Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

    Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
    The sneaky stars to me were Ndiaye (C) and Rosario (SG) from Rutgers. Ndiaye is a SR and is crushing in blocked shots. I happened to be doubling this viewing with the Rutgers/UNC replay during timeouts, so I was also seeing him vs Ed Davis. Ndiaye is a little rough in some places, but IMO he's better than Thabeet was last year at this point. He can make some pretty good moves in the lane and certainly is a big, impressive defender.

    Rosario got the same treatment he saw vs UNC, they put bigger, physical defenders on him and it gave him some trouble. But he also lacked the team support to help get him good looks. Despite a not great night, his moves and style look very NBA capable. He's only a sophmore and I assume will stay one more year. I think he's a guy to keep your eye on as a pure scorer.


    Ed Davis just does not impress me when you see him against a kid like Ndiaye. He's not as big, not as physical, and yet he's got all these "PF numbers". I can't buy in yet. If the concern was that James Johnson or Jordan Hill were soft as bigs, then it has to apply to Davis too. At least from what I've seen.
    I concur with DrFife on your assessments of College Players.....so I'll ask the obvious question since it's been continually brought up here in regards to Hibbert. Who ( for now ) is the closest Player in the Draft that resembles the type of Player that we will need to complement Hibbert?

    It doesn't sound like ( for now ) that Ed Davis is that guy.

    It's been mentioned by several here that we need a Dale Davis-like Player to complement Hibbert.

    Can someone give me a quick description of what Dale David did that was complementary to Rik Smits?

    I'm guessing that Dale Davis was a Big Man that was more of a PF then a Center ( but could...if needed play both positions )....that was more of a "banger inside", was somewhat athletic and was a very solid Low-Post defender and rebounder. Does that sound about right?

    How much of a concern was Dale Davis' Offensive game?

    I never really paid attention way back when...only thinking that Dale was probably a more lanky, probably quicker, tougher and longer version of Jeff Foster....but I didn't really get the sense that we relied upon his Offensive game that often.

    I guess the obvious question is whether there is a Dale Davis out there that we can draft to play next to our modern-day version of Rik Smits?
    Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

    Comment


    • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

      I'm not sure where this thread has ended up but I have one simple question... What's all the hype with John Wall??
      I watched the KY vs. LOU game last week and wasn't impressed. Sure, he has basketball skills but I saw nothing spectacular on his part. There were 2 distinct things I did see in him though. He seemed very cocky for starters. He def had that "Hey lookie here I'm John Wall, recognize!" Also, he's a terrible free throw shooter. He was in that game anyway. He was clanking easy FT's with no pressure off the back of the rim. maybe it was a bad game. Idk, Ive only seen him in that one game. Ive heard all the hype. So im curious about him.
      Did I just see a bad game??
      Coach Vogel on the Chicago crowd in game 4 : "I only heard pacers fans. I didn't see any red, I saw Pacers fans I saw yellow and blue, and I heard Pacers chants. That's all I heard the whole game."

      http://www.cacawebdev.com

      Comment


      • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

        Wall is shooting .786 (.819 prior to going 7-12 vs Louisville) from the line. I'd hardly call that terrible.

        Comment


        • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

          Perhaps i did catch a bad game to form an opinion on him. an opinion based on his true talent that is. but if you caught that game, you have to say he had some hardcore struggles from the line.
          Coach Vogel on the Chicago crowd in game 4 : "I only heard pacers fans. I didn't see any red, I saw Pacers fans I saw yellow and blue, and I heard Pacers chants. That's all I heard the whole game."

          http://www.cacawebdev.com

          Comment


          • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

            Originally posted by DrFife View Post
            At the risk of feeding your ego, Seth (to the dismay of others ), I'll say that I highly value your draft-related opinions and insights. That said, as the winter unfolds, may I ask you, please, to gather evidence and post an opinion on Larry Sanders? I got an early seat on his bandwagon -- I believe he could develop into the Player X we've longed for to complement Hibby and your buddy Hans -- but I don't watch nearly the amount of footage you do, and I'd really appreciate your notes on him (in time).
            T'bird and I were raving about him last summer even. We both really like Sanders. I haven't gotten to see VCU this year yet, but when I tracked down a couple of games last year to see Maynor, Sanders was the kid I noticed instead. He was far more their impact guy, someone the team could lean on.

