Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Disappointing Game 5 no-call (with video)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Disappointing Game 5 no-call (with video)

    Originally posted by Dr. Hibbert View Post
    Thank you. Who the hell whines about this? If Hibbert was any kind of an NBA center, he would have attacked the rim so hard there that it couldn't have possibly been blocked.

    I'm actually embarrassed that a 7 ft center got blocked by a 6 ft point guard. It's disgraceful really.

    I don't know why people are so up in arms about this lol. First of all that really didn't have **** to do with Hibbert "Not throwing it down," Taller people just can't jump as high and aren't at all as quick off of their feet, especially Hibbert. they jumped at the same time, but with Rose actually being able to get higher than hibbert faster, Rose was able to block it before Hibbert could barely get it over the rim. It happens pretty often with tall centers really.

    It's a part of the reason why defensive backs in football are shorter. Being quick off your feet helps even with taller receivers.

    At the end of the day though, it does look embarassing lol. But really I don't think Hibbert deserves to have his aggressiveness questioned because of this..... and to the Topic: I say Rose got a completely clean block.

    EDIT: I would also like to add the fact that Hibbert was flat footed and rose was not.
    Last edited by Gold; 04-28-2011, 01:37 AM.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Disappointing Game 5 no-call (with video)

      I think that is a really really good block and there was no foul!
      ANDY: I guess it comes down to a simple choice, really. Get busy winning or get busy losing.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Disappointing Game 5 no-call (with video)

        Originally posted by Eleazar View Post
        I don't see how you can say that with decades of video evidence saying otherwise. Everyone knows it, except for a small minority of people who don't want to accept it. I can't accept that trained NBA refs cannot see what a stadium of Joe Blows can see in real time.
        Because 99% of the time those Joe Blows are wrong about the call, exhibit A being the Rose play this thread is about.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Disappointing Game 5 no-call (with video)

          Hand is part of the ball and that's the way it is in all levels. Good block by Rose, but Hibbert has to get better at finishing.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Disappointing Game 5 no-call (with video)

            It was a nice block, but everybody so far has missed that Rose touched the rim on the block. It should have been a goal tend, but I can see how the refs missed it.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Disappointing Game 5 no-call (with video)

              Originally posted by imawhat View Post
              It was a nice block, but everybody so far has missed that Rose touched the rim on the block. It should have been a goal tend, but I can see how the refs missed it.
              I am not sure if that was goaltending. His hand hit the rim from blocking Hibbert. Good no call.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Disappointing Game 5 no-call (with video)

                http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_11...av=ArticleList

                Section I-A Player Shall Not:
                a. Touch the ball or the basket ring when the ball is using the basket ring as its lower base.
                EXCEPTION: If a player near his own basket has his hand legally in contact with the ball, it is not a violation if his contact with the ball continues after the ball enters the cylinder, or if, in such action, he touches the basket.
                b. Touch the ball when it is above the basket ring and within the imaginary cylinder.
                c. For goaltending to occur, the ball, in the judgment of the official, must have a chance to score.
                d. During a field goal attempt, touch a ball after it has touched any part of the backboard above ring level, whether the ball is considered on its upward or downward flight.
                e. During a field goal attempt, touch a ball after it has touched the backboard below the ring level and while the ball is on its upward flight.
                f. Trap the ball against the face of the backboard. (To be a trapped ball, three elements must exist simultaneously. The hand, the ball and the backboard must all occur at the same time. A batted ball against the backboard is not a trapped ball.)
                g. Touch any live ball from within the playing area that is on its downward flight with an opportunity to touch the basket ring. This is considered to be a "field goal attempt" or trying for a goal.
                h. Touch the ball at any time with a hand which is through the basket ring.
                i. Vibrate the rim or backboard so as to cause the ball to make an unnatural bounce.
                PENALTY: If the violation is at the opponent's basket, the offended team is awarded two points, if the attempt is from the two point zone and three points if it is from the three point zone. The crediting of the score and subsequent procedure is the same as if the awarded score has resulted from the ball having gone through the basket, except that the official shall hand the ball to a player of the team entitled to the throw-in. If the violation is at a team's own basket, no points can be scored and the ball is awarded to the offended team at the free throw line extended on either sideline. If there is a violation by both teams, play shall be resumed by a jump ball between any two opponents at the center circle.

