Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Pittman, Haslem, suspended, Tyler gets Flagrant 2

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Re: Pittman, Haslem, suspended, Tyler gets Flagrant 2

    Originally posted by Shade View Post
    Bandwagon fans in general are stupid. That's why they're bandwagon fans.
    True. I guess I was more referring to the org then. I think I would feel sick to my stomach if the team I rooted for would have its stars send a 7-foot, 350 pound center to maliciously attack a 2nd-year guard. Then again, I guess you are saying that if I were a fan of said team, such things would never offend me since I would have to be a total douchebag. I'm beginning to understand.
    You Got The Tony!!!!!!

    Comment


    • #77
      Re: Pittman, Haslem, suspended, Tyler gets Flagrant 2

      Pittman should have been suspended for at the very least the rest of the playoffs, he got off extremely easy (I don't think there was any doubt he was going to be suspended).

      Haslem I think they got right.

      Hansbrough's was a borderline flagrant 1 foul to begin with, so I have no idea how they could think it was a flagrant 2, while Lou's elbow was just a normal ordinary foul. Ultimately though not that big of a deal since he wasn't suspended.

      Comment


      • #78
        Re: Pittman, Haslem, suspended, Tyler gets Flagrant 2

        I think all you have to do is look at the NBA handled Artest. 7 games for a viscous elbow by a guy with a LOT of history. 3 games for Pittman feels about right. What really surprises me is the 1 game for Haslem. That could actually hurt Miami for game 6. Pittman, not so much.

        Comment


        • #79
          Re: Pittman, Haslem, suspended, Tyler gets Flagrant 2

          I guess they "had" to give Tyler a Flagrant 2 just to make it seem fair after suspending Haslem and Pittman. He didn't deserve a F2, but it's not really a big deal.

          I think the story to come out of this should be how classless and dirty the Heat are for laughing at the elbow to Lance's neck. DWade catches an elbow like that and the whole nation stops for a moment of silence, it's the headline story for the next few days, people call for lifetime suspension for the guy who did it, wailing and gnashing of teeth. One of the Heat's roster-fillers do it to someone, and they laugh. Absolutely classless.

          That said, the game must go on, and the Pacers MUST take advantage of the Heat's frontcourt. Seriously, Fez needs to be activated and we can just rotate in our bigs all game long, control the paint, and stomp the Heat into the ground.

          Oh, and one last thing. Watch the video of Tyler getting mugged and check out how quickly he gets right back up. Lance didn't even go all the way down. Larry Bird, I love ya, but these guys ain't S-O-F-T. They have an attitude, and thanks to an absolute butt-kicking (and some words of encouragement), they're going to proudly display it in Game 6.
          It's a new day for Pacers Basketball.

          Comment


          • #80
            Re: Pittman, Haslem, suspended, Tyler gets Flagrant 2

            Originally posted by Ken Carson
            Haslem: "I was making a play on the ball..."



            Right...


            And to the people saying Hansborough's foul on Wade was the same (not anyone here so far)...this...



            ...is a play on the ball that is a flagrant 1.

            This...



            ...is a multiple game suspension.

            Originally posted by Ken Carson
            And this...



            should be a rest of the postseason suspension. Ron Artest got 7 games for a gray-area elbow. Pittman clearly lines the kid up and delivers one of the cheapest shots in NBA history. The fact that he winks afterwards should boot him for the rest of the playoffs.
            I agree with this completely, and it was on a Tampa Bay Buccaneers board.

            Comment


            • #81
              Re: Pittman, Haslem, suspended, Tyler gets Flagrant 2

              Originally posted by IUfan4life View Post
              I've seen a lot of this, and it's just stupid. Lebron got down and played D. give credit where it's due. Don't look at numbers, watch the games
              He's been called for four fouls in 208 minutes. It's hard to believe that a player so heavily used, both offensively and defensively, averages less than a foul per game.

              Surely, it has nothing to do with his status as a ratings-and-revenue-generating superstar, right? Keeping him on the floor instead of on the bench can't be a result of unequal treatment, can it? Nah, it's just a coincidence. Or his defense is so good that despite how involved he is, he never makes mistakes. He never reaches in, his blocks are all ball all the time and he's always in position for the charge. Always. And offensively? He's so talented that he's able to never commit an offensive foul. He always evades the defender attempting to draw a charge, and never pushes off. Never.

              Less than a foul per game? Watch the games.
              2015, 2016, 2019 IKL Fantasy Basketball Champions - DC Dreamers

              Comment


              • #82
                Re: Pittman, Haslem, suspended, Tyler gets Flagrant 2

                Originally posted by Speed View Post
                Well it leaves Battier to throw himself on the ground every play while defending DWest, so there's that entertainment. I honestly wish DWest would just reserve a foul to use as a charge and just crush his flopping arse.
                I think this at least partially explains David's hesitancy. He knows that Shane Battier is very good at drawing fouls, and I think he's concerned that any given flop will result in a cheap foul call.

