Tweet
Re: Drafting Game
how do i set my starting lineup?
how do i set my starting lineup?
The Rules of Pacers Digest
Hello everyone,
Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.
A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.
Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.
Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.
Rule #1
Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:
"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"
"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"
"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"
"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"
"He/she is just delusional"
"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"
"I'm going to take a moment to point and
/ laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"
"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good?"
In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.
We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.
Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.
That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.
A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.
There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.
Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.
In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.
Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.
If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!
All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.
Rule #2
If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.
The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.
The right places to do so are:
A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.
B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.
If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.
Rule #3
If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.
When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:
A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.
B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.
To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!
Rule #4
Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.
Rule #5
When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.
An example:
If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:
http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star
Rule #6
We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.
The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.
Rule #7
Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.
It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).
We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).
However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.
Rule #8
We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.
Rule #9
Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.
Rule #10
We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.
Rule #11
Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.
A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.
Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.
Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.
Rule #1
Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:
"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"
"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"
"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"
"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"
"He/she is just delusional"
"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"
"I'm going to take a moment to point and
/ laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*""Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good?
"In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.
We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.
Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.
That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.
A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.
There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.
Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.
In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.
Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.
If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!
All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.
Rule #2
If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.
The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.
The right places to do so are:
A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.
B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.
If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.
Rule #3
If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.
When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:
A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.
B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.
To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!
Rule #4
Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.
Rule #5
When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.
An example:
If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:
http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star
Rule #6
We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.
The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.
Rule #7
Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.
It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).
We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).
However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.
Rule #8
We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.
Rule #9
Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.
Rule #10
We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.
Rule #11
Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less
-
-
Re: Drafting Game
3 point shooting is vastly over rated. My team seems to do better when they don't take any 3's. It has never taken more than 8-10 in any game that I can remember.Originally posted by MSA2CF
Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
All you have to do is set your team up as if you were going to play someone and just plug in the right starters. Then click the box that says...Save as default starting line-up!Originally posted by SkipperZ
Or just tell me your starters and I will set them for you....Still "flying casual"
@roaminggnome74Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
********PLAYER OF THE GAME---SHAQUILLE O'NEAL********
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
2002-03 SycamoreKen at 2002-03 Roaming Gnome
8/30/2004 5:29:00 PM
Final
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Total
2002-03 SycamoreKen
22 15 26 31
94
2002-03 Roaming Gnome
31 25 18 31
105
VISITING TEAM: 2002-03 SycamoreKen
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Jimmy Jones
48
7/12
0/0
0/0
4
10
0
1
3
2
14
Kevin McHale
48
7/17
0/1
4/4
10
4
1
1
1
2
18
Charles Barkley
48
6/13
0/1
4/8
15
5
0
1
2
2
16
Dale Ellis
46
8/19
0/3
2/2
3
3
2
0
4
4
18
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
40
13/18
0/1
2/2
8
5
1
0
1
5
28
Clyde Lovellette
8
0/3
0/0
0/0
4
1
0
0
1
1
0
Byron Scott
2
0/0
0/0
0/0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTALS
240
41/82
0/6
12/16
44
28
4
3
12
16
94
50.0%
0%
75.0%
HOME TEAM: 2002-03 Roaming Gnome
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Tim Hardaway
48
12/24
1/5
0/0
5
5
0
1
2
1
25
Jeff Hornacek
48
6/20
0/7
4/5
6
10
0
3
1
4
16
Jerry Lucas
48
4/13
0/0
3/4
14
3
0
1
1
2
11
Shaquille O'Neal
48
15/23
0/0
5/8
12
3
1
2
2
2
35
Cedric Maxwell
42
7/11
1/1
3/4
6
5
0
0
1
6
18
Dennis Rodman
6
0/0
0/0
0/0
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
TOTALS
240
44/91
2/13
15/21
47
26
2
7
7
15
105
48.4%
15.4%
71.4%
Home •
SimLeagues •
SimMatchup •
Forums •
My Account •
Logout
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc.
All rights reserved.
