Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

So What Are Your Expectations For The Pacers?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Re: So What Are Your Expectations For The Pacers?

    Originally posted by 90'sNBARocked View Post
    How about simply looking at a win loss record that has gotten worse in three consecutive years?

    Now we are only looking at facts, not opinoins
    If you have to drag us into yet another Job thread, get your facts straight! The Pacers did not have a won lost record that got worse three years in a row!

    I know I'm splitting hairs but you're the one that was stating facts, and you were wrong!
    Last edited by Will Galen; 10-12-2010, 04:35 PM.

    Comment


    • #77
      Re: So What Are Your Expectations For The Pacers?

      Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
      So for those that keep saying that JOB did not have the right players to win, please tell me how many more years you think he needs? two more? Five more? Ten?
      Bill I know you keep Talking about the pacers maybe leaving in two years, do you really think that by the pacers sticking with Jim this is going to change? the fan base is tired of his bs and even if the record is not 100% his fault at the end nobody is gonna go to the fieldhouse and buy tickets making it easier for the pacers to leave.
      @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

      Comment


      • #78
        Re: So What Are Your Expectations For The Pacers?

        [QUOTE=90'sNBARocked;1073540]
        Originally posted by BillS View Post
        It's the players that have to execute. How can you have improvement WITHOUT the players?


        Bill ,

        You and I both know that there has been plenty of examples in all sports were the only change from the prior season was the coach, yet they expereienced a dramtic turn around in their record

        True?
        Sure. And sometimes they get one key player and they experienced a dramatic turnaround in their record.

        Just because you have lots of factors doesn't mean they are always non-zero. And just because you have examples where all factors but one are 0 doesn't mean they are always 0.

        So, if this boils down to the idea that you think, absent any coaching influence, the teams would have been better (or at worst the same) every year, then fine. I definitely disagree, but that's why it's an opinion.

        Where we are arguing here is some general idea that every team will be the same or better every year and anything that disturbs it must be a coaching influence. I simply can't accept that. There are too many factors.
        BillS

        A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
        Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

        Comment


        • #79
          Re: So What Are Your Expectations For The Pacers?

          Originally posted by Dr. Awesome View Post
          Honestly, I expect O'Brien to ruin the season like he has the last 3 years.
          I was on a LA Lakers forum a few days ago. I was curious to see what fans from a knowledgeable fanbase thought about our team. Many users posted positive comments about Roy Hibbert, and some shared their opinion that Jim O'Brien is the Pacer's greatest obstacle.

          I hope Jim O'Brien proves many spectators and fans wrong. I feel like he has the tools to compete this season. There is little to no room for an excuse about "why" we won't make the playoffs this year. If you disagree with that point simply look around. There are teams with less talent than the Pacers who make the playoffs.

          Comment


          • #80
            Re: So What Are Your Expectations For The Pacers?

            Originally posted by BillS View Post
            So substitute any first year coach and the premise is identical. IF the record is EXACTLY the same, how do you know if it is the roster or the new coach? You would probably assume it is the new coach, which is why as a potential new coach I stay so far away from that I wouldn't see it with the Hubble Telescope.
            What are you talking about? You're getting way off base.

            Originally posted by BillS View Post
            Who would we have picked up for a single year? Who would want to take the team not knowing who would be GM if he signed a multi-year contract and therefore not know what players he'd have to work with after his first year?

            As I've said, there are more reasons than just that bottom line.

            The real irony is that I don't particularly care for JOB as a coach, but the circumstances aren't such that there were better or more effective coaches waiting in the wings without other highly probably disadvantages or problems.
            That's your original post that started it off.

            Hiring Mark Jackson, as an example, of saying I would have been willing to see what a first year coach could do was answering your question about who would you get to coach the team when they didn't know who was going to be on the roster.

            If Mark Jackson, or another coach, isn't making progress in areas you want to see, then fire them. That's why I said a cheap two year deal.



            Jim O'Brien isn't, and never was, the long term solution. At some point in time you have to turn the page and start looking for just that. A long term solution.

            EDIT: And I think that time is now, or definately at the end of this season. While I can't stand Jim as the coach, I don't really care to see him fired right this moment. I don't like the way he coaches, because it's pretty opposite of what I would like to see, and what I think the next coach will do. He's not really developing players, he's trying to force them into his style of basketball, and his style isn't what they need to be doing in order to get better.

            I want to see a coach try and better his players during transition periods, and that's exactly what the Pacers have been doing. Transitioning or rebuilding, whatever you want to call it.

