Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Do you like the pick and trade?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Do you like the pick and trade?

    Originally posted by Justin Tyme View Post
    AND Rush doesn't. Tell us how Bayless sucked the last month of the year. He looks to have started to get his game together where as Rush can't get his game going.

    I'm going to be interested in seeing how Bayless progresses next season.
    Yeah, and Ike Diogu had back to back 30 point games for Sacramento a couple of years ago, statistical oddities happen. I'd like to see Bayless put up those stats for a whole season.

    Comment


    • Re: Do you like the pick and trade?

      Well, I have a boatload of work to do today so I can't take the time to read through all the posts here, though I'd love to. So, at the risk of reproducing what has already been said by others, I'll give my initial impressions.

      Hill is just another small guard for us. He is too short to be an effective SG. As a PG, he's just slightly taller than Collison. So, did we effectively trade a high prospect for a back-up PG? Looks a little like that. Or has Bird given up on Collison? If so, the Collison-Murphy trade might as well have never happened. Can Collison be moved in the offseason? Sure, but then you are relying on Hill as the starting PG and he's not a starting caliber PG. And that leaves you with Jones as your best back up PG. I love Jones as a player, but I don't feel comfortable with him as the primary back up.

      I understand Bird not wanting to bring in another young player who needs time to develop and I am a huge proponent of adding veteran presence to this young squad. However, I firmly believe there was better value to be had in exchange for Leonard that what Bird got. In reality, the trade was probably set before we picked Leonard, meaning he selected Leonard as the player San Antonio wanted, but I believe there was more to be had at that slot.

      I don't see that the team was improved in this draft. The 11-12 prospects look exactly the same now as they did pre-draft.


      Name-calling signature removed

      Comment


      • Re: Do you like the pick and trade?

        I'm kind of surprised with the split on this one.

        I mean everyone called this a weak draft, i mean it set the record for international players in the lottery. It was weak, but we enjoy talking about all the players that have some upside like they are all going to pan out. Leonard is ok, but he has 0 offense and plays a position that we don't need that much.

        In a weak draft Bird pulled out of the draft and got us the Spurs 6th man. I like hill a lot, I think he'll put a little pressure on the pacers back court to earn their minutes.

        I love the trade. If you told me we'd get George Hill with the 15th pick I would have thought you were crazy. I don't even care about Lorbek or our 2nd. Lorbek wasn't coming over and our 2nd probably would have been a career back up.

        We know Bird isn't done, there is no way we go into next year with the log jam of back court that we have right now

        Comment


        • Re: Do you like the pick and trade?

          i'm on board with George Hill. He will be our closer.
          Being unable to close out a game in which you have a comfortable lead in the 4th Q = Pulling a Frank Vogel

          Comment


          • Re: Do you like the pick and trade?

            Originally posted by Banta View Post
            Well, I have a boatload of work to do today so I can't take the time to read through all the posts here, though I'd love to. So, at the risk of reproducing what has already been said by others, I'll give my initial impressions.

            Hill is just another small guard for us. He is too short to be an effective SG. As a PG, he's just slightly taller than Collison. So, did we effectively trade a high prospect for a back-up PG? Looks a little like that. Or has Bird given up on Collison? If so, the Collison-Murphy trade might as well have never happened. Can Collison be moved in the offseason? Sure, but then you are relying on Hill as the starting PG and he's not a starting caliber PG. And that leaves you with Jones as your best back up PG. I love Jones as a player, but I don't feel comfortable with him as the primary back up.

            I understand Bird not wanting to bring in another young player who needs time to develop and I am a huge proponent of adding veteran presence to this young squad. However, I firmly believe there was better value to be had in exchange for Leonard that what Bird got. In reality, the trade was probably set before we picked Leonard, meaning he selected Leonard as the player San Antonio wanted, but I believe there was more to be had at that slot.

            I don't see that the team was improved in this draft. The 11-12 prospects look exactly the same now as they did pre-draft.
            im just going off top of my head but isnt george hill 2inches taller and 20pounds heavier then collison? 6'2 is pretty good size for a pg, but i guess if ur not 6'3-6'4 ur not elite right?...

            Comment


            • Re: Do you like the pick and trade?

              Originally posted by bhaas0532 View Post
              i'm on board with George Hill. He will be our closer.
              At first I didn't agree with this but after looking at how Hill functioned in SA I think you might be right.

              Personally i think he is less of a closer than I would like but for the cost he is pretty reasonable and we can resign him to a alright contract.

              Shot selection
              Shot
              Att.
              eFG%
              Ast'd
              Blk'd
              Pts
              Jump
              78% .488 57% 4% 6.3
              Close
              21% .602 39% 14% 2.1
              Dunk
              1% .714 40% 0% .1
              Tips
              0% .000 0% 0% .0
              Inside
              22% .607 39% 13% 2.2
              Shot clock usage
              Secs.
              Att.
              eFG%
              Ast'd
              Blk'd
              Pts
              0-10
              30% .548 36% 7% 2.7
              11-15
              25% .519 57% 6% 2.2
              16-20
              26% .479 58% 8% 2.1
              21+
              19% .504 65% 4% 1.6
              Crunch
              45% .490 61% 6% 3.7

              Comment


              • Re: Do you like the pick and trade?

