Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Jermaine says Pacers are involved in trade talks with several teams

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: Jermaine says Pacers are involved in trade talks with several teams

    Originally posted by Bball View Post
    I don't have a problem with him getting a day off to go to the funeral of his GF's cousin. You don't want to pi$$ off the GF! ...And seriously, I have no idea how close they might've been.

    The question I'd have is exactly how did the trip to the strip club fit in? Was that the same day as a game? If by attending the funeral it didn't allow enough time for him to attend a game that evening (which could easily be true if the game or funeral were out of town), then I'm not going to be overly bothered by him going to a strip club later and minding his own business. Is it a little tasteless? It sure seems it could be... But totally wrong? I'd need more info.

    Now... since he already has some troubles involving a stripper then attending a strip club is awfully questionable. ..But that is a different issue.

    Really... he sounds like he would fit right in with some of the Pacers!

    -Bball
    As far as we know he hasn't had any trouble since leaving Portland but still, aren't we attempting to put some polish on this pig? As for behavior, I'd be willing to give him a Zero Tolerance shot, but if he can't play defence....


    shame on me.
    Ever notice how friendly folks are at a shootin' range??.

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: Jermaine says Pacers are involved in trade talks with several teams

      Regardless, the fact that he was in a stip club when he was supposed to be at a funeral is pretty messed up. I guess we all mourn i our own ways...
      Roy Hibbert.... It's the POWER!!!

      Comment


      • #63
        Re: Jermaine says Pacers are involved in trade talks with several teams

        Originally posted by jmoney2584 View Post
        Regardless, the fact that he was in a stip club when he was supposed to be at a funeral is pretty messed up. I guess we all mourn i our own ways...
        It didn't say that... So we don't know when he was at the strip club or if he didn't attend the funeral or memorial and went to the strip club instead.

        We need more info on this one... unless you have some info besides what was printed in this thread.

        But, I think a player that likes hanging out in strip clubs, even after running into trouble with a stripper, likes driving fast on city streets, etc is a player that should fit right in with some of our current roster.

        Doesn't Randolph have a dope bust in his recent past?

        Bad judgement: check
        Trafific Violations: check
        Get him a gun and a blunt...
        He should fit right in!

        -Bball
        Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

        ------

        "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

        -John Wooden

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: Jermaine says Pacers are involved in trade talks with several teams

          How about a three-team trade? Milwaukee supposedly wanted Randolph, anything of theirs we want? Miami still has that expiring Jwill contract, that plus a pick (which is not as valuable any more cause it will climb, but not worthless cause they won't get out of the lottery) is a good start on a package.
          2010 IKL Fantasy Basketball Champion Baltimore Bulldogs

          Comment


          • #65
            Re: Jermaine says Pacers are involved in trade talks with several teams

            Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooooooo!!!
            No to anything related to NY. The water is poisoned there. Just walk away from the
            phone Donnie, or Bird, or whoever makes those decisions.
            {o,o}
            |)__)
            -"-"-

            Comment


            • #66
              Re: Jermaine says Pacers are involved in trade talks with several teams

              Originally posted by rexnom View Post
              JO needs to shut his yapper...sorry. I'm just constantly afraid of him lowering his own value.
              It does not matter what JO says at this point. Cats been out of the bag a long time. His trade value only changes at this point based on his health changes.

              Trading for Randolph would mean the Pacers haven't learned anything over the last 4 years. I don't think that can happen. If they do trade for him, nothing will ever convince me that they know what they're doing.

              Here is the trade I would like to see...and I am assuming that JO is never going to be back near the same level...particularly for any length of time....because otherwise I would not do this trade.

              This trade is a fairly quick salary cut of Marbury's contract, rids us of Tinsley, avoids the risk that JO's knee is really done, gives us a decent player in David Lee, gives us a legit NBA center. No, Curry is not the answer in the middle if you want to compete, but he is a space eater and his paycheck is not that big. He can also regularly give you 15ppg shooting a high percentage...something JO could never do. Not saying he's in a healthy JO's league. However, he did play 81 games last year. He's also barely 25 yo and may actually get better and retain his value much longer than JO.

              Why does Zeke do this?

              He is a trouble-maker magnet. Tinsley and DH qualify. Second, he is in love with JO and wants to have his babies...so we have major leverage. Third, he hates Marbury and I don't think he likes Curry either. He gets another big body in return in DH and probably thinks he comes out OK. He also gets the equivalent at PG without the personal issues.

              Why does Bird do this?

              He desperately wants to clean up this team. Tinsley and DH heading out cleans things up. Second, Marbury dirties things up a little bit, but has a big, fat, short contract. He might simply be asked to stay in NY. Third, David Lee is a decent PF who can score efficiently and rebounds the ball very well. Fourth, he gets a more physical presence in Curry, which he has mentioned needing...who can give the team 15ppg consistently. Last year he played 81 games...something like double what JO played. Fifth and most important, he is not a JO fan.

              I suspect Bird and Zeke have caught wind of the fact everyone thinks they're incapable of making a deal...maybe they prove us wrong.
              Change in Team Outlook: -6.5 ppg, -2.8 rpg, and +5.0 apg.