                Comment


                • #83
                  Re: Pittman, Haslem, suspended, Tyler gets Flagrant 2

                  Definitely hard to believe he only has 4 fouls this series....hmm....

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Re: Pittman, Haslem, suspended, Tyler gets Flagrant 2

                    Originally posted by Kuq_e_Zi91 View Post
                    He's been called for four fouls in 208 minutes. It's hard to believe that a player so heavily used, both offensively and defensively, averages less than a foul per game.

                    Surely, it has nothing to do with his status as a ratings-and-revenue-generating superstar, right? Keeping him on the floor instead of on the bench can't be a result of unequal treatment, can it? Nah, it's just a coincidence. Or his defense is so good that despite how involved he is, he never makes mistakes. He never reaches in, his blocks are all ball all the time and he's always in position for the charge. Always. And offensively? He's so talented that he's able to never commit an offensive foul. He always evades the defender attempting to draw a charge, and never pushes off. Never.

                    Less than a foul per game? Watch the games.
                    Exactly, if watch him you will see lots of push offs, lots of grabbing. One of the fouls that was not called in game 3 was Lebron trying to front David West and reaching back and hooking West's leg. He did it repeatedly to keep West behind him and to feel out his positioning.
                    You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Re: Pittman, Haslem, suspended, Tyler gets Flagrant 2

                      Originally posted by shags View Post
                      And that's the thing. Are the Pacers disciplined enough to take advantage? Remember Juwan Howard? He may actually have to play now. And the Heat might have to, gasp, activate Eddy Curry.

                      And by the way, the NBA got the Haslem suspension right, Hansbrough's shouldn't have been upgraded, and Pittman's suspension was at least 2 games too low.
                      If we don't continually pound the ball into Hibbert where he sees at least 15 FGA this game and Hansbrough FOR ONCE actually attacks the basket in the Low-Post as opposed to settle for the "top of the key" Mid-Range jumpshot.....this Team doesn't deserve to go to Game 7.

                      I just pray that West and Granger is able to play.
                      Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Re: Pittman, Haslem, suspended, Tyler gets Flagrant 2

                        All season Frank Vogel told anyone who'd listen what a smashmouth basketball team we are. Between the absence of Bosh/Haslem/Pittman, the trash talking prior to the start of the series, and Larry calling the team soft, there is no excuse not to prove to the world that we really are that team in Game 6. It's as much of a 'nut up or shut up' scenario as I've ever seen.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Re: Pittman, Haslem, suspended, Tyler gets Flagrant 2

                          Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                          If we don't continually pound the ball into Hibbert where he sees at least 15 FGA this game and Hansbrough FOR ONCE actually attacks the basket in the Low-Post as opposed to settle for the "top of the key" Mid-Range jumpshot.....this Team doesn't deserve to go to Game 7.

                          I just pray that West and Granger is able to play.
                          To be fair to Tyler, that shot was his bread and butter last season, and so far he has been hitting most of them against the Heat. It is when he is attacking the basket that he has had trouble scoring.

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Re: Pittman, Haslem, suspended, Tyler gets Flagrant 2

                            Originally posted by vapacersfan View Post
                            Which feed is that from? I went back to watch the game to catch that footage again cause I didn't see it live and there was nothing like that shown during or after the Dexter incident.

                            i'm all for raising pitchforks and hunting down witches - but I also don't like adding fake fuel to the fire.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Re: Pittman, Haslem, suspended, Tyler gets Flagrant 2

                              Originally posted by bellisimo View Post
                              Which feed is that from? I went back to watch the game to catch that footage again cause I didn't see it live and there was nothing like that shown during or after the Dexter incident.

                              i'm all for raising pitchforks and hunting down witches - but I also don't like adding fake fuel to the fire.
                              NBATV (Bottom right corner)

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Re: Pittman, Haslem, suspended, Tyler gets Flagrant 2

                                Originally posted by Derek2k3 View Post
                                Good, I think they got it right. Although you could nitpick the Tyler F2...


                                However, what the **** is their answer to NOT upgrading Wade's tackle of DC? If Tyler was given an F2 for making excessive contact, what do you call a 220 pound person going at full speed taking out a 180 pound guy?
                                Repeat after me....Wade did nothing wrong... Wade did nothing wrong... As a matter of fact, the play of which you speak never even happened... We shall never mention this again... Again, Wade did nothing wrong...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X