            I'm hoping he'll continue to impress...but maybe not quite too much. However I was bullish on Monroe and so far that's not been so great this year.


            Of course I got off the Hibbert bandwagon his final year after being all geeked up to see his progression, and he's panning out. Of course in my defense he is awkward and slow which was my knock. He even said so himself in the in-game video the other night (he cited it as his least favorite thing about himself).



            The last 2 years when I've gone way out of my way to track players I've noticed that 3-4 guys will play up and 3-4 will play down in the draft. Not sure who yet, but someone we aren't really watching will start standing out and walk right up from something like 20th to 12th in draft ranking, or higher. Sanders could be one of those guys.

            Comment


            • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

              Originally posted by Dr. Awesome View Post
              Ed Davis has played really well, what are you talking about? He started off a little hesitant, but if you watch a UNC game now he has stepped up as the leader - he just has 5 other post players he has to share time/shots with: Deon Thompson, John Henson, Tyler Zeller, David Wear, and Travis Wear.

              His rebounding and defense have been great too.
              Could be my Harden for this year. Caught a couple unimpressive moments early, some people wondered WTF I was talking about, so I made sure to keep tracking him and came to change my opinion quite a bit.

              I haven't seen all the Rutgers game yet, but what I watched so far didn't look like much in terms of NBA moves and style. Obviously I'll see plenty more UNC game this year.


              I couldn't care less about stats, except as a way to keep some rough tab on a player when I can't see them play. I want to see HOW they got them. I'm telling you right now that Harangoody does not look like an NBA guy, but he's killing the numbers again.

              Comment


              • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                Dale did lots of things, rebounding, physical defense and was able to play as big as or bigger than other tough, tall guys. Hans is nowhere close to that, nor is he like Tony at all. Tony, especially younger and leaner Tony, was just a slight chip less than being a Dale close. A bit more offense, maybe not quite the defense, but pretty dang strong inside.

                These guys didn't bounce off people and slap and just go nuts like Hans does, they were something closer to wrestling you into submission.

                However, I think when you are looking to find that in a college kid now, you are probably better off watching how he screens. One thing I liked about Blair, he put a body on people and kept his screen or pick ENGAGED, ie he established contact without pulling a moving screen foul and then moved just enough to keep you locked up without extending his arms.

                Rebounds can come in many ways, as can blocks, but there is only one way to consistently set strong, solid picks. That's by being Dale-like in your court presence. You don't see many NCAA bigs that can, partially because the younger guys haven't even filled out yet. So when you do see one, you notice.

                Comment


                • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                  Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                  Dale did lots of things, rebounding, physical defense and was able to play as big as or bigger than other tough, tall guys. Hans is nowhere close to that, nor is he like Tony at all. Tony, especially younger and leaner Tony, was just a slight chip less than being a Dale close. A bit more offense, maybe not quite the defense, but pretty dang strong inside.

                  These guys didn't bounce off people and slap and just go nuts like Hans does, they were something closer to wrestling you into submission.

                  However, I think when you are looking to find that in a college kid now, you are probably better off watching how he screens. One thing I liked about Blair, he put a body on people and kept his screen or pick ENGAGED, ie he established contact without pulling a moving screen foul and then moved just enough to keep you locked up without extending his arms.

                  Rebounds can come in many ways, as can blocks, but there is only one way to consistently set strong, solid picks. That's by being Dale-like in your court presence. You don't see many NCAA bigs that can, partially because the younger guys haven't even filled out yet. So when you do see one, you notice.
                  I'm guessing that you're responding to my question about Dale Davis. Do you see anyone ( for now ) in the draft that ( in any way ) resembles this type of Player that you mention?
                  Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                    Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                    I'm guessing that you're responding to my question about Dale Davis. Do you see anyone ( for now ) in the draft that ( in any way ) resembles this type of Player that you mention?
                    I haven't seen anyone like that in a long time. I think the closest I've seen is Reggie Evans and he is obviously a very poor mans Dale Davis.

                    I still don't buy all the hype with DeJuan Blair, maybe its just because I don't want to eat crow from all the things I said about him over the summer, but I just can't buy into the hype. I don't think he will get better from where he is now and I still believe he will have a large injury history(hope I'm wrong). I'm glad we have Hansbrough over him, but like I've said 1,000 times, I really would prefer either Holiday or Lawson.

