Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

The Pacers shouldn't trade anyone away during the season

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Re: The Pacers shouldn't trade anyone away during the season

    Originally posted by Pacer Fan View Post
    Wilson Chandler is a RFA, so a trade would have to be made. I don't see Denver giving him up at the Deadline when they are 2nd in the west, unless it's for a big upgrade, something we are in search for.

    Shawn Marion, plz no! 2011-12 7.7mil, 2012-13 8.4mil, 2013-14 9.1mil. I'm sure he wouldn't exercise his early termination option either. He wouldn't give up 9 mil.
    Yeah as far as the Shawn Marion thing is concerned if you want him that badly just wait till Dallas amnesties him in an attempt to clear enough cap space to bring on Deron Williams or Howard or both.

    Comment


    • #77
      Re: The Pacers shouldn't trade anyone away during the season

      Originally posted by Dgreenwell3 View Post
      I think what we could use is a buried big guy like Timofy Mosgov. Athletic big, lots of ability to defend the rim.
      I'd personally like to get Nikola Pekovic as our primary backup to Roy..
      "Political Correctness is a doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

      Comment


      • #78
        Re: The Pacers shouldn't trade anyone away during the season

        Originally posted by Kemo View Post
        I'd personally like to get Nikola Pekovic as our primary backup to Roy..
        I literally had no idea Mosgov was getting playing time...I figured he would be buried behind Anderson and Nene there...
        Nikola would be a good pick-up but Kahn is either an easy trade partner or freakin' impossible...

        Comment


        • #79
          Re: The Pacers shouldn't trade anyone away during the season

          I like the Idea of Allen, but I'd hate to give up a 1st for him as I don't think he will put us over the top and having him for a 3 month rental makes no sense.

          I'd rather see a Allen for a 2nd rounder and Lance.

          I Would like to see Larry get JR Smith for like 2 years, 14mil with the second year being 6mil if this is possible with the new CBA. I know his history, but I think he would be fine with a short contract and he is getting older. This front load would allow Pacers to deal him next season if things don't work out.
          This guy is exactly what we need, heck of a talent and we lose no players or picks.

          Hill, Smith, Jones, Hans, Lou / Foster would be a pretty hyper, fast 2nd unit.
          Garbage players get 1st round picks, (WTF)! All of the NBA must hate the Pacers! LOL

          Comment


          • #80
            Re: The Pacers shouldn't trade anyone away during the season

            Originally posted by xBulletproof View Post
            I believe I was the one of the first to yell for this, but didn't think it was very realistic with him being an RFA. However, looking at Denver salary situation, they're at the cap this year, and next year they're at 42 million and I expect they're going to give Gallinari a big pay day. Then the next year they're going to need to pay Lawson.

            Makes me wonder if there isn't some way to pry him away from them with a S&T.
            Well, we've got this player called Jones that they might like...
            This space for rent.

            Comment


            • #81
              Re: The Pacers shouldn't trade anyone away during the season

              Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
              If it makes you better you make the trade.
              I agree... But I think you have to be as close to 100% sure as possible that it does make you better because I feel that one of our biggest strengths is the cohesive relationships between all of our players... If the Pacers are going to take this TEAM vs. Super Friends approach to winning a championship they should have to be aware of how much of an impact it will make to our specific basketball model when they go through employee turnovers...

              TEAMS are often strongest when their players have played together for a good while... They know each other as well as they know themselves... That is where we need to try to get to to become elite under our basketball model...

              With us having so much cap room we do have the luxury of trading nothing for something to add to the players that we have... But even just adding players will initially have a minor negative impact on our teams chemistry overall because everyone will have to then learn the new players tendencies... But at least that way we aren't losing any relationships that have already been forged between our players...

              I like the "My team is on the floor" motto by some on this board... Do I sometimes feel we could use better players or different skill sets at certain positions... Yes... But sometimes the grass seems greener on the other side and isn't... If we have to give a player to get one we need to be very careful not to undervalue what we will be losing by giving up a player...

              C -
              Roy is Indiana Pacers basketball...

              Foster is a career Pacer...

              PF -
              Mr. West has a high bball IQ... Veteran Leadership... Ice in his veins in the clutch...

              Tyler is the epitome of our Smasheye... Err... Smashnose... Uh... Smashmouth Basketball Identity...

              SF -
              Granger is the big brother... He stuck with the franchise knowing he was going to be going through a rebuild... He put us on his back for the last 3 years... To trade him now would be the biggest negative shot to our overall chemistry... A small market team should be run like a good small business... Dedicated employees are treated as family... Danny is definately family... You don't trade away family easily... If at all...

              SG -
              Paulie is our greatest hope to become a superstar...

              GHill is becoming our most consistant player... And is a area native...

