Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Pacers/Timberwolves Postgame Thread 3/13/13

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: Pacers/Timberwolves Postgame Thread 3/13/13

    Originally posted by BillS View Post
    Kobe will be out against the Lakers, so plonk them into your "doesn't count" list. I'm sure there will be an excuse for the other teams as well.

    The Pacers are the luckiest team in the league. We only play teams that are short-handed or tired or playing injured.

    Sorry, that I feel for the Pacers to be a really good team they should do well against the better NBA teams. The Pacers have the 7th best record in the NBA, so I guess I should be overjoyed to watch them defeat a shorthanded cellardweller team that they are suppose to beat instead of getting exhuberant over defeating the better NBA teams. My expectations for the Pacers to be a really good team is to beat really good teams. If they can't, then they aren't as good as many seem to believe. Beating top teams make the Pacers a better team. Isn't that what we all want?

    The Pacers have played numerous teams that weren't at full strength this season as all teams do. Pacers are playing w/o Granger this season, but I make NO excuses when the Pacers lose to a team that the loss was b/c Granger is injured. The Pacers have 14 other players, and a number of them have picked up the slack of Grangers injury. I would expect the same with the other Lakers player if Kobe doesn't play Saturday. Someone like World Peace playing against his old team the Pacers.

    Speaking of MWP I'm looking forward to seeing a matchup of him and PG. "D" vs "D".

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: Pacers/Timberwolves Postgame Thread 3/13/13

      Originally posted by Justin Tyme View Post
      I'd give up much much more than that to get Rubio!
      Get the hell out of here.

      Comment


      • #63
        Re: Pacers/Timberwolves Postgame Thread 3/13/13

        Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
        This is my very concern if Danny does make it back. I would rather he definitely be finishing games or just on the bench.

        But if he makes a few shots in one game, they will let him finish. That leaves Lance wondering what his role is. That leaves the starters not knowing if they will finish. I just don't like the uncertainty.
        Yeah, because our players are all about worrying if they will be on the floor instead of letting the person making shots be on the floor.

        I mean, you REALLY think that if Danny is performing well in those situations that the rest of the team will get all confused and upset?

        If we'd traded for someone at the deadline with a potential to come in and be a 10 ppg finisher would you be predicting doom gloom and disaster because of how it would mess up the team as it stands?
        BillS

        A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
        Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: Pacers/Timberwolves Postgame Thread 3/13/13

          Originally posted by Justin Tyme View Post
          Sorry, that I feel for the Pacers to be a really good team they should do well against the better NBA teams. The Pacers have the 7th best record in the NBA, so I guess I should be overjoyed to watch them defeat a shorthanded cellardweller team that they are suppose to beat instead of getting exhuberant over defeating the better NBA teams. My expectations for the Pacers to be a really good team is to beat really good teams. If they can't, then they aren't as good as many seem to believe. Beating top teams make the Pacers a better team. Isn't that what we all want?

          The Pacers have played numerous teams that weren't at full strength this season as all teams do. Pacers are playing w/o Granger this season, but I make NO excuses when the Pacers lose to a team that the loss was b/c Granger is injured. The Pacers have 14 other players, and a number of them have picked up the slack of Grangers injury. I would expect the same with the other Lakers player if Kobe doesn't play Saturday. Someone like World Peace playing against his old team the Pacers.

          Speaking of MWP I'm looking forward to seeing a matchup of him and PG. "D" vs "D".
          2-0 vs. Memphis (3rd in the West)
          2-1 vs. Miami
          2-1 vs. New York
          etc..

          Since our 4-7 start we've had a winning record against .500+ teams, most teams don't just dominate other very good teams the same way they deal with the riff raff.
          Goodbye Captain, My Captain. I wish you had the chance to sink or swim with your ship on its quest for the "ship".

