Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Sixers/Pacers postgame thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Sixers/Pacers postgame thread

    The trade rumors I believe has really gotten to rush. Face it would you go out and give 100% to a company that you knew was going to dump you as soon as they get a chance? George needs to start at the 2, start Tyler, basically increase Josh's minutes by having him be the back-up 4&5 w/o Foster. DJ, Tyler, and Paul last night seemed to me to be the only players who were still fighting towards the end. I was at the game and have been to every home game this year, what I saw last night was an embarrassment to the franchise not because we lost but because of the effort or lack thereof in the game. Had we won I would've still felt the same way. I like roy, granger, and collison, but out of those three only Roy showed up. I would rather see players who will give their all every night and lose than what I saw last night. This is Larry & David's team hope they were proud of what they saw last night.

    Comment


    • Re: Sixers/Pacers postgame thread

      Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
      No I'm not. You are combining two of my points into one when the two points are completely separate.

      Our defense was really good during the first 6 or 7 weeks of the season. Then from mid December through end of JOB's time as coach, the defense started to breakdown as the players no longer could continue playing for O'Brien, plus the team started losing and the trust and commitment to defense started to wane.

      Since Vogel has taken over the defense has continuely gotten worse and worse to the point right now where I think it is about the worst in the NBA.

      My point about Dunleavy was a separate point. Many have been critical of Mike's defense for awhile and I thought it was worth mentioning that since he's been out the defense has been terrible and getting worse by the game it seems to me
      And why make that observation unless that is the point you are trying to make? You've done it in other threads too. You like Mike and you defend him every chance you get. And that's fine, I do the same with players I like.

      But it's like me saying that since we are still scoring over 100 most of the time that Mike doesn't really help the offense.
      "Don't get caught watchin' the paint dry"

      Comment


      • Re: Sixers/Pacers postgame thread

        I think we should start Jones or George over Rush. I'm thinking Jones would be better. We need to put Rush back on the end of the bench. One of the problems we have is that Dunleavy was able to get things going at the start of the games and with him out and Rush in we all just wander around the floor at the start of the game.
        Go Pacers!

        Comment


        • Re: Sixers/Pacers postgame thread

          Dunleavy helps in that he knows where to be on the floor, on both sides of the ball, and he usually did a good job of getting there. That's his contribution.

          Of course, as we know, the problem was that even when he was in position, unless it was a jumpshot or drawing a charge, he couldn't do a whole heck of a lot while in position.

          Comment


          • Re: Sixers/Pacers postgame thread

            Originally posted by Hicks View Post
            Dunleavy helps in that he knows where to be on the floor, on both sides of the ball, and he usually did a good job of getting there. That's his contribution.

            Of course, as we know, the problem was that even when he was in position, unless it was a jumpshot or drawing a charge, he couldn't do a whole heck of a lot while in position.
            +1

            The only thing I understand about Mike, is that the team sucks defensively when he's on the floor and the team sucks defensively when he's not on the floor.

            Well and the fact that they can still put up offensive numbers, with or without him as well.

            I don't see much of a difference on either side of the ball.
            Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

            Comment


            • Re: Sixers/Pacers postgame thread

              Originally posted by BillS View Post
              From where I sat, Lance played like a rookie who never had seen an NBA court last night. I was surprised he got the second round of time instead of DC, though I'd bet it had more to do with providing some rest for others than some acknowledgment that Lance was doing well.
              Probably that DC was doing that bad.
              Danger Zone

              Comment


              • Re: Sixers/Pacers postgame thread

                Originally posted by Volginator View Post
                The trade rumors I believe has really gotten to rush. Face it would you go out and give 100% to a company that you knew was going to dump you as soon as they get a chance? .
                For the money he's making I'd clean their toilets and give my boss a swedish massage on the way out the door.
                Danger Zone

                Comment


                • Re: Sixers/Pacers postgame thread

                  Mike being out of the lineup has very little to do with the defensive struggles. Individually, our starters just aren't very good defensive players. Collison gets abused almost on every play, consistently allowing penetration. Our post defense is remarkably soft. Josh can sweep in for some nice help side blocks and Roy can use his length well when he jumps straight up to disrupt some shots, but one-on-one? The opposing post player can score every time. Danny doesn't seem engaged at all. Rush is the only one I trust to defend his man well.

                  Yes, we miss Dun's rotating and drawing charges, but if 4 out of 5 of our starters struggle to guard their man one-on-one, then it's not surprising that there will be breakdowns.

