Tweet
Re: Drafting Game
WOWOWOW what an upset. My team came up clutch. DAMN!
So who do I play next?
WOWOWOW what an upset. My team came up clutch. DAMN!
So who do I play next?
The Rules of Pacers Digest
Hello everyone,
Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.
A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.
Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.
Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.
Rule #1
Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:
"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"
"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"
"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"
"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"
"He/she is just delusional"
"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"
"I'm going to take a moment to point and
/ laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"
"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good?"
In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.
We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.
Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.
That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.
A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.
There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.
Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.
In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.
Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.
If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!
All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.
Rule #2
If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.
The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.
The right places to do so are:
A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.
B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.
If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.
Rule #3
If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.
When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:
A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.
B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.
To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!
Rule #4
Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.
Rule #5
When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.
An example:
If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:
http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star
Rule #6
We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.
The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.
Rule #7
Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.
It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).
We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).
However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.
Rule #8
We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.
Rule #9
Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.
Rule #10
We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.
Rule #11
Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.
A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.
Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.
Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.
Rule #1
Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:
"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"
"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"
"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"
"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"
"He/she is just delusional"
"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"
"I'm going to take a moment to point and
/ laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*""Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good?
"In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.
We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.
Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.
That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.
A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.
There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.
Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.
In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.
Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.
If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!
All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.
Rule #2
If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.
The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.
The right places to do so are:
A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.
B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.
If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.
Rule #3
If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.
When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:
A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.
B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.
To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!
Rule #4
Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.
Rule #5
When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.
An example:
If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:
http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star
Rule #6
We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.
The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.
Rule #7
Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.
It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).
We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).
However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.
Rule #8
We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.
Rule #9
Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.
Rule #10
We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.
Rule #11
Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less
-
-
Re: Drafting Game
And who so far would be considered mvp worthy?Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
Can anyone see the bracket in my post up there?...Still "flying casual"
@roaminggnome74Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
no i cantComment
-
Re: Drafting Game
My guys choked when it counted.
There will be serious repercussions 
d:
How about double elimination. 
Congrats Lips
s:
"Just look at the flowers ........ BANG" - Carol "The Walking Dead"Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
*****PLAYER OF THE GAME---T-MAC*****
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
2002-03 Roaming Gnome at 2002-03 Jose Slaughter
9/5/2004 9:00:00 PM
Final
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Total
2002-03 Roaming Gnome
27 26 19 26
98
2002-03 Jose Slaughter
31 19 21 24
95
VISITING TEAM: 2002-03 Roaming Gnome
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Tim Hardaway
48
11/18
2/2
2/2
3
8
0
4
1
3
26
Jeff Hornacek
48
6/15
1/5
5/6
4
3
0
0
1
3
18
Jerry Lucas
48
4/8
0/0
2/4
13
3
0
1
0
0
10
Cedric Maxwell
48
6/12
0/2
5/8
10
3
0
0
2
1
17
Shaquille O'Neal
32
8/16
0/0
2/12
11
2
3
1
3
3
18
Dikembe Mutombo
16
2/4
0/0
5/6
2
2
0
2
1
2
9
TOTALS
240
37/73
3/9
21/38
43
21
3
8
8
12
98
50.7%
33.3%
55.3%
HOME TEAM: 2002-03 Jose Slaughter
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Tracy McGrady
48
16/22
2/2
4/4
10
4
0
0
1
3
38
Kiki Vandeweghe
48
11/25
0/1
4/4
3
5
0
0
0
6
26
Anthony Mason
47
2/8
0/0
0/0
9
3
0
0
2
5
4
Magic Johnson
41
5/9
0/0
2/2
6
9
2
1
3
2
12
Zelmo Beaty
37
5/11
0/0
3/3
7
0
0
2
2
6
13
Mel Daniels
11
1/3
0/1
0/0
4
0
1
1
1
1
2
Mark Price
7
0/1
0/1
0/0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
Rick Barry
1
0/0
0/0
0/0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTALS
240
40/79
2/5
13/13
39
23
3
4
10
23
95
50.6%
40.0%
100.0%
Home •
SimLeagues •
SimMatchup •
Forums •
My Account •
Logout
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc.
All rights reserved.
