The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

The Pacers need to change their Marketing Strategy... again

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Pacers need to change their Marketing Strategy... again

    Billboards are nice but they aren't enough. Before I go on, I should say that this thread isn't for bashing the Pacers Marketing department. It's designed to suggest ways the Pacers can reach more of the casual sports fans in Indy.

    We all love to complain about the lack of attendance and what we think the underlying issues are. Even many of the Pacers players, coaches, and broadcasters find ways to bring it up. Complaining about the problem doesn't fix anything. Complaining only helps if it gives birth to solutions.

    We know what the issues are. Here are my ideas to improve the Indiana Public's awareness. I'd love to hear yours as well.

    1. Increase merchandise retail availability. It's mind boggling that Pacers gear is non-existent in retail giants like Target and Walmart. Try finding a sweatshirt anywhere other than the Homecourt gift shop. It's harder than finding Carmen SanDiego! A t-shirt on a rack or in the window of a shop at the mall is advertisement. Tons of casual sports fans could be reached this way. Heck, someone might even buy one once they know that they exist!

    2. Pacers players and the organization have been doing a great job getting the message out via social media and have made several appearances here and there. A better way of getting the attention of basketball fans would be to set up appearances at Butler, IU, and Purdue games. Get a few on air interviews set up where they can comment on the college team and how the Pacers are playing this year. Just sitting in the crowd could get the Pacers a few Twitter mentions or a shoutout during the telecast or on SportsCenter later that night.

    3. New Uniforms. Changing the uniforms would go a long way to help people see that this is a new Pacers team. It would also distance this team from all the losing and frustrating years. This isn't something that they can do this season but it should be a definite change starting next season.

    4. Get the local media to support the team. Give them tickets, t-shirts, polos, mugs, or whatever it takes to get them interested in the team. Don't just do it once. Do it at least once a month. Tell them to pass some of it on to their family and friends. What does 100 mugs cost? They're really cheap to produce but could be worth word-of-mouth and/or media gold when given to the right people.

    5. Similar to the idea above but this centers around promoting the team to all the bars in the city. Not just downtown but in Muncie, Bloomington, Lafayette, and Fort Wayne. Posters with just the schedule on them are great for the teams and the bars. Have a few of the Pacers drop once in a to have their pictures taken with the owners and bartenders.

    6. Get a grassroots movement started. I'm sure Area 53 and the G2 crew would be down to help pass out flyers about the Pacers latest deals for upcoming games at the malls. Viral videos like Hibbert's Gangnam-style video were great for recognition. I know that if they got the fans more involved in the marketing plan, the Pacers could see a surge in popularity.

    That's all I have for now but I feel really confident that these ideas could work. What are yours?

  • #2
    Re: The Pacers need to change their Marketing Strategy... again

    To me it's mind boggling that Pacers gear is non-existent in retail giants SIMON MALLS.
    "Danny Granger is one of the top players in the league. To move Danny, you better get a lot back." - Larry Bird


    • #3
      Re: The Pacers need to change their Marketing Strategy... again

      You guys really think PG and Hill and Lance going to IU events was their own idea?


      • #4
        Re: The Pacers need to change their Marketing Strategy... again

        Originally posted by Heisenberg View Post
        You guys really think PG and Hill and Lance going to IU events was their own idea?
        No, not really. IIRC, wasn't that before the season started or shortly thereafter?

        Also, I'm talking about them attending one of the games. I'm not sure if it's possible with the schedule but it couldn't hurt and they could get to see a good game in the process.


        • #5
          Re: The Pacers need to change their Marketing Strategy... again

          Originally posted by naptownmenace View Post
          No, not really. IIRC, wasn't that before the season started or shortly thereafter?

          Also, I'm talking about them attending one of the games. I'm not sure if it's possible with the schedule but it couldn't hurt and they could get to see a good game in the process.
          PG was at the Michigan(I think?) game tweeting about it. Those 3 went there for a football game, not sure which one. Pacers official twitter was all over it.


          • #6
            Re: The Pacers need to change their Marketing Strategy... again

            Who wouldn't have wanted to go to that IU Michigan game? haha


            • #7
              Re: The Pacers need to change their Marketing Strategy... again

              Tweets like this from Paul George are not an accident.

              There is no NBA player named Monte Ellis.


              • #8
                Re: The Pacers need to change their Marketing Strategy... again

                I've complained about it in other threads so thanks for the all in one thought thread.

                Try to get a few more games scheduled for a Saturday or Sunday. 5 games total is not going to cut it for folks living outside of th Indy metro. Also on the same thought process... if the Sat/Sunday games are not doable then at least make some of the Friday games have a later starting time please.

                This request comes from someone 88.4 miles away (one way) from BLF.
                You know how hippos are made out to be sweet and silly, like big cows, but are actually extremely dangerous and can kill you with stunning brutality? The Pacers are the NBA's hippos....Matt Moore CBS Sports....


                • #9
                  Re: The Pacers need to change their Marketing Strategy... again

                  Going back to the Pinstripes IMO would be a brilliant idea. Yes they wore them during the brawl, but those are more associated with the only NBA finals appearance. It's easy, it fits with a "retro" feel, and they are great unis to boot.


                  • #10
                    Re: The Pacers need to change their Marketing Strategy... again

                    They really need to change the jerseys. 1) These jerseys are terrible and I don't understand why anyone would want one but also 2) They will be associated with the mediocrity of the post-Reggie era and the thugs. The Pacers have too many great options for jerseys to keep on wearing this garbage.


                    • #11
                      Re: The Pacers need to change their Marketing Strategy... again

                      Originally posted by cgg View Post
                      To me it's mind boggling that Pacers gear is non-existent in retail giants SIMON MALLS.
                      I go to oklahoma city for work a lot. They have stores everywhere with Thunder gear. I went into a store that was just in a strip mall that had Sooners, OK. St. Cowboys, and Thunder gear. I was blown away by all the stuff they had just for the Thunder. It was stuff we can only get by going down to BLF. Most of stuff was on sale too, not like BLF.


                      • #12
                        Re: The Pacers need to change their Marketing Strategy... again

                        1. From what I've heard, we should have new unis next year

                        2. It's Area 55, not Area 53
                        Turner and Young are THE FUTURE!


                        • #13
                          Re: The Pacers need to change their Marketing Strategy... again

                          They need to advertise more on local TV, but local TV also needs to have more coverage on the Pacers too. Roy, Paul, and G.Hill do a lot of stuff in the community. It covered by the TV sations, but not enough.


                          • #14
                            Re: The Pacers need to change their Marketing Strategy... again

                            Going to finals would help too. LOL, not really LOL.


                            • #15
                              Re: The Pacers need to change their Marketing Strategy... again

                              I grew up an hours drive from Indy. When I was a kid I attended games in person (back in the ABA, 'cause I'm old) because there was a church group that had a bus and took us to Sunday afternoon games on occasion. I think if somehow the Pacers explored making a mini season ticket package available and coupled it to a locally-run charter bus service, from perhaps West Lafayette, Columbus IN, or other similarly-distanced cities, it could revive interest in these satellite markets. At least it could be heavily advertised in one or two cities just to gauge the interest. When I visit my relatives an hour south of Indy there's an obvious Colts marketing presence but the Pacers seem kind of invisible. This needs fixing!
                              The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!).