                  It sounds weird after how much we criticized O'Brien, but I think he performed a miracle by getting this team to be even average defensively considering the personnel. It's even more of a miracle when you consider he started Dunleavy so often, making every single starter a weak one-on-one defender for their own individual reasons, and yet the team was still average in the league.
                  2015, 2016, 2019 IKL Fantasy Basketball Champions - DC Dreamers

                  Comment


                  • Re: Sixers/Pacers postgame thread

                    Originally posted by Kuq_e_Zi91 View Post
                    It sounds weird after how much we criticized O'Brien, but I think he performed a miracle by getting this team to be even average defensively considering the personnel. It's even more of a miracle when you consider he started Dunleavy so often, making every single starter a weak one-on-one defender for their own individual reasons, and yet the team was still average in the league.
                    No one was complaining about his defensive schemes.

                    If basketball was like football, I doubt many would have a problem hiring Jimmy as a DC.

                    EDIT: The fall in the plan, for wanting Jim gone, was that the defense would remain strong.

                    A horrible assumption in the present time.
                    Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Sixers/Pacers postgame thread

                      Originally posted by Since86 View Post
                      No one was complaining about his defensive schemes.
                      Yes they were, seriously they really were

                      Comment


                      • Re: Sixers/Pacers postgame thread

                        Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                        Yes they were, seriously they really were
                        Yeah I remember that too. At one point wasn't that one of the main things people complained about with Obie?

                        Comment


                        • Re: Sixers/Pacers postgame thread

                          Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                          Yes they were, seriously they really were
                          What were the specific complaints?

                          We complained about the contradiction between his offensive scheme (taking long open jump shots) and his defenseive scheme (forcing long jump shots).

                          We complained about his rotations, and who he used to execute those schemes.

                          But I don't recall anyone being upset at the defensive scheme when it comes to defensive rotations, as opposed to player rotations.
                          Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

                          Comment


                          • Re: Sixers/Pacers postgame thread

                            Originally posted by Since86 View Post
                            What were the specific complaints?

                            We complained about the contradiction between his offensive scheme (taking long open jump shots) and his defenseive scheme (forcing long jump shots).

                            We complained about his rotations, and who he used to execute those schemes.

                            But I don't recall anyone being upset at the defensive scheme when it comes to defensive rotations, as opposed to player rotations.

                            The complaint was that the defensive system over-rotated, allowing weakside open shots. Hicks complaied about it in this thread today.

                            I remember having several discussions with posters about how the scheme is fine as it is similar to what the Celtics were running.

                            I said the problem wasn't the scheme it was that the players (until the start of this season) never fully bought into it.

                            Comment


                            • Re: Sixers/Pacers postgame thread

                              Some things I saw from last nights game.

                              Our whole offense with the first unit is basically an isolation. Whenever we throw the ball down to Roy in the post the whole team goes away from the basket. This leaves nobody to get an offensive rebound. We have 3 people on the wing and the 4 is out of position to make the rebound.

                              When DC is in, our offense is based around 1 on 1. His shoot first mentality cripples the offense. Each time he distributes the ball the person will have to create his own shot. Granger is terrible at this, Rush for some reason freaks out, Mcbob hesitates. It seems like once either dg or hibb get the ball everyone sits around and waits for them to score.

                              Why the hell doesnt PG get more shots? He is the only one on this team that I feel comfortable with when driving to the lane. As of now he basically sits in the corner waiting for the the dish out for the 3. Why? He has struggled the majority of the season with his 3pt shot. He is most affective when he has the ball at the top of the key with space to drive on his defender. His shot creating ability needs to be incorporated into the offense. I dont know if the problem is his unselfishness or the players around him. The second unit is made of very selfish ball dominant players. DJ thinks hes kobe and takes ridiculous shots. Price shoots way to much. Hansbrough doesnt even look to pass once he has the ball in the post. Somehow Vogel needs to get the ball in PGs hands. DJ needs a reality check and be reminded that he was brought to this team for defense not offense.

                              Lance needs to be more under control but overall I like him as a player. His court vision is second to known on the team. Simply he can makes passes that DC cant. Players around him seem to be more energized when hes in.
                              The Brawl set our franchise back years but it was a hell of a lot fun to watch!

                              Comment


                              • Re: Sixers/Pacers postgame thread

                                Originally posted by NewEra View Post
                                Some things I saw from last nights game.

                                Our whole offense with the first unit is basically an isolation. Whenever we throw the ball down to Roy in the post the whole team goes away from the basket. This leaves nobody to get an offensive rebound. We have 3 people on the wing and the 4 is out of position to make the rebound.

                                When DC is in, our offense is based around 1 on 1. His shoot first mentality cripples the offense. Each time he distributes the ball the person will have to create his own shot. Granger is terrible at this, Rush for some reason freaks out, Mcbob hesitates. It seems like once either dg or hibb get the ball everyone sits around and waits for them to score.