[Terms of Use]
[Customer Support]
[Privacy Statement]
WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
WhatIfSports.com: Play by Play
4 T H Q U A R T E R 12:00 72 - 71 O'Neal is fouled while shooting. Foul #5 on Zelmo Beaty, team foul #1.
2002-03 Jose Slaughter: Zelmo Beaty is replaced by Mel Daniels. O'Neal misses the first FT and misses the second. Johnson grabs the rebound11:47 72 - 71 McGrady lays it in. 11:37 72 - 73 Maxwell is fouled by Kiki Vandeweghe on the floor. Foul #3 on Vandeweghe, team foul #2. 11:24 72 - 73 Hornacek misses from the baseline. Daniels snags the board 11:14 72 - 73 McGrady's shot is rejected by O'Neal. O'Neal snags the board 11:03 72 - 73 O'Neal lays it in. 10:49 74 - 73 Vandeweghe sinks the short jumper. 10:38 74 - 75 Lucas is fouled while shooting. Foul #4 on Anthony Mason, team foul #3. Lucas misses the first FT and makes the second.
2002-03 Jose Slaughter: IN: Zelmo Beaty -- OUT: Mel Daniels.10:22 75 - 75 2002-03 Roaming Gnome: [PG] T. Hardaway, [SG] J. Hornacek, [SF] C. Maxwell, [PF] J. Lucas, [C] S. O'Neal 2002-03 Jose Slaughter: [PG] M. Johnson, [SG] T. McGrady, [SF] K. Vandeweghe, [PF] A. Mason, [C] Z. Beaty Hardaway comes up with a steal. 10:03 75 - 75 O'Neal is fouled while shooting. Foul #6 on Zelmo Beaty, team foul #4.
2002-03 Jose Slaughter: Zelmo Beaty is replaced by Mel Daniels. O'Neal misses the first FT and misses the second. Mason snags the board9:41 75 - 75 Johnson is fouled while shooting. Foul #3 on Tim Hardaway, team foul #1. Johnson makes the first FT and makes the second. 9:20 75 - 77 Hornacek is fouled while shooting. Foul #2 on Tracy McGrady, team foul #5. Hornacek makes the first FT and makes the second. 9:09 77 - 77 Vandeweghe hits from the baseline. 8:56 77 - 79 Hardaway hits from the baseline. 8:34 79 - 79 McGrady misses short. Hornacek grabs the rebound 8:13 79 - 79 O'Neal is fouled while shooting. Foul #1 on Mel Daniels, team foul #6. O'Neal misses the first FT and misses the second. Daniels snags the board 7:58 79 - 79 O'Neal comes up with a steal. 7:46 79 - 79 Hornacek misses. McGrady grabs the rebound 7:36 79 - 79 McGrady buries it from the top of the key. 7:17 79 - 81 Hardaway buries it from the top of the key. 7:04 81 - 81 Mason banks it in off the glass. 6:50 81 - 83 O'Neal is fouled while shooting. Foul #3 on Tracy McGrady, team foul #7. O'Neal misses the first FT and misses the second. Mason clears the rebound 6:33 81 - 83 Johnson scores. 6:13 81 - 85 Hornacek hits the mid-range jumper. 5:57 83 - 85 McGrady hits from the baseline. 5:41 83 - 87 O'Neal's shot is blocked by Daniels. Mason snags the board 5:27 83 - 87 McGrady scores the layup. 5:10 83 - 89 O'Neal scores. 5:00 85 - 89 McGrady misses from the baseline. Lucas grabs the rebound 4:46 85 - 89 Hornacek misses a 3 from the wing. Vandeweghe clears the rebound 4:25 85 - 89 Vandeweghe misses from the top of the key. Vandeweghe comes down with the offensive rebound 4:15 85 - 89 Vandeweghe is fouled while shooting. Foul #3 on Jeff Hornacek, team foul #2. Vandeweghe makes the first FT and makes the second. 4:11 85 - 91 Maxwell misses a 3 from the corner. Daniels clears the rebound 3:49 85 - 91 Daniels misses off the glass. Maxwell grabs the rebound 3:34 85 - 91 Hornacek hits the mid-range jumper. 