                    Also, another thing that really stands out to me with Ed Davis is his rebounding. Rebounding seems to be the one stat that translates well to the NBA. Ed Davis is 6'10 and has a lot of athletic ability that helps him get rebounds, but he is crazy skinny. When Ed Davis adds some muscle to his frame, I think it will only help increase that as he would be able to out muscle people more.
                    Last edited by Dr. Awesome; 01-09-2010, 12:21 AM.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                      Malcom Lee (UCLA) vs Cal
                      What? Really? This is a top prospect (according to HoopsHype)? Not in this game. He made no off the ball reads except one ball hawk steal of a long lob pass from a baseline trap. He did nothing off the ball on offense. He's a tweener that UCLA has playing PG now and at 6'4" that would be nice.

                      His shot was iffy. Semi good form I guess but some horrible misses on shots he took with time and confidence, his 1-7 shooting was well earned. I never saw him make big floor reads, never really created a big play for someone. His lack of off ball involvement meant few big rebounds either.

                      Defense - they went between zone and man. He really didn't come up with a big play on his own, the lob pass steal was created by others. He often made very sloppy reads or efforts on screens which left his man with a significant advantage or tons of space.

                      Unless Lee makes a large improvement he seems to be a non-factor in this draft. Right now he's maybe a lesser version of a Willie Warren or something. Maybe if I saw his game vs NDame I'd feel different, but then that is a major standout effort for him and not the norm.


                      Honeycutt, his 6'7" teammate was pleasantly active and pulled down a ton of tough rebounds with physical efforts. He made a couple of really nice entry passes, reaching to get the improved angle and make a safer feed. I look for those little decisions where a guy isn't just going through the motions, but is improving the situation with an on-the-fly choice.

                      The question on him will be size, as he's closest to being a shorter version of T Prince. He's a freshman who is clearly still finding his game and won't come out this year or maybe even next. Just putting a post it note to follow him a bit and see where it goes.


                      CAL has a solid team but no one stood out for sure here since I wasn't really focused on them.



                      Next up - either that Seattle U romp over OSt or Syracuse vs Pitt.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                        Call me pessitmistic but I sort of got the feeling that our draft picks will again be around the 13-17 range. Has anyone seen Ekpe Udoh?

                        Comment


                        • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                          I'm guessing we'll be picking at #7 or #8. We'll see. Obviously Wall, Favors, Davis or Turner will all be gone.
                          2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                          2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                          2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

                          Comment


                          • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                            Gani Lawal is looking really good against Duke right now. Perhaps a target late in the 1st round, or early 2nd, which we will have if our play continues

                            Comment


                            • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                              Well Favors isn't looking impressive at all today. Poor screens and especially poor pick and roll defense. If it was NBA talent they'd be eating him alive as he's left a wide open lane for the ball handler or his man to roll to the basket. Hands are constantly at his sides on defense also. His typical method of blocking out is to put his butt against the other player and his hands are at his knees. He's also taking ball out of bounds quite often for GT and the offense is having to wait for him to jog down the court. If this is his modus operandi, he needs another year of college.

                              Comment


                              • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                                Just watched the Kentucky game. Georgia either has a good team or Kentucky just plain struggled against the zone.

                                Wasn't impressed by Wall's decision making. The guy is fast and has some serious moves on the court, but just had a lot of mental mistakes. He did seem to hustle on D and try to stick to his guys as much as possible. Seems at least an average defender that could be better if he really wanted to. He is only a freshman so I can probably give him a pass on some of his mental mistakes. For the most part he did seem to try and find his teammates, but there were times you could tell that it was all about him and getting his shots.

                                Patrick Patterson played a pretty good game but seemed to disappear quite a bit.

                                Cousins does have some good post moves and seems to move pretty well for such a big guy. Doesn't seem to have a lot of lift and got blocked quite a bit, but he kept banging and taking it at guys trying to draw fouls, so you have to like that. Kinda reminded me of Hans that way. haha Seemed to get beat a lot by the opposing players, so I don't seem him as a good defender in the post that the Pacers really need.

                                It was one game, so maybe the Bulldogs just matched up well against Kentucky. Pretty close game all the way.
                                First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X