          Comment


          • #65
            Re: Pacers/Timberwolves Postgame Thread 3/13/13

            Originally posted by Justin Tyme View Post
            Sorry, that I feel for the Pacers to be a really good team they should do well against the better NBA teams. The Pacers have the 7th best record in the NBA, so I guess I should be overjoyed to watch them defeat a shorthanded cellardweller team that they are suppose to beat instead of getting exhuberant over defeating the better NBA teams. My expectations for the Pacers to be a really good team is to beat really good teams. If they can't, then they aren't as good as many seem to believe. Beating top teams make the Pacers a better team. Isn't that what we all want?

            The Pacers have played numerous teams that weren't at full strength this season as all teams do. Pacers are playing w/o Granger this season, but I make NO excuses when the Pacers lose to a team that the loss was b/c Granger is injured. The Pacers have 14 other players, and a number of them have picked up the slack of Grangers injury. I would expect the same with the other Lakers player if Kobe doesn't play Saturday. Someone like World Peace playing against his old team the Pacers.

            Speaking of MWP I'm looking forward to seeing a matchup of him and PG. "D" vs "D".
            You play your schedule, the Pacers have played and beat plenty of good teams at full strength. We beat LAL when they had Kobe, Dwight and Gasol dressed and playing this season. EVERY team plays numerous other teams that have an injury here or there.

            Also on the bright side if we can get past the resurgent Lakers tomorrow evening than we can put together a nice winning streak...

            We can't miss the opportunity to pad our record @Philly @Cleveland and vs. Orlando leading into our chance to put the final screws into securing the division vs. Milwaukee and @Chicago. Barring let downs we have a great chance to string off a 5 game win streak heading into the final game vs. Chitown.
            Last edited by daschysta; 03-14-2013, 05:08 PM.
            Goodbye Captain, My Captain. I wish you had the chance to sink or swim with your ship on its quest for the "ship".

            Comment


            • #66
              Re: Pacers/Timberwolves Postgame Thread 3/13/13

              Originally posted by BillS View Post
              Yeah, because our players are all about worrying if they will be on the floor instead of letting the person making shots be on the floor.

              I mean, you REALLY think that if Danny is performing well in those situations that the rest of the team will get all confused and upset?

              If we'd traded for someone at the deadline with a potential to come in and be a 10 ppg finisher would you be predicting doom gloom and disaster because of how it would mess up the team as it stands?
              No reason to get ill. I'm just sharing my concern.

              I don't think they will "get confused and all upset." I do think they've spent an entire season developing trust and chemistry, and that can't be recreated with Danny in a couple of weeks.

              Regarding the trade deadline question, if Danny was 100 percent at that time, that would probably be enough time to weave him back into the finishing crew. That was a few weeks ago and it will be a few more, it appears, before he returns, not 100 percent.
              "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

              Comment


              • #67
                Re: Pacers/Timberwolves Postgame Thread 3/13/13

                Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
                Regarding the trade deadline question, if Danny was 100 percent at that time, that would probably be enough time to weave him back into the finishing crew. That was a few weeks ago and it will be a few more, it appears, before he returns, not 100 percent.
                I just don't think the chemistry and trust in the coaching staff and their teammates is so fragile that it couldn't survive Danny playing 10 minutes off the bench to finish a game in order to spread minutes before the playoffs.

                If the coaching staff thinks Danny is doing well enough to deserve those minutes, I think the team will be fine with it and will be able to work with it. We're not talking, say, a ball-dominant scorer coming straight back into the starting lineup going into the playoffs. That would be no problem at all because it is Derek Rose really disruptive.
                BillS

                A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                Comment


                • #68
                  Re: Pacers/Timberwolves Postgame Thread 3/13/13

                  Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                  The TWolves Frontcourt is basically decimated with KLove, Pekovic and AK47 out. When the closest thing that you have to a Center is Greg Steisma, Dante Cunningham and Derrick Williams.....I'm not surprised that they basically resorted to jacking up jumpshots.
                  But it wasn't just a lack of low post bigs, it was a lack of much interior play at all. They tried a few times and the success rate was miserable. Like I mentioned they had at least 2 AIRBALL shots at the rim. Of course a several others got stuffed, and not just Roy but Ian's monster block and OJ in the lane as well IIRC.

