Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

2012 NBA draft prospects thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: 2012 NBA draft prospects thread

    http://marquettetribune.org/2012/04/...oves-to-guard/

    Men’s Basketball: Jae Crowder looks to move back to guard
    Posted By Mark Strotman On April 24, 2012 @ 4:00 am In Featured,Sports

    Former Marquette forward Jae Crowder was known around college basketball as one of the hardest-working forwards in the country.

    When his name is called on June 28 in New York City at the NBA Draft, however, the team that drafts Crowder will be adding a shooting guard to its roster.

    The 6-foot-6 Crowder, who played shooting guard his sophomore season at Howard Community College, has begun training for the upcoming draft and is looking to move back to shooting guard at the next level.

    “I want to play the ‘2,’” Crowder said. “Being 6-foot-6, being able to guard the post can be tough for you, and I don’t want it to be too tough.”

    The process will require the 245-pound Crowder to lose 20 pounds over the next two months while also refining his current skill set.

    While finishing up his final semester at Marquette, Crowder has been taking weekend flights to Miami, where he trains and stays with his father, Corey.

    The three-day workout sessions include ball-handling, agility, shooting, strength and nutrition, all of which Crowder has specific coaches for.

    The move to the perimeter will be a difficult one for Crowder, but it’s not the first time he’s done it.

    “When Jae first came here, he didn’t have a good attitude about working,” junior guard Junior Cadougan said. “But once he realized that time was running out, he started to work hard. He started to be the leader on our team.”

    Crowder admitted his focus and dedication lacked when he first arrived at Marquette. But an understanding of what coach Buzz Williams expected on a daily basis helped mold him into one of the hardest workers on the team.

    “It was about buying into the program as a player and a person,” Crowder said. “When you transfer in, there’s going to be things you don’t like. Once I figured that part out, everything started coming naturally. It was a process, and me buying in helped me exploit my skills and exploit my talent.”

    Crowder averaged 11.8 points and 6.8 rebounds his first season at Marquette, one year after being named the junior college player of the year at Howard.

    But increased responsibility as the team’s senior leader propelled him to new heights in 2011. Crowder exploded onto the national scene, averaging 17.4 points and 8.1 rebounds and leading Marquette to its second-straight Sweet 16 berth.

    “It was hard for me to see when he had a bad day because he works so hard, regardless of the day,” freshman guard Derrick Wilson said. “We could play three Big East games in a row, and he’d still come out the next day and work just as hard.”

    Crowder will likely be the third Marquette player drafted in the last three NBA Drafts, following Lazar Hayward and Jimmy Butler. But it was a conversation with Wesley Matthews, who went undrafted in 2009, that Crowder noted as most helpful.

    “He reached out and told me once I get to workouts to just keep doing what I’ve been doing, do what I hang my hat on,” Crowder said. “Every guy has skill, can make shots and defend, but every guy doesn’t work hard each and every play.”

    Crowder’s move from forward to guard will require hours of training, but if the last two years are any indication, he should have no problem accomplishing that goal.

    “There aren’t many guys who can do the things I do,” Crowder said. “I’m trying to sharpen up each tool I have to be a guy the world has never seen before.”

    __________________________________________________ _____________________

    Anyone know anything about this kid? He sounds intriguing!
    Last edited by NapTonius Monk; 04-24-2012, 03:32 PM.

    Comment


    • Re: 2012 NBA draft prospects thread

      In this particular draft everyone says get a big man and I am all far that but the best player available might be a
      guard.

      Teague
      Jenkins(excellent shooting percentage)
      http://nbadraft.net/players/john-jenkins

      or Wroten are three that deserve a thorugh evaluation.
      http://nbadraft.net/players/tony-wroten

      Wroten is extremely athletic, something lacking somewhat in the Pacers guards.
      Last edited by owl; 05-04-2012, 11:21 AM.
      {o,o}
      |)__)
      -"-"-

      Comment


      • Re: 2012 NBA draft prospects thread

        Originally posted by owl View Post
        Wroten is extremely athletic, something lacking somewhat in the Pacers guards.
        I don't agree with that at all... Paul George?! Collison and Barbosa are fast as hell, and Hill is a good athlete, too! Did you see his putback dunk against Min?!

        Passing and ball handling sure, most definitely, but athleticism?! Puuuulease!
        Did you know Antonio and Dale aren’t actually brothers?

        Comment


        • Re: 2012 NBA draft prospects thread

          Originally posted by owl View Post
          In this particular draft everyone says get a big man and I am all far that but the best player available might be a
          guard.

          Teague
          Jenkins(excellent shooting percentage)
          http://nbadraft.net/players/john-jenkins

          or Wroten are three that deserve a thorugh evaluation.
          http://nbadraft.net/players/tony-wroten

          Wroten is extremely athletic, something lacking somewhat in the Pacers guards.
          I like Jenkins as an off the bench 3-point shooting specialist.