[Terms of Use]
[Customer Support]
[Privacy Statement]
WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
...Still "flying casual"
@roaminggnome74Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
*****PLAYER OF THE GAME---kEVIN McHALE*****
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
2002-03 Roaming Gnome at 2002-03 SycamoreKen
8/30/2004 5:31:00 PM
Final
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Total
2002-03 Roaming Gnome
18 27 18 30
93
2002-03 SycamoreKen
29 22 13 31
95
VISITING TEAM: 2002-03 Roaming Gnome
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Tim Hardaway
48
6/16
0/1
2/2
1
7
0
1
6
1
14
Jeff Hornacek
48
7/14
0/1
1/1
3
5
0
3
2
2
15
Jerry Lucas
47
7/10
0/0
5/6
15
2
1
0
1
4
19
Shaquille O'Neal
34
11/15
0/0
4/9
8
3
1
1
1
3
26
Cedric Maxwell
29
0/3
0/0
4/4
7
3
1
1
4
6
4
Dennis Rodman
19
3/8
0/1
1/2
5
1
0
1
2
1
7
Dikembe Mutombo
8
1/3
0/0
2/2
2
0
1
0
1
1
4
Karl Malone
7
1/2
0/0
2/2
2
0
0
0
0
0
4
TOTALS
240
36/71
0/3
21/28
43
21
4
7
17
18
93
50.7%
0%
75.0%
HOME TEAM: 2002-03 SycamoreKen
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Dale Ellis
48
7/22
2/4
6/6
2
2
0
1
3
1
22
Jimmy Jones
48
5/15
0/0
1/2
3
7
0
3
1
1
11
Kevin McHale
48
10/15
0/0
5/5
11
2
0
1
2
3
25
Charles Barkley
48
6/11
0/2
3/4
10
4
2
4
4
4
15
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
35
7/13
0/0
4/8
11
4
2
1
2
5
18
Clyde Lovellette
13
2/4
0/0
0/0
2
0
0
0
0
1
4
TOTALS
240
37/80
2/6
19/25
39
19
4
10
12
15
95
46.3%
33.3%
76.0%
Home •
SimLeagues •
SimMatchup •
Forums •
My Account •
Logout
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc.
All rights reserved.
[Terms of Use]
[Customer Support]
[Privacy Statement]
WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
...Still "flying casual"
@roaminggnome74Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
*****PLAYER OF THE GAME---MICHEAL JORDAN*****
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
2002-03 Burnzone at 2002-03 ILovethePacers
8/30/2004 5:34:00 PM
Final
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Total
2002-03 Burnzone
36 24 15 39
114
2002-03 ILovethePacers
34 24 30 38
126
VISITING TEAM: 2002-03 Burnzone
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Pete Maravich
48
5/21
3/8
6/7
4
4
1
1
1
5
19
Dave Bing
48
6/18
2/7
0/0
5
6
0
1
5
3
14
John Havlicek
48
10/19
0/1
2/2
9
5
0
7
1
5
22
Wilt Chamberlain
48
16/28
0/0
5/12
19
3
0
4
3
4
37
Marvin Barnes
32
9/17
0/0
2/2
11
3
1
0
1
6
20
George Mikan
6
0/1
0/1
0/0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
Alex English
5
0/0
0/0
0/0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Predrag Stojakovic
5
1/1
0/0
0/0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
TOTALS
240
47/105
5/17
15/23
48
24
2
14
12
23
114
44.8%
29.4%
65.2%
HOME TEAM: 2002-03 ILovethePacers
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Michael Jordan
48
19/29
0/0
5/6
6
5
3
1
3
4
43
Maurice Cheeks
48
5/11
0/1
3/3
3
10
0
4
1
1
13
Adrian Dantley
48
8/19
0/0
11/12
10
3
0
1
7
3
27
Artis Gilmore
48
9/15
0/0
9/12
18
2
5
0
3
2
27
Elton Brand
25
2/4
0/0
0/0
9
4
1
0
0
3
4
Jeff Ruland
23
4/6
0/1
4/4
6
3
2
2
3
6
12
TOTALS
240
47/84
0/2
32/37
52
27
11
8
17
19
126
56.0%
0%
86.5%
Home •
SimLeagues •
SimMatchup •
Forums •
My Account •
Logout
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc.
All rights reserved.
[Terms of Use]
[Customer Support]
[Privacy Statement]
WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
...Still "flying casual"
@roaminggnome74Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
*****PLAYER OF THE GAME---MICHEAL JORDAN*****
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
2002-03 ILovethePacers at 2002-03 Burnzone
8/30/2004 5:36:00 PM
Final
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Total
2002-03 ILovethePacers
31 34 25 28
118
2002-03 Burnzone
30 38 21 26
115
VISITING TEAM: 2002-03 ILovethePacers
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Michael Jordan
46
15/26
0/1
8/8
8
8
0
0
2
3
38
Adrian Dantley
46
13/20
0/0
6/8
12
3
0
1
9
2
32
Maurice Cheeks
44
6/15
0/0
4/4
3
14
0
2
5
5
16
Artis Gilmore
39
4/9
0/0
1/2
16
1
3
0
1
2
9
Jeff Ruland
38
5/9
0/0
3/4
10
3
0
3
1
5
13
Elton Brand
12
3/3
0/0
0/0
2
1
0
0
1
0
6
Detlef Schrempf
7
0/0
0/0
0/0
3
0
1
0
0
1
0
Norm Nixon
4
0/0
0/0
0/0
0
2
0
0
1
2
0
David Thompson
2
1/2
0/0
0/0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Rudy Tomjanovich
2
1/2
0/0
0/0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
TOTALS
240
48/86
0/1
22/26
55
32
4
6
20
20
118
55.8%
0%
84.6%
HOME TEAM: 2002-03 Burnzone
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Dave Bing
48
6/17
2/4
7/8
2
3
0
1
3
3
21
Marvin Barnes
48
8/18
0/0
2/2
16
5
1
1
0
2
18
Wilt Chamberlain
48
18/31
0/1
8/11
16
2
2
1
3
4
44
Pete Maravich
47
9/19
0/1
0/0
2
7
0
1
1
4
18
John Havlicek
47
5/14
0/1
2/4
7
15
0
5
1
4
12
Gail Goodrich
1
1/1
0/0
0/0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Alex English
1
0/0
0/0
0/0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTALS
240
47/100
2/7
19/25
43
32
3
9
8
17
115
47.0%
28.6%
76.0%
Home •
SimLeagues •
SimMatchup •
Forums •
My Account •
Logout
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc.
