Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Tbird draft analysis: Brandon Rush

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Tbird draft analysis: Brandon Rush

    Originally posted by Kemo View Post
    Here is a real nice video of Brandon Rush..


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ad4JPI1lBE4


    I am so amped about this coming year...
    Not that it is sinking in that TJ FORD will be running the point.. ALONG with our draftees ,.. and our already good core of Granger , Dunleavy and Foster.. with even a great backup in Diener..


    I think both Rush and Hibbert will be awesome for us...
    and they will contribute immediately I believe they will surprise everyone.....

    The more I think about it , the more I really like this draft trade...

    At first I was in shock at trading Bayless... but now that the above has sunk in .. I can't help but feel excited for our team.....and where we are going...



    I just hope like hell that Toronto doesnt back out ..
    it will screw everything up...

    James "Flight" White has a great video from his Cincinnati days as well.

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Tbird draft analysis: Brandon Rush

      Originally posted by Plax80 View Post
      James "Flight" White has a great video from his Cincinnati days as well.
      White was athletic, but had attitude issues. B-Rush is infinitely more skilled all around.

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Tbird draft analysis: Brandon Rush

        Since I haven't been exactly impressed with Rush, I decided to go back and re-read at T-Bird's evaluation of Rush. After re-reading it, I was especially interested in the type of system T-Bird described for Rush and about what he had to say about JO'B and the Pacers in regards to Rush.

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Tbird draft analysis: Brandon Rush

          Give him a little time guys. Hes only played 8 regular season games. He seems a bit nervous.

          I say we all take another look at Rush during the All Star break
          "So, which one of you guys is going to come in second?" - Larry Bird before the 3 point contest. He won.


          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Tbird draft analysis: Brandon Rush

            What is Rush missing other than a consistent shot? The reason why people like him is because he has very few other holes in his game...and the likelihood of him shooting better with some time is fairly high. I'm not worried about him at this point.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Tbird draft analysis: Brandon Rush

              Originally posted by Roy Munson
              As I wrote when the Pacers drafted Rush, he is an NBA journeyman. That's all he is. He's not the Pacers' savior. The best he'll ever be on a good team is someone's 8th or 9th man.
              Really? I've had the opposite reaction. I was somewhat down on him when we drafted him, but he's impressed me in ways I wasn't expecting.

              His shot hasn't been "on" yet, but that will come. He's a much more athletic player than I expected, and can do more with the ball besides just shoot it. And while everyone talked about his defense, I hadn't expected it to translate so well to the NBA.

              I'd say his ceiling is solid starter on a good team. I agree that he's still not a savior, but I don't really think anyone expected him to be.
              This space for rent.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Tbird draft analysis: Brandon Rush

                Rush's shooting is the last thing we should be worried about. His shooting will come around. He shot over 40% from 3 at Kansas. Great shooters don't regress into terrible ones in one season..

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Tbird draft analysis: Brandon Rush

                  Originally posted by thunderbird1245
                  Larry Brown is the perfect coach philosophically for Rush, as he can use him like has used Reggie Miller and Rip Hamilton in the past.
                  I just had this exact same thought today. And that scares me.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Tbird draft analysis: Brandon Rush

                    Prediction: Rush will have his first double figure scoring outing this month and have quite a few in December.

                    The rest will be history...

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Tbird draft analysis: Brandon Rush

                      .bump.

                      Rush is ahead of schedule. The stroke is looking very smooth. The confidence is increasing. He is too quick, too athletic, has too high of bball IQ, works too hard....to not be a great player.

                      All Rush - All the time!

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Tbird draft analysis: Brandon Rush

                        Hahaha, B+G, I like the confidence - and Rush finally showed some of his own tonight - but he still has a ways to go. Still, it's nice to take something positive out of this heartbreaking loss.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Tbird draft analysis: Brandon Rush

                          Originally posted by LoneGranger33 View Post
                          Hahaha, B+G, I like the confidence - and Rush finally showed some of his own tonight - but he still has a ways to go. Still, it's nice to take something positive out of this heartbreaking loss.
                          Tough loss. I remember the days in the early 90's where we seemed to come up short all the time. Making the playoffs was a MIRACLE! People need to take heart in the fact this team is rebuilding and the best we can expect is to improve. It will be a fun ride back up....and I think Rush will be one of the key components. Mike Dunleavy is a good offensive player, but his days are numbered as our #2.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Tbird draft analysis: Brandon Rush

                            Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post
                            Tough loss. I remember the days in the early 90's where we seemed to come up short all the time. Making the playoffs was a MIRACLE! People need to take heart in the fact this team is rebuilding and the best we can expect is to improve. It will be a fun ride back up....and I think Rush will be one of the key components. Mike Dunleavy is a good offensive player, but his days are numbered as our #2.
                            amen brother...
                            Haggard's Blog: Can't Buy a Basket. Covering the highs and lows of the NBL

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Tbird draft analysis: Brandon Rush

                              Originally posted by me
                              Occassionally I'd see him burned on a cut, such as S. Curry used in an over and back move with an outside screener. But those kinds of things rarely happened twice. He plays smart and tweeks out his ability. And the Curry thing - KS moved him onto Curry after he had that scorching start against them.

                              I actually also somewhat disagree on his offense. When it's on it's silky, but I would not rely on him. He's a guy that can fill it up, but most of the time he's going to be your intangibles player, like a better Marquis (true SG/SF though, not PG at all).

                              Certainly a team could make him the center of scoring attention but I don't think that's really his thing. I'll keep pounding this view out there - SG version of Derrick McKey. McKey COULD score and that often frustrated people. Rush deferred to others almost to a fault this year. Certainly he had explosive scoring games, but sometimes even in the midst of a hot streak he'd pass up the shot in favor of a teammate.
                              The ONLY thing that has changed is that Rush has been way more assertive on a regular basis. Otherwise I strongly stand by my read on him. I had him as a 6th man type, borderline starter. I now think he's going to be a bit better than that.

                              I really disgree with T'bird on running Rush off screens in plays set just for him as it wastes his main talent which is to learn and read the floor on his own. Leave things open and he finds his spots. Let him make a mistake and it doesn't happen again.

                              Just like the Curry story where he got burned just once, last night he cut and wasn't looking for the pass. That s*** ended right then and a bit later he came back with a similar play for the score.

                              That's Rush, he's basketball smart in an all-around way and is quick to understand the team's need for spacing at any given moment.

                              He's already passing up Granger in his ability to drive to the rim. He's not far behind in defense.

                              He only needs to dial in the shot, that's it. And as I said in the quote, up till now he's not been a go-to scorer every night, he has those games where he's a monster but most of the time he's more of a Mr. What Do You Need.

                              Dude was a homerun draft for this team.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: Tbird draft analysis: Brandon Rush

                                In preparation for the upcoming 2009 draft analysis threads I'll start later in May, I thought it would be fun to review last years pre draft thoughts by myself and everyone else on the players who eventually ended up being Pacers.

                                Enjoy!

                                Tbird

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X