            Emphasis should have been on player development from day 1. Not just strict wins and losses. If another coach came in and gave a lot of time to AJ last year, and it resulted in 3 or 4 less wins, I would have been a lot happier about the situation.

            Instead we got a coach telling us how great he was in practice, then we get to see him perform pretty well on the court, only to go back to the bench later with a quote of "now we know what we got."

            Well we would have known back in Jan. or earlier if you would have played him then, instead of freaking March and April.

            You guys can talk about Wins/Losses like they paint the picture of a successful season all you want. No one would have won a lot of basketball games with that roster last year, and I think it's dumb to argue over that point alone like it would have made a difference.

            The Pacers were in no position to be competitive. And if they can't be competitive I want them working on the future of the franchise.

            I don't care about today, I care about tomorrow. Who cares if we squeak into the playoffs and get swept in the first round? What a great accomplishment. Congrats.
            Last edited by Since86; 10-12-2010, 04:39 PM.
            Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

            Comment


            • #81
              Re: So What Are Your Expectations For The Pacers?

              I edited this part to another one of my posts on page 3... but I highly doubt it gets noticed anymore. And this was the whole point of the article, so here we go:

              As for my expectations... I may as well be consistent in every thread... 44-38 record. And in what is sure to be a wild year in the East this year, an 8 seed. I want the Heat. Sooooo badly.
              Danny - I expect him to MAN THE EFF UP and play. Both sides of the ball.
              Roy - If he can be anything close to what most of expect he can be this year, we'll be set at the C for quite a few years. 18 ppg 8 rpg (needs to improve) 1.7 bpg
              DC - Screw what people (coaches) say. Play YOUR game. Get after your man on D and YOU set the pace for US. Not for the opponent.
              Paul G - Why won't that shot fall? It looks sooo smooth and easy. I do expect to round out our rotation my the all-star break.
              McRob - I'll admit it. I'm a huge fan. But why isn't EVERYONE? Hans looked good in that ONE preseason game... but I still think Josh can do everything Hans can except better. He's just off doing things Tyler can't when everyone is expecting him to be posted up down low
              Dun Dun - He's gonna make us go. Danny can be danny. Roy can be Roy. Darren can be... well you get it. As long as Mike is Mike. Smooth. Consistent. Smart. You can't double anyone or sag off Mike if he's hittin the sweet mid-range game. Look out if he gets that 3 going...
              Reggie Miller is a God. Period.

              Passion. Pride. Pacers.

              It's ALWAYS Miller Time.
              #31 & Only

              Comment


              • #82
                Re: So What Are Your Expectations For The Pacers?

                Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
                Bill I know you keep Talking about the pacers maybe leaving in two years, do you really think that by the pacers sticking with Jim this is going to change? the fan base is tired of his bs and even if the record is not 100% his fault at the end nobody is gonna go to the fieldhouse and buy tickets making it easier for the pacers to leave.
                My reasons for being concerned about the future of the team are more complex than the coaching.

                However, I seem to remember that 2 years ago there was, in fact, an increase in excitement because the team was in nearly every game and was competitive down to the end.

                Last year was a step backward. I don't blame it all on JOB. It cut the momentum.

                I don't think most of the fan base knows enough about JOB's actual coaching to know if he is at fault or if someone else is at fault. They just blame the coach because that's what you do. It is the reason why I get so embroiled in the arguments here when folks trot out the old sound bite criticisms, that "JOB's offense consists of jacking up 3 point shots" and "JOB never wants his players to play defense". On this forum, we should be better than that. We should be able to be more specific, to recognize when things seem to be different instead of jumping to the same old conclusions from drastically different data points.

                No, keeping JOB is not the way to keep the team here. However, firing JOB and replacing him without doing anything else isn't going to do that, either.
                BillS

                A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                Comment


                • #83
                  Re: So What Are Your Expectations For The Pacers?

                  I don't want to jump into the fray here but IMO Jim is just Jim. An average coach with an average record.

                  I could come up with a million reasons why coaches with losing records should be kept if results are on the table. Results like player development or a superior offensive and defensive schemes or maybe just great scouting and preparation.

                  I just don't see that many reasons why Jim should be the coach of the Pacers. I could be wrong but if Collison's game regresses and this team once again fails I am not going to blame it on Jim not having enough talent. IMO we have the talent to win 40+ games.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Re: So What Are Your Expectations For The Pacers?