All rights reserved.
[Terms of Use]
[Customer Support]
[Privacy Statement]
WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
WhatIfSports.com: Play by Play
4 T H Q U A R T E R 12:00 90 - 89 Jordan hits from the baseline. 11:44 92 - 89 Chamberlain scores the layup. 11:34 92 - 91 Dantley is fouled by John Havlicek on the floor. Foul #3 on Havlicek, team foul #1.
2002-03 ILovethePacers: IN: Jeff Ruland -- OUT: Elton Brand.11:23 92 - 91 2002-03 ILovethePacers: [PG] M. Cheeks, [SG] M. Jordan, [SF] A. Dantley, [PF] A. Gilmore, [C] J. Ruland 2002-03 Burnzone: [PG] D. Bing, [SG] P. Maravich, [SF] J. Havlicek, [PF] M. Barnes, [C] W. Chamberlain Maravich comes up with a steal. 11:13 92 - 91 Maravich misses a 3 from the corner. Cheeks grabs the rebound 11:02 92 - 91 Gilmore sinks the short jumper. 10:44 94 - 91 Bing misses short. Chamberlain snags the offensive board 10:28 94 - 91 Havlicek hits the mid-range jumper. 10:25 94 - 93 Dantley misses the short jumper. Jordan comes down with the offensive rebound 10:15 94 - 93 Jordan's shot is swatted away by Chamberlain. Chamberlain snags the board 10:12 94 - 93 Barnes sinks the short jumper. 10:05 94 - 95 Dantley banks it in off the glass. 9:51 96 - 95 Havlicek misses short. Jordan clears the rebound 9:37 96 - 95 Ruland's shot is blocked by Barnes. Chamberlain grabs the rebound 9:15 96 - 95 Bing is fouled while shooting. Foul #4 on Maurice Cheeks, team foul #1. Bing makes the first FT and misses the second. Dantley grabs the rebound 9:06 96 - 96 Gilmore misses. Chamberlain clears the rebound 8:48 96 - 96 Maravich's shot is blocked by Gilmore. Dantley snags the board 8:40 96 - 96 Chamberlain comes up with a steal. 8:26 96 - 96 Maravich misses short. Gilmore snags the board 8:10 96 - 96 Dantley is fouled while shooting. Foul #4 on John Havlicek, team foul #2. Dantley makes the first FT and misses the second. Barnes grabs the rebound 7:57 97 - 96 Chamberlain is fouled while shooting. Foul #5 on Jeff Ruland, team foul #2. Chamberlain makes the first FT and makes the second. 7:45 97 - 98 Cheeks misses short. Chamberlain grabs the rebound 7:34 97 - 98 Maravich misses from the baseline. Gilmore grabs the rebound 7:27 97 - 98 Cheeks hits from the baseline. 7:06 99 - 98 Chamberlain banks it in off the glass. 6:56 99 - 100 Gilmore scores. 6:42 101 - 100 Chamberlain hits from the baseline. 6:29 101 - 102 Jordan misses the short jumper. Barnes snags the board 6:07 101 - 102 Chamberlain sinks the short jumper. 5:51 101 - 104 Dantley hits from the baseline. 5:39 103 - 104 Bing misses short. Ruland grabs the rebound 5:31 103 - 104 Dantley misses from the baseline. Barnes clears the rebound 5:18 103 - 104 Bing misses short. Chamberlain snags the offensive board 5:10 103 - 104 Chamberlain hits the mid-range jumper. 5:07 103 - 106 Ruland hits from the baseline. 4:47 105 - 106 Chamberlain misses long. Gilmore snags the board 4:37 105 - 106 Cheeks misses the layup. Havlicek grabs the rebound 4:25 105 - 106 Maravich hits the mid-range jumper. 4:16 105 - 108 Jordan is fouled while shooting. Foul #3 on Pete Maravich, team foul #3. Jordan makes the first FT and makes the second. 3:58 107 - 108 Maravich buries it from the top of the key. 3:48 107 - 110 Dantley misses long. Chamberlain grabs the rebound 3:32 107 - 110 Ruland comes up with a steal. 3:18 107 - 110 Cheeks is called for an offensive foul. Foul #5. 3:08 107 - 110 Chamberlain misses short. Jordan snags the board 2:52 107 - 110 Dantley is called for traveling. 