Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

TJ Ford

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: TJ Ford

    Originally posted by thefeistyone View Post
    Over the course of Best's career he averaged 7 points 3 assist. Ford is around 15 and 7. Let's not forget This is Ford's 5th year. Saying he can't improve his decision making is kind of silly unless you stopped learning when you were 26 years old.

    Speaking of his decision making though. Ford is 21st among guards in TO per game. Let's look at some of the players who have more....Nash, Williams, Wade are your top 3, Parker, Iverson, and Kobe are up there too. I know Ford isn't as good a player as most of those, but as far as taking care of the ball I think some of you guys are a little hard on him.
    If Travis Best were on a sub .500 team like this with very little talent, he would be putting up bigger numbers and getting much bigger minutes. Instead, he played for years on a contender during his prime behind a great PG. If Ford had been Mark Jackson's backup, he would have never been allowed to wheel out that 1 on 1 garbage. He would have been forced to adjust his game or not get on the floor.

    Also, Best was not big but was physically strong (nearly 20lbs heavier than TJ) and as a result was a very good defensive player. TJ Ford is extremely quick, but is weak and easy to over power. As a result, he usually leaves the job of stopping his player to the PF (Troy Murphy)...hence, the usual layup.

    Not saying Best was better because he had some major flaws...but they were no bigger than TJ's gaping holes. The fact TJ is on a bad team calling his own number does not make him a better player.

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: TJ Ford

      Originally posted by danman View Post
      1. I dunno where you guys are getting that missed layup = fast break. Yes, the shooter is down low, but please. It's very rare. Are you arguing for the sake of aguing? If you want to take about real side effects of missed layups, it's that they get put back more often because the driver often draws a post defender. C'mon now.
      I'm talking about blocked layups. A big % of his misses are blocked.

      He'd be better off just driving to the basket but aborting the shot attempt and just dribble out of bounds. (Okay, that is a slight exaggeration.)
      Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
      Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
      Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
      Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
      And life itself, rushing over me
      Life itself, the wind in black elms,
      Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: TJ Ford

        Yay, I love stats! For point of reference, this is what i'm looking at:
        http://www.82games.com/0809/08IND1.HTM
        http://www.82games.com/0607/06TOR1A.HTM
        http://www.82games.com/0708/07TOR1A.HTM
        First of all, we have to say that TJ is becoming more effective.
        When we look to his attempts, we see that he is actually taking more drives and taking more close shots this season, and that he seems to be more efficient due to the increase in shooting percentage for close and inside. And yes, his percentage is only sub fifty. Too bad he isn't like Jack, who is around 52-53.

        His assist to bad pass ratio is decent, and he has a better one than Jack, and Nash surprisingly.



        When we talk about his blocked attempts, lets look at other PG's who attempt close shots.
        http://www.82games.com/0809/08NOH1.HTM
        Paul has relatively the same rate, and yet you would want him to drive.
        http://www.82games.com/0809/08UTA1.HTM
        Same with Williams
        http://www.82games.com/0809/08DET3.HTM
        And with Iverson.
        http://www.82games.com/0809/08SAS1.HTM
        And his blocked rate is identicial to Parker.
        http://www.82games.com/0809/08IND3.HTM
        Lookie here, Jack has a higher inside blocked rate. And he has the same amount of handling turnovers even though he handles the ball less, and his hands rating is lower, while TJ has shown in the past that he can have very good hands.

        PS: Granger has been blocked at the rim more than Ford has, percentage wise. Funny eh?

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: TJ Ford

          I just wanted to add one thing to the discussion. The reason TJ's assist #'s are down significantly is O'brien's offense. It is a ball motion offense which creates a lot of assists but spreads them more evenly among all the players. For example, as a team Indiana is 7th in the league in assists per game. But TJ just ranks 22nd in assists. New Orleans, on the other hand, ranks 28th in assists per game, but their leading assist man ranks first. It is just a different style of play.

          The last couple of years TJ has averaged about 13 assists per 48 minutes which puts him in the top five. This year he is at 8.2 per 48 or 23 rd.
          Last edited by joeshmoe; 04-01-2009, 10:18 PM.

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: TJ Ford

            Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
            Having said all of that - I find it insulting to compare TJ's defense with Tinsley - Ford is a much better defender - in fact I've been more than satisfied with Ford's defense - it isn't bad.
            You'd probably find it more insulting if I put together some video highlights from the past few games and you got to see TJ taking plays off just like Tinsley. It is RIDICULOUS how much he's given up in the past month.

            The #1 indicator, every night, is whether or not TJ is fighting through picks/screens. Within one minute of playing, you'll know what kind of night he'll have defensively.


            The thing is, I believe TJ can be (and has been in the past) a much better defender. And for that reason it's very frustrating.


            Also, I think he can be a much better player on offense. In fact, I think 80-85% of the negative impact he has is caused by him trying too hard in some facet of the game (i.e. going to deep to score, rushing the fast break, etc.).

            If anything, the past few games are a great example of this. Far less overdribbling, far less layups in congested traffic, quicker decisions on the fast break, far better output. To me, the highlight last night was the fast break with the dish/dunk to Brandon.

            I think he has the court vision, as he's shown sporadically, and the speed to make a very good player.

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: TJ Ford

              I'm not sure. I think it was on Dakich's show today that there was a lot of praise for TJ's play. I agree.

              I honestly think he is doing not too bad of a job. If you notice, when he takes those desperation shots, there aren't too many other *consistent* options available.

