Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Lance Stephenson Making Strides To Help Pacers On The Court

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Lance Stephenson Making Strides To Help Pacers On The Court

    Originally posted by Since86 View Post
    Because he didn't say that Lance would only play at the 2. He said Lance would get most of his minutes there, not all of them.

    (EDIT: News: Stephenson will serve primarily as a shooting guard while George Hill is out with an ankle injury, the Indianapolis Star reports.
    http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/player/-/news/821226?q )

    He also said that Lance would be used a backup PG.
    http://www.indystar.com/article/2012...-2-point-guard

    Yes, I understand that this was before Hill getting hurt, but you're argument before then was GH was the PG and Lance was the SG then too.
    I think I've seen Lance play PG once, maybe twice, for a play or two since Vogel's comments, JMO.


    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Lance Stephenson Making Strides To Help Pacers On The Court

      I dont give a flying **** what you call Lance : SG/PG.

      IT DOESNT FREAKIN MATTER!!!

      Lance is best with the ball in his hands. Peroid. He does not do well standing in a corner waiting to get a pss only if the player with the ball is stuck or the shot clock is winding down. He is best with the ball in his hands where he can beat his player off the dribble, drive to the basket and dish. Like him or not, he makes plays that I dont believe anyone else on the team can. He can post up guards , and is deft at finding cutters. He is young and will have flashes of brillanced and also times where you smack you head. He is 20 years old with very little in game experience. His strengths though you cant teach

      I am not naming names but I remember I wass one of , if not the biggest Lance supporter when allegations first arrived. I wish I could pull some of the comments about him at that time. Everything from "Artest 2.0", to woman beater, to he should be in the D league" etc etc. You dont just magically become rated in the top 5 highschool players in the country. He has skills he has had most of his life. He does need to learn how to utilize those skills in a professional NBA game and he is making progress. Not a knock on DC but I bet if Lance was given DC's minutes as the starting PG, he would eventually have a better assist to turnover ratio . Not saying he is better at this point than DC, just that I feel there are SOME things Lance is better at and would be better if given the chance

      The book of Lance Stephenson still has many chapters to be written, and who knows how it will end. Those who act like he has no talent or potential I dont see how they come to that conclusion, or the conclusion that Lance can't run an offense

      Most of all though , he has been affiliated with the Pacers almost 2 years, and after the intial hiccup, which was droped, not a peep negative has been heard, and he spent his entire off season here in Nap, bustin his hump.

      So for all those that said all the discuraging and nasty things about him (which you had the right to do so)

      In the words of one of the pioneer rappers Kool Mo Dee

      "HOW YA LIKE ME NOW"!
      Sittin on top of the world!

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Lance Stephenson Making Strides To Help Pacers On The Court

        Originally posted by 90'sNBARocked View Post
        I am not naming names but I remember I wass one of , if not the biggest Lance supporter when allegations first arrived. I wish I could pull some of the comments about him at that time. Everything from "Artest 2.0", to woman beater, to he should be in the D league" etc etc. You dont just magically become rated in the top 5 highschool players in the country. He has skills he has had most of his life.
        How are those things said about him, and those skills he's had, at all related?

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Lance Stephenson Making Strides To Help Pacers On The Court

          Well Vogel's comments clearly indicate that the Pacers view him as both.
          Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Lance Stephenson Making Strides To Help Pacers On The Court

            Although every game counts...after Bird's comments about Lance's passing and court vision skills coupled with AJ's "on and off" again games ( where's he's doing a great impression of a "pass first PG" and a really bad impression as a "J'OB PG that would take bad shots" )....I really want to see how Lance does with the ball in his hands running the offense for extended periods of time over the course of a few games.

            I want to see if he can actually "sink or swim" as the guy trying to create for others or passing the ball. If anything...over the course of a few games...this would put this whole Lance is better "on or off" the ball as the PG or SG to rest.
            Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Lance Stephenson Making Strides To Help Pacers On The Court

              Originally posted by CableKC View Post
              I really want to see how Lance does with the ball in his hands running the offense for extended periods of time over the course of a few games.

              I want to see if he can actually "sink or swim" as the guy trying to create for others or passing the ball. If anything...over the course of a few games...this would put this whole Lance is better "on or off" the ball as the PG or SG to rest.
              Have to disagree. If the Pacers were losing then so be it, but at this time experimentation needs to wait with the shortened season.
              You know how hippos are made out to be sweet and silly, like big cows, but are actually extremely dangerous and can kill you with stunning brutality? The Pacers are the NBA's hippos....Matt Moore CBS Sports....

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Lance Stephenson Making Strides To Help Pacers On The Court

                Originally posted by RWB View Post
                Have to disagree. If the Pacers were losing then so be it, but at this time experimentation needs to wait with the shortened season.
                I totally agree....but honestly......I'd take the risk of seeing what Lance can do with the ball in his hands.