2:32 107 - 110 Barnes's shot is swatted away by Gilmore. Gilmore snags the board 2:23 107 - 110 Dantley misses from the top of the key. Havlicek snags the board 2:13 107 - 110 Barnes misses short. Ruland grabs the rebound 2:00 107 - 110 Dantley hits the mid-range jumper. 1:40 109 - 110 Bing carries the ball. 1:30 109 - 110 Dantley hits from the baseline. 1:14 111 - 110 Maravich misses long. Dantley snags the board 1:05 111 - 110 Gilmore misses long. Dantley comes down with the offensive rebound 0:50 111 - 110 Dantley is fouled while shooting. Foul #2 on Wilt Chamberlain, team foul #4. Dantley makes the first FT and makes the second. 0:47 113 - 110 Havlicek hits from the baseline. 0:38 113 - 112 Jordan is fouled while shooting. Foul #4 on Pete Maravich, team foul #5. Jordan makes the first FT and makes the second. 0:25 115 - 112 Dantley comes up with a steal. 0:16 115 - 112 Ruland is fouled by Wilt Chamberlain on the floor. Foul #3 on Chamberlain, team foul #6. Ruland makes the first FT and misses the second. Barnes clears the rebound 0:14 116 - 112 Havlicek misses a 3 from the corner. Bing comes down with the offensive rebound 0:11 116 - 112 Bing nails a 3 from the corner. 0:08 116 - 115 Ruland is fouled by Wilt Chamberlain on the floor. Foul #4 on Chamberlain, team foul #7. Ruland makes the first FT and makes the second. 0:07 118 - 115 Bing misses a 3. Dantley snags the board 0:03 118 - 115 Cheeks loses it out of bounds.
2002-03 Burnzone call timeout. The ball is inbounded at half-court.0:01 118 - 115 Chamberlain misses a 3 from straight away. 0:00 118 - 115 4 T H Q U A R T E R - 2002-03 ILovethePacers: 118 2002-03 Burnzone: 115
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
[edit=29=1093902037][/edit]...Still "flying casual"
@roaminggnome74Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
PG Stockton
SG Bryant
SF Garnett
PF Nance
C Lanier
ThanksComment
-
Re: Drafting Game
*****PLAYER OF THE GAME---CHRIS MULLIN*****
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
2002-03 Jose Slaughter at 2002-03 Indy Magic Rats
8/30/2004 5:44:00 PM
Final
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Total
2002-03 Jose Slaughter
29 26 29 23
107
2002-03 Indy Magic Rats
41 29 30 30
130
VISITING TEAM: 2002-03 Jose Slaughter
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Magic Johnson
48
6/11
0/0
2/4
12
20
0
1
5
2
14
Zelmo Beaty
48
11/18
0/0
5/6
10
1
0
1
6
2
27
Anthony Mason
47
2/8
0/0
3/3
6
5
0
0
0
6
7
Kiki Vandeweghe
40
13/23
0/0
4/4
3
2
0
1
1
4
30
Tracy McGrady
30
5/12
2/3
2/4
1
1
0
3
1
3
14
Drazen Petrovic
24
7/11
0/0
1/1
2
2
0
0
0
2
15
Rick Barry
2
0/0
0/0
0/0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Otis Thorpe
1
0/0
0/0
0/0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTALS
240
44/83
2/3
17/22
34
31
0
6
13
19
107
53.0%
66.7%
77.3%
HOME TEAM: 2002-03 Indy Magic Rats
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Jerry West
48
9/20
1/6
3/3
6
12
0
2
3
3
22
Reggie Miller
48
7/9
1/1
6/6
2
9
0
0
4
2
21
Chris Mullin
48
13/19
2/5
8/8
5
4
0
1
1
3
36
Patrick Ewing
48
12/18
0/0
4/4
8
0
3
2
2
2
28
Shawn Kemp
41
8/10
0/0
7/9
13
2
1
0
1
4
23
Ben Wallace
7
0/0
0/0
0/0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
TOTALS
240
49/76
4/12
28/30
35
27
6
5
11
14
130
64.5%
33.3%
93.3%
Home •
SimLeagues •
SimMatchup •
Forums •
My Account •
Logout
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc.
All rights reserved.