                  And the Heat did the same thing. Bosh made ONE shot in the paint in that game. All of his shooting was jumpers. Even Lebron and Wade failed to repeatedly score inside and both of them can get to the rim, plus James as learned to post as well.


                  It just struck me that while people have been unhappy with the defense that last couple of games, on both nights it required quite a lot of jump shots from opponents. If the Pacers did anything wrong it was relying on their own jumpers too much.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Re: Pacers/Timberwolves Postgame Thread 3/13/13

                    Originally posted by Mackey_Rose View Post
                    Paul George and George Hill seems like a hefty price to pay for Ricky Rubio.
                    It's not even close to being a fair trade.

                    Paul is going to make more all-star games and plays defense at a level HIGHER than what Rubio plays offense. Paul's version of a nice assist is some insane length-based close out across the court to make an "easy" steal in a passing lane he wasn't even guarding. Then it goes the other way and he's been strong enough to score or draw the fouls. I'll take the -2 PLUS the +2 rather than just Rubio passing to someone that still needs to make the bucket for it to even come to anything.

                    I love a Steve Nash creator PG type, but I don't see Rubio controlling the floor or changing speeds or even shooting as consistently as Nash did even last season.

                    I also hate his flat 2 handed jumper which SUCKS by the way. Not a little low sucks, I mean one of the worst guys putting up 10 shots a night. His adjusted FG% (with 3s accounted for) is still below 40%, and was last year as well. Picture Jackson's worst year of shooting in Indy when fans just frothed with anger at his shot selection (because 36% from 3 sucked I guess). He still shot an eFG% a full 10 points higher. People would boo Rubio out of town after his 8-9th 5-14 with 7 assists game. 3-10, 2-12, 4-15, 3-13, 5-12...these are FG nights just in the last month. 38% for FEB, 40% in JAN and that's the good version, the recovering Rubio shot 29% in JAN.

                    Rubio looks better doing what he does than the actual results he gets. And I like him, I enjoy watching him play, but he's got a long way to go. People see the Pistol look and are adding to his game all these things they remember Pistol doing but that Rubio isn't actually doing himself yet.

                    And I believe it was Paul that made Rubio shoot the air ball layup that Williams rebounded and scored.



                    Hill's eFG% is 15 points higher this season (38 vs 53) while his Ast/36 is 5 vs Rubio's 9. But Rubio's TOs and Fouls are both higher (twice as much). And while Rubio gets 2 steals to Hill's 1, Hill fouls less to do that and can actually block shots (1 every other game) where Rubio basically does not block shots.

                    People are upset (some at least) because they think Hill isn't a good enough defender, but Rubio gives up space on defense as easily as DJ does. That would also be miserable to live with every night.
                    Last edited by Naptown_Seth; 03-14-2013, 07:27 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Re: Pacers/Timberwolves Postgame Thread 3/13/13

                      Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                      It's not even close to being a fair trade.

                      Paul is going to make more all-star games and plays defense at a level HIGHER than what Rubio plays offense. Paul's version of a nice assist is some insane length-based close out across the court to make an "easy" steal in a passing lane he wasn't even guarding. Then it goes the other way and he's been strong enough to score or draw the fouls. I'll take the -2 PLUS the +2 rather than just Rubio passing to someone that still needs to make the bucket for it to even come to anything.

                      I love a Steve Nash creator PG type, but I don't see Rubio controlling the floor or changing speeds or even shooting as consistently as Nash did even last season.

                      I also hate his flat 2 handed jumper which SUCKS by the way. Not a little low sucks, I mean one of the worst guys putting up 10 shots a night. His adjusted FG% (with 3s accounted for) is still below 40%, and was last year as well.