                All three of these occurred on the play. Rose was touching the ball and basket ring, when it briefly entered the ring, and his combination of touching the basket ring and the ball hitting it caused the goal to shake.

                I can totally see how the refs missed it. It was in traffic and you see most of on the replay above the basket, but you could still see the rim shaking.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Disappointing Game 5 no-call (with video)

                  Originally posted by imawhat View Post
                  http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_11...av=ArticleList

                  Section I-A Player Shall Not:
                  a. Touch the ball or the basket ring when the ball is using the basket ring as its lower base.
                  EXCEPTION: If a player near his own basket has his hand legally in contact with the ball, it is not a violation if his contact with the ball continues after the ball enters the cylinder, or if, in such action, he touches the basket.
                  b. Touch the ball when it is above the basket ring and within the imaginary cylinder.
                  c. For goaltending to occur, the ball, in the judgment of the official, must have a chance to score.
                  d. During a field goal attempt, touch a ball after it has touched any part of the backboard above ring level, whether the ball is considered on its upward or downward flight.
                  e. During a field goal attempt, touch a ball after it has touched the backboard below the ring level and while the ball is on its upward flight.
                  f. Trap the ball against the face of the backboard. (To be a trapped ball, three elements must exist simultaneously. The hand, the ball and the backboard must all occur at the same time. A batted ball against the backboard is not a trapped ball.)
                  g. Touch any live ball from within the playing area that is on its downward flight with an opportunity to touch the basket ring. This is considered to be a "field goal attempt" or trying for a goal.
                  h. Touch the ball at any time with a hand which is through the basket ring.
                  i. Vibrate the rim or backboard so as to cause the ball to make an unnatural bounce.
                  PENALTY: If the violation is at the opponent's basket, the offended team is awarded two points, if the attempt is from the two point zone and three points if it is from the three point zone. The crediting of the score and subsequent procedure is the same as if the awarded score has resulted from the ball having gone through the basket, except that the official shall hand the ball to a player of the team entitled to the throw-in. If the violation is at a team's own basket, no points can be scored and the ball is awarded to the offended team at the free throw line extended on either sideline. If there is a violation by both teams, play shall be resumed by a jump ball between any two opponents at the center circle.

                  All three of these occurred on the play. Rose was touching the ball and basket ring, when it briefly entered the ring, and his combination of touching the basket ring and the ball hitting it caused the goal to shake.

                  I can totally see how the refs missed it. It was in traffic and you see most of on the replay above the basket, but you could still see the rim shaking.
                  I think it could go either way. The evidence you showed makes sense, but I'm not sure if it is considered a shot when it was blocked. Doesn't really matter though since we lost by 27.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Disappointing Game 5 no-call (with video)

                    The only thing I hope comes of this, is that ROY HIBBERT, YES, YOU ROY, (if your reading), you dunk this down the bulls throat no matter who is coming into block you. Go up with explosiveness, get the ball in the circle and come down ferociously as the ref calls the AND 1.
                    "To give anything less than your best, is to sacrifice the gift." - Steve Prefontaine

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Disappointing Game 5 no-call (with video)

                      Originally posted by imawhat View Post
                      http://www.nba.com/analysis/rules_11...av=ArticleList

