Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Trading JO this summer, might be the worst move the Pacers ever make

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: Trading JO this summer, might be the worst move the Pacers ever make

    We will not get any player comparable in return to Danny's numbers if we trade him.

    I disbelieve that Danny shouldn't be considered one of our main building blocks.

    You've got to be out of your effin mind that Granger needs to be traded.

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: Trading JO this summer, might be the worst move the Pacers ever make

      Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
      I was just listening to Kravitz, and I think he said there is a 99.99% chance that JO is not on the Pacers next season. (My guess is Wells is feeding him this info - I'm sure Wells would never steer him wrong)
      That's just Kravitz being Kravitz. He obviously doesn't know what is right for this team. He is an over-opinionated columnist who always tried to put his underinformed two cents in.

      In regards to JO, I have no problem with him being a pure defensive player. Putting up decent numbers in rebounds, blocked shots and so-on-so-fourth, would and is highly beneficial to this team. I think with more rest this summer, he can become that defensive spark we need. (I honestly agree with you, Buck, that it would be a big mistake letting go or trading O'Neal.) That spark just needs to be complimented with some "hard-nosed defense" from Danny and Mike. (Mike especially)

      I hope this offseason Dun Dun can find his defensive touch. He shown us that his offense is worth the money we are paying him this season, and I look to see him become a lot smarter on the D side of things.

      Now back onto Jermaine...

      Today, LB will or should have sat with JO for the final team's player meetings. On Kevin Lee's radio show last night he said that the main topic of discussion between JO and Bird is whether or not he wants to remain with the team.

      This offseason will be a wild one. Moving and shaking is always exciting, but I expect to see JO remain with the team for at least this next season, who knows how long after that...

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: Trading JO this summer, might be the worst move the Pacers ever make

        Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
        Byron Scott, not a top notch FA. Yep, that's what they said at the time.


        I totally agree with Buck, separate from my enjoyment of JO's A game (not always around lately I'll admit) but instead in the "gotta deal him, what's the best way to do it" mode.

        His value is at a low point. The team doesn't have a lot of options for filling up the roster with talent just yet, so why not make moving him one of the FINAL steps instead of step 1 when it's not a good time to do it?

        Might as well paint the walls right before you start redoing the wiring and plumbing.
        Aggreed 100%. I was for trading him two years ago and last year, but trading him now would definitely be a mistake IMO.

        Regards,

        Mourning
        2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

        2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

        2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: Trading JO this summer, might be the worst move the Pacers ever make

          In the post-game the other night Danny said something like "next year, I'm not sure what JO's going to do...but if he's..." then sort of stopped himself. It's not an exact quote. Is it really possible that JO could simply opt out, or am I over-analyzing?

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: Trading JO this summer, might be the worst move the Pacers ever make

            Originally posted by tdubb03 View Post
            In the post-game the other night Danny said something like "next year, I'm not sure what JO's going to do...but if he's..." then sort of stopped himself. It's not an exact quote. Is it really possible that JO could simply opt out, or am I over-analyzing?
            This isn't against Danny or anything, but I would think that the only person(s) who really know what Jermaine has in mind is himself and/or Larry.

            I wouldn't try to over-anaylize this quote. Granger seems to be a pretty honest guy, but I don't think he knows what JO is going to do. IMO, he saying that was more or less of a filler answer to a question he has no business addressing.

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: Trading JO this summer, might be the worst move the Pacers ever make

              I think it would be nice to deal Jermaine. However that is much easier said than done. I would just rather keep Jermaine then deal him for Vince Carter. If that rumor turns out to be true and we make that swap that will be making a trade for the sake of making a trade. Awful deal.

              I feel that are best chance to deal Jermaine was to the Lakers. However with Bynum developing and the Lakers getting Gasol we have no chance to deal him there.

              Forget about value for a second, what teams even have legit interest in Jermaine at this point? Maybe the Bulls but that is kind of iffy. Is there really any team out that would have legit interest in Jermaine considering his salary and health concerns?

              I like Jermaine and see use for him if healthy. Jamaal on the other hand no no. He has to go. But IDK he will also be difficult to move.

              I'd be happy if Jermaine, Jamaal, amd Marquis can all be moved. However I have this funny feeling that it won't happen. That our biggest addition will be whoever we draft and our biggest subtraction will be David Harrison or Flip Murray.