[Terms of Use]
[Customer Support]
[Privacy Statement]
WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
...Still "flying casual"
@roaminggnome74Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
****PLAYER OF THE GAME---KIKI VANDEWEGHE*****
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
2002-03 Indy Magic Rats at 2002-03 Jose Slaughter
8/30/2004 5:46:00 PM
Final
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Total
2002-03 Indy Magic Rats
43 25 22 48
138
2002-03 Jose Slaughter
40 32 28 46
146
VISITING TEAM: 2002-03 Indy Magic Rats
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Jerry West
48
6/16
1/3
7/8
3
14
0
2
0
1
20
Reggie Miller
48
6/9
3/5
9/10
4
5
1
3
1
5
24
Shawn Kemp
48
17/18
0/0
9/13
8
4
0
2
2
3
43
Patrick Ewing
44
8/16
0/1
4/6
9
0
4
1
4
3
20
Chris Mullin
25
6/11
0/1
0/0
5
4
0
0
0
6
12
Bernard King
23
7/13
0/0
5/6
0
1
0
0
0
5
19
Sam Lacey
4
0/0
0/0
0/0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTALS
240
50/83
4/10
34/43
30
28
5
8
7
23
138
60.2%
40.0%
79.1%
HOME TEAM: 2002-03 Jose Slaughter
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Tracy McGrady
48
11/18
4/7
7/7
6
6
0
0
3
4
33
Kiki Vandeweghe
48
24/29
1/1
17/18
5
3
1
0
0
4
66
Anthony Mason
42
4/6
0/0
3/3
5
3
0
1
2
6
11
Magic Johnson
41
2/10
0/2
0/0
5
15
1
0
3
5
4
Zelmo Beaty
36
7/12
0/0
4/4
9
0
0
2
1
4
18
Mel Daniels
12
3/4
0/0
1/2
5
1
0
0
1
1
7
Mark Price
7
2/2
0/0
0/0
2
1
0
0
0
1
4
Otis Thorpe
6
0/0
0/0
3/4
2
1
0
1
0
3
3
TOTALS
240
53/81
5/10
35/38
39
30
2
4
10
28
146
65.4%
50.0%
92.1%
Home •
SimLeagues •
SimMatchup •
Forums •
My Account •
Logout
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc.
All rights reserved.
[Terms of Use]
[Customer Support]
[Privacy Statement]
WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
...Still "flying casual"
@roaminggnome74Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
*****PLAYER OF THE GAME---JACK TWYMAN*****
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
2002-03 able at 2002-03 LouisvilleLip
8/30/2004 5:49:00 PM
Final
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Total
2002-03 able
34 24 29 29
116
2002-03 LouisvilleLip
35 26 33 33
127
VISITING TEAM: 2002-03 able
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Vince Carter
48
14/23
3/6
8/8
6
3
1
3
1
6
39
Bob Pettit
48
7/25
0/1
7/9
12
2
1
0
1
3
21
Jermaine O'Neal
48
10/17
0/1
8/9
13
4
3
0
3
5
28
Jason Kidd
34
1/12
0/0
2/2
5
9
0
0
0
4
4
Bill Cartwright
28
2/3
0/0
2/2
3
2
0
0
1
5
6
Elvin Hayes
13
1/6
0/0
2/2
8
2
2
0
1
1
4
Larry Jones
11
4/4
0/0
0/0
1
0
0
1
0
0
8
Hakeem Olajuwon
7
1/3
0/0
4/4
3
0
1
2
1
1
6
Allen Iverson
3
0/1
0/0
0/0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTALS
240
40/94
3/8
33/36
51
22
8
6
8
25
116
42.6%
37.5%
91.7%
HOME TEAM: 2002-03 LouisvilleLip
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Jack Twyman
47
10/18
2/2
8/10
8
1
3
1
0
4
30
Oscar Robertson
44
6/18
1/2
6/10
14
10
0
1
4
5
19
Anfernee Hardaway
34
4/8
1/3
4/7
1
5
1
0
0
3
13
Bill Walton
34
6/9
0/0
4/8
11
4
0
0
2
4
16
Dan Issel
32
8/19
0/0
6/6
8
3
0
0
0
6
22
Sleepy Floyd
19
3/5
0/1
0/0
5
6
0
0
1
0
6
Caldwell Jones
16
5/8
0/0
0/0
4
0
3
0
0
0
10
Connie Hawkins
14
4/6
0/0
3/3
5
2
1
1
1
1
11
TOTALS
240
46/91
4/8
31/44
56
31
8
3
8
23
127
50.5%
50.0%
70.5%
Home •
SimLeagues •
SimMatchup •
Forums •
My Account •
Logout
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc.
All rights reserved.
