic of a deeper flaw
    throwing LeBron’s entire balance out of whack. If we freeze his form on landing, the
    defective technique reveals iteslf. Notice the sharp angle of his body lean:


    He’s a few inches from falling over backwards completely. Also notice the slight bend
    at the knee; his lower body has moved forward completely, while his upper body has
    remained stationary. If you have room to spare, try jumping forward with your feet
    while keeping your upper body in place. On landing, you’ll probably backpedal. That’s
    what LeBron is doing here. His upper and lower body are disjointed and do not move
    in tandem with each other. It should come as no shock, then, that he misses the shot.
    (A fix might be not jumping so far forward.)

    It’s fair to surmise that LeBron backs away more often under pressure – crowding a
    shooter’s space makes him want to back away. And the numbers support this
    hypothesis, too: since 2010, approximately 76% of his contested looks have been off-
    balance, as opposed to 24% on-balance. But this shot isn’t just any run-of-the-mill
    fadeaway. In a prototypical fadeaway, the feet land behind the takeoff spot to create
    space. Here, LeBron’s feet are usually moving forward in spite of crowding. It’s his
    upper/lower body disconnect that’s generating the balance problem. This is partially
    evidenced by the consistent existence of backpedaling even in his uncontested looks.
    It’s a core problem of his shooting technique on the whole.

    Just take a look at how far he skates away from the three-point line despite a healthy
    amount of room between himself and the defender.


    2. One-Foot LeBron

    This one is pretty simple: sometimes LeBron lands on one foot.


    And now in real time:


    As for the why, it’s tough to say. While at times he reverts to the one-foot landing on
    fadeaways or heavily contested looks, other times he’s all by himself. But it would
    seem that it’s further proof of the systemic lack of balance in LeBron’s jump during his
    jump shot.

    Also: it happens more often than you think. More than 1/4 of his attempts (26.0%)
    since 2010 have been one-footed.

    3. Transition-Shooting LeBron

    Nearly every one of LeBron’s three-pointers in transition follows the same rubric: lean
    in, use the right foot to corral forward momentum on landing. Here’s an example:


    Because he’s not quite stopping on a dime, the weight of his body carries his entire
    frame forward. To compensate and not overshoot the ball, all of the pressure lands on
    his protruding right leg. And that would be fine, if his goal were not to run forward
    anymore. But the goal, presumably, is to make the shot. While the forward leg serves
    its weight-transferring purpose, it makes his frame as a whole more wobbly. There’s
    less width to absorb the landing, and he’s more prone to falling off to the left or right
    side. If you’re a HoopChalk vet, you might remember that Jason Kidd is similarly
    unsuccessful
    with this type of shot.


    So: what do the numbers say about off-balance LeBron James overall? Here’s how it
    breaks down, any time he one-foots it or backs away or kicks out his leg:


    Which is a fancy way of saying that LeBron James shoots the ball poorly when he’s
    off-balance, but slightly better when his off-balance shots are uncontested as opposed
    to contested. No shock there. What’s particularly cringe-worthy is that his worst shot
    – the off-balance/contested three-pointer – is also his most frequent. 54.2% of his
    three-point attempts since 2010, in fact. The contested portion is understandable: as
    mentioned earlier, defenses tend not to leave LeBron James open. And even the
    reliance on off-balance looks is partially defensible, too: sometimes it’s tough to
    maintain balance under pressure. But it’s certainly possible – remember that he’s 44-
    107 (41.1%) on contested/on-balance 3s over the last three seasons.

    Okay, fine. But why is LeBron getting better?

    Now that we’ve dissected his shooting form...CONTINUE READING AT HOOPCHALK

    Tyler Parker: Tyler Hansborough Reviews Today’s Top Country Music

    Tyler Hansborough likes country music and asked us if he could review some of the top
    songs currently being played on country radio. After six voicemails and eleven emails
    we finally agreed to let him. These are his reviews. [Please note these are extremely
    condensed as, initially, they were each four pages long. Also, at his behest, we omitted
    a portion of his I Want Crazy review as there was an off color allegory involving
    vag!nas, Connect Four, and orange juice that he wrote while he was "way too drunk,
    trying to get Ashleigh to send him pics of her new Bass Pro tattoo".]


    Downtown by Lady Antebellum - This song is good to me. I experienced some of
    these things when I dated a girl from Duke named Ashleigh who sucked. She began to
    refuse to actually go out with me. She would insist on staying in. When we ordered
    food from Kugino’s she’d make sure and never allow the both of us to be seen by the
    delivery guy in the apartment at the same time. It was weird and made me sad. I
    change my mind. I hate this song.

    Wagon Wheel by Darius Rucker - This is one that I’ll be playing for awhile. I am
    a big fan of Old Crow Medicine Show, but I think Hootie does this justice. I’m tired of
    hearing people hate on Rucker because he’s covering the song, acting like they’re big
    fans of OCMS. Please. If you can name more than three of their songs off the top of
    your head, then you can talk. If not, please close your mouth forever and be gone,
    wanna be. Be gone. The video is also good because people from Duck Dynasty are in
    it and that is a good, funny show and I think Si is funny. Ashleigh refused to get me a
    Si tea cup for my birthday from Bass Pro so she sucks.

