Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Wells: 'The best locker room I've had the opportunity to cover since I've been in Indiana'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Wells: 'The best locker room I've had the opportunity to cover since I've been in Indiana'

    Originally posted by mellifluous View Post
    In general I feel like success breeds success. Also, we can't forget that there's a very large monetary incentive that teams get for making the playoffs. For a team like the Pacers that's in a small market and concerned with the bottom line, playoff revenues are very important.
    Having a horrible record, and only making the playoffs because the rest of the East has an even worse record, isn't success. That's my point.

    Winning is success. Losing most of the time, and just happening to be in the top 8 is hardly something to celebrate.

    And while I don't even pretend like I know anything about the financial side, I doubt the increased revenue will lengthen in the life of the Pacer franchise, or it's life in Indy. It might help the burden for next year, but it's not like the franchise is going to collapse any time sooner if they don't get it. I know that's not what you're saying BTW. Just that I don't think the overall impact of it outweighs the situation.
    Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

    Comment


    • Re: Wells: 'The best locker room I've had the opportunity to cover since I've been in Indiana'

      Danny was a top level talent that fell on draft day. It isn't a good assumption to believe that very many late-teen draft picks ever pan out as starters.

      We got lucky.
      Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
      Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
      Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
      Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
      And life itself, rushing over me
      Life itself, the wind in black elms,
      Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

      Comment


      • Re: Wells: 'The best locker room I've had the opportunity to cover since I've been in Indiana'

        Originally posted by rexnom View Post
        I agree. If there was some sort of guarantee we'd get Blake Griffin, I might be singing a different tune. However, in general, I don't think a high draft pick is necessarily the answer. It could be. Or it couldn't. I like how we paint Brandon and Roy into our future starting lineup with Danny but still clamor for high draft picks when all three were relatively low picks. I would much rather the Pacers make the playoffs and battle in a playoff atmosphere. I saw Danny grow his rookie year more in that one playoff series than in the entire regular seasons.
        I agree.

        Comment


        • Re: Wells: 'The best locker room I've had the opportunity to cover since I've been in Indiana'

          Originally posted by ChicagoJ View Post
          Danny was a top level talent that fell on draft day. It isn't a good assumption to believe that very many late-teen draft picks ever pan out as starters.

          We got lucky.
          And I agree.

          Danny was such a good talent Bird actually apologized for working him out because he said he it was a waste of Danny's time due to him being taken so early and the Pacers not having a realistic shot at him. Thankfully his knee issues scared people off.

          Talent wise, Danny was an extremely high draft pick.
          Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

          Comment


          • Re: Wells: 'The best locker room I've had the opportunity to cover since I've been in Indiana'

            Originally posted by rexnom View Post
            I like how we paint Brandon and Roy into our future starting lineup with Danny but still clamor for high draft picks when all three were relatively low picks.
            We wouldn't have been in position to get those guys had we squeaked into the playoffs last year.

            The only reason we got Rush was because we were in the draft lottery and had the pick to trade for him. We got Hibbert via a trade.

            Comment


            • Re: Wells: 'The best locker room I've had the opportunity to cover since I've been in Indiana'

              Originally posted by A-Train View Post
              We wouldn't have been in position to get those guys had we squeaked into the playoffs last year.

              The only reason we got Rush was because we were in the draft lottery and had the pick to trade for him. We got Hibbert via a trade.
              But that was last year...

              Comment


              • Re: Wells: 'The best locker room I've had the opportunity to cover since I've been in Indiana'

                Originally posted by duke dynamite View Post
                But that was last year...
                Thank you for pointing that out, Mr. Obvious.

                Comment


                • Re: Wells: 'The best locker room I've had the opportunity to cover since I've been in Indiana'

                  Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                  Pacers are notw5-6 in games decided by 3 points or less and have won 3 straight. I know I have a lot more confidence when the game goes down to the last shot
                  Exercise destroys tissue and makes way for greater growth. So do forest fires.

                  So no pain, no gain. The team has young guys that need to learn things, one of those things being how to handle close games. So while it sucks that they still blow leads, at least they are getting a ton of chances to experience late pressure.

                  Either you have dumb guys who will never get it or all of this will end up paying off. Maybe it's already happening.

                  Now personally I don't think its as simple as "they learned to close out". I think they got lucky a few times...but hold your anger. I also think that most of the time people, and not just in sports, see the most growth and learning by pure chance experiences.

                  Danny felt good about his shot, the team has felt good about chances to win late (TJ, Jack, Troy's tip) when they tried them, but that's true when they've missed too. There is something else to it, some mindset or groove or inner peace that locks you in and IMO the only way to ever find that place is to fall a**backward into it.

                  Once you do though it sticks in your memory. Now that Granger has made that shot he'll feel that memory the next time and find it easier to lock into that comfort zone. I think this is what happened with Reggie, or has happened with Horry.

                  You become that guy, but I don't think they were always certain to be that guy. I think they had a few shots and they happened to fall while for other guys they were misses. The guys who have it go in grow from that and get better at it. Almost a catch-22, you can't do it till you do it. So it helps to luck into it early on.


                  I recall the Reggie Pacers moving from self-confidence to then learning to protect big leads, avoiding playing down to competition, how to close out a series, and eventually how to protect home court with extreme efficiency. But they didn't learn all those things in one season.

