Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

    Originally posted by Bball View Post
    we might start preparing ourselves for the possibility that Tyler's career could be a short one due to this.
    Yeah, I've been waiting for this topic to come up for at least a month.

    I've been waiting for a simple statement from the Pacers: "We expect Tyler to be fine before next season." We haven't heard anything like that, which means it's at least possible that he might be done.
    This space for rent.

    Comment


    • #77
      Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

      Originally posted by Anthem View Post
      Yeah, I've been waiting for this topic to come up for at least a month.

      I've been waiting for a simple statement from the Pacers: "We expect Tyler to be fine before next season." We haven't heard anything like that, which means it's at least possible that he might be done.
      Likely they haven't a clue either.
      The way these things often play out is that the player eventually can play but could be a season or two or.....

      Comment


      • #78
        Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

        Originally posted by Psycho T View Post
        For those thinking that Hansbrough had some mysterious injury at UNC that wasnt disclosed.. Well you can stop right there because it isnt true. You dont average 20 and 10 while hiding a serious injury that could set you out an entire season. It isnt possible.

        He had already played this season and that proves this head injury happened during the season at some point and judging by the mini groove he was in before he started missing time tells us that he was fine at that point.

        IMO he had an ear infection and that ended up making his PCS worse by giving him lingering vertigo.

        For all we know his concussion could have happened while he was out.. He might have fell and hit his head or the ear infection just gave him some PCS symptoms.

        Multiple concussions can accumulate symptons. After my second concussion I was told by the doctor that I could have brain damage on my next one. My football days were over.

        Tyler's history of concussions could not have been an undisclosed medical condition, if in fact all it takes is for some random poster to google his name and concussion.

        But the severity of the concussions might not have been disclosed. To assess the severity one would need a cat scan and other scans. I doubt many teams flagged him for a cat scan since in fact he was playing so much in college.

        Any way I would classify Tyler's condition as PPCS (Prolong Post Concussion Syndrome). Symptom's could last for over six months. I almost failed to graduate because I had severe irritability and anxiety due to my PPCS. Friends were saying that I was going through menapause.

        I had physical and behavioral therapy for my condition. The major indication is loss of consciousness in the incident. I was out only 20 seconds, but I loss 3 hours of memory before and after the last incident. So that would be my question. Did he lose consciousness?

        Tyler is forever more suseceptable to PCS or PPCS due to his history.

        There is a major difference between minor concussions and major concussions. Maybe that was the undisclosed part.

        Comment


        • #79
          Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

          Originally posted by Major Cold View Post
          Multiple concussions can accumulate symptons. After my second concussion I was told by the doctor that I could have brain damage on my next one. My football days were over.

          Tyler's history of concussions could not have been an undisclosed medical condition, if in fact all it takes is for some random poster to google his name and concussion.

          But the severity of the concussions might not have been disclosed. To assess the severity one would need a cat scan and other scans. I doubt many teams flagged him for a cat scan since in fact he was playing so much in college.

          Any way I would classify Tyler's condition as PPCS (Prolong Post Concussion Syndrome). Symptom's could last for over six months. I almost failed to graduate because I had severe irritability and anxiety due to my PPCS. Friends were saying that I was going through menapause.

          I had physical and behavioral therapy for my condition. The major indication is loss of consciousness in the incident. I was out only 20 seconds, but I loss 3 hours of memory before and after the last incident. So that would be my question. Did he lose consciousness?

          Tyler is forever more suseceptable to PCS or PPCS due to his history.

          There is a major difference between minor concussions and major concussions. Maybe that was the undisclosed part.
          My thinking at this point is that "undisclosed" means the Pacers didn't do all the homework on Tyler they should have. Or maybe they did, took a chance, and got burned. It happens.

          1. Given that we can google the fact that he had two concussions at UNC, the Pacers had enough information to be on alert about PCS.

          2. Concussions happen in basketball, but they seem fairly rare and it seems even more rare for a guy to have had two of them.

          3. Given those facts, a sensible thing for the Pacers to do would have been to look hard at his medical history. If the Pacers didn't, or if they were somehow stonewalled, then the joke's on them for ignoring it.