[Terms of Use]
[Customer Support]
[Privacy Statement]
WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
...Still "flying casual"
@roaminggnome74Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
*****PLAYER OF THE GAME---JACK TWYMAN*****
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
2002-03 LouisvilleLip at 2002-03 able
8/30/2004 5:50:00 PM
Final
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Total
2002-03 LouisvilleLip
27 32 44 27
130
2002-03 able
25 27 20 25
97
VISITING TEAM: 2002-03 LouisvilleLip
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Anfernee Hardaway
48
9/12
1/2
2/3
9
5
0
3
3
1
21
Jack Twyman
47
12/28
0/5
12/14
7
6
0
2
1
5
36
Oscar Robertson
46
10/21
0/2
8/8
9
12
0
1
3
3
28
Dan Issel
43
7/14
0/0
11/12
17
3
0
2
2
5
25
Bill Walton
36
5/11
0/0
1/2
10
2
2
1
1
2
11
Caldwell Jones
14
4/4
0/0
1/2
3
0
2
0
0
0
9
Connie Hawkins
4
0/0
0/0
0/0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Mitch Richmond
2
0/0
0/0
0/0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
TOTALS
240
47/90
1/9
35/41
55
29
4
9
10
16
130
52.2%
11.1%
85.4%
HOME TEAM: 2002-03 able
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Vince Carter
48
6/17
3/3
3/4
3
4
0
1
2
3
18
Bill Cartwright
48
8/13
0/0
4/6
7
1
0
1
1
3
20
Bob Pettit
41
7/19
0/1
7/8
15
0
0
0
2
6
21
Jason Kidd
40
7/15
1/2
0/0
5
8
0
2
3
5
15
Elvin Hayes
30
5/18
0/2
5/6
10
2
0
1
6
3
15
Jermaine O'Neal
21
2/5
0/0
0/0
5
2
2
0
0
6
4
Larry Jones
5
1/3
0/0
2/2
2
1
0
0
1
0
4
Allen Iverson
4
0/0
0/0
0/0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
Marques Johnson
3
0/0
0/0
0/0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
TOTALS
240
36/90
4/8
21/26
47
18
2
6
16
29
97
40.0%
50.0%
80.8%
Home •
SimLeagues •
SimMatchup •
Forums •
My Account •
Logout
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc.
All rights reserved.
[Terms of Use]
[Customer Support]
[Privacy Statement]
WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
...Still "flying casual"
@roaminggnome74Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
My team F-ing sucks.Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
*****PLAYER OF THE GAME---MOSES MALONE*****
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
2002-03 dipperdunk at 2002-03 PIg Nash
8/30/2004 5:53:00 PM
Final
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Total
2002-03 dipperdunk
31 35 26 31
123
2002-03 PIg Nash
33 22 33 32
120
VISITING TEAM: 2002-03 dipperdunk
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Bob Cousy
48
6/18
0/0
3/6
5
10
0
3
1
2
15
Tim Duncan
48
8/13
0/1
14/21
18
5
3
1
4
3
30
Moses Malone
46
17/34
0/0
12/15
21
1
1
1
1
2
46
Julius Erving
38
7/16
0/0
0/0
10
7
1
2
1
6
14
Sidney Moncrief
25
3/10
0/0
0/0
3
2
0
0
0
4
6
Andrew Toney
17
3/7
0/1
2/2
1
0
0
0
2
2
8
James Worthy
10
2/6
0/1
0/2
4
0
0
0
0
0
4
Earl Monroe
6
0/3
0/0
0/0
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
Willis Reed
2
0/0
0/0
0/0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTALS
240
46/107
0/3
31/46
64
27
6
7
9
19
123
43.0%
0%
67.4%
HOME TEAM: 2002-03 PIg Nash
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Dominique Wilkins
48
11/25
0/1
7/10
15
5
2
1
5
2
29
World B. Free
36
4/11
0/1
7/8
3
4
0
0
0
2
15
Isiah Thomas
35
5/9
0/0
1/1
3
14
0
0
3
6
11
Bob McAdoo
35
7/16
0/0
3/4
13
5
2
0
0
6
17
Ralph Sampson
21
6/10
0/0
0/0
7
0
1
1
2
6
12
Terry Cummings
16
8/11
0/0
1/1
7
1
1
1
0
6
17
Michael Finley
15
1/3
0/0
0/0
3
1
1
1
0
0
2
Rich Kelley
13
0/2
0/0
0/0
4
0
3
0
1
2
0
Mark Aguirre
11
3/6
0/1
5/6
3
1
0
0
0
1
11
Walt Frazier
10
3/4
0/0
0/0
1
2
0
1
2
1
6
TOTALS
240
48/97
0/3
24/30
59
33
10
5
13
32
120
49.5%
0%
80.0%
Home •
SimLeagues •
SimMatchup •
Forums •
My Account •
Logout
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc.
All rights reserved.