          Comment


          • Re: 2012 NBA draft prospects thread

            I want P4E back! Does anyone have the confirmed whereabouts of that kid?

            Comment


            • Re: 2012 NBA draft prospects thread

              Originally posted by Haywoode Workman View Post
              I want P4E back! Does anyone have the confirmed whereabouts of that kid?
              http://www.pacersdigest.com/showthre...thread-3/page3
              Did you know Antonio and Dale aren’t actually brothers?

              Comment


              • Re: 2012 NBA draft prospects thread

                I like seeing Teague sitting at 25 in the mock draft. Wouldn't mind seeing the Pacers try to move up a bit to grab him. Get a local fella and a pretty good one as well.

                Comment


                • Re: 2012 NBA draft prospects thread

                  Originally posted by Mac_Daddy View Post
                  I like seeing Teague sitting at 25 in the mock draft. Wouldn't mind seeing the Pacers try to move up a bit to grab him. Get a local fella and a pretty good one as well.
                  If Marquis could develop into the type of player his brother Jeff has become, this would be a huge steal at 25. With that being said, I would expect Marquis to be taken much higher than 25. I don't really know why Marquis is so low on these mock draft boards, but I don't think he lasts too far out of the lottery
                  Being unable to close out a game in which you have a comfortable lead in the 4th Q = Pulling a Frank Vogel

                  Comment


                  • Re: 2012 NBA draft prospects thread

                    Originally posted by Pacergeek View Post
                    If Marquis could develop into the type of player his brother Jeff has become, this would be a huge steal at 25. With that being said, I would expect Marquis to be taken much higher than 25. I don't really know why Marquis is so low on these mock draft boards, but I don't think he lasts too far out of the lottery
                    Yeah, I don't see it happening either, but it would be nice to have a shot at him.

                    Comment


                    • Re: 2012 NBA draft prospects thread

                      Originally posted by Haywoode Workman View Post
                      I want P4E back! Does anyone have the confirmed whereabouts of that kid?
                      I wont be on much I have some big tourneys coming up so I am practicing 3-8 hrs a day and working and taking classes if I am not.



                      about Tony Mitchell I am hearing that he was going to reconsider and possibly enter the draft .Tony Benford was the reason he choose UNT and after he decided to leave the program Tony was going to leave. But glad he is staying if he left now it would be a Lance Stephenson situation where he would need to red shirt his first few years in the league because his team game still need tons of work but his raw talent is really impressive I would take him in the late lottery to late first huge risk but huge reward if you can develop him he has all the tools to be a force.



                      But for some reason I cant watch ESPN3 so no more scouting unless they fix it. It really doesn't make sense just all of a sudden it didn't work I guess ESPN signed a new deal and my internet provider and cable provider aren't in it. Really sucks but there isnt anything I can do. I have watched most of the players in this draft but I haven't watched all of the players I had a ton of games marked that I was gonna watch leading up to the draft but now I wont get to.

                      Comment


                      • Re: 2012 NBA draft prospects thread

                        I'm seeing CJ Leslie in 2013 mock drafts. I thought he's coming out this year?
                        First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

                        Comment


                        • Re: 2012 NBA draft prospects thread

                          Good article by David Aldridge on the draft.


                          http://www.nba.com/news/features/dav...s=iref:nbahpt1
                          {o,o}
                          |)__)
                          -"-"-

                          Comment


                          • Re: 2012 NBA draft prospects thread

                            Originally posted by Sparhawk View Post
                            I'm seeing CJ Leslie in 2013 mock drafts. I thought he's coming out this year?
                            Nope. He toyed with the idea I think, but he is returning to NC State.

                            Comment


                            • Re: 2012 NBA draft prospects thread

                              Robbie Hummel supposedly has a workout with San Antonio scheduled for the 22nd. Glad to see there is at least some interest. I don't think he'll get drafted, but he'll probably get a shot.

                              Comment


                              • Re: 2012 NBA draft prospects thread

                                If there is any way to trade up to get Arnett Moultrie in the draft, we should. He's a big time project, but all he needs to do is add a lot of strength (Which would take a good two years at least) in order to even be anymore than Earl Clark, but he is fundamentally sound and would greatly benefit from learning from David West for a couple of years until he retires. He is very similar to him, except Moultrie is athletic and long instead of very strong and focused like West. To me its Moultrie, Jared Sullinger, or bust when it comes to trading up... Sullinger is 'special' with his body, hands, and skill, and Moultrie just has a great opportunity here to succeed.

                                If we can't trade our pick, I like Meyers Leonard and Festus Ezeli. Meyers could be good in a couple of years after adding strength and some more polish to his game, and I like Festus because he could bring some BEEF into our front court. He has the tools and the motor to become an excellent defender and rebounder.

                                No to Fab Melo, or Marquis Teague, popular guys. Fab Melo doesn't have a good motor or a back to basket game, and Teague is not a point guard.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X