          4. It's also very possible that they looked at it, figured it was unlikely to be a problem, and just turned out to be wrong.
          SportsTwo.com

          Comment


          • #80
            Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

            Of course they felt it was not a problem. They passed on Blair and did their homework on him, or maybe they listened to other GMs homework.

            Either way I don't pin this on the Front Office. Obviously the head bump against Dallas coupled with an IEI was what triggered PCS or PPCS.

            Comment


            • #81
              Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

              Looks like the pacers been calling this an ear infection and it was a concussion, it also looks like Mike Wells got used to PD calling Mcroberts McBob


              http://blogs.indystar.com/pacersinsi...rough_and.html

              Hansbrough and McBob

              DENVER - Pacers coach Jim O'Brien, who has been a busy person with the fans this week, brought to light some news surrounding rookie Tyler Hansbrough on his weekly radio show on WFNI-1070 AM with Kevin Lee.

              O'Brien said Hansbrough may be dealing with post concussion syndrome.

              I asked O'Brien about it before the game.

              "I'm not 100 percent sure that they are 100 percent sure what exactly are the difficulties," O'Brien said. "They thought it was an inner ear infection, they thought it was post concussion (syndrome). Maybe it's a possibility of a lot of things."

              O'Brien said he thinks Hansbrough got the concussion against Boston on Dec. 22.

              "We're not 100 percent sure he had a concussion, but there's a good chance he did at that point in time because he got hit in the head and it seemed right from the proximity of his problems starting," O'Brien said.

              Hansbrough played in the next two games, including 31 minutes against Atlanta on Dec. 26, before the team announced he had the inner ear infection and shut him down on Dec. 30.

              The team will continue to call it an inner ear infection for the time being.Hansbrough could still turn out to be a great pick for the Pacers down the road, but this has been a waste of a rookie season for him.

              The Pacers could use any kind of toughness they can get because that's an area they really lack in.

              "It'll be like having another rookie year next season," O'Brien said about Hansbrough.
              Last edited by vnzla81; 03-06-2010, 10:36 AM.
              @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

              Comment


              • #82
                Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                My question is does the training staff really know what they're doing?
                I'm sure they do since they work for a professional basketball team but it seems that over the years Pacers players have had a lot more injury problems than other players.
                Also it seems that a lot of times the injuries could have been prevented:

                -Dunleavy and his knee when he came back too soon(I think that was last year)
                -Granger playing through whatever injury it was (knee I think) earlier this year which ended up with him injuring his foot and being out 5 weeks
                -Now Tyler and this whole deal about how maybe he had a concussion that they didn't really know about
                -Oh and Jermaine O'Neal and all his knee problems which oddly enough seem to have disappeared since he's found his way to Miami

                I'm sure I am leaving out some other as well...

                Comment


                • #83
                  Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                  Originally posted by JOB
                  "It'll be like having another rookie year next season," O'Brien said about Hansbrough.
                  This doesn't fit real well with the idea that playing AJ a lot this year doesn't really matter.

                  In fact, for AJ it will be like another rookie year. (Aren't his minutes similar to Tyler's for the year?)
                  "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                    The concussion may have happened Dec 22, then the Ear Infection was diagnosed on or about the 29th.

                    Seems possible they are connected. However, considering he has seen specialists who didn't seem to rule out the ear infection, it is very hard to blame this on the Pacers medical staff. Sounds like this one is just a really hard one to figure out.
                    BillS

                    A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                    Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                      He either had an infection or not. It is hard to misdiagnose an inner ear infection. But the symptoms can be attributed to the wrong thing.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                        Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
                        This doesn't fit real well with the idea that playing AJ a lot this year doesn't really matter.

                        In fact, for AJ it will be like another rookie year. (Aren't his minutes similar to Tyler's for the year?)
                        There you go. JOB caught in his own BS where his "reasons" contradict each other, proving to me that at least some of what he says is not a real reason at all but just BS cover up.