3:12 87 - 91 Mason misses from the top of the key. Lucas snags the board 2:51 87 - 91 O'Neal banks it in off the glass. 2:29 89 - 91 Vandeweghe misses short. Hornacek grabs the rebound 2:11 89 - 91 Lucas is fouled while shooting. Foul #5 on Anthony Mason, team foul #8. Lucas misses the first FT and makes the second. 1:58 90 - 91 McGrady loses it out of bounds. 1:42 90 - 91 Maxwell is fouled while shooting. Foul #4 on Kiki Vandeweghe, team foul #9. Maxwell makes the first FT and makes the second. 1:34 92 - 91 Johnson misses short. Maxwell snags the board 1:26 92 - 91 Maxwell is fouled while shooting. Foul #5 on Kiki Vandeweghe, team foul #10. Maxwell makes the first FT and misses the second. Mason snags the board 1:10 93 - 91 Vandeweghe hits the mid-range jumper. 0:56 93 - 93 O'Neal scores the layup. 0:47 95 - 93 Daniels buries it from the top of the key. 0:35 95 - 95 O'Neal buries it from the top of the key. 0:22 97 - 95 Vandeweghe misses long. Lucas clears the rebound 0:18 97 - 95 Daniels comes up with a steal. 0:15 97 - 95 Vandeweghe misses the short jumper. Maxwell grabs the rebound 0:04 97 - 95 Maxwell is fouled by Kiki Vandeweghe on the floor. Foul #6 on Vandeweghe, team foul #11.
2002-03 Jose Slaughter: Kiki Vandeweghe is replaced by Rick Barry. Maxwell makes the first FT and misses the second. Daniels clears the rebound
2002-03 Jose Slaughter call timeout. The ball is inbounded at half-court.0:01 98 - 95 Daniels misses a 3. 0:00 98 - 95 4 T H Q U A R T E R - 2002-03 Roaming Gnome: 98 2002-03 Jose Slaughter: 95
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
...Still "flying casual"
@roaminggnome74Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
*****PLAYER OF THE GAME----T-MAC*****
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
2002-03 Roaming Gnome at 2002-03 Jose Slaughter
9/5/2004 9:04:00 PM
Final
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Total
2002-03 Roaming Gnome
22 27 19 28
96
2002-03 Jose Slaughter
35 31 23 29
118
VISITING TEAM: 2002-03 Roaming Gnome
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Tim Hardaway
48
7/12
1/1
6/9
4
13
0
0
2
2
21
Jeff Hornacek
48
6/15
0/3
2/2
1
4
0
1
2
3
14
Jerry Lucas
48
6/18
0/1
8/9
16
1
0
1
1
4
20
Shaquille O'Neal
40
7/13
0/0
1/2
7
2
1
3
0
4
15
Cedric Maxwell
38
9/16
1/1
7/7
3
0
0
0
5
5
26
Dennis Rodman
10
0/1
0/1
0/0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
Dikembe Mutombo
8
0/2
0/0
0/2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTALS
240
35/77
2/7
24/31
34
21
1
5
10
19
96
45.5%
28.6%
77.4%
HOME TEAM: 2002-03 Jose Slaughter
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Tracy McGrady
48
10/20
5/9
5/6
6
4
0
0
1
3
30
Kiki Vandeweghe
48
10/13
0/0
8/8
6
2
0
2
1
4
28
Anthony Mason
48
6/9
0/0
4/6
9
9
0
1
2
3
16
Magic Johnson
42
8/11
0/1
0/0
4
11
0
1
1
6
16
Zelmo Beaty
41
8/13
0/0
8/9
12
2
1
0
5
3
24
Mel Daniels
7
0/1
0/0
0/0
2
1
0
0
0
1
0
Mark Price
6
2/5
0/1
0/0
1
2
0
0
0
0
4
TOTALS
240
44/72
5/11
25/29
40
31
1
4
10
20
118
61.1%
45.5%
86.2%
Home •
SimLeagues •
SimMatchup •
Forums •
My Account •
Logout
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc.
All rights reserved.