                      Section I-A Player Shall Not:
                      a. Touch the ball or the basket ring when the ball is using the basket ring as its lower base.
                      EXCEPTION: If a player near his own basket has his hand legally in contact with the ball, it is not a violation if his contact with the ball continues after the ball enters the cylinder, or if, in such action, he touches the basket.
                      b. Touch the ball when it is above the basket ring and within the imaginary cylinder.
                      c. For goaltending to occur, the ball, in the judgment of the official, must have a chance to score.
                      d. During a field goal attempt, touch a ball after it has touched any part of the backboard above ring level, whether the ball is considered on its upward or downward flight.
                      e. During a field goal attempt, touch a ball after it has touched the backboard below the ring level and while the ball is on its upward flight.
                      f. Trap the ball against the face of the backboard. (To be a trapped ball, three elements must exist simultaneously. The hand, the ball and the backboard must all occur at the same time. A batted ball against the backboard is not a trapped ball.)
                      g. Touch any live ball from within the playing area that is on its downward flight with an opportunity to touch the basket ring. This is considered to be a "field goal attempt" or trying for a goal.
                      h. Touch the ball at any time with a hand which is through the basket ring.
                      i. Vibrate the rim or backboard so as to cause the ball to make an unnatural bounce.
                      PENALTY: If the violation is at the opponent's basket, the offended team is awarded two points, if the attempt is from the two point zone and three points if it is from the three point zone. The crediting of the score and subsequent procedure is the same as if the awarded score has resulted from the ball having gone through the basket, except that the official shall hand the ball to a player of the team entitled to the throw-in. If the violation is at a team's own basket, no points can be scored and the ball is awarded to the offended team at the free throw line extended on either sideline. If there is a violation by both teams, play shall be resumed by a jump ball between any two opponents at the center circle.

                      All three of these occurred on the play. Rose was touching the ball and basket ring, when it briefly entered the ring, and his combination of touching the basket ring and the ball hitting it caused the goal to shake.

                      I can totally see how the refs missed it. It was in traffic and you see most of on the replay above the basket, but you could still see the rim shaking.
                      a-The ball was blocked into the rim in the first place. Also, the ball wasn't using the rim as its base at all. It was almost off the side of the rim where it's completely legal for a defender to touch it.
                      b-The ball didn't get within the cylinder.
                      i-The whole "vibrating the rim" thing just means you can't make the rim vibrate and alter a shot. It doesn't mean you can't touch it and make it vibrate ever. If someone throws up a shot, you can't pull on the rim to make it bounce. In Rose's case, what made the shot not go in, is the fact that he blocked it. He only inadvertently touched the rim after that.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Disappointing Game 5 no-call (with video)

                        I have no sympathy for Roy. He can, and should, bring that **** so hard that Rose ends up on hiss *** every time.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Disappointing Game 5 no-call (with video)

                          In my opinion, blocks rarely, if ever, are much cleaner than that, especially in the playoffs.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Disappointing Game 5 no-call (with video)

                            That was an amazing clean block. I said so when it happened and that was the turning point of the game not because of the refs but because that play pumped up the crowd and DRose's teammates.

                            As far as a goal tending call is concerned, I disagree. Rose's hand comes in contact with the ball before the ball touches the rim. In fact, Rose blocked the ball into the rim which is legal as long as the ball is not in the cylinder - and it wasn't.

                            No need to be mad at Roy about that play either. He didn't see Rose coming. If not for Rose's great timing, he would've had a very timely dunk that wouldn't pumped up the Pacers and quieted the UC crowd.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Disappointing Game 5 no-call (with video)

                              The only thing the video shows me is that Roy should spend the summer doing squats and curls on a daily basis.
                              "I mean, you'd walk into our dressing room and run into Mel Daniels holding a .45 -- it makes you wonder."

                              Bob Netolicky

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Disappointing Game 5 no-call (with video)

                                Originally posted by Eleazar View Post
                                The NBA is the only league where the underdog is always fighting an up hill battle against the other team AND the refs.

                                The only league... other than the NFL, NHL, American League, National League, NCAA in all sports (at least from the perspective of the fans of the underdog team).

                                If you don't think that people in other sports complain about not getting calls, well... you don't watch other sports. It happens a little more frequently in basketball since there are most judgment calls per minute of action, but geesh.
                                The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!).

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X