                                Why the hell doesnt PG get more shots? He is the only one on this team that I feel comfortable with when driving to the lane. As of now he basically sits in the corner waiting for the the dish out for the 3. Why? He has struggled the majority of the season with his 3pt shot. He is most affective when he has the ball at the top of the key with space to drive on his defender. His shot creating ability needs to be incorporated into the offense. I dont know if the problem is his unselfishness or the players around him. The second unit is made of very selfish ball dominant players. DJ thinks hes kobe and takes ridiculous shots. Price shoots way to much. Hansbrough doesnt even look to pass once he has the ball in the post. Somehow Vogel needs to get the ball in PGs hands. DJ needs a reality check and be reminded that he was brought to this team for defense not offense.

                                Lance needs to be more under control but overall I like him as a player. His court vision is second to known on the team. Simply he can makes passes that DC cant. Players around him seem to be more energized when hes in.
                                I agree with you on your first point. When we go into Roy, he takes his hook and everyone hopes for the best. McRoberts for a while was getting some putbacks on Roy's misses, but the last time I can remember it happening was eons ago. I just have this foggy memory of it happening. I may have been fantasizing.

                                DC2 is supposed to be running pick and rolls and pick and pops as part of our new "smash mouth" style. It takes two guys to do a pick and roll. Our picks for DC2 kind of suck and our "rolls" and "pops" are sort of non-existent. I'd call our offense with DC2 mostly an "attempted pick" followed usually by an errant pass. When your starting point guard only has 1 assist in 21 minutes of play, there's something wrong with your "pick and roll". We don't do it right. We do pickle relish on a hot dog bun. Pickin' and a grinnin'. Picking your nose. What we do isn't a pick and roll.

                                Of late Rush has been doing his famous impersonation of Claude Raines (cinema's first "Invisible Man"). You never know he's there. You think he might be sometimes, but you are never sure. He fades in and then fades out. I'm hoping someone will wrap him in bandages like Claude so we can see him out there. So we can see him do something, particularly offensively.

                                DG's thing a few months ago was "I don't worry about my offense. That's always there. Now I'm working on my defense. I want to be on the NBA All-Defensive Team". Now we're worrying about offense and that "All Defensive Team" thing I thought I heard talk about has now also become sort of lost in the fog of memory. Maybe he said it, or maybe not. I'm not sure anymore. I must have been hallucinating when I heard it. I've watched too many players blowing by him lately so I'm not sure. I probably imagined it. I'm a sick puppy.

                                And Paul George getting shots? Not his role. No plays for PG. We don't run plays for him. Rather, his role is to improvise. "Quick! Here's a fishbowl, Paul. Do something with it. Put it on your head. Throw it up in the air! See, you're a spaceman! Now you're a juggler!"

                                Our "team defense" is a strange scheme designed by a madman/savant (ex-coach Jim O'Brien). It's aim is to apparently double-team whatever opposing player has the ball as quickly and as often as possible (whether they pose a scoring threat or not) and then arrive late or not arrive at all when the doubled player kicks out to a teammate on the wing standing open, ready for a "J" behind the 3-point line. It has lots of crafty zone principles. I've wondered if we'd be better off just playing a stationary zone or perhaps just play a simple man-to-man sans the "help" but that seems too logical. And what do I know? Better to make late, crazy, ineffective runs at the guy that just launched the uncontested jump shot seconds before. Perhaps fate will smile on us and he will miss! That's our defense. A double-down low followed by a prayer.

                                Passing? Ha! Who needs passing? What's that? Passing was certainly never in Tyler's or in Dahntay's ACC playbook. Shooting's the story. Not passing. Passing's not a North Carolina / Duke/ ACC thing apparently. Accept it. Live with it. Say nothing about it. Who needs assists? Who needs ball distribution? Who needs unpredictability? Give them a pass and watch the shot go up. They're pretty good shooters. They hit a lot of them. Don't worry.

                                Oddly, Lance can and does pass and actually has been seen on occasion, shockingly, to dole out that rarest of Pacers gems, an assist. (He didn't play at Duke or NC in college and eschews the "pick and roll"). When not assisting, he likes to engage in merry bouts of creative dribbling - a la Curley Neal, always entertaining exhibitions, seemingly designed to result in unfortunate takeaways, usually at the hands of small pesky quick handed guards, followed by an ineffectual foul incurred in trying to get the ball back. No matter. Tis just the growing pains of a rookie.

                                But all this will pass. We are young. It is all part of our youth. Ah, youth.

                                Pass me the bottle.

                                I know. I rant. But I do it here at PD. Not in Area 55, where I will chant and be squarely behind every one of the above guys that, for some strange, crazy reason, I have come to love. Because these are just their flaws. They are also capable of brilliance and, sometimes, I have seen them do brilliant things. This gives me hope. I have not lost hope.

                                Rant away!!!!!!
                                Last edited by IndyHoya; 03-10-2011, 04:54 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X