                    Originally posted by Since86 View Post
                    Hiring Mark Jackson, as an example, of saying I would have been willing to see what a first year coach could do was answering your question about who would you get to coach the team when they didn't know who was going to be on the roster.

                    If Mark Jackson, or another coach, isn't making progress in areas you want to see, then fire them. That's why I said a cheap two year deal.



                    Jim O'Brien isn't, and never was, the long term solution. At some point in time you have to turn the page and start looking for just that. A long term solution.
                    OK, I answered one question with my answer to another question. The problem is that trying to simplify this thing is what causes people to get crazy.

                    I'll try to answer why I think those guys weren't available.

                    First, I stand by my idea that we can talk all we want to about hiring a first year coach, but we have no evidence that one would take the job. My rationale for why they would not is exactly as I stated.

                    Second, a 2-year deal vs a 1-year deal is part of the issue. If Bird goes and by extension most of the FO goes in the middle of a 2-year contract, that leaves the coach in a very precarious position. Again, I think that makes it less likely that you get a new coach.

                    Third, anyone with a lick of sense is going to look at the situation and know that it is one that is difficult to succeed in. In this position you would have to make a drastic improvement with a team that really doesn't look like it will do that. A new coach, without experience, isn't likely to come into the league and both learn the ropes AND revolutionize things his first year.


                    We can say over and over "well, if this guy or that guy was available I'd hire him" but we don't know he was. However, so many of these arguments seem to proceed from the premise that they WERE available.

                    Now, the other part of the question, which is that I would not hire them because I don't think they'd be more effective and I would have no way to evaluate them if they weren't significantly more effective. Which fixed the problem, a new coach or having Darren Collison? Which didn't fix the problem, a new coach or Danny Granger getting injured?
                    BillS

                    A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                    Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Re: So What Are Your Expectations For The Pacers?

                      I only stand by one point, and that is why should we not expect to see progress after 3 years of coaching the team?

                      Why, even if there are 150 excuses, should a coach not be held accountable to improve the record after 3 years ?

                      Obrien came on board with Troy and Mike already on the team. There have been players added and players removed alll role players at best, but we didnt have a radical makeover nor traded away a star player

                      So why should we not expect improvement after 3 years of chances to improvce the team?
                      Sittin on top of the world!

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Re: So What Are Your Expectations For The Pacers?

                        I expect them to at least challenge for the last playoff spot, and not one of those seasons where we suck the whole year long and decide to win 9 of 12 to close out the season and finish 2 games behind. I want us to be in the mix all year long. If they enter all-star break 10 games under .500, then I expect the coach will not be JOB the following week. I dont' care if Dan Burke is named interm coach at that point.
                        You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Re: So What Are Your Expectations For The Pacers?

                          Originally posted by BillS View Post
                          OK, I answered one question with my answer to another question. The problem is that trying to simplify this thing is what causes people to get crazy.

                          I'll try to answer why I think those guys weren't available.

                          First, I stand by my idea that we can talk all we want to about hiring a first year coach, but we have no evidence that one would take the job. My rationale for why they would not is exactly as I stated.

                          Second, a 2-year deal vs a 1-year deal is part of the issue. If Bird goes and by extension most of the FO goes in the middle of a 2-year contract, that leaves the coach in a very precarious position. Again, I think that makes it less likely that you get a new coach.

                          Third, anyone with a lick of sense is going to look at the situation and know that it is one that is difficult to succeed in. In this position you would have to make a drastic improvement with a team that really doesn't look like it will do that. A new coach, without experience, isn't likely to come into the league and both learn the ropes AND revolutionize things his first year.


                          We can say over and over "well, if this guy or that guy was available I'd hire him" but we don't know he was. However, so many of these arguments seem to proceed from the premise that they WERE available.

                          Now, the other part of the question, which is that I would not hire them because I don't think they'd be more effective and I would have no way to evaluate them if they weren't significantly more effective. Which fixed the problem, a new coach or having Darren Collison? Which didn't fix the problem, a new coach or Danny Granger getting injured?

                          Well **** it then. Jim O'Brien will be the coach for as long as there is an Indiana Pacers team, or until he decides to step down.

                          Because there will not be one season where there isn't injuries, players just don't play consistantly, or whatever other excuse you can come up with.

                          I know that's not what you're saying, but my point still stands. It will always come down to a "is it the coach or is it XXXX reason?"

                          I don't blame Jim for not having a good PG. I never will. I will blame him for how he handled AJ. I'm not dumb enough to suggest AJ would have put them in the playoffs.