    Highway Don’t Care by Tim McGraw featuring Taylor Swift & Keith Urban – We
    missed you, Tim! Timmy is finally back with this hit new smash. Really a throwback
    for him. Taylor does well on this as well and Keith shreds the solo. Best guitar
    picking he’s done since Rainin’ On Sunday, in my opinion. I played this for my new
    girlfriend, Tanna, who is much better than Ashleigh ever was. I told her that I care
    if she’s alone and don’t want her to be and stuff. Because of love. That’s why I told
    her that. Because I love her and stuff. And Ashleigh used to claim she loved me but
    then would let me be alone. So, clearly, she didn’t love me.

    I Want Crazy by Hunter Hayes - This reminds me of every Hunter Hayes song
    ever, but I still kind of dig the chorus. It’s catchy and I found myself tapping my foot.
    I will say that I think it’s crazy to say he wants crazy because Ashleigh was crazy
    and speaking from experience you do not want crazy. That’s the last thing you want,
    really. You want sane. Crazy gets you slashed tires and a shoe polished penis on the
    back window of your F-150 whenever a girl from NC State asks to take a picture with
    you after a game then kisses you on the cheek right when it’s snapped and puts it up
    on Facebook. I also think the shirts he wears are weird and too tight. Henley’s aren’t
    supposed to hug you like that...CONTINUE READING AT BALLERBALL




    PACERS
    Mike Wells @MikeWellsNBA
    Jared Wade @8pts9secs
    Tim Donahue @TimDonahue8p9s
    Tom Lewis @indycornrows
    Ian Levy @HickoryHigh
    Miss Bumptious @missbumptious


    HEAT
    Brian Windhorst @windhorstESPN
    Tom Haberstroh @tomhaberstroh
    Ira Winderman @iraheatbeat
    Ethan J. Skolnick @EthanJSkolnick
    Surya Fernandez @SuryaHeatNBA
    Joseph Goodman @JoeGoodmanJr
    This is the darkest timeline.

  • #2
    Re: 6/1/2013 NBA Playoffs, Eastern Conference Finals - Game Thread #6: Pacers Vs. Heat

    I believe this team can play 2 games of outstanding basketball in a row. Lets do this!!!!

    "I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about." - Peter Griffin

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: 6/1/2013 NBA Playoffs, Eastern Conference Finals - Game Thread #6: Pacers Vs. Heat

      in game 4 G Hill showed a little pressure on the inbounds pass after a make, it disappeared in game 5, I hope we see a little of that tonight. It wasn't much but it made Miami work a little harder to get up court, and took a little time off the shot clock.

      lol @ lance as the wild card

      Go all out tonight guys!

      Go Pacers!
      Last edited by focused444; 06-01-2013, 07:30 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: 6/1/2013 NBA Playoffs, Eastern Conference Finals - Game Thread #6: Pacers Vs. Heat

        Protect home court for a last time. Do not go down in our home. Force a game 7. This is the most important game of the season. Leave it all on the court.

        Let's gooooooooooooo!!!

        Originally posted by IrishPacer
        Empty vessels make the most noise.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: 6/1/2013 NBA Playoffs, Eastern Conference Finals - Game Thread #6: Pacers Vs. Heat

          I think the Pacers win comfortably tonight.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: 6/1/2013 NBA Playoffs, Eastern Conference Finals - Game Thread #6: Pacers Vs. Heat

            BEAT THE HEAT!!!!!!

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: 6/1/2013 NBA Playoffs, Eastern Conference Finals - Game Thread #6: Pacers Vs. Heat

              Originally posted by shags View Post
              I think the Pacers win comfortably tonight.
              wish i felt like you right about now. I don't know who will win but i think it will be close, and I'm nervous.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: 6/1/2013 NBA Playoffs, Eastern Conference Finals - Game Thread #6: Pacers Vs. Heat

                I sense a very hard fought game 6 .. and possibly for us to break it open in the 3rd and blow the Heat out by 16 pts..
                I just have that odd feeling that our guys are gonna come out and win this game come hell or high water....

                No Way -no how, are Miami gonna win this series on OUR HOME FLOOR !! Royzilla won't allow it... Hell he may have to shake the crap out of a few people if he has to .. lol
                "Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: 6/1/2013 NBA Playoffs, Eastern Conference Finals - Game Thread #6: Pacers Vs. Heat

                  Just win tonight and let the chips fall where they may come game 7.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: 6/1/2013 NBA Playoffs, Eastern Conference Finals - Game Thread #6: Pacers Vs. Heat

                    I think this is the end of the road for us happy to be proven wrong though.
                    Counting down the days untill DJ Augustin's contract expires.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Birthday mojo fully committed to this game!

                      Let's shock the world, one game at a time.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: 6/1/2013 NBA Playoffs, Eastern Conference Finals - Game Thread #6: Pacers Vs. Heat

                        Just a quick note, ATC the link to the Lebron three point shooting article actual directs to a Carmelo article. Lebron article is here.
                        You Got The Tony!!!!!!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: 6/1/2013 NBA Playoffs, Eastern Conference Finals - Game Thread #6: Pacers Vs. Heat

                          I hope Born Ready is Bron Ready tonight.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: 6/1/2013 NBA Playoffs, Eastern Conference Finals - Game Thread #6: Pacers Vs. Heat

                            Originally posted by shags View Post
                            I think the Pacers win comfortably tonight.
                            I cringed when I read this. Gotta accept the nerves and step up to the challenge as Frank says. This is going to be tough, but we can do it if we play our game. Gotta get some production from our back-court. Let's go boys!!!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: 6/1/2013 NBA Playoffs, Eastern Conference Finals - Game Thread #6: Pacers Vs. Heat

                              And Grant Hill makes it official. Not that anyone is surprised.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X