[Terms of Use]
[Customer Support]
[Privacy Statement]
WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
WhatIfSports.com: Play by Play
4 T H Q U A R T E R 12:00 92 - 88 Frazier misses from the baseline. Cousy grabs the rebound 11:49 92 - 88 Duncan is called for traveling. 11:32 92 - 88 Frazier scores. 11:15 92 - 90 Duncan sinks the short jumper. 11:01 94 - 90 Aguirre is fouled while shooting. Foul #2 on Tim Duncan, team foul #1. Aguirre misses the first FT and makes the second.
2002-03 PIg Nash: IN: Isiah Thomas, Terry Cummings, Bob McAdoo -- OUT: Walt Frazier, Mark Aguirre, Rich Kelley.
2002-03 dipperdunk: IN: Sidney Moncrief, Julius Erving -- OUT: Andrew Toney, James Worthy.10:47 94 - 91 2002-03 dipperdunk: [PG] B. Cousy, [SG] S. Moncrief, [SF] J. Erving, [PF] T. Duncan, [C] M. Malone 2002-03 PIg Nash: [PG] I. Thomas, [SG] W. Free, [SF] D. Wilkins, [PF] T. Cummings, [C] B. McAdoo Malone is fouled by Isiah Thomas on the floor. Foul #5 on Thomas, team foul #1. 10:28 94 - 91 Malone lays it in. 10:11 96 - 91 Cummings sinks the short jumper. 9:57 96 - 93 Duncan is fouled while shooting. Foul #6 on Terry Cummings, team foul #2.
2002-03 PIg Nash: Terry Cummings is replaced by Ralph Sampson. Duncan makes the first FT and misses the second. Malone snags the offensive board9:40 97 - 93 Malone hits from the baseline. 9:37 99 - 93 Thomas misses long. Moncrief snags the board 9:26 99 - 93 Cousy misses the short jumper. Wilkins grabs the rebound 9:08 99 - 93 Sampson sinks the short jumper. 8:57 99 - 95 Duncan hits the mid-range jumper. 8:49 101 - 95 Sampson sinks the short jumper. 8:37 101 - 97 Cousy misses. Malone grabs the offensive rebound 8:25 101 - 97 Malone misses. Thomas grabs the rebound 8:22 101 - 97 McAdoo buries it from the top of the key. 8:06 101 - 99 Moncrief misses. McAdoo grabs the rebound 7:51 101 - 99 Thomas hits from the baseline. 7:40 101 - 101 Erving misses short. Malone snags the offensive board 7:29 101 - 101 Malone misses from the baseline. Malone comes down with the offensive rebound 7:26 101 - 101 Malone misses long. Duncan comes down with the offensive rebound 7:23 101 - 101 Duncan is fouled while shooting. Foul #6 on Ralph Sampson, team foul #3.
2002-03 PIg Nash: Ralph Sampson is replaced by Mark Aguirre. Duncan misses the first FT and misses the second. Wilkins clears the rebound7:20 101 - 101 Wilkins is called for traveling. 7:07 101 - 101 Erving sinks the short jumper. 6:58 103 - 101 Aguirre misses the short jumper. Erving clears the rebound 6:42 103 - 101 Moncrief misses from the baseline. Malone snags the offensive board 6:34 103 - 101 Malone hits from the baseline. 6:31 105 - 101 Thomas is fouled by Bob Cousy on the floor. Foul #2 on Cousy, team foul #2. 6:22 105 - 101 Wilkins sinks the short jumper. 6:09 105 - 103 Erving misses the short jumper. Free clears the rebound 5:55 105 - 103 Wilkins misses long. Duncan snags the board 5:42 105 - 103 Moncrief misses short. Erving grabs the offensive rebound 5:23 105 - 103 Erving scores. 5:20 107 - 103 Wilkins misses a 3. Erving snags the board 5:10 107 - 103 Moncrief misses short. Aguirre grabs the rebound 4:54 107 - 103 McAdoo sinks the short jumper. 4:40 107 - 105 Malone sinks the short jumper. 4:23 109 - 105 Free hits the mid-range jumper. 4:07 109 - 107 Erving misses from the baseline. McAdoo grabs the rebound 3:52 109 - 107 Aguirre is fouled while shooting. Foul #5 on Julius Erving, team foul #3. Aguirre makes the first FT and makes the second. 3:46 109 - 109 Duncan misses short. Wilkins snags the board 3:31 109 - 109 Aguirre lays it in. 3:20 109 - 111 Moncrief banks it in off the glass. 3:06 111 - 111 McAdoo lays it in. 2:58 111 - 113 Cousy is fouled by Isiah Thomas on the floor. Foul #6 on Thomas, team foul #4.
2002-03 PIg Nash: Isiah Thomas is replaced by Walt Frazier.2:45 111 - 113 Malone is fouled by Bob McAdoo on the floor. Foul #6 on McAdoo, team foul #5.
