Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

    Originally posted by GrangeRusHibbert View Post
    Final lottery standings...

    Code:
    14. Rockets      	42	40
    12. Raptors      	40	42
    12. Grizzlies   	40	42
    11. Hornets       37	45
    10. Pacers	        32	50
    8. Knicks 	        29	53
    8. Clippers 	29	53
    6. Pistons       	27	55
    6. 76ers 	        27	55
    4.Warriors 	26	56
    4. Wizards 	26	56
    3. Kings         	25	57
    2. Wolves 	        15	67
    1. Nets        	12	70


    Six ties among teams that finished the 2009-10 NBA regular season with identical records were broken today through random drawings to help determine the order of selection for the 2010 NBA Draft, which will be held on Thursday, June 24 at The WaMu Theater at Madison Square Garden in New York City.

    The drawings were conducted earlier today in New York City at the Board of Governors meeting by Stu Jackson, NBA Executive Vice President, Basketball Operations.

    The results of the drawings:

    - Utah (53-29) won a tiebreaker with Atlanta and Denver; Atlanta then won a tie-breaker with Denver - Boston (50-32) won a tiebreaker with San Antonio, Oklahoma City and Portland; San Antonio then won a tie-breaker with Oklahoma City and Portland; Oklahoma City then won a tie-breaker with Portland - Memphis (40-42) won a tiebreaker with Toronto - The Los Angeles Clippers (29-53) won a tiebreaker with New York - Philadelphia (27-55) won a tiebreaker with Detroit - Golden State (26-56) won a tiebreaker with Washington
    RealGM via press release.

    Btw, I think the way most lottery teams played in the final week(s) of the season shows that this year very few teams were tanking. If they were, they were pretty bad at it and extremely good pretending they were not.

    Comment


    • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

      Here's what I think is the best draft analysis (to this point) in a single post from someone on Warriors board. I couldn't find much to disagree with. (FWIW, this guy has seen John Wall play in person). Also note what he says about Aldrich.

      Long but worth it.


      Posted by BackseatGM on 2010-04-16 11:53:21

      I don't necessarily have any better opinions than anyone else on here but I'm damn sure a lot more plugged in than Kawakami, and he actually gets paid for the worthless crap we read here a couple weeks ago. I'm offering up comparisons for the sake of anyone who knows the pro game but didn't watch any college (people like Tim K.). The comparisons mean I see similarities in their game and body type. They DON'T mean I think they're ****in' carbon copies. If you think I'm out to lunch, say so, but don't nitpick me because one guy's an inch taller or a little better shooter, okay.

      John Wall (a PG version of Dwayne Wade, rookie year) - This guy is the one true potential superstar of this draft and he's been the #1 pick since last year's Nike game. The league has never seen his combination of speed, quickness, length, handle, court vision, freakish athleticism, and confidence. In the NBA no one will be able to guard him. They'll have to pack the middle and hope he doesn't become a better shooter. On the break it'll be hopeless. Drafting anyone ahead of him would be like taking Marvin Williams over DWill and CPaul. It'd get someone fired.

      Evan Turner (Brandon Roy, senior year) - Not the shooter or defender Roy was but probably a better handle. A little taller. While he has no deep range, he's decent from 15-18. You can't leave him open. Not a high flyer but his game doesn't need it. He plays under control and makes his teammates better. To me, he's the clear #2 though I think it'll take him part of his first year to adapt to the NBA game, kinda like Curry.

      Derrick Favors (Al Horford, freshman year) - He was the best player at last year's MacDonald's game (Wall not being there helped). He's got a nice body for a PF and at his age you know he'll fill out. In today's NBA he'll likely see plenty of time at the 5 once he gets his feet wet. He's got all the tools and he should really flourish once he gets some experience under his belt. But laying Amare and DHoward comparisons on him is unreasonable. Their athleticism is at a whole other level. But he should be a solid player for years.

      Demarcus Cousins (Eddie Curry) - Lord knows he has the size, he's got great hands, a bit of a mean streak. His upside is high. But so was Curry's. He needs to mature and learn how to play for the right reasons. Frankly, if I was a GM he'd scare the hell out of me. I'd hate to bet my franchise on him. I also think he'll disappoint a little when he's measured. I don't think his 6'11 is as tall as Aldrich's 6'11. Shouldn't matter too much but he's not gonna tower over people in the NBA.

