Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Mike Wells George Hill article

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Mike Wells George Hill article

    Originally posted by Anthem View Post
    Pronounced oo-ee-poo-ee.
    Isn't that some hawaiian dish?
    Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Mike Wells George Hill article

      Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
      Thanks. Never freaking heard of it.
      It also has what some would say the dubious honor of being the closest Division 1 school to the NCAA National office..... Next door.
      "Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough NO BODY!" ~ Frank Vogel

      "And David put his hand in the bag and took out a stone and slung it. And it struck the Philistine on the head and he fell to the ground. Amen. "

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Mike Wells George Hill article

        I don't get it. MUCHO excitement about a guy who's not exactly a household name in the NBA. A useful player but certainly not even remotely a STAR. In fact, he doesn't even START on a majority of teams in the NBA. But it's a party here and I'm even reading about how he can become out CLOSER.
        This speaks to the quality of our present CLOSER (This is not to say that we even have anyone remotely resembling a true closer.) Of course, typical of this forum, many are focusing on his defensive skills. You can play all the defense you want, but, as was shown in this year's playoffs, when a team gets HOT there's nothing a defense can do about it. Of course, why in the world would TPTB ever focus on getting some players who can actually SCORE the ball.

        Let's put this in perspective: Fernadez is going to have a more significant impact with the Mavericks, BECAUSE HE CAN MAKE SHOTS -- more specifically, CAN CREATE HIS OWN SHOTS-- than Hill will with the Pacers. Bet they're as ecstatic about Fernandez over at the Mav's forum as the masses are about Hill over here.

        Hill will be just another guy on a team that can't score at crunch time.

        Bet the SPURS figure they got over real good with this one. To think, they were sweating losing Parker. They were that desperate.

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Mike Wells George Hill article

          Originally posted by Anthem View Post
          Pronounced oo-ee-poo-ee.
          Which never made sense. How the hell do you gett oo-ee from frickin' IU? If anything it's ee-oo, not oo-ee, but don't let the facts get in the way of a silly nickname, I guess.....

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Mike Wells George Hill article

            Originally posted by Eddie Gill View Post
            I just turned it on. They're playing a Paul George interview from last night's draft party. Just said "Danny's known as being a lazy dude, but this summer he's working".
            That's... interesting...

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Mike Wells George Hill article

              Originally posted by v_d_g View Post
              I don't get it. MUCHO excitement about a guy who's not exactly a household name in the NBA. A useful player but certainly not even remotely a STAR. In fact, he doesn't even START on a majority of teams in the NBA. But it's a party here and I'm even reading about how he can become out CLOSER.
              Which household name/star/closer would you have taken at #15 overall?

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Mike Wells George Hill article

                Originally posted by Hicks View Post
                Which never made sense. How the hell do you gett oo-ee from frickin' IU? If anything it's ee-oo, not oo-ee, but don't let the facts get in the way of a silly nickname, I guess.....
                I think "oo-ee-poo-ee" came from the same place the word "hoosier" came from.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Mike Wells George Hill article

                  Originally posted by v_d_g View Post
                  Of course, typical of this forum, many are focusing on his defensive skills. You can play all the defense you want, but, as was shown in this year's playoffs, when a team gets HOT there's nothing a defense can do about it.
                  Were you ever the GM of the Phoenix Suns by any chance?

                  Look, offense beats defense when they are equal, but unless your team plays some damned good defense, your opponent won't even NEED to get hot to beat you. It's the frickin' NBA. You have to be a good defensive team to seriously have a chance at winning anything worth a damn. The Pacers were not set defensively. We needed more defense. Hell, we STILL need more defense (front court).

                  Having defenders like Hill, George, Rush??, and Jones is a good start for the backcourt, and Tyler and Roy aren't bad defensively, but we won't be in business until we add someone really good at D at the 4.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Mike Wells George Hill article

                    Originally posted by bphil View Post
                    I think "oo-ee-poo-ee" came from the same place the word "hoosier" came from.
                    Someone's ***? Figuratively speaking, of course.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Mike Wells George Hill article

                      The fact that he's a hometown favorite is probably what triggered Bird's attention the most and of course more importantly, we needed him.

                      He's the combo guard, leading player we can really use. We really needed someone to man up on the defensive end other than Paul and we got him.

                      Though he's really a SG in a PG's body. His numbers aren't really that of a PG, but I think spot up minutes there would be good.

                      I'm thrilled with this trade all in all.