2002-03 PIg Nash: Bob McAdoo is replaced by Rich Kelley. Malone makes the first FT and makes the second.2:31 113 - 113 Wilkins is fouled while shooting. Foul #6 on Julius Erving, team foul #4.
2002-03 dipperdunk: Julius Erving is replaced by James Worthy. Wilkins makes the first FT and misses the second. Moncrief clears the rebound2:23 113 - 114 Malone's shot is blocked by Kelley. Malone grabs the offensive rebound 2:13 113 - 114 Malone misses from the top of the key. Malone snags the offensive board 2:10 113 - 114 Cousy is fouled while shooting. Foul #1 on Walt Frazier, team foul #6. Cousy makes the first FT and makes the second. 2:07 115 - 114 Aguirre buries it from the top of the key. 1:58 115 - 116 Malone loses it out of bounds. 1:42 115 - 116 Free misses short. Duncan clears the rebound 1:28 115 - 116 Moncrief misses off the glass. Frazier snags the board 1:20 115 - 116 Free misses short. Aguirre comes down with the offensive rebound 1:09 115 - 116 Aguirre is fouled while shooting. Foul #3 on Tim Duncan, team foul #5. Aguirre makes the first FT and makes the second. 1:06 115 - 118 Worthy banks it in off the glass. 0:55 117 - 118 Cousy comes up with a steal. 0:44 117 - 118 Cousy scores. 0:35 119 - 118 Aguirre scores the layup. 0:29 119 - 120 Duncan lays it in. 0:21 121 - 120 Cousy comes up with a steal. 0:11 121 - 120 Duncan is fouled by Mark Aguirre on the floor. Foul #1 on Aguirre, team foul #7. Duncan makes the first FT and makes the second. 0:09 123 - 120 Free misses a 3 from straight away. Aguirre snags the offensive board 0:04 123 - 120 Aguirre's shot is blocked by Duncan. Duncan snags the board 0:01 123 - 120 Worthy is fouled by Dominique Wilkins on the floor. Foul #2 on Wilkins, team foul #8. Worthy misses the first FT and misses the second. 0:00 123 - 120 4 T H Q U A R T E R - 2002-03 dipperdunk: 123 2002-03 PIg Nash: 120
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
...Still "flying casual"
@roaminggnome74Comment
-
Re: Drafting Game
*****PLAYER OF THE GAME---BOB McADOO*****
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
WhatIfSports.com: NBA Boxscore
2002-03 PIg Nash at 2002-03 dipperdunk
8/30/2004 5:56:00 PM
Final
1st
2nd
3rd
4th
Total
2002-03 PIg Nash
29 32 33 33
127
2002-03 dipperdunk
33 28 31 28
120
VISITING TEAM: 2002-03 PIg Nash
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Isiah Thomas
48
7/16
1/1
6/8
7
17
0
2
2
3
21
Dominique Wilkins
48
12/23
1/1
6/6
11
2
1
4
4
2
31
Bob McAdoo
48
12/23
0/0
9/10
18
3
4
2
0
2
33
World B. Free
45
6/14
0/0
7/12
1
4
0
0
0
6
19
Ralph Sampson
34
7/13
0/0
5/6
14
2
3
1
2
2
19
Terry Cummings
14
2/6
0/0
0/0
4
1
0
1
1
6
4
Michael Finley
3
0/0
0/0
0/0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
TOTALS
240
46/95
2/2
33/42
56
29
8
10
11
21
127
48.4%
100.0%
78.6%
HOME TEAM: 2002-03 dipperdunk
PLAYER
MIN
FGM/FGA
3PT
FGM/FGA
FTM/FTA
REB
AST
BLK
STL
TO
PF
TP
Bob Cousy
48
7/17
1/6
6/6
8
10
0
1
2
4
21
Sidney Moncrief
48
9/19
0/1
5/8
4
8
0
0
2
5
23
Julius Erving
41
8/23
0/1
5/6
17
4
1
2
5
6
21
Moses Malone
35
8/27
0/1
2/2
15
2
1
0
3
4
18
Tim Duncan
32
5/11
0/1
8/10
13
2
0
1
2
5
18
Willis Reed
21
7/11
0/0
1/1
7
1
2
0
0
0
15
Bobby Jones
8
1/3
0/0
0/0
1
0
1
0
0
1
2
James Worthy
7
1/1
0/0
0/0
1
0
0
1
0
0
2
TOTALS
240
46/112
1/10
27/33
66
27
5
5
14
25
120
41.1%
10.0%
81.8%
Home •
SimLeagues •
SimMatchup •
Forums •
My Account •
Logout
© 1999-2004 WhatIfSports.com, Inc.
All rights reserved.
[Terms of Use]
[Customer Support]
[Privacy Statement]
WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license.
The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.
...Still "flying casual"
@roaminggnome74Comment
Comment