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: TJ Ford

                Originally posted by joeshmoe View Post
                I just wanted to add one thing to the discussion. The reason TJ's assist #'s are down significantly is O'brien's offense. It is a ball motion offense which creates a lot of assists but spreads them more evenly among all the players. For example, as a team Indiana is 7th in the league in assists per game. But TJ just ranks 22nd in assists. New Orleans, on the other hand, ranks 28th in assists per game, but their leading assist man ranks first. It is just a different style of play.

                The last couple of years TJ has averaged about 13 assists per 48 minutes which puts him in the top five. This year he is at 8.2 per 48 or 23 rd.
                Great point. Except you stole it from me! J/K. Seriously though here is a post I made a few weeks ago.
                "To all the people hating on T.J. Ford for not being a distributor: the Pacers are currently fifth in the NBA in assists. Our offense simply isn't conducive to one player racking up a ton of assists. The offense is very open and pass heavy, i.e. everyone touches the ball, so both guards, forwards, and even big men can get assists. For example, we have a whopping 9 guys on our roster that average at least 1.7 assists per game. The Hornets on the other hand have only 3. So even though Chris Paul averages 11 assists per game, as a team we average more assists than the Hornets. So please cut T.J. some slack, he is a good pg, and much of the criticism of him on this board is unfounded."

                I'm not really accusing you of thievery, I assume this is more of a "great minds think alike" scenario. Anyway, I'm glad someone else understands the situation. Also, once again, to those of you complaining about T.J. going to the hoop and not distributing the ball: this is also a result of the system, not Ford's talent. We sometimes spread the floor, ISO TJ at the top of the key, and allow him to break down his man while everyone else stands motionless watching. He simply has no other option but to take a difficult layup sometimes. We also do the same thing with Jack, Daniels, hell even Granger. Oddly though, no one criticizes them. I'm starting to think people around here just have a "blame the PG" fetish. Seriously though, if bad decision making is your main argument against TJ (and for some it seems to be), how do you feel about Danny jacking up contested threes 6 or 7 seconds into the shot clock. Is Danny beyond reproach, or are you somehow able to understand that this is a result of the system, despite inexplicably blaming TJ for his role in the system.
                "Ever wonder what it's like to wonder what it's like to wonder, they get up out of bed but can't awaken from their slumber, they know what they've been told by those who know what they've been told, you see this hand me down knowledge generated ages ago, and I know what they've been told because I've been told the same thing, I had to broaden my horizons to expand on greater things..." Many Styles

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: TJ Ford

                  Originally posted by duke dynamite View Post
                  I'm not sure. I think it was on Dakich's show today that there was a lot of praise for TJ's play. I agree.

                  I honestly think he is doing not too bad of a job. If you notice, when he takes those desperation shots, there aren't too many other *consistent* options available.
                  Well, somebody must not be doing a good job somewhere. We're way under 0.500 and about to be mathematically eliminated.

                  If it is not TJ/ our PGs, then who is it?
                  Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                  Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                  Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                  Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                  And life itself, rushing over me
                  Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                  Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: TJ Ford

                    Originally posted by ChicagoJ View Post
                    Well, somebody must not be doing a good job somewhere. We're way under 0.500 and about to be mathematically eliminated.

                    If it is not TJ/ our PGs, then who is it?
                    That there were a number of things at the beginning of the season that have settled down now?

                    I tend to flinch at the phrase "doing a bad job", and I reserve it for those not playing to their potential or making stupid mistakes.

                    I don't think most of the team has been doing a bad job as such, I just think they don't have the talent needed to get to the next stage of development.

                    Note, however, that when TJ gets trapped on Yet Another drive to the basket, the words "doing a bad job" go through my mind...
                    BillS

                    A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                    Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: TJ Ford

                      I agree on the talent deficiency. But just because somebody is maxxing out thier potential does not mean they are doing a good job.

                      I mean I "could" do my very best to play PG for the Pacers, but the results would be so bad that even Duke wouldn't try to say "Ah, Jay's doing a good job out there."

                      If everyone is doing a good job, the results would be better. I appreciate that they're doing their best but upgrades are still needed. (Some of the upgrades are taking place as Rush and Hibbert continue to blossom.)
                      Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                      Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                      Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                      Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                      And life itself, rushing over me
                      Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                      Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: TJ Ford

                        Originally posted by PostArtestEra View Post
                        Also, once again, to those of you complaining about T.J. going to the hoop and not distributing the ball: this is also a result of the system, not Ford's talent. We sometimes spread the floor, ISO TJ at the top of the key, and allow him to break down his man while everyone else stands motionless watching. He simply has no other option but to take a difficult layup sometimes. We also do the same thing with Jack, Daniels, hell even Granger. Oddly though, no one criticizes them. I'm starting to think people around here just have a "blame the PG" fetish. Seriously though, if bad decision making is your main argument against TJ (and for some it seems to be), how do you feel about Danny jacking up contested threes 6 or 7 seconds into the shot clock. Is Danny beyond reproach, or are you somehow able to understand that this is a result of the system, despite inexplicably blaming TJ for his role in the system.
                        I totally agree with the above. TJ isn't the perfect PG but he's about 80% pros versus 20% cons. Compare that to Tinsley's 40-60% ratio and it should be easy to see he's an upgrade.

                        I don't think he's totally realized his potential but he's still a young player with room and time to improve. The Pacers should definitely keep him around for another year.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X