                      I really hope he doesn't disappoint. DC got my hopes up really high when we got him, but I think George, coming from the Spurs and played a ton of minutes, being a huge impact, I think he'll be solid.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Mike Wells George Hill article

                        Originally posted by v_d_g View Post
                        I don't get it. MUCHO excitement about a guy who's not exactly a household name in the NBA. A useful player but certainly not even remotely a STAR. In fact, he doesn't even START on a majority of teams in the NBA. But it's a party here and I'm even reading about how he can become out CLOSER.
                        This speaks to the quality of our present CLOSER (This is not to say that we even have anyone remotely resembling a true closer.) Of course, typical of this forum, many are focusing on his defensive skills. You can play all the defense you want, but, as was shown in this year's playoffs, when a team gets HOT there's nothing a defense can do about it. Of course, why in the world would TPTB ever focus on getting some players who can actually SCORE the ball.

                        Let's put this in perspective: Fernadez is going to have a more significant impact with the Mavericks, BECAUSE HE CAN MAKE SHOTS -- more specifically, CAN CREATE HIS OWN SHOTS-- than Hill will with the Pacers. Bet they're as ecstatic about Fernandez over at the Mav's forum as the masses are about Hill over here.

                        Hill will be just another guy on a team that can't score at crunch time.

                        Bet the SPURS figure they got over real good with this one. To think, they were sweating losing Parker. They were that desperate.
                        Hmmmm.

                        So, you'll take Derek Fisher () Mike Bibby, Beno Udrih, Luke Ridnour, Ramon Sessions, DJ Augustin, Mo Williams, Bayless over George Hill?

                        And, the fact that he got more playing time in the playoffs than expected a couple seasons ago simply because he stepped up when Parker and others shrank means he will wilt in crunch time?

                        And you think a player that gets so pissy about playing time that he threatens to leave and play in Spain will be happy on a Mavs team that could have 2 or 3 players in front of him?

                        C'mon. George Hill isn't Chris Paul, but look what was given up. Sure, Kawhi could end up being a very good player, but we are set at the 3. Not to mention, Hill fits nicely with our team, and Bird was able to acquire him without giving up a single piece of the team that finished the second half of the season over .500 and pushed a Bulls team in every game of that series, up until game five.

                        Bird was able to add a quality player with a skill set that fits the Pacers, while still maintaining flexibility to swing trades for top talent.

                        Oh, and god forbid that Pacer fans get excited about a trade for a guy that has contributed for 2-3 years on a championship level team

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Mike Wells George Hill article

                          Random, but check out this tattoo that Hill got just a few weeks ago.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Mike Wells George Hill article

                            Originally posted by Sparhawk View Post
                            No, I'm sure most casual fans won't remember who Hill even is. I guess this could start the beginning of the grassroots campaign to get all Indiana players back to Indiana. Need to get JJ, Gordon, Oden, etc.
                            I'm not trying to call you out or say you are not a knowledgable fan just because you live in Atlanta, but you are 100% wrong.

                            I go to the IUPUI campus for business meetings and marketing purposes once in a while. They still love George Hill. He hasn't been forgotten. Maybe if he wasn't very good and in the NBA wasn't very good then he'd be forgotten about, but he's the opposite.

                            Heck even when we played the Spurs, a handful of IUPUI fans showed up to see him.

                            I was happy we got George for the way he plays alone excluding the fact that he's a born and raised Hoosier.

                            He's gotta feel extremely honored and happy. Playing for the team he grew up watching. I'm happy for him and happy for Indy and the Pacers most of all.

                            Getting George alone is going to shoot up in attendance (now I'm 100% convinced). More importantly George is a good player and we will probably see more wins which is the icing on the cake and is what will really lure the fans back. Additionally, we got everyone's attention because of making the playoffs.

                            We were at the Fieldhouse draft party last night. We were impressed with how many people showed up this year as opposed to the past. Fortunately we got our passes when we did.

                            CANNOT WAIT FOR NEXT SEASON!

                            We can finally kiss the sea empty seats goodbye and enjoy some good Pacers basketball again!

                            The Fieldhouse is where it's at Indy!
                            In 49 states it's just basketball, but this is Indiana!

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Mike Wells George Hill article

                              Originally posted by Hicks View Post
                              That's... interesting...
                              For many reasons. One, if he has never really worked that hard and still improved to the point he has what could he have been if he just worked a little harder on his ball handling?

                              And two, it's funny to me how much being in the playoffs can do for a player. I'm sure the excitement of the playoffs is what might of "pushed" him to work harder.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: Mike Wells George Hill article

                                Why do people want to trade Collison because of Hill? KEEP BOTH. I would 10x rather have DC/GH than GH/AJ get rid of Rush or Dahntay if needed and sign a decent PF.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X