Re: Four Big Questions Surround JO's Future w/Pacers
Based on what stat or fact?
That's my point. I've not said JO didn't complain so you didn't have to prove that he did.
I didn't say the offense didn't change, and in fact said just the opposite, again no reason to prove that.
I said that nothing indicated that JO demanded the ball more. JO touched the ball nearly every play BEFORE his rant, it was just in the high post.
You must admit that you strongly dislike JO and perhaps aren't reliable as a neutral observer in that regard. You've blasted him for a long time, certainly before this moment and thus were primed to view it as proof of something that you have NO REASON to believe went the way you said it did, ie "I need more touches".
Prove to me that JO didn't say "I'm sick of the lazy defense and I'm sick of Jackson taking crap shots, you've got to get after these guys Rick instead of letting them walk all over you."
You can't. So my point remains that we don't know that JO said "give me more touches", and paired with the fact that he statistically didn't appear to get more touches indicates that presenting this as a KNOWN fact is still 100% wrong.
Oh it did. It had nothing to do with the team struggling and wanting to get Foster into the starting lineup? Oh I forgot, you also don't think much of Foster and get upset if I dare to compare him to Dale as a rebounder because he doesn't get the tough rebounds.
To me the much simpler explanation, the non-conspiracy version, makes the most sense. Team was spinning it's wheels and had gotten off to slow starts. You change the starters to impact that.
You didn't mention Jackson going to the bench for Quis/Rawle I notice. Not an accident IMO, it's part of the bias where you only notice the things you don't like. To me I see all the changes as part of the same thing, trying to find a group of starters that didn't get off to a slow start.
Jack bench didn't help, he came back. Danny had a HORRIBLE +/-, worst on the team, so naturally you look to get a vet with a more positive impact in the game. That didn't quite work and it became apparent that Al was the part not fitting.
Why is that JO's rant, or did JO also rant to Nellie in Golden St? Maybe you can blame JO's rant for Saras being moved too.
Or maybe sometimes things are as simple as they appear on face value. JO wasn't good in the high post, the team wasn't good at running. I wasn't the only one complaining about this BEFORE JO's rant. Every play down JO touched the ball outside the arc or in the high post, PnR, ball handoff or fed someone and turned to face up on the FT line area. He often got the kick out for his jump shot. Is this how JO should be used?
It's not up to a player to dictate? As if Bird, Magic, Jordan never let their coach know how they felt and their opinions were never considered. You've got Bird in the paper saying "JO needs to step up and lead" but doesn't help guide him personally, show him how to become that leader. I think that affects how JO tries to interact with the team. I agree it's not his thing, that's a fault that limits him from being THE guy, but it doesn't make him insincere when he tries.
And we are back at the start. JO DID DO THIS. The team was floundering with uninspired play but JO WAS GETTING HIS SHOTS. THEN HE RANTED and got the same amount of shots after that. So it wasn't about shots, you just want it to be.
I appreciate the banana and have the same sentiment. It's not dislike, just friends with one serious disagreement. I really think you let your Dale love bleed into JO discussions (and Foster). I loved Dale too but JO is a different guy in a different situation.
The problem with JO is that he's been hurt and hasn't been a reliable $18m+ type of offensive force. Inside he hasn't had the explosion and outside he just doesn't have a reliable enough jumper.
The knock on JO has been that the team doesn't win more with him, but that doesn't mean they win more without him.
I will concede that if a true inside source can be quoted as hearing JO explicitly say "I need more touches, this team is about me" then I am wrong. Until then it's just a JO rant that might in fact have been 100% justified and 100% with the TEAM'S best interest in hand.
The % of the times that the ball went through O'Neal increased.
That's my point. I've not said JO didn't complain so you didn't have to prove that he did.
I didn't say the offense didn't change, and in fact said just the opposite, again no reason to prove that.
I said that nothing indicated that JO demanded the ball more. JO touched the ball nearly every play BEFORE his rant, it was just in the high post.
You must admit that you strongly dislike JO and perhaps aren't reliable as a neutral observer in that regard. You've blasted him for a long time, certainly before this moment and thus were primed to view it as proof of something that you have NO REASON to believe went the way you said it did, ie "I need more touches".
Prove to me that JO didn't say "I'm sick of the lazy defense and I'm sick of Jackson taking crap shots, you've got to get after these guys Rick instead of letting them walk all over you."
You can't. So my point remains that we don't know that JO said "give me more touches", and paired with the fact that he statistically didn't appear to get more touches indicates that presenting this as a KNOWN fact is still 100% wrong.
J.O.'s rant ended up putting Danny on the bench, getting his buddy Harrington ultimately benched and disgruntled and at the end of the day traded
To me the much simpler explanation, the non-conspiracy version, makes the most sense. Team was spinning it's wheels and had gotten off to slow starts. You change the starters to impact that.
You didn't mention Jackson going to the bench for Quis/Rawle I notice. Not an accident IMO, it's part of the bias where you only notice the things you don't like. To me I see all the changes as part of the same thing, trying to find a group of starters that didn't get off to a slow start.
Jack bench didn't help, he came back. Danny had a HORRIBLE +/-, worst on the team, so naturally you look to get a vet with a more positive impact in the game. That didn't quite work and it became apparent that Al was the part not fitting.
Why is that JO's rant, or did JO also rant to Nellie in Golden St? Maybe you can blame JO's rant for Saras being moved too.
Or maybe sometimes things are as simple as they appear on face value. JO wasn't good in the high post, the team wasn't good at running. I wasn't the only one complaining about this BEFORE JO's rant. Every play down JO touched the ball outside the arc or in the high post, PnR, ball handoff or fed someone and turned to face up on the FT line area. He often got the kick out for his jump shot. Is this how JO should be used?
It's not up to a player to dictate? As if Bird, Magic, Jordan never let their coach know how they felt and their opinions were never considered. You've got Bird in the paper saying "JO needs to step up and lead" but doesn't help guide him personally, show him how to become that leader. I think that affects how JO tries to interact with the team. I agree it's not his thing, that's a fault that limits him from being THE guy, but it doesn't make him insincere when he tries.
Also this was about Jermaine O'Neal getting his, pure and simple. Do you believe that if J.O. was getting enough shots a game and we were losing that he would march into the office and say "hey, this isn't working. Why don't we run some plays so that Danny can more open looks". No, I don't think so either.
I appreciate the banana and have the same sentiment. It's not dislike, just friends with one serious disagreement. I really think you let your Dale love bleed into JO discussions (and Foster). I loved Dale too but JO is a different guy in a different situation.
The problem with JO is that he's been hurt and hasn't been a reliable $18m+ type of offensive force. Inside he hasn't had the explosion and outside he just doesn't have a reliable enough jumper.
The knock on JO has been that the team doesn't win more with him, but that doesn't mean they win more without him.
I will concede that if a true inside source can be quoted as hearing JO explicitly say "I need more touches, this team is about me" then I am wrong. Until then it's just a JO rant that might in fact have been 100% justified and 100% with the TEAM'S best interest in hand.
Comment