              PG -
              DC has provided a great scoring spark... Even though he seems to have bad court vision for a PG... I feel he builds solid relationships with his teammates... And if DC plays with the same teammates long enough it should eventually help him compensate for his lack of court vision... If he already knows where everyone should be there is less need to see...



              I have a real hard time trading any of these ^ guys...
              Nothing in life worth having comes easy.

              Comment


              • #82
                Re: The Pacers shouldn't trade anyone away during the season

                Originally posted by BringJackBack View Post
                I think if we got Ray Allen he would be our number one scorer... Maybe that's just me but I feel like he needs to be closed in on the same way Danny needs to be zeroed in on. He'd be our starter in my opinion.

                I think the minutes would go something like this:

                DC (30)/Hill (18)
                Allen (32)/George (8)/Hill (8)
                Granger 33/George (15)

                Super stacked, and super talented.

                I think the more realistic route would be to add Wilson Chandler or Shawn Marion though.
                I don't know why everyone keeps on forgetting that the Simons have decided that they do not want the FO to pursue RFAs from other Teams....Chandler...despite playing in China...is still a RFA for the Nuggets.
                Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                Comment


                • #83
                  Re: The Pacers shouldn't trade anyone away during the season

                  Originally posted by Dgreenwell3 View Post
                  I literally had no idea Mosgov was getting playing time...I figured he would be buried behind Anderson and Nene there...
                  Nikola would be a good pick-up but Kahn is either an easy trade partner or freakin' impossible...

                  He hates the Pacers, so don't ever count on a trade with Minnie until he leaves.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Re: The Pacers shouldn't trade anyone away during the season

                    Originally posted by Anthem View Post

                    Well, we've got this player called Jones that they might like...

                    LOL! They've been there done that.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Re: The Pacers shouldn't trade anyone away during the season

                      Originally posted by TheDon View Post
                      Yeah as far as the Shawn Marion thing is concerned if you want him that badly just wait till Dallas amnesties him in an attempt to clear enough cap space to bring on Deron Williams or Howard or both.
                      Haywood's the player Dallas will amnesty, not Marion. In fact, Marion might be the most realistic option to acquire with cap space. Dallas may trade him for a couple of second rounders to clear cap space for next season.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Re: The Pacers shouldn't trade anyone away during the season

                        Originally posted by Peck View Post
                        Ok if you can get Ray Allen for cap space, sure. But let me ask, is he going to be ok with coming off of the bench? Our starting five has 5 players who all play defense and Ray while not horrid is not good. I'm afraid what you would gain on offense you would lose on defense and right now we are one of the best in the entire NBA.

                        If he would be willing to come off of the bench and be the designated outside shooter then sure I guess, why not if we don't lose a player.
                        We are on the same page.

                        It was said we needed a couple more players of Danny's caliber to be really good. We picked one up in West, and we grew one in Roy. I also have no doubt Paul George will soon join them.

                        I don't want to trade any of our players. All we need is time.

                        Like you, I think if we can add someone without disturbing what we have, okay, otherwise I'm really happy with what we have.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Re: The Pacers shouldn't trade anyone away during the season

                          If you can get Ray Allen without giving away your top 7 (heck, I'd consider giving away DC) you do it.

                          He's a great vet, and Paul George could learn *so* much from him. He doesn't have a great offensive player to learn from on the team, and although PG can have a better overall offensive game than Ray. Ray could teach him to be an off ball scorer (and he'd learn to guard off ball scorers) as well as making moves to the basket himself.

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Re: The Pacers shouldn't trade anyone away during the season

                            Originally posted by Justin Tyme View Post
                            LOL! They've been there done that.
                            My point exactly.
                            This space for rent.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Re: The Pacers shouldn't trade anyone away during the season

                              Originally posted by Sookie View Post
                              If you can get Ray Allen without giving away your top 7 (heck, I'd consider giving away DC) you do it.

                              He's a great vet, and Paul George could learn *so* much from him. He doesn't have a great offensive player to learn from on the team, and although PG can have a better overall offensive game than Ray. Ray could teach him to be an off ball scorer (and he'd learn to guard off ball scorers) as well as making moves to the basket himself.
                              Ray's presence could be a definite plus. I don't think he encompasses what Paul needs though. I think Danny fits much closer to Ray's style. I would like for Paul to learn from a SG that can create his own shot/teach him how to dribble and penetrate.

                              But if you can do it without giving up a top 7 player on your team....well, that's hard to not pull the trigger.

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Re: The Pacers shouldn't trade anyone away during the season

                                Originally posted by TheDon View Post
                                Yeah as far as the Shawn Marion thing is concerned if you want him that badly just wait till Dallas amnesties him in an attempt to clear enough cap space to bring on Deron Williams or Howard or both.
                                Yeah, I'd agree with you on this....Marion is owed $8-9 mil a year over the next 3 seasons. If you want him, just wait.....
                                Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X