                          The question is this "Is Jim O'Brien the coach you want when the team gets the players in order to be competitive?" My answer is no. And while the next coach might not be the answer either, you still have to make the switch to find out. You can't hide back on the excuse that you just don't know what you will get, or that there might not be another coach. There will always be another coach.

                          Jim isn't the answer, and because he isn't the answer, it's time to move on.
                          Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Re: So What Are Your Expectations For The Pacers?

                            Originally posted by Since86 View Post
                            Jim O'Brien isn't, and never was, the long term solution. At some point in time you have to turn the page and start looking for just that. A long term solution.

                            EDIT: And I think that time is now, or definately at the end of this season. While I can't stand Jim as the coach, I don't really care to see him fired right this moment. I don't like the way he coaches, because it's pretty opposite of what I would like to see, and what I think the next coach will do. He's not really developing players, he's trying to force them into his style of basketball, and his style isn't what they need to be doing in order to get better.

                            I want to see a coach try and better his players during transition periods, and that's exactly what the Pacers have been doing. Transitioning or rebuilding, whatever you want to call it.

                            Emphasis should have been on player development from day 1. Not just strict wins and losses. If another coach came in and gave a lot of time to AJ last year, and it resulted in 3 or 4 less wins, I would have been a lot happier about the situation.

                            Instead we got a coach telling us how great he was in practice, then we get to see him perform pretty well on the court, only to go back to the bench later with a quote of "now we know what we got."

                            Well we would have known back in Jan. or earlier if you would have played him then, instead of freaking March and April.

                            You guys can talk about Wins/Losses like they paint the picture of a successful season all you want. No one would have won a lot of basketball games with that roster last year, and I think it's dumb to argue over that point alone like it would have made a difference.

                            The Pacers were in no position to be competitive. And if they can't be competitive I want them working on the future of the franchise.

                            I don't care about today, I care about tomorrow. Who cares if we squeak into the playoffs and get swept in the first round? What a great accomplishment. Congrats.
                            I'll answer this separately instead of as an edit, and it will take me back to another rehash of old posts.

                            First, I think this should be JOB's last year no matter how he does. If he continues to fail, the reason should be obvious. If he succeeds, it means to me that we are ready for the next step and I don't think he's the coach for that next step.

                            To the rest of it, I just fall back on my old line that you don't teach players how to win by putting them into a position to be clobbered.

                            You don't teach players to respect ability by benching it in favor of someone just because they are younger.

                            Now, if you argue that the players who should have been being developed were in fact the better players, I am not sure I completely disagree. Certainly I think Troy got too many minutes, and I wish I understood what JOB means when he talks about "good in practice" because it doesn't seem to match most people's expectations.

                            The bottom line is that they are things to disagree with JOB about in the course of his coaching. I don't think, however, that they mean he failed to develop anyone or that he ruined anyone. One could make the argument that the reason so many of our players came into this season looking different and with different skillsets that they worked in the offseason was BECAUSE of the way they were brought along last year, and that they were given lots of opportunities to see what they needed. Rather than being subjected to it over and over, they were able to be put into situations where they built some confidence and had a single goal.

                            Could another coach have done it differently? I don't know, but I see few coaches in the NBA who play rookies heavily who don't step onto the court as top-3 draft picks or fillers of immediate needs. Certainly no coach of the Pacers since the 90s did so more than JOB.

                            And, on your final point - yes, there's a point where getting to the playoffs IS important, even if you are first round and out. I know of few teams that either fail to make the playoffs or win a championship with no time in between. I would say that if this team makes the playoffs through effort and hard work, the city will start to support them. Fine, falling into the playoffs because the 8th seed tanks it is no good, but getting there by being a better team than we have been in 3 years isn't going to be seen as some "failure to develop".
                            BillS

                            A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                            Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Re: So What Are Your Expectations For The Pacers?

                              First, I think this should be JOB's last year no matter how he does. If he continues to fail, the reason should be obvious. If he succeeds, it means to me that we are ready for the next step and I don't think he's the coach for that next step.
                              I think that was well put Bill
                              Sittin on top of the world!

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Re: So What Are Your Expectations For The Pacers?

                                I thanked your post, but honestly I don't know why you're arguing with everyone about it then.

                                We're all in agreement that Jim needs to be shown the door. (except maybe UB, because he's said only if a top 5 coach is available......) I don't think the question of when is enough of a contrast that 4 pages needed to be dedicated to it.
                                Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X