      Wesley Johnson (Rudy Gay, coming out of college) - Wes is long, smooth, athletic, has a sweet stroke; everything you'd want in a SF. He played in Syracuse's zone for a year but I suspect he has the skills to play man okay. The thing I always notice when I watched Syracuse is that the team played good when Rautins played good, not Johnson. Wes will fill some team's 3-spot for years to come but he'll always be a complimentary player, IMO.

      Al-Farouq Aminu (Luol Deng) - Me and Al had bad chemistry. Every time I watched him play he was mediocre or worse. I saw him get shutout, that's never impressive. And his body language was terrible; you'd think he just heard his mom died. But obviously he's better than what I saw. He will defend and he uses his length well. He'll give 3's some problems but I don't see him having much success against true PF types. He's thin and he doesn't look like that will change. He rebounds well in college but in the league that'll get harder. Nothing he does on offense gets me excited except finishing on the break. I'll be really surprised if he's more than a handy player down the line.

      Cole Aldrich (Robert Parish, coming out of college) - I think a lot of fans are sleeping on this guy because he's white but I doubt that many GM's are looking past him. He's the most talented big in college right now. He's a full-sized center with Kirilenko arms, wide shoulders, and surprising mobility for a big white guy. He can score down low with either hand, has a jumper out to 15' or so, rebounds tenaciously, and blocks shots with ease. He hits 2/3 of his freethrows; not great but not terrible. So, the Parish comparison? If you didn't see Parish play as a Warrior you're not qualified to **** on me for that. He was a very similar player back then, even down to the awkward though somewhat effective release on his freethrows and jumpers. No, I don't think Aldridge will play 20 years and become a HOFer, but lets face it, Parish landed in the sweetest spot this side of Alba's snatch.

      Greg Monroe (Chris Webber in college, with glue on his shoes) - He's not Webber but he might be the best passing big man since Webber. This is a guy you can run your offense through because he has great court vision and he can deliver the ball right where you need it. He can also shoot it if you back off him or go to the rim if you crowd him. He's very left handed and he plays below the rim. Both those things would limit him if he wasnt so damn good at finding other people. In the right offensive system he'll be a real asset. On the other end he blocks some shots and gets some boards because he's tall and mobile, but he's definitely not an intimidator.

      Patrick Patterson (David West, in college) - Like West, Patterson's considered a little undersized for a 4 but that just means he won't have to play any 5. He's a smart player with some decent skills who knows his limitations. It's unlikely he'll improve as much as West did once he reached the league but Patterson should be a contributor for years to come.

      Ekpe Udoh (Tyrus Thomas, hopefully with a better attitude) - Udoh is long, thin, and springy, and he will block a lot of shots when he's on the floor. He can handle and shoot a little, too, so he's not a one trick pony but I think he'll disappoint a little when they measure him. Bottom line, I don't see a center in him, even as a backup. He can be a useful player but I don't think he's 20-30 spots better than Jarvis Varnado.

      Donatas Montiejunas (every tall, skinny, perimeter oriented big that's come from Europe since Dirk) - I saw him in the Nike game and I saw nothing that made me think he could have an impact in the league. Time will tell but I'm gun shy when it comes to these guys.

      Hassan Whiteside - I've never seen him, not even a highlight. I know he's tall, thin, and blocks a lot of shots. I also know he has a low bball IQ. IMO, let someone else gamble on a guy who has one skill and needs to learn most everything else. But, then again, I've never seen him. My opinion is based on the past history of inexperienced players who block shots because they can touch the rim on tiptoes. That's not fair to him but I don't really care.

      Gordon Hayward (skilled white guys) - I hate "white hate" and yet I think Hayward is being overrated because he had a nice tournament. Does he have enough skill to compete against more athletic players on the wing? Well, he's sure as hell is not the scorer that Adam Morrison was in college and we all know how well Morrison has done (I'm still shocked that Morrison couldn't at least score in the NBA. I pimped him hard - shows what I know).

      Avery Bradley (Monta Ellis, rookie year) - Bradley is an exciting, high wire act but he'll never be more of a PG than Ellis, IMO. If a GM takes him hoping that he can develop into a point I think he'll be disappointed. Good player, though. Too bad he's so small.

      Quincy Pondexter (Pietrus, with a brain) - Quincy is a running, jumping machine who really improved over his 4 years. He defends well and is a strong rebounder for his size but his competition is about to get a lot bigger and stronger. He can play some one on one and has a developing shot but I think he'll be limited to a valuable energy guy off the bench. Great attitude. A steal if he slips to the 2nd round.