                Believe me....I was totally in the "Let AJ run the point" camp....but over the last couple of games, I don't know if the "Good AJ" is going to show up or the "Bad AJ" is going to show up to run the point.

                I'm now in the "I am still skeptical as to whether Lance can do it...but AJ has been so 'hit or miss' when it comes to running the point as of late.....if Bird thinks that Lance has the skillset to do it, then prove to me that he can be a good creator and passer" camp.

                If Bird truly does believe that he has really good passing skills and court vision....as long as the 2nd unit is ready on the offensive end to receive some crazy pass from him....I'm just at the point where I'd just like to see what Lance can do.
                Last edited by CableKC; 02-10-2012, 02:40 PM.
                Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Lance Stephenson Making Strides To Help Pacers On The Court

                  Originally posted by RWB View Post
                  Have to disagree. If the Pacers were losing then so be it, but at this time experimentation needs to wait with the shortened season.
                  I'd say the opposite. Since we're winning, there's a little more room for experimentation. Lance is very unlikely to get minutes during the playoffs, so let's see if he sharpen some of his weaknesses.

                  I don't agree with the way he's being used or how he's being fed minutes, but now's the time to do it.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Lance Stephenson Making Strides To Help Pacers On The Court

                    Originally posted by Mackey_Rose View Post
                    http://www.82games.com/1112/11IND4.HTM

                    When Lance is on the court, the Pacers give up 104.2 points per 100 possessions. When he's on the bench, the Pacers give up 93.9 points per 100 possessions.

                    When Lance is on the court, the Pacers score 93.9 points per 100 possessions. When he's on the bench, the Pacers score 103.6 points per 10 possessions.

                    Completely independent of what position he's playing, the Pacers are a net 14.6 points per 100 possessions worse with him on the floor.
                    Holy cow you mean our second unit scores less than our starters?
                    Thanks Mr. O you are a lifesaver!

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Lance Stephenson Making Strides To Help Pacers On The Court

                      If it was me, I would make a couple adjustments and see how it works

                      Starters :
                      DC
                      Dhanty Jones
                      Danny Granger
                      David West
                      Roy Hibbert

                      Bench

                      Lance
                      G Hill
                      Paul George
                      Tyler
                      Lou/Foster

                      Reason being I think PG would be better suited as the primary scorer on the second unit. He could also take advantage of the other teams bench player. I like DJ in the starting unit because he would play good defense and being the first unit has more scorers on the floor and would feel less inclined to take wild shots/drives

                      Lance having the ball in his hands will make him a playmaker, which would be better than having him stand around. If Lance faulters, then bring in AJ
                      Sittin on top of the world!

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Lance Stephenson Making Strides To Help Pacers On The Court

                        Originally posted by Mackey_Rose View Post
                        How are those things said about him, and those skills he's had, at all related?
                        My point was Lance was obliterated by people here before who wanted him run out of town and thought it was anohter Tinsely/Artest situation

                        Glad that he , so far, has proven those individuals wrong

                        on his skills, several also said he is not an NBA player, should be in the d league, etc. My point, Lance does have skills and is an NBA player

                        so yeah , a little vindication (as one of Lance's biggest supporters) feels good
                        Sittin on top of the world!

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Lance Stephenson Making Strides To Help Pacers On The Court

                          Originally posted by kielbeze View Post
                          Holy cow you mean our second unit scores less than our starters?
                          Thanks Mr. O you are a lifesaver!
                          http://www.82games.com/1112/11IND2.HTM

                          When AJ Price is on the court, the Pacers give up 82.2 points per 100 possessions. When he's on the bench, the Pacers give up 101.4 points per 100 possessions.

                          When AJ is on the court, the Pacers score 90.0 points per 100 possessions. When he's on the bench, the Pacers score 103.1 points per 10 possessions.

                          Completely independent of what position he's playing, the Pacers are a net 6.1 points per 100 possessions better with him on the floor.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Lance Stephenson Making Strides To Help Pacers On The Court

                            Originally posted by Mackey_Rose View Post
                            22 assists, and 23 turnovers.

                            I suppose that is technically correct. I included preseason games in my count.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Lance Stephenson Making Strides To Help Pacers On The Court

                              I am a big fan of Born Ready, but he does seem to be a turnover machine. He needs to figure how to limit turnovers
                              Being unable to close out a game in which you have a comfortable lead in the 4th Q = Pulling a Frank Vogel

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: Lance Stephenson Making Strides To Help Pacers On The Court

                                I can't think of a single maneuver (short of benching Roy Hibbert in favor of Lou) that would have a more detrimental effect on this team than moving Paul George to the bench.


                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X