                      Rubio looks better doing what he does than the actual results he gets. And I like him, I enjoy watching him play, but he's got a long way to go. People see the Pistol look and are adding to his game all these things they remember Pistol doing but that Rubio isn't actually doing himself yet.

                      And I believe it was Paul that made Rubio shoot the air ball layup that Williams rebounded and scored.
                      Young Jason Kidd? Or as he was known early in his career, Ason Kidd (No J.) Keep in mind I'm making this comparison while doing absolutely no research whatsoever.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Re: Pacers/Timberwolves Postgame Thread 3/13/13

                        If he had the size/strength of Kidd that would help. Kidd did start off his career with poorer shooting than he developed, but he still bottomed out at 42% eFG in year 1. Rubio now has 2 seasons below that level by a fair margin.

                        First 2 seasons, both age 21-22.

                        eFG%
                        Kidd 43
                        Rubio 39

                        Ast/36
                        8.8 each

                        TO
                        3.6 each

                        Reb
                        6.2 Kidd
                        4.5 Rubio

                        Stl/36
                        2.1 Kidd
                        2.5 Rubio

                        Foul/36
                        1.9 Kidd
                        2.7 Rubio

                        FTA/36
                        3.8 Kidd
                        4.7 Rubio

                        So the comparison is actually close, though Kidd had the size to rebound more and started off shooting better than Rubio has, though both are bad.

                        To me the thing to remember is how Kidd was viewed in year 2 and how often people should expect that kind of FG% jump. At 22 it's not crazy, guys do work on it and get better. But Kidd was also looking like a guy who was going to get shuffled around looking for a home. Remember before his Nets era he was traded for Sam Casell/Finley and then traded for Marbury (how he got to Nets).

                        And most importantly is that Kidd was considered a good defensive PG that gave people fits due to his size. The whole Nets plan was to create TOs out on top and then just go to the races with it, and Kidd was the key anchor of that.



                        It was a good comparison Shags, it got me thinking about what the expectations should be with him. But I still don't see him as good as Paul George, let alone G2 (or even more). Kidd, unlike Nash, always needed shooting help and the lack of it in New Jersey was a big reason why they had to track meet for points. With G2 gone then who is shooting the jumpers and keeping the floor spaced?

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Re: Pacers/Timberwolves Postgame Thread 3/13/13

                          I don't want to start another attendance issues thread or whatever, so I'll just stick it here. Kelly Dwyer writes for Yahoo's Ball Don't Lie NBA blog and lives in Lafayette. He went to this game, his first live NBA game (as a fan), he loved it, it's a pretty good read.

                          http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nba-ba...1217--nba.html

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Re: Pacers/Timberwolves Postgame Thread 3/13/13

                            Originally posted by Heisenberg View Post
                            I don't want to start another attendance issues thread or whatever, so I'll just stick it here. Kelly Dwyer writes for Yahoo's Ball Don't Lie NBA blog and lives in Lafayette. He went to this game, his first live NBA game (as a fan), he loved it, it's a pretty good read.

                            http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nba-ba...1217--nba.html
                            I'd like to know where he paid $15 bucks to park so I can run in the completely opposite direction.
                            "Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough NO BODY!" ~ Frank Vogel

                            "And David put his hand in the bag and took out a stone and slung it. And it struck the Philistine on the head and he fell to the ground. Amen. "

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Re: Pacers/Timberwolves Postgame Thread 3/13/13

                              Across the street? Just a thought. Maybe the lot next to the wall schedule?
                              There is no NBA player named Monte Ellis.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Re: Pacers/Timberwolves Postgame Thread 3/13/13

                                Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                                It's not even close to being a fair trade.
                                Just to clarify, when I said it "seemed like a hefty price to pay," that was really just a polite way of saying, "you must be totally ****ing insane."

                                Rubio is a hell of a player, and I'd trade George Hill for him. Giving them Paul George, as well, is one of the craziest ideas I've ever heard. I would love to know how "much, much more" Justin wants to give up to get him.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X