Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

    As far as Monroe/Roy pairing. I tried to think of a scenario where you have the rebounding and toughness come from other positions. I can't think of one. I think that BRush is a good rebounder for that position and I agree with Bird that Danny could elavate that part of his game. Even with that happening, I still can't see it being enough to make up for a "soft" or "skill-oriented" front line.

    The other side of the coin is this, imho, if Monroe is still available at 10 and he is clearly the best available you take him and worry about the rest of it later. The Pacers aren't in a position to pass on talent based on fit at this point, imo.

    The reason I say this, let's say it's a disaster pairing, but they both are really good at the same things, you now have a solid trade piece.

    If you draft solely on need and get a less talented role player who doesn't work out because they lack talent, you have nothing. Same with a reach project player, if he doesn't get better, you have nothing.

    Bad teams don't have the luxury to pass on talent, regardless of need.
    Last edited by Speed; 04-23-2010, 11:00 AM.

    Comment


    • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

      I think that Monroe would actually be a very good fit next to Hibbert. I think that you will see Monroe put on some weight once he gets to the pros, which will help his rebounding/positioning. That is really what he needs and I think if you look at his frame, he is not filling out his shoulder width yet. I think if Monroe became stronger, his effectiveness would go up tremendously. I also think that Hibbert is much more suited to the low post, whereas Monroe is decent in the low block, but he is much better than Hibbert as a mid-range shooter.

      I think people overrate his apparent "lack of athleticism" and forget how great his touch and feel for the game are. I think he is athletic, but too many times he would put the ball on the floor from the college three point line and never quite get to the hole. Other guys would collapse, or he would take a bad dribble, or be forced to change directions too fast for his natural pace. If he started his drives from just outside the elbow, in the 15' range where is a good shooter, he would create more mismatches than attempting to start so far outside. He is a touch awkward looking and I think people knock his athleticism for not being smooth like Welsey Johnson.

      I think Monroe has incredible upside, but he would have a lot to work on and if he doesn't quite have the work ethic that the article suggests, then he will only be a servicable front court player, not great. I think you need to give a lot of consideration to the fact that Monroe was on the court with four guards at all times. The closest thing they had to another big was Julian Vaughn who is listed at 6'9" but that's a sizeable stretch and he played more like a guard. He was often times posting up against zones and was actually pretty effective with it. He can break down what the defense gives him very effectively. Teams gameplanned around guarding Monroe, often times doubling him in the post. With as many zones as he faced, it forced him to the outside more where teams could contain him more effectively. He was also often times fighting four players for rebounds with absolutely no help. I am very high on this kid after watching him and think there are a few things that would really help his transition to the NBA. I think he would be very good with Hibbert. This is looking a couple years out and assuming he will fill out with the help of NBA strength and conditioning coaches.
      Last edited by pacergod2; 04-23-2010, 11:08 AM.
      "Your course, your path, is not going to be like mine," West says. "Everybody is not called to be a multimillionaire. Everybody's not called to be the president. Whatever your best work is, you do it. Do it well. … You cease your own greatness when you aspire to be someone else."

      Comment


      • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

        Monroe's only 19 too, so ya upside should be there.

        Comment


        • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

          Ok, NBAdraft has a player called Tiny Gallon listed in their mock draft. It's not a name I've heard b4. Anyone know who the heck he is? He supposedly weighs 290 pounds. How can he be better than Ndiaye to make the draft?

          I see where in the 4/20 mock Stanley Robinson dropped to the 2nd round. It looks like Udoh has dropped a little too.

          "If" things would stay this way, I'd really be interested in trading Minnie our #10 for their 16 & 23. I'd also like to make a trade up in the 2nd round in order to have 2 top 10 picks in the 2nd round.

          Comment


          • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

            Originally posted by Skaut_Ech View Post
            I think it would be a really bad pairing. You'd have two guys who are more mid-range jumper guys who would occupy the same space on the floor. we would get KILLED on the boards on both ends of the floor. I don't see either guy being a "dirty work" guy, and that's what needed.

            Best most well known examples I can think of are Hakeem/Sampson and Robinson/Duncan. In those cases Hakeem and Duncan were the fundamentals, dirty work guys. I don't see Monroe or Roy carving out that role.
            Wait, when did Roy become a "mid-range jumper guy"? Yes, he has that shot, but he's our low post guy.

            I don't like the pairing out of concern for defense.

            Comment


            • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

              Tiny Gallon was a freshman this year at Oklahoma. He was highly touted coming out of high school (Oak Hill). He was one of two big time recruits that came into OK this year, and they both supposedly contributed to Willie Warren having such a bad year. I am not a huge fan of WW's game, but he is athletic and has some terrific basketball ability. Last year, I hated him as a top ten choice. A late first, early second this year is very good value. Tiny Gallon is called Tiny for a reason. He is anything but Tiny. He is not really tall at 6'8"-6'9", but he is just a big dude. Reminds me of Tractor Trailor, but not as fat.
              "Your course, your path, is not going to be like mine," West says. "Everybody is not called to be a multimillionaire. Everybody's not called to be the president. Whatever your best work is, you do it. Do it well. … You cease your own greatness when you aspire to be someone else."

              Comment


              • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                Originally posted by Hillman's 'Fro' View Post
                Need less to say, Favors would be the perfect fit next to Hibbs. But
                unless Bird is ready to part with Granger to move up to #3 or 4 (which
                I assume would induce wholesale mutiny on PD and among most Pacer
                fans), that's not gonna happen.