      Devin Ebanks (Scottie Pippen, in body type only) - I've seen WV play in 4 tourney game and I never once saw Ebanks stand out from the pack. He's got a great body for a 3 but he's nowhere near as good a bball player as his teammate, DeSean Butler. If someone wants to gamble he's all yours. He does seem to be dropping on the mocks. Maybe they've seen what I saw (or didn't see).

      DeSean Butler (Caron Butler, but not as good) - Like Caron, DeSean is a smaller, not overly athletic SF who can score in a lot of ways. Unlike Caron, he's not gonna dominate a game, though his 6 game winning shots prove he can step up when it matters. His knee injury is gonna cost him a lot of money. It's too bad 'cause he's good guy. He still might become a player because his game isn't predicated on athleticism.

      My two 2nd round sleepers:

      Kevin Seraphin (Antonio McDyess, in college) - I said I wouldn't mention him again for awhile but I can't leave him out here. Anyone who saw last year's Nike game had to circle his name. For one thing he's a physical specimen. In the Nike game he blocked like 4 shots in the 2nd half, including twice on John Wall's acrobatics, and threw down some thunderous dunks. The world team doesn't win that game without his defensive effort. The thing I can't shake from my head is that he looked as impressive in the Nike game as Favors did in the MacDonald game. He's got plenty to add to his offense but he can defend and rebound in the league right now. At worst I see a Ronny Turiaf. At best, sky's the limit. He seems to be stuck in the middle of the 2nd round right now. I'd take that gamble in a heartbeat.

      Charles Garcia (sorry, I got no one) - I'm probably the only guy here who's seen Garcia, yet I still don't know what to think. Actually, I think Draftexpress' new profile hits the nail on the head. He started the year as the 2nd coming and then it really changed, at least in most the games. Playing at a low division one school it's hard to get a good feel for what he'll be able to do at the next level. He looks to be every bit of 6'9 barefoot and he's built like Favors, maybe a little thinner in the legs. He's got some low post skills but he can also step out with a nice looking jumper, all the way to the NBA 3. The thing that really stands out is his handle. He can take his defender off a live dribble at will and go straight to the rim. No problem using his left hand. He'll often rip a defensive board and dribble full speed left handed the length of the court. As aggressive as he is off the dribble I wish he'd finish stronger. He'll often go off the backboard when he should just ram it. As great as his handle is he's not really a passer. He drives to score like a SG. Also, as the season progressed his shot selection got terrible. Part of that was probably due to the fact that he was by far the best player but it actually hurt the team. Bottom line, he's got an NBA body and NBA skills; I just don't know how he'll fit in.

      So, the Warriors:

      My take assumes Nellie will be the coach next year and that Riley will be the GM. At the very least, there's not much time to get a new group in here for this draft. Nellie says he'll coach one more year. If there's a sale and Riley keeps his job for the time being, he has to look at next year as an audition. In other words, both guys are only interested in winning. IMO, forget about projects like Favors or Cousins. They'll have little value next year. I've been around Nellie long enough that I think I know what he likes, and I think their guy has always been Greg Monroe. Nellie still drools over what he could have done running his offense through Webber. Monroe is the closest he'll get to that. The kid can flat out pass and I can just see Nellie fantasizing about him hitting open cutters or passing back to Curry, Morrow, etc, for the open J. He won't lessen Curry's value as a PG; he'll improve it. Monroe is mature enough to step on the court next year, and with either AR or BW playing alongside him, we'd still have a shotblocker on the floor.

      I won't argue with anyone who says the Warriors should be building for the future but if Nellie and Riley are making the pick, the future is now. Thing is, if Monroe can facilitate the offense the way I think he can, that's not a bad thing. It's not like Cousins is guaranteed to be Shaq and Favors will be Howard or Amare. When it's all said and done, Monroe could turn out to be the best of the 3 anyway.

      With Monroe in place we can look to dump Biedrins. Not saying it would be easy but I think his value to us is all in the past. Monta is also an interesting trade chip and someone Nellie/Riley would be fine with losing for the right return.

      Of course, if we jump to #1 we take Wall. #2 is Turner. That's obvious. But, IMO, anywhere from 3 on, Monroe will be the pick. In fact, I think that's why they weren't overly concerned about winning a few more games. Nellie may be a lot of things but stupid is not one of them. I think next year might be a real turning point for us. Nellie's last year, a new owner's first, adding at least one more talented player; those all sound like good things to me.

