Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Hollinger's All-2012 Team Features Hansbroughand George

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Hollinger's All-2012 Team Features Hansbroughand George

    Since alot of you are talking about Rush, I'm curious, Do anyone actually know why he doesn't try harder. Has he ever been asked this question in a interview?

    He has the skillls and a good shot...I just don't get it.

    I like Rush alot, when I first seen him he reminded me of a young "Big Smooth". Especially the hair style he was sporting and sleepy eyes.
    Garbage players get 1st round picks, (WTF)! All of the NBA must hate the Pacers! LOL

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Hollinger's All-2012 Team Features Hansbroughand George

      Some players are just naturally passive, it's an expression of his personality on the floor. He's a nice complimentary piece, as he knows his role, and has been on winners before. The problem is that the pacers would be better off if he had the aggression to match his physical tools. The fans see this and resent what is percieved as a blatant lack of effort, whereas I think that rush could really thrive on a team that didn't need him to assert himself as one of the top offensive options.
      Goodbye Captain, My Captain. I wish you had the chance to sink or swim with your ship on its quest for the "ship".

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Hollinger's All-2012 Team Features Hansbroughand George

        Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
        *Snipped rant*
        Tyler's played 79 career games; Brandon's played 204.

        If Hansbrough's still the exact same player 200 games into his career, I assure you that Pacer fans wont be nearly so forgiving of his flaws. Likewise, I'm sure "Brandon haters" were far easier on him earlier on in his career when there was still hope that he'd fully realize his potential. He has not.

        Also, as has been mentioned, most fans appreciate the hustle and energy Tyler plays with, which is in stark contrast with the impression most have of Rush as a pothead with a lazy─almost apathetic─demeanor.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Hollinger's All-2012 Team Features Hansbroughand George

          Yea, I get all that, I'm just wondering if he has ever been asked that question in a interview. You know, get put on the spot in the public eye.
          Garbage players get 1st round picks, (WTF)! All of the NBA must hate the Pacers! LOL

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Hollinger's All-2012 Team Features Hansbroughand George

            No interviewer would be that rude, rush would just say that he gives 100 percent all the time and that interviewer wouldn't get any more scoops from him at least.
            Goodbye Captain, My Captain. I wish you had the chance to sink or swim with your ship on its quest for the "ship".

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Hollinger's All-2012 Team Features Hansbroughand George

              Well, we need to get Geraldo Rivera to interview him live. He would ask the hard questions.
              Garbage players get 1st round picks, (WTF)! All of the NBA must hate the Pacers! LOL

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Hollinger's All-2012 Team Features Hansbroughand George

                Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                BTW, on a totally different angle we've got the long line of ***** ****** who think that Rush is some disaster on offense in comparison to Dunleavy. Rush being unaggressive or a poor shooter or something.
                .
                It is a real pleasure to watch Rush pass up shots when we're behind double digit points and then finally take a 3 pointer when he's so wide open because why bother to defend a guy who doesn't shoot. Last game he took the same number of shots or one less than foster. That helps but of course everyone who isn't a Rush fan is ***** ******.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Hollinger's All-2012 Team Features Hansbroughand George

                  Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post

                  43% from a PF is HORRIBLE. Not kinda bad. Like out of the NBA bad. Unless you are 3pt type PF. Guys like Dale or Tony Davis were 50%+ types. This is because most PFs are able to supplement their regular shooting with power dunks or scores at the rim.

                  So Hansbrough is shooting 43% when his career games played is equivalent to a full rookie season. Big deal. There is plenty of time for him to improve. If he's shooting 43% in his 8th season like Jermaine O'Neal did (03-04) then maybe I'll be concerned. An alleged Super Star PF shooting 43% in his "prime". Now that's horrible.
                  Last edited by Sollozzo; 03-08-2011, 07:42 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Hollinger's All-2012 Team Features Hansbroughand George

                    Everyone, including Hollinger, recognizes that Tyler needs to improve his shooting percentage.

                    On the other hand, most people also recognize that all shots are not created equal. Most players, especially post players, are going to sacrifice shooting % when their attempts increase. Switch Josh and Tyler in the lineups, tell Tyler to only score on garbage baskets and Josh to shoot the ball 12 times a night and see what happens to those numbers.

                    I hope that nobody changes their opinions and interests in players because you think they should be picking their favorite players based on TS%. I don't give a **** if Tyler shoots 35% from the field or Monta Ellis can't play a lick of defense or Foster's jumpshot looks like it was ejected out of a cannon. They are still my favorite players, irrespective of their faults.

                    People like Tyler because he brings it every night. These same people are probably inclined to dislike the nightly apathy and tentative play out of Rush.