                Personally though, assuming they stay at #10 post-Lottery, I'm not
                sure that the Pacers are even at the point where drafting (or seriously
                reaching, as with Bledsoe) for need makes the most sense.
                Drafting
                the best player available regardless of current 'fit' may make more
                sense as a means of accumulating valuable assets.
                Drafting the BPA is always the best practice to follow when it comes to the draft. But IMHO, at the 10th pick....it's debateable as to which Player would be the BPA as there isn't a clear cut favorite among the likely remaining Players. Unless some Player that is slated to be some top tier Player that somehow falls ( like Granger when we drafted him ), it's not entirely unreasonable for me to consider taking positional need into consideration. The only scenario where I can see this happening is if TPTB really think that taking Bledsoe at the 11th spot isn't a total reach. Otherwise, if we were to draft someone like Patterson or Udoh....it would make sense where it's not unreasonable to assume that the BPA happens to fit a positional need ( since this draft is deep in SF/PFs ).
                Last edited by CableKC; 04-23-2010, 11:35 AM.
                Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                Comment


                • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                  Originally posted by pacergod2 View Post
                  Tiny Gallon was a freshman this year at Oklahoma. He was highly touted coming out of high school (Oak Hill). He was one of two big time recruits that came into OK this year, and they both supposedly contributed to Willie Warren having such a bad year. I am not a huge fan of WW's game, but he is athletic and has some terrific basketball ability. Last year, I hated him as a top ten choice. A late first, early second this year is very good value. Tiny Gallon is called Tiny for a reason. He is anything but Tiny. He is not really tall at 6'8"-6'9", but he is just a big dude. Reminds me of Tractor Trailor, but not as fat.


                  Thanks!

                  How about a Glen "Baby" Davis when he was drafted?

                  Comment


                  • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                    Originally posted by Justin Tyme View Post
                    Thanks!

                    How about a Glen "Baby" Davis when he was drafted?
                    I would definitely say similar in stature. I have not gotten to see Tiny Gallon play too much because the only OK games I saw were early in the season. I don't know what his game turned into. He looked lost to me. He dominated bad teams and didn't do great against better teams. His playing time was sporadic and it wasn't because of foul trouble. I just don't know about him. I think he realizes he may have weight issues later down the road and he wants to try to cash in as much as possible now.
                    "Your course, your path, is not going to be like mine," West says. "Everybody is not called to be a multimillionaire. Everybody's not called to be the president. Whatever your best work is, you do it. Do it well. … You cease your own greatness when you aspire to be someone else."

                    Comment


                    • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                      Originally posted by cdash View Post
                      I've gotten to the point with Hassan Whiteside where I would be irate if we drafted him. Hansbrough pushed me pretty far last year, Whiteside would have me drinking moonshine and chasing it with maple syrup for a year.
                      Why don't you like him? I'd sure as hell take him over Patrick Patterson and so on. Of all the bigs available when we pick, he is the one who could potentially be an All-Star and will be a force defensively and rebounding the ball aka exatly what we need.

                      I think I'd lose it if we draft Patrick Patterson.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                        Originally posted by Hicks View Post
                        Wait, when did Roy become a "mid-range jumper guy"? Yes, he has that shot, but he's our low post guy.

                        I don't like the pairing out of concern for defense.
                        He's our low post guy, for what that's worth, but I don't think we utilize or train him as one. It seems when I look at shot charts and watch games for Roy for any given series of games I notice we tend to put him in the the high post and he seems to take an awful lot of mid-range shots for his size. I don't see him operating out of the low block as much as he should to utilize his skills set.

                        Low post guys bring to my mind the games of Carlos Boozer, Elton Brand, Duncan, etc. It doesn't seem, to me, that we are molding Roy that way.
                        Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

                        Comment


                        • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                          Originally posted by Dr. Awesome View Post
                          Why don't you like him? I'd sure as hell take him over Patrick Patterson and so on. Of all the bigs available when we pick, he is the one who could potentially be an All-Star and will be a force defensively and rebounding the ball aka exatly what we need.

                          I think I'd lose it if we draft Patrick Patterson.
                          I can understand some reservation about Patterson....but would you choose Udoh over Whiteside?

                          Udoh just seems more polished offensively and still a solid Rebounding/shotblocker that actually is a PF as opposed to a Center.
                          Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                          Comment


                          • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                            Originally posted by Dr. Awesome View Post
                            Why don't you like him? I'd sure as hell take him over Patrick Patterson and so on. Of all the bigs available when we pick, he is the one who could potentially be an All-Star and will be a force defensively and rebounding the ball aka exatly what we need.

                            I think I'd lose it if we draft Patrick Patterson.
                            I've read some things about him having a poor attitude. He couldn't even start all the games for his crappy team in his crappy conference. I think he would be better served playing the 5 in the NBA, and I don't think he's a guy who ever develops much of a post game. If you are going to draft someone to play defense and rebound, wait until the late first/early second and grab Jarvis Varnado.

                            Comment


                            • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                              Originally posted by cdash View Post


                              I've read some things about him having a poor attitude. He couldn't even start all the games for his crappy team in his crappy conference.


                              I think he would be better served playing the 5 in the NBA, and I don't think he's a guy who ever develops much of a post game. If you are going to draft someone to play defense and rebound, wait until the late first/early second and grab Jarvis Varnado.

                              His poor attitude got him either suspension or DNP in the NIT. Great team player whose attitude won't allow him to help his team in a post tournament. The Pacers don't need that type of player. PASS!!!

                              Comment


                              • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                                Ya, I'm willing to give a project a chance and I'm willing to give a guy who does something stupid like that, a chance. I'm just not willing to draft, at 10, a guy who's a project who does that does something stupid like that.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X