      Comment


      • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

        I agree with this part
        He can be a useful player but I don't think he's 20-30 spots better than Jarvis Varnado.
        I don't think that Udoh is that much better than Varnado(they are similar), he(Varnado) could be a nice steal in the second round I think
        I also agree with the guy on Hayward, the guy is not even better than Adam Morrison in college, how people expect him to be good in the NBA
        Last edited by vnzla81; 04-16-2010, 07:23 PM.
        @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

        Comment


        • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

          I have no idea how are Hayward and Morrison similar players.

          I'm fairly sure that LeBron's combination of speed, quickness, length, handle, court vision, freakish athleticism and confidence trumps Wall's one but I understand the hyperbole and I agree Wall's potential is too high to pass on (although if I'm Utah or New Orleans I would look for someone to trade the pick or the player).

          Seraphin has very good upside and excellent physical tools, I completely agree with that. Massive body and uses it very well, physical player. But that's why he looked good in a game like the Nike Hoops Summit and why he was a dominant presence in the U-20 championship in Greece last year - for the same reason Milan Macvan was even more dominant than him in that NHS game and Enes Kanter demolished everybody in this one. But he's extremely raw and that shows when he plays against men - he lacks defensive fundamentals/awareness and is a tremendous foul magnet, biting pretty much every fake thrown at him. More worrying, he had a very bad season and showed no signs of improvement throughout the course of it (unlike someone like Ibaka, for example). But I like him, he's ambidextrous finishing at the rim and even though the jump hook is his only move he can turn to any of his shoulders. Never seen him involved much in pick'n'roll situations but he's the kind of player that has lots of potential there. If he stays in the draft, which is far from a given, he's an excellent pick for someone with a early 2nd rounder to stash in Europe for another year or two. Heck, his athleticism alone makes him a decent mid 1st round pick.

          Comment


          • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

            Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
            I also agree with the guy on Hayward, the guy is not even better than Adam Morrison in college, how people expect him to be good in the NBA
            I don't necessarily disagree with your point, but very few people were as good as Adam Morrison was in college. The only reason people compare Morrison to Hayward is because they are both white. Their games are really not that similar.

            Comment


            • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

              Originally posted by d_c View Post
              Here's what I think is the best draft analysis (to this point) in a single post from someone on Warriors board. I couldn't find much to disagree with. (FWIW, this guy has seen John Wall play in person). Also note what he says about Aldrich.

              Long but worth it.
              Not nearly as infatuated with John Wall as most. What did he do this year to justify all that hype? As the Wildcats moved into conference play Wall got noticeably worse. But based on the media you would have thought he had a Kenny Anderson-like freshman season. Yes, his upside is great (he has more upside than Kenny), but the hyperbole is a bit much. Frankly I would draft Turner #1 unless I needed a point guard.

              The guy loses all credibility when he compares Cole Aldrich to Robert Parish. If Cole was anywhere near that Kansas at least makes it to the championship game because Self does play a system that is friendly towards big men with back-to-the-basket games. I'm not old enough to have seen Parish play in college but I do know he was a lot more dominant than Cole. For this guy to call Cole the most talented big in college last year is also a joke. The guy is a good player and a legitimate pro, but lets not go overboard.

              People need to stop talking about Greg Monroe UNTIL he actually enters the draft. Trust me if he was motivated to just run for the cash like most of these other guys he would have entered the draft last year. Its 50/50 whether this kid leaves this year. He is still going to class at Georgetown for crying out loud. And I think Greg's upside is tremendous. Kid is still just 19 years old. Doesn't leap out of the gym but he has great footspeed and can run the court as well as any big man in college. He's not just the best passing big man in college, he is arguably the best passer of any position IMO. Has things to work on (his jumpshot and his right hand) but that's why he stayed in school the first time. Even money that he stays again. Also he is a PF at the next level. People who thinks his position is the C are nuts.

              Love Wes Johnson but dude is 23. That has to give one pause if one is factoring upside. Plus he needs to use his skills and athleticism to drive more to the hoop. He falls too much in love with his jumper.

              Comment


              • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                Originally posted by KennerLeaguer View Post
                Not nearly as infatuated with John Wall as most. What did he do this year to justify all that hype? As the Wildcats moved into conference play Wall got noticeably worse. But based on the media you would have thought he had a Kenny Anderson-like freshman season. Yes, his upside is great (he has more upside than Kenny), but the hyperbole is a bit much. Frankly I would draft Turner #1 unless I needed a point guard.