[Terms of Use]
[Customer Support]
[Privacy Statement]
WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
...Still "flying casual"
@roaminggnome74Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
*****PLAYER OF THE GAME---MICHAEL JORDAN*****
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
2002-03 LouisvilleLip at 2002-03 ILovethePacers
9/5/2004 9:06:00 PM
Final
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Total
2002-03 LouisvilleLip
34 28 24 32
118
2002-03 ILovethePacers
31 23 27 40
121
VISITING TEAM: 2002-03 LouisvilleLip
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Oscar Robertson
48
7/16
3/6
3/4
8
11
0
2
1
4
20
Dan Issel
48
12/25
0/3
8/12
12
3
0
1
0
5
32
Bill Walton
39
4/12
0/0
2/4
10
6
2
2
3
4
10
Jack Twyman
37
10/21
1/4
2/2
6
2
0
1
1
5
23
Anfernee Hardaway
32
10/17
1/4
4/4
5
7
0
0
2
6
25
Sleepy Floyd
16
0/1
0/0
0/0
0
4
0
1
0
0
0
John Brisker
11
4/4
0/0
0/0
0
0
0
1
1
0
8
Caldwell Jones
9
0/0
0/0
0/0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
TOTALS
240
47/96
5/17
19/26
42
33
2
9
8
24
118
49.0%
29.4%
73.1%
HOME TEAM: 2002-03 ILovethePacers
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Michael Jordan
48
13/18
0/0
7/7
6
10
2
1
4
3
33
Maurice Cheeks
48
9/16
0/1
5/7
3
13
0
2
3
4
23
Adrian Dantley
48
15/22
0/0
3/6
5
3
0
2
3
2
33
Jeff Ruland
48
5/14
0/0
3/6
21
4
1
1
4
2
13
Artis Gilmore
36
6/10
0/0
5/9
12
2
2
0
0
5
17
Elton Brand
12
1/2
0/0
0/2
3
1
0
0
1
0
2
TOTALS
240
49/82
0/1
23/37
50
33
5
6
15
16
121
59.8%
0%
62.2%
Home •
SimLeagues •
SimMatchup •
Forums •
My Account •
Logout
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc.
All rights reserved.
[Terms of Use]
[Customer Support]
[Privacy Statement]
WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
WhatIfSports.com: Play by Play
4 T H Q U A R T E R 12:00 86 - 81 Twyman misses short. Dantley clears the rebound 11:50 86 - 81 Cheeks misses. Ruland snags the offensive board 11:37 86 - 81 Ruland hits from the baseline. 11:34 86 - 83 Robertson is fouled while shooting. Foul #3 on Michael Jordan, team foul #1. Robertson makes the first FT and makes the second.
2002-03 LouisvilleLip: IN: Anfernee Hardaway -- OUT: Sleepy Floyd.11:26 88 - 83 2002-03 LouisvilleLip: [PG] A. Hardaway, [SG] O. Robertson, [SF] J. Twyman, [PF] D. Issel, [C] B. Walton 2002-03 ILovethePacers: [PG] M. Cheeks, [SG] M. Jordan, [SF] A. Dantley, [PF] A. Gilmore, [C] J. Ruland Gilmore misses from the top of the key. Hardaway grabs the rebound 11:12 88 - 83 Twyman misses from the baseline. Ruland grabs the rebound 10:57 88 - 83 Dantley scores the layup. 10:47 88 - 85 Hardaway buries a 3 from the wing. 10:33 91 - 85 Jordan hits from the baseline. 10:18 91 - 87 Twyman misses a 3 from the corner. Ruland grabs the rebound 10:00 91 - 87 Gilmore is fouled while shooting. Foul #4 on Oscar Robertson, team foul #1. Gilmore makes the first FT and misses the second. Walton grabs the rebound 9:42 91 - 88 Twyman misses off the glass. Issel grabs the offensive rebound 9:25 91 - 88 Issel misses from the top of the key. Twyman snags the offensive board 9:22 91 - 88 Twyman sinks the short jumper. 9:19 93 - 88 Dantley misses from the baseline. Twyman grabs the rebound 9:08 93 - 88 Twyman misses from the top of the key. Gilmore clears the rebound 8:49 93 - 88 Ruland buries it from the top of the key. 8:28 93 - 90 Issel is fouled while shooting. Foul #3 on Artis Gilmore, team foul #2. Issel misses the first FT and makes the second. 8:18 94 - 90 Dantley buries it from the top of the key. 7:59 94 - 92 Walton misses short. Jordan grabs the rebound 7:41 94 - 92 Gilmore is fouled and the shot drops! Foul #4 on Dan Issel, team foul #2. Gilmore makes the free throw. 7:23 94 - 95 Issel scores. 7:08 96 - 95 Jordan loses it out of bounds. 6:56 96 - 95 Hardaway misses a 3. Jordan clears the rebound 6:46 96 - 95 Dantley hits from the baseline. 