                    I know you understand this because you're in love with Josh because he can dribble behind his back and throw a no-look pass on the break and jump out of the gym despite the fact that some of his production statistics are unflattering.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Hollinger's All-2012 Team Features Hansbroughand George

                      Originally posted by Adam1987 View Post
                      So Hansbrough is shooting 43% when his career games played is equivalent to a full rookie season. Big deal. There is plenty of time for him to improve. If he's shooting 43% in his 8th season like Jermaine O'Neal did (03-04) then maybe I'll be concerned. An alleged Super Star PF shooting 43% in his "prime". Now that's horrible.
                      Yeah. Kind of hilarious that in his "closest he ever got to being MVP" season, Jermaine put up what is now described as an 'out of the league bad' FG%.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Hollinger's All-2012 Team Features Hansbroughand George

                        Just to jump in the new Brandon vs Tyler debate.. which is so nice since it's not a Josh vs Tyler debate.

                        There is one huge difference between the two players besides all the stats and what not. Tyler WANTS to take over the game. He WANTS to be the difference maker. Rush, while solid, just wants to do as little as possible on offense, almost as if his thought process is this... "damn they passed it to me, now I gotta go pull some crap out of my ***... or maybe I'll miss a shot! eek! I better try to pass it!"

                        Brandon is very mouse-like... a damn big barrel chested mouse, but that is what I see in his demeanor.

                        Now, I am not a hater, I like Brandon, but he is what he is. He is a role player who wants to defer. He plays solid D usually and he can be a really good 3pt assassin. He is a role player every team needs, they don't get paid much and they bring necessary skills that you need with bench players.

                        Tyler is a leader and has the eye of the tiger.

                        That's the difference and why they aren't equal in value to our club.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Hollinger's All-2012 Team Features Hansbroughand George

                          Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post

                          Yet people love Tyler drawing points and lament Rush passing up shots, as if that is a bad thing. For all of Tyler's aggressive play and foul drawing, he's not as efficient as Rush is at scoring the ball.



                          Rush shot 2-2 last night for a wussy 4 points, but thank God he didn't hurt his efficiency rating......

                          I don't care about some efficiency statistic. I care that my starting SG has no aggression whatsoever when it comes to scoring the basketball. It seems he can barely put up double digits which is awful.

                          Forgive us for being more patient Hansbrough, a guy who is still basically a rookie if you go by career games played, than we are with Rush, someone who is in his third season and has had opportunity after opportunity to reach his potential but hasn't.

                          Something people forget with Hansbrough is that the dude couldn't practice all summer. Never discount how important working in the summer is, especially for young players. The guy pretty much lost his rookie season AND the summer after it. That's HUGE.

                          We all know Tyler will be in the gym working his tail off every day this summer. I know I can't wait to see him next year with a full summer of work under his belt.
                          Last edited by Sollozzo; 03-09-2011, 08:19 AM.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Hollinger's All-2012 Team Features Hansbroughand George

                            [QUOTE=Naptown_Seth;1187995]
                            Yet people love Tyler drawing points and lament Rush passing up shots, as if that is a bad thing. For all of Tyler's aggressive play and foul drawing, he's not as efficient as Rush is at scoring the ball.



                            QUOTE]




                            You can throw out all the fancy statistics you want,at the end of the day we are starting a shooting guard who refuses to shoot.We start a powerforward that is not asked to score but to do the other little things like provide energy, rebound ,defense and score off garbage points you are now essentially playing 3 on 5 on the offensive end.Starting one guy who doesn't look to shoot the ball is fine but it's hard for teams to start two guys like that and expect to outscore your opponents.Brandon Rush by not looking to shoot the basketball makes it tougher on Roy and Danny to get good shots.

                            Nobody is saying Brandon Rush needs to take 15 shots a game, it would be nice just once in a while if our starting two guard would be a threat to shoot the basketball.It may make Rush's defender think twice to come help out on Roy or Danny.
                            Last edited by nyballer31; 03-09-2011, 10:16 AM.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Hollinger's All-2012 Team Features Hansbroughand George

                              Originally posted by nyballer31 View Post
                              It may make Rush's defender think twice to come help out on Roy or Danny.
                              Please find me an example of this happening. I watch closely for this kind of stuff, and it pretty much never, ever happens.

                              Rush may not shoot enough to satisfy a majority of people, but he's too good a shooter to be left alone. NBA coaches know this, so his defender almost never helps. He's almost always being guarded closely, that's probably why he doesn't shoot much. The few times his man does help out, result in him getting open looks, and those are the only shots he takes.

                              Conventional basketball wisdom says contested shots are bad shots. Rush is just reluctant to take bad shots. That isn't a bad thing.

                              We need our scorers to score. Not Rush.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Hollinger's All-2012 Team Features Hansbroughand George

                                Originally posted by BRushWithDeath View Post
                                I don't know where the ridiculous notion that because Tyler is fouled a lot it hurts his shooting percentage. It actually helps it. A ton. If you are fouled on a shot attempt, it only counts as a shot attempt if you make it. If you miss and are fouled it is not an attempt.
                                I could be wrong but I thought what he was saying is that Tyler is aggressively looking to attack and either score or draw the foul. Sometimes he fails to do both - meaning he either misses a makeable shot or he is fouled and there is no whistle and he misses the shot.

                                At least he's being aggressive. Brandon Rush should be coming off the bench. He's hurting the Pacers out there more than he helps them because he doesn't do nearly enough positive on the offensive end of the floor and his defense has regressed as well.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X