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: Trading JO this summer, might be the worst move the Pacers ever make

                It's April 17th and we already have a "summer thread", hold on while I load my gun.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: Trading JO this summer, might be the worst move the Pacers ever made

                  Originally posted by croz24 View Post
                  jo's trade value has become lower and lower each season we have kept him on this team...the pacers need to trade granger pre-draft, which in turn would make trading jo much easier because it would then reduce our asking price after having received our 'prospect(s)' via the granger trade...
                  trade granger? are you nuts? and trading guys cause they are injury prone is so horrible...tinsley was having a fantastic season before he got hurt...and i'm sure it wasn't all his decision to play. We needed him because we couldn't have diener running the pg with no one backing him up before flip got here...JO out the door? we hear it ever year. Just another sour grapes writer trying to stir up trouble...w/e
                  "GIMMIE DAT!"-DANGER

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: Trading JO this summer, might be the worst move the Pacers ever made

                    Originally posted by OnlyPacersLeft View Post
                    trade granger? are you nuts? and trading guys cause they are injury prone is so horrible...tinsley was having a fantastic season before he got hurt...and i'm sure it wasn't all his decision to play. We needed him because we couldn't have diener running the pg with no one backing him up before flip got here...JO out the door? we hear it ever year. Just another sour grapes writer trying to stir up trouble...w/e
                    same post i made on the 2nd page...i want a championship. anything else is a failure in my eyes...

                    i won't drop it because granger is the ONLY player we have worth a damn, and even then i view most of his production as a product of how bad we are as a team and the volume of shots he receives. i do not trust this organization to ever get us a top 5 pick in the nba draft, or at least not for another 10+yrs. people need to realize that one, granger is not as good as his production insists, and we will find ourselves vastly overpaying somebody who is NOT a franchise player. and two, that teams win championships with top 5 picks. that is a fact that can not be disputed. keeping danny granger maintains our mediocrity, especially at his age. at 25, granger has 5-6 peak years left. i don't think the pacers will be a contender in 5-6 years so what's the point? if you can trade granger straight up for a top 5 pick (not many busts 1-5) you have to do it imo. i'm tired of mediocrity and keeping granger will further that...

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: Trading JO this summer, might be the worst move the Pacers ever make

                      Originally posted by BoomBaby31 View Post
                      It's April 17th and we already have a "summer thread", hold on while I load my gun.
                      2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                      2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                      2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: Trading JO this summer, might be the worst move the Pacers ever make

                        Originally posted by rommie View Post
                        I'd be happy if Jermaine, Jamaal, amd Marquis can all be moved. However I have this funny feeling that it won't happen. That our biggest addition will be whoever we draft and our biggest subtraction will be David Harrison or Flip Murray.
                        Ah, so you mean the samething that happenned as last summer?








                        2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                        2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                        2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: Trading JO this summer, might be the worst move the Pacers ever make

                          i agree with ub and several others. trading jo now is a huge mistake. his value is as low as it's gonna get really. every day that contract goes, the greater his value. we don't really have all that much longer to go and i don't think trying to move him for 40-50 cents on the dollar is at all a good move.
                          trading granger is also a huge mistake unless we were to get some seriously sweet offer. nobody should be untradeable but, the price has got to be pretty damn good or else it is just spinning your wheels or even moving backwards.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: Trading JO this summer, might be the worst move the Pacers ever make

                            Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                            I was just listening to Kravitz, and I think he said there is a 99.99% chance that JO is not on the Pacers next season.
                            Of course there's a chance. There's a chance Granger might be traded too. The more says JO is leaving the more I think he's staying.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: Trading JO this summer, might be the worst move the Pacers ever make

                              Originally posted by mildlysane View Post

                              Our team seemed to play a little better with him in the lineup this last time.

                              Yeah, but 20 plus million worth better?


                              It would be great if JO could come back healthy, but the odds on that aren't great. Trading JO is the best thing, as long as it's not for junk and bad contracts. The Pacers are rebuilding, and JO has no place in the rebuilding other than help get players who can help.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: Trading JO this summer, might be the worst move the Pacers ever make

                                The problem I see is there are plenty of people saying "Don't trade JO" and "Don't trade Granger" without any qualifiers on it. Any player on our roster should be movable for the right price. Bad deals are made every year, and it is quite possible that we could fleece someone.

                                I think it's fair to say that we shouldn't trade Granger unless we get value plus markup. Although offers of that sort seem far-fetched, he's not untouchable. I know plenty of people that would trade Granger if it got us the #2 pick in the draft (See the words "far-fetched" in the previous sentence).

                                We're a bad basketball team. In the summer heat, behind closed doors, we should be willing to listen to any deal.

                                To another note: While I normally agree with Nuff Said, I disagree that we couldn't trade JO to an EC team, or a division rival. I'd happily play against a team that would be sporting him 50/82 with the turn around clanks. I'd gladly trade him to a contender where he'd flourish if it helped our team not suck. No reason why we can't both benefit.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X