                  It may take a few years but it does feel like they are really going the right direction.



                  Will - I agree, I couldn't give up Danny for Wade at this point. No more than I would have been okay with trading Reggie even for Jordan by 97 or so. It would have bugged me no matter how well the trade went. It was tough as hell letting Det, Dale and Jax go and luckily we got 2 of them back for a bit.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Wells: 'The best locker room I've had the opportunity to cover since I've been in Indiana'

                    Originally posted by A-Train View Post
                    We wouldn't have been in position to get those guys had we squeaked into the playoffs last year.

                    The only reason we got Rush was because we were in the draft lottery and had the pick to trade for him. We got Hibbert via a trade.
                    Roy still comes over in the exact same deal. Rush might have fallen 3-4 more spots, and if not you still could have gotten Chalmers or Lee to help the backcourt.

                    What you lose if you make the playoffs is getting Jack. McBob was a throw in that you might have been able to get for Ike even, if you knew he was worth it.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Wells: 'The best locker room I've had the opportunity to cover since I've been in Indiana'

                      Playing .500 ball and getting mediocre draft picks year in and year out is not a good way to build a team. The Pacers proved that in the late 80's, early 90's. They always barely made the playoffs, got ousted in the first round, then didn't have a high enough draft pick the next year to make that much of a difference. So, mediocre they remained.
                      Good lord.

                      Rik Smits, Tisdale, Person - how'd those teams do? Those are the "miss playoffs, get high pick" guys.

                      Then .500 ball, sub-10 picks come along, guys like Reggie, Dale, Tony, Best, and even Jax wasn't a high draft pick for NY. How'd the team fare with them?

                      The 80/90s had 2 stages - the crappy "high picks" version and then the much better "good picks but .500 ball every year and smart trades" version that kicked butt. Cripes even though Herb Williams was a high pick by the time they traded him for Detlef he had very little value to the Pacers, it was just a trade steal.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Wells: 'The best locker room I've had the opportunity to cover since I've been in Indiana'

                        I don't understand why people keeps saying that the pacers are a young team and need to get to the playoffs to get experience, the have 15 players(counting tinsley) out of the 15 they have 7players either are over 30years old or getting there, they need to build trough the draft, just like Miami,Cleveland,Memphis,Atlanta, even the celtics, if they did not had all the pieces to make a trade they could have never got KG or Ray. for the other guys that keep saying that they could sing a free agent, you need to understand that the pacers don't have any money to sing a big free agent for at least another two years




                        "YOU CAN'T BE A YOUNG TEAM WHEN ALMOST 50% OF YOUR PLAYERS ARE OLD"
                        Last edited by vnzla81; 01-09-2009, 03:03 PM.
                        @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

                        Comment


                        • Re: Wells: 'The best locker room I've had the opportunity to cover since I've been in Indiana'

                          But the old players are all expendable (generally.)

                          Foster, Rasho, Daniels, Tinsley and Murphy aren't part of the long term plans. I don't think Ford should be part of the long term plans, although he might be. Dunleavy, who knows - I'd love him to be a sixth man when Rush moves to the starting lineup.

                          The next step is to convert those guys into players that are the next step of the rebuilding process.
                          Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                          Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                          Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                          Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                          And life itself, rushing over me
                          Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                          Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                          Comment


                          • Re: Wells: 'The best locker room I've had the opportunity to cover since I've been in Indiana'

                            Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
                            I don't understand why people keeps saying that the pacers are a young team and need to get to the playoffs to get experience, the have 15 players(counting tinsley) out of the 15 they have 7players either are over 30years old or getting there...
                            The only players actively involved in the rotation that are over 30 are Jeff Foster and Rasho. I don't think it is relevant to include Baston or Tinsley in this statistic, as neither are involved in the future plans of the team. Dunleavy, Murphy, and Daniels are all 28 (which I guess is where you filled out your 7 people that are "getting there"), but 28 is still two years away from 30, and two years is a long time. While the Pacers certainly aren't the youngest team in the NBA, they still have a welth of players that have many years left in their careers.

                            (beat to the punch)

                            Comment


                            • Re: Wells: 'The best locker room I've had the opportunity to cover since I've been in Indiana'

                              Originally posted by ChicagoJ View Post
                              But the old players are all expendable (generally.)

                              Foster, Rasho, Daniels, Tinsley and Murphy aren't part of the long term plans. I don't think Ford should be part of the long term plans, although he might be. Dunleavy, who knows - I'd love him to be a sixth man when Rush moves to the starting lineup.

                              The next step is to convert those guys into players that are the next step of the rebuilding process.
                              I agreed, my point is why some people keep saying that this players need experience when a big % of the players are not going to be here next year? I see the pacers making some noise in maybe two years and by that time some of the players they have right now would well over past of their prime. That is why I am one of the few guys that wants the pacers to build trough the draft
                              @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

                              Comment


                              • Re: Wells: 'The best locker room I've had the opportunity to cover since I've been in Indiana'

                                Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
                                I agreed, my point is why some people keep saying that this players need experience when a big % of the players are not going to be here next year? I see the pacers making some noise in maybe two years and by that time some of the players they have right now would well over past of their prime. That is why I am one of the few guys that wants the pacers to build trough the draft
                                The guys that are staying need the experience.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X