                        Either he couldn't give a s*** about player development or he doesn't really think Tyler will lose out on not playing this year. I'm with you, he's just fine with Roy having another rookie year this year just so Rasho could play 1200 meaningless minutes and has no problem giving McRoberts 2 extra rookie years and Price another rookie year.

                        So next year when all these kids play like rookies and it upsets him, he can just walk over to a mirror.

                        Of course he's dragging the rest of us along for the misery ride, and the team is asking to pony up more money to support this next year.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                          Originally posted by Major Cold View Post
                          He either had an infection or not. It is hard to misdiagnose an inner ear infection. But the symptoms can be attributed to the wrong thing.
                          It's not necessarily hard to misdiagnose it at the start, especially if there's no tell-tale inflammation but there are other symptoms. But if those other symptoms stick around, treatment and rest doesn't help, and no tell-tale inflammation ever shows, it gets increasingly less likely the initial diagnosis was ever correct.

                          Judging by what O'Brien said it looks like that is exactly the case. Of course judging anything by what O'Brien says is usually an exercise in futility.
                          Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                          ------

                          "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                          -John Wooden

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                            It sounds to me like what happened is the Pacers medical staff screwed up repeatedly.

                            Dec 22 he likely suffered a concussion that wasn't properly diagnosed as a concussion.

                            One of the things that frequently leads to PCS problems is from repeated trauma. Like, if you have a mild concussion and wait a week for everything to heal, you're generally fine. But if you follow up the mild concussion more getting your head banged around, you have a much higher risk incurring long-lasting injury.

                            This sounds like exactly what happened. Tyler suffered a concussion but was allowed to go out and play with it (and practice, I'd assume) the next couple of games. This likely exacerbated the problem.

                            Then, they misdiagnosed the problem as an inner ear infection because it produces similar symptoms and often doesn't show any outward evidence.
                            SportsTwo.com

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                              Originally posted by BillS View Post
                              Sometimes the elephant in the room is just an elephant, not a big gray tent with wire armatures made to look like an elephant in order to disguise the crates of rabid weasels.
                              Originally posted by Naptown_Seth
                              But usually it's weasels, sneaky f****ers.

                              Yeah. I hate weasels!





                              But, I think Bill's point right here is the most important one.

                              Originally posted by BillS View Post
                              I don't understand the apparent desire to declare that there was a misdiagnosis involved. Why is a misdiagnosis more likely than the idea that he REALLY had an ear infection whose major symptoms subsided but left remnants that turned out to be from PCS?

                              None of us (except The Poster Formerly Known as Kaufman) and maybe one or two others are medical professionals. We don't know the implications of anything we hear. We don't know, with any medical announcement, if what the team, tells us is a symptom, a cause, or a diagnosis.

                              We don't know on any occasion if they are telling us everything they know, but we DO know that they are never under no obligation to do so. If they tell us a player is not going to play because of (something) , then we can believe the player won't play. The team is under no obligation to tell us a complete diagnosis, and probably has a moral obligation not to tell us everything. All we are entitled to know is that the player is out for medical reasons.

                              It is OK for us to muse and ponder and theorize about the nature of the medical condition. But it is WRONG of us to accuse TPTB of not revealing everything about a player's health, and it is WRONG of us to pretend that we even understand the full implications of what they tell us.




                              EDIT: If anybody on the forum happens to be a medical professional and a genuine expert on ear infections and would identify himself as such, I'd be happy to read his opinions. If such a person exists, he ought to be able to end the debate with a real diagnosis.

                              But the rest of us ought to recognize how bogus our amateur diagnoses are.
                              .
                              Last edited by Putnam; 03-06-2010, 05:17 PM.
                              And I won't be here to see the day
                              It all dries up and blows away
                              I'd hang around just to see
                              But they never had much use for me
                              In Levelland. (James McMurtry)

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Re: Jim O'Brien confirms that Tyler has post concussion syndrome

                                Even if Kaufman was here. He would need to see Tyler to make an accurate diagnosis.

                                Never make complete judgment on incomplete knowledge. So you can assume everything you want, but if you want to write off TPTB with incomplete knowledge.....how much have you pre-determined the nature of TPTB?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X