6:25 96 - 97 Robertson sinks a 3 from straight away. 6:10 99 - 97 Dantley is fouled while shooting. Foul #4 on Jack Twyman, team foul #3. Dantley makes the first FT and makes the second. 5:48 99 - 99 Hardaway misses from the baseline. Jordan grabs the rebound 5:39 99 - 99 Cheeks sinks the short jumper. 5:22 99 - 101 Twyman is fouled while shooting. Foul #2 on Adrian Dantley, team foul #3. Twyman makes the first FT and makes the second. 5:13 101 - 101 Gilmore hits from the baseline. 4:59 101 - 103 Hardaway hits from the baseline. 4:48 103 - 103 Dantley hits the mid-range jumper. 4:41 103 - 105 Twyman hits the mid-range jumper. 4:28 105 - 105 Cheeks is fouled and the shot drops! Foul #5 on Anfernee Hardaway, team foul #4. Cheeks makes the free throw. 4:14 105 - 108 Dantley comes up with a steal. 3:57 105 - 108 Ruland is fouled by Anfernee Hardaway on the floor. Foul #6 on Hardaway, team foul #5.
2002-03 LouisvilleLip: Anfernee Hardaway is replaced by Sleepy Floyd. Ruland misses the first FT and misses the second. Issel snags the board3:44 105 - 108 Robertson misses from the top of the key. Walton comes down with the offensive rebound 3:30 105 - 108 Issel is fouled while shooting. Foul #4 on Artis Gilmore, team foul #4. Issel makes the first FT and makes the second. 3:27 107 - 108 Cheeks scores the layup. 3:12 107 - 110 Issel hits from the baseline. 3:03 109 - 110 Cheeks sinks the short jumper. 2:53 109 - 112 Walton is fouled while shooting. Foul #2 on Jeff Ruland, team foul #5. Walton makes the first FT and misses the second. Ruland clears the rebound 2:34 110 - 112 Jordan's shot is blocked by Walton. Walton grabs the rebound 2:16 110 - 112 Robertson hits the mid-range jumper. 2:02 112 - 112 Gilmore misses from the top of the key. Gilmore comes down with the offensive rebound 1:53 112 - 112 Gilmore scores. 1:50 112 - 114 Twyman misses long. Issel comes down with the offensive rebound 1:40 112 - 114 Issel is fouled by Maurice Cheeks on the floor. Foul #4 on Cheeks, team foul #6. Issel misses the first FT and makes the second. 1:37 113 - 114 Dantley buries it from the top of the key. 1:20 113 - 116 Walton misses from the baseline. Dantley grabs the rebound 1:12 113 - 116 Jordan lays it in. 1:02 113 - 118 Twyman misses a 3. Robertson snags the offensive board 0:51 113 - 118 Jordan comes up with a steal. 0:48 113 - 118 Twyman comes up with a steal. 0:27 113 - 118 Issel is fouled while shooting. Foul #5 on Artis Gilmore, team foul #7. Issel makes the first FT and makes the second. 0:18 115 - 118 Ruland is fouled by Bill Walton on the floor. Foul #4 on Walton, team foul #6. Ruland misses the first FT and makes the second. 0:16 115 - 119 Twyman misses a 3 from straight away. Issel comes down with the offensive rebound 0:12 115 - 119 Issel misses a 3 from the corner. Ruland grabs the rebound 0:09 115 - 119 Gilmore is fouled by Dan Issel on the floor. Foul #5 on Issel, team foul #7. Gilmore makes the first FT and misses the second. Gilmore comes down with the offensive rebound 0:06 115 - 120 Dantley is fouled by Jack Twyman on the floor. Foul #5 on Twyman, team foul #8. Dantley misses the first FT and makes the second. 0:05 115 - 121 Twyman nails a 3 from the corner. 0:00 118 - 121 4 T H Q U A R T E R - 2002-03 LouisvilleLip: 118 2002-03 ILovethePacers: 121
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
...Still "flying casual"
@roaminggnome74Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
*****PLAYER OF THE GAME---OSCAR ROBERTSON*****
WhatIfSports.com: Play by Play
4 T H Q U A R T E R 12:00 86 - 81 Twyman misses short. Dantley clears the rebound 11:50 86 - 81 Cheeks misses. Ruland snags the offensive board 11:37 86 - 81 Ruland hits from the baseline. 11:34 86 - 83 Robertson is fouled while shooting. Foul #3 on Michael Jordan, team foul #1. Robertson makes the first FT and makes the second.