                Kind of baffling how much this trade is being panned. Look, I liked Leonard, too. Was happy about that pick. But this move makes so much more sense than Leonard does at this point.

                I think this may signal the end of amy meaningful minutes for A.J. Price, and that's a good thing. Hill brings a far better defensive presence -- laughable that his 'D' was undervalued in this thread. He still may not defend Rose when the Pacers play the Bulls, but he can handle Korver and the rest of the league's more moderate PGs.

                I still fully expect the addition of another wing, too. Collison, Hill, George, Granger and TBD. Don't see how Leonard would play enough to develop, especially when ours needs at the wing are for more of a scorer.

                Comment


                • Re: Do you like the pick and trade?

                  Originally posted by MrHale View Post
                  im just going off top of my head but isnt george hill 2inches taller and 20pounds heavier then collison? 6'2 is pretty good size for a pg, but i guess if ur not 6'3-6'4 ur not elite right?...
                  Except Hill is more of a shooting guard.
                  First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Do you like the pick and trade?

                    Originally posted by MrHale View Post
                    im just going off top of my head but isnt george hill 2inches taller and 20pounds heavier then collison? 6'2 is pretty good size for a pg, but i guess if ur not 6'3-6'4 ur not elite right?...
                    Hill's 6'9 wing span is what makes up for his height and is why he can guard sg's.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Do you like the pick and trade?

                      Originally posted by Sparhawk View Post
                      Except Hill is more of a shooting guard.
                      Agreed. You can play him at PG, but you get more SG qualities out of him. Personally, when I see DC and GH, I think we have two great b/u PGs, one of which can also give you some minutes at SG, pending matchups.

                      As another poster alluded to, I do think Hill can defend some SGs effectively - i.e. Korver. Korver's finesse style of play coupled with GH's wingspan should allow it. Likewise, Hill will be a capable defender of many PGs - not elite - but solid.

                      My take is that the value of this trade will be predicated to a greater degree within the context of other moves - or lack thereof - that follow.
                      I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

                      -Emiliano Zapata

                      Comment


                      • Re: Do you like the pick and trade?

                        This trade was an incredible use of limited resources to acquire a proven player (who is just coming into his prime!) that fills the dire need of additional backcourt scoring for this team. Good luck to Leonard, Bertans and Lorbek, but none of them help us win next year. Phase 1 of rebuilding, where we suck and wait for players to come to grips with the NBA game is ending. Phase 2 is ooooon! We win now and get better by improving with the foundation that we have and adding players ready to hit the ground running to patch the holes; players like George Hill. All the Bird-haters should pack it up and head out. Over the past three years he's been as good at working the system with what he has to work with as any GM/Director of Ops in the NBA, period. Viva George Hill! Viva Pacers!

                        Comment


                        • Re: Do you like the pick and trade?

                          Originally posted by wintermute View Post
                          Yes, just Lorbek not Stanko.

                          I suspect Lorbek told Bird/Morway that he wasn't willing to leave Barca for the Pacers, and that's why we traded him. On the other hand, maybe he's more willing to move to the Spurs, and that's why the Spurs wanted his rights.
                          My guess is a little different. I think Lorbek wants to come over, but the Pacers don't want to bring both him and Stanko over, given our current core of weak rebounders. One? We can do. So it might as well be the younger, bigger one.
                          "man, PG has been really good."

                          Comment


                          • Re: Do you like the pick and trade?

                            Originally posted by GrangeRusHibbert View Post
                            Kawhi Leonard is another Julian Wright. Nice length and athleticism to be a solid rebounder and defender in the NCAA, but a lack of offense will kill his NBA hopes and dreams. I don't think too highly of George Hill, but it's a fair deal. I'm just disappointed we moved #42, too.
                            From what I've read, Leonard is a high intensity, blue-colour worker out their on the court... Wright's game on the other hand, has always been based more around skill, and the Hornet's considered him a point-forward prospect for many years, due to his supposed high basketball IQ.

                            The only real comparison between the two is length and athleticism, JuJu has had some serious confidence issues from day 1, and never possessed anywhere near the amount of competitiveness and drive as a player like Leonard.

                            Comment


                            • Re: Do you like the pick and trade?

                              George Hill is a professional & wont whine if/when he sits on the bench. He will shut up and work harder. This makes DC have to step up his game, Paul George doesn't have as much pressure on him. Danny gets a proven player to work with. Lance gets another postive influence as well.

                              I like it because the Pacers are closer to winning a playoff series next year than if we had kept Leonard.

                              Comment


                              • Re: Do you like the pick and trade?

                                Originally posted by idioteque View Post

                                I'd like to see Bayless put up those stats for a whole season.

                                It sounds you have already made up your mind Bayless will never amount to anything. If he doesn't, he can always sit on the front porch with the Rush brothers talking about how it coulda shoulda been.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X