Re: Off season Rumors and Speculation
Is this a rule? I think you can win with Hill as your 4th or 5th best player. Your 1-3 guys have to be near-all-stars/all-stars. And you have to have 3-4 guys near/just below Hill's level.
Isn't that basically the Pacers' plan? Granger-West-Hibbert as your top 3. Hill and George as the fourth or fifth best players, depending on what you think of Paul George and his potential to raise his game next year. And then guys like DC, Mayo, and Kaman to fill up the rest of your top 8. That's basically what our thinking is, as best I can tell.
We aren't going to get those max superstars so we build a team a slightly different way, which requires us to have several Hill-level guys. In this case, Hill is especially nice to have because he's a proven hard worker/good chemistry guy and we already have him in the fold so we overpay by a million or so.
Is this a rule? I think you can win with Hill as your 4th or 5th best player. Your 1-3 guys have to be near-all-stars/all-stars. And you have to have 3-4 guys near/just below Hill's level.
Isn't that basically the Pacers' plan? Granger-West-Hibbert as your top 3. Hill and George as the fourth or fifth best players, depending on what you think of Paul George and his potential to raise his game next year. And then guys like DC, Mayo, and Kaman to fill up the rest of your top 8. That's basically what our thinking is, as best I can tell.
We aren't going to get those max superstars so we build a team a slightly different way, which requires us to have several Hill-level guys. In this case, Hill is especially nice to have because he's a proven hard worker/good chemistry guy and we already have him in the fold so we overpay by a million or so.
Comment