2002-03 LouisvilleLip: IN: Anfernee Hardaway -- OUT: Sleepy Floyd.11:26 88 - 83 2002-03 LouisvilleLip: [PG] A. Hardaway, [SG] O. Robertson, [SF] J. Twyman, [PF] D. Issel, [C] B. Walton 2002-03 ILovethePacers: [PG] M. Cheeks, [SG] M. Jordan, [SF] A. Dantley, [PF] A. Gilmore, [C] J. Ruland Gilmore misses from the top of the key. Hardaway grabs the rebound 11:12 88 - 83 Twyman misses from the baseline. Ruland grabs the rebound 10:57 88 - 83 Dantley scores the layup. 10:47 88 - 85 Hardaway buries a 3 from the wing. 10:33 91 - 85 Jordan hits from the baseline. 10:18 91 - 87 Twyman misses a 3 from the corner. Ruland grabs the rebound 10:00 91 - 87 Gilmore is fouled while shooting. Foul #4 on Oscar Robertson, team foul #1. Gilmore makes the first FT and misses the second. Walton grabs the rebound 9:42 91 - 88 Twyman misses off the glass. Issel grabs the offensive rebound 9:25 91 - 88 Issel misses from the top of the key. Twyman snags the offensive board 9:22 91 - 88 Twyman sinks the short jumper. 9:19 93 - 88 Dantley misses from the baseline. Twyman grabs the rebound 9:08 93 - 88 Twyman misses from the top of the key. Gilmore clears the rebound 8:49 93 - 88 Ruland buries it from the top of the key. 8:28 93 - 90 Issel is fouled while shooting. Foul #3 on Artis Gilmore, team foul #2. Issel misses the first FT and makes the second. 8:18 94 - 90 Dantley buries it from the top of the key. 7:59 94 - 92 Walton misses short. Jordan grabs the rebound 7:41 94 - 92 Gilmore is fouled and the shot drops! Foul #4 on Dan Issel, team foul #2. Gilmore makes the free throw. 7:23 94 - 95 Issel scores. 7:08 96 - 95 Jordan loses it out of bounds. 6:56 96 - 95 Hardaway misses a 3. Jordan clears the rebound 6:46 96 - 95 Dantley hits from the baseline. 6:25 96 - 97 Robertson sinks a 3 from straight away. 6:10 99 - 97 Dantley is fouled while shooting. Foul #4 on Jack Twyman, team foul #3. Dantley makes the first FT and makes the second. 5:48 99 - 99 Hardaway misses from the baseline. Jordan grabs the rebound 5:39 99 - 99 Cheeks sinks the short jumper. 5:22 99 - 101 Twyman is fouled while shooting. Foul #2 on Adrian Dantley, team foul #3. Twyman makes the first FT and makes the second. 5:13 101 - 101 Gilmore hits from the baseline. 4:59 101 - 103 Hardaway hits from the baseline. 4:48 103 - 103 Dantley hits the mid-range jumper. 4:41 103 - 105 Twyman hits the mid-range jumper. 4:28 105 - 105 Cheeks is fouled and the shot drops! Foul #5 on Anfernee Hardaway, team foul #4. Cheeks makes the free throw. 4:14 105 - 108 Dantley comes up with a steal. 3:57 105 - 108 Ruland is fouled by Anfernee Hardaway on the floor. Foul #6 on Hardaway, team foul #5.