                The guy loses all credibility when he compares Cole Aldrich to Robert Parish. If Cole was anywhere near that Kansas at least makes it to the championship game because Self does play a system that is friendly towards big men with back-to-the-basket games. I'm not old enough to have seen Parish play in college but I do know he was a lot more dominant than Cole. For this guy to call Cole the most talented big in college last year is also a joke. The guy is a good player and a legitimate pro, but lets not go overboard.

                People need to stop talking about Greg Monroe UNTIL he actually enters the draft. Trust me if he was motivated to just run for the cash like most of these other guys he would have entered the draft last year. Its 50/50 whether this kid leaves this year. He is still going to class at Georgetown for crying out loud. And I think Greg's upside is tremendous. Kid is still just 19 years old. Doesn't leap out of the gym but he has great footspeed and can run the court as well as any big man in college. He's not just the best passing big man in college, he is arguably the best passer of any position IMO. Has things to work on (his jumpshot and his right hand) but that's why he stayed in school the first time. Even money that he stays again. Also he is a PF at the next level. People who thinks his position is the C are nuts.

                Love Wes Johnson but dude is 23. That has to give one pause if one is factoring upside. Plus he needs to use his skills and athleticism to drive more to the hoop. He falls too much in love with his jumper.

                I was hoping we'd hear from you on Monroe. Thanks.

                Do you think Roy and Monroe could play together effective in the NBA? I am mainly concerned about defensively.

                Comment


                • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                  Originally posted by Speed View Post
                  I was hoping we'd hear from you on Monroe. Thanks.

                  Do you think Roy and Monroe could play together effective in the NBA? I am mainly concerned about defensively.
                  Could they be effective? Yes, to an extent. Their skills could complement one another. But I don't think it would be the best pairing. You need one of the two to be a BEAST. A guy who puts more a premium on owning the boards rather than skill; a guy who wants to stay down low at all times. With Roy and Greg you would have two unusually skilled big guys who can score and pass, but I'm not sure if either wants to be the garbage man who does all the dirty work (just look at Toronto if you want to see a close example of that). Don't gte me wrong about Greg. The kid is a hell of a rebounder, easily the best big man rebounder for Gtown since Mike sweetney. And he is quick enough to defend any PF or C without getting into the foul troubles that Roy often gets in. But Greg is going to spend perhaps most of his time at the next level being a faceup guy. His postup game is really coming along and he can be very effective down there. But Greg is like most big men coming out of college these days in that he plays on the perimeter a lot. Not that I blame him. His handle and his passing allows him to abuse other bigs. The only thing left for him now on that front is a reliable outside shot. In two or three years he should have that.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                    Well, now its official. Mr. Monroe has just declared for the draft. Good luck to Greg, who is a really good guy.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                      The deeper the draft, the happier I get.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                        Originally posted by KennerLeaguer View Post
                        Well, now its official. Mr. Monroe has just declared for the draft. Good luck to Greg, who is a really good guy.
                        Monroe also said he would hire an agent, so he won't be able to change his mind an go back to school.

                        Comment


                        • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                          http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2...ory?id=5104754

                          Comment


                          • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                            Originally posted by Hicks View Post
                            The deeper the draft, the happier I get.
                            Well, the Pacers better get a difference maker in this draft because next year's draft will be mighty weak.

                            Comment


                            • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                              Originally posted by Will Galen View Post
                              Monroe also said he would hire an agent, so he won't be able to change his mind an go back to school.
                              That's what I meant by official. We all knew that as soon as Greg entered his name he wasn't coming back. He's going to be a lottery pick so why would he return? Only one guy has done that after entering his name and he is known as Roy Hibbert.

                              Wouldn't surprise me if Greg's agent turns out to be David Falk. He and his client John Thompson III were at that recent Pacers-Wizards game to watch Roy. They were probably discussing other business as well.

                              Comment


                              • Re: Official 2010 NBA Draft Recruiting Center

                                Originally posted by KennerLeaguer View Post
                                That's what I meant by official. We all knew that as soon as Greg entered his name he wasn't coming back. He's going to be a lottery pick so why would he return? Only one guy has done that after entering his name and he is known as Roy Hibbert.

                                Wouldn't surprise me if Greg's agent turns out to be David Falk. He and his client John Thompson III were at that recent Pacers-Wizards game to watch Roy. They were probably discussing other business as well.
                                Now I just hope his new agent helps him sign a contract with the Pacers and we can have Roy and Greg manning the paint for years to come

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X