2002-03 LouisvilleLip: Anfernee Hardaway is replaced by Sleepy Floyd. Ruland misses the first FT and misses the second. Issel snags the board3:44 105 - 108 Robertson misses from the top of the key. Walton comes down with the offensive rebound 3:30 105 - 108 Issel is fouled while shooting. Foul #4 on Artis Gilmore, team foul #4. Issel makes the first FT and makes the second. 3:27 107 - 108 Cheeks scores the layup. 3:12 107 - 110 Issel hits from the baseline. 3:03 109 - 110 Cheeks sinks the short jumper. 2:53 109 - 112 Walton is fouled while shooting. Foul #2 on Jeff Ruland, team foul #5. Walton makes the first FT and misses the second. Ruland clears the rebound 2:34 110 - 112 Jordan's shot is blocked by Walton. Walton grabs the rebound 2:16 110 - 112 Robertson hits the mid-range jumper. 2:02 112 - 112 Gilmore misses from the top of the key. Gilmore comes down with the offensive rebound 1:53 112 - 112 Gilmore scores. 1:50 112 - 114 Twyman misses long. Issel comes down with the offensive rebound 1:40 112 - 114 Issel is fouled by Maurice Cheeks on the floor. Foul #4 on Cheeks, team foul #6. Issel misses the first FT and makes the second. 1:37 113 - 114 Dantley buries it from the top of the key. 1:20 113 - 116 Walton misses from the baseline. Dantley grabs the rebound 1:12 113 - 116 Jordan lays it in. 1:02 113 - 118 Twyman misses a 3. Robertson snags the offensive board 0:51 113 - 118 Jordan comes up with a steal. 0:48 113 - 118 Twyman comes up with a steal. 0:27 113 - 118 Issel is fouled while shooting. Foul #5 on Artis Gilmore, team foul #7. Issel makes the first FT and makes the second. 0:18 115 - 118 Ruland is fouled by Bill Walton on the floor. Foul #4 on Walton, team foul #6. Ruland misses the first FT and makes the second. 0:16 115 - 119 Twyman misses a 3 from straight away. Issel comes down with the offensive rebound 0:12 115 - 119 Issel misses a 3 from the corner. Ruland grabs the rebound 0:09 115 - 119 Gilmore is fouled by Dan Issel on the floor. Foul #5 on Issel, team foul #7. Gilmore makes the first FT and misses the second. Gilmore comes down with the offensive rebound 0:06 115 - 120 Dantley is fouled by Jack Twyman on the floor. Foul #5 on Twyman, team foul #8. Dantley misses the first FT and makes the second. 0:05 115 - 121 Twyman nails a 3 from the corner. 0:00 118 - 121 4 T H Q U A R T E R - 2002-03 LouisvilleLip: 118 2002-03 ILovethePacers: 121
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
...Still "flying casual"
@roaminggnome74Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
Can you see this???
Jose Slaughter Vs Roaming Gnome---Series tied 1-1
ILoveThePacers Vs Louisville Lip---ILPacers leads 2-0
I know that Lip said he couldn't see the bracket that I made for this, but I wanted to ask again if anyone can see it...
...Still "flying casual"
@roaminggnome74Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
That one works.....
PSN: MRat731 XBL: MRat0731Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
I only see one of the games posted yet im down 2-0?Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
Nope, I haven't seen any of the brackets, just red X's.Originally posted by RoamingCan you see this???
Jose Slaughter Vs Roaming Gnome---Series tied 1-1
ILoveThePacers Vs Louisville Lip---ILPacers leads 2-0
I know that Lip said he couldn't see the bracket that I made for this, but I wanted to ask again if anyone can see it...
"Just look at the flowers ........ BANG" - Carol "The Walking Dead"Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
Originally posted by HoopNope, I haven't seen any of the brackets, just red X's.Originally posted by RoamingCan you see this???
Jose Slaughter Vs Roaming Gnome---Series tied 1-1
ILoveThePacers Vs Louisville Lip---ILPacers leads 2-0
I know that Lip said he couldn't see the bracket that I made for this, but I wanted to ask again if anyone can see it...
I see no brackets... I saw the first one, but thats it.Here, everyone have a
: on meComment
-
Re: Drafting Game
I havn't seen any brackets.Comment
Comment