              Incoming Players
              David Harrison
              7-0 C from Colorado
              4.2 ppg, 2.0 rpg, 0.3 apg in 12.3 minutes
              Jamaal Tinsley
              6-1 PG from Iowa State
              11.9 ppg, 3.6 rpg, 8.4 apg in 33.2 minutes
              Jermaine O'Neal
              6-11 PF from Eau Claire (HS)
              15.3 ppg, 7.3 rpg, 2.5 apg in 31.3 minutes
              Outgoing Players
              David Lee
              6-9 PF from Florida
              9.9 ppg, 8.2 rpg, 1.0 apg in 27.3 minutes
              Eddy Curry
              6-11 C from Thornwood (HS)
              14.1 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 0.5 apg in 26.7 minutes
              Stephon Marbury
              6-2 PG from Georgia Tech
              13.9 ppg, 2.5 rpg, 4.7 apg in 33.5 minutes

              Comment


              • #67
                Re: Jermaine says Pacers are involved in trade talks with several teams

                It's like we here this everyday. We know Jermaine would accept getting traded and we know that the Pacers are probably always talking to teams. So what's new?

                I am wondering who these "several" teams are besides the Knicks.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Re: Jermaine says Pacers are involved in trade talks with several teams

                  The question I have is if the Pacers are prepared to "Get it done" or are sitting too hard on any deals so as to appear to be dealing from a position of strength?

                  IOW... Are they waiting for the other team(s) to come to THEIR (Pacers) terms or are they willing to work the phones, crunch the numbers, and try to find a solution that gets the ball rolling and meets another team halfway and get things headed in the right way?

                  If they are attacking this like they are in the driver's seat, or by going out of their way to present that image, then it'll be no wonder why a deal doesn't get done. ....We are far from being in the driver's seat... and haven't been for a long, long time.

                  -Bball
                  Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                  ------

                  "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                  -John Wooden

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Re: Jermaine says Pacers are involved in trade talks with several teams

                    We're less than 2 weeks away from the trade deadline. Thank God.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Re: Jermaine says Pacers are involved in trade talks with several teams

                      Bird denied any interest in Randolph this afternoon on 1070 The Fan. Other than that, same ol' "if we can make a deal to make us better we'll do it" story. Audio link below.


                      http://media.1070thefan.com/podcasts/080208_bird.mp3
                      Go Pacers!
                      Indy Cornrows

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Re: Jermaine says Pacers are involved in trade talks with several teams

                        Originally posted by Cornrows View Post
                        Bird denied any interest in Randolph this afternoon on 1070 The Fan. Other than that, same ol' "if we can make a deal to make us better we'll do it" story. Audio link below.


                        http://media.1070thefan.com/podcasts/080208_bird.mp3
                        This is the best news of my day, thanks for the heads up.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Re: Jermaine says Pacers are involved in trade talks with several teams

                          Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post
                          It does not matter what JO says at this point. Cats been out of the bag a long time. His trade value only changes at this point based on his health changes.

                          Trading for Randolph would mean the Pacers haven't learned anything over the last 4 years. I don't think that can happen. If they do trade for him, nothing will ever convince me that they know what they're doing.

                          Here is the trade I would like to see...and I am assuming that JO is never going to be back near the same level...particularly for any length of time....because otherwise I would not do this trade.

                          This trade is a fairly quick salary cut of Marbury's contract, rids us of Tinsley, avoids the risk that JO's knee is really done, gives us a decent player in David Lee, gives us a legit NBA center. No, Curry is not the answer in the middle if you want to compete, but he is a space eater and his paycheck is not that big. He can also regularly give you 15ppg shooting a high percentage...something JO could never do. Not saying he's in a healthy JO's league. However, he did play 81 games last year. He's also barely 25 yo and may actually get better and retain his value much longer than JO.

                          Why does Zeke do this?

                          He is a trouble-maker magnet. Tinsley and DH qualify. Second, he is in love with JO and wants to have his babies...so we have major leverage. Third, he hates Marbury and I don't think he likes Curry either. He gets another big body in return in DH and probably thinks he comes out OK. He also gets the equivalent at PG without the personal issues.

                          Why does Bird do this?

                          He desperately wants to clean up this team. Tinsley and DH heading out cleans things up. Second, Marbury dirties things up a little bit, but has a big, fat, short contract. He might simply be asked to stay in NY. Third, David Lee is a decent PF who can score efficiently and rebounds the ball very well. Fourth, he gets a more physical presence in Curry, which he has mentioned needing...who can give the team 15ppg consistently. Last year he played 81 games...something like double what JO played. Fifth and most important, he is not a JO fan.

                          I suspect Bird and Zeke have caught wind of the fact everyone thinks they're incapable of making a deal...maybe they prove us wrong.
                          Change in Team Outlook: -6.5 ppg, -2.8 rpg, and +5.0 apg.

                          Incoming Players
                          David Harrison
                          7-0 C from Colorado
                          4.2 ppg, 2.0 rpg, 0.3 apg in 12.3 minutes
                          Jamaal Tinsley
                          6-1 PG from Iowa State
                          11.9 ppg, 3.6 rpg, 8.4 apg in 33.2 minutes
                          Jermaine O'Neal
                          6-11 PF from Eau Claire (HS)
                          15.3 ppg, 7.3 rpg, 2.5 apg in 31.3 minutes
                          Outgoing Players
                          David Lee
                          6-9 PF from Florida
                          9.9 ppg, 8.2 rpg, 1.0 apg in 27.3 minutes
                          Eddy Curry
                          6-11 C from Thornwood (HS)
                          14.1 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 0.5 apg in 26.7 minutes
                          Stephon Marbury
                          6-2 PG from Georgia Tech
                          13.9 ppg, 2.5 rpg, 4.7 apg in 33.5 minutes
                          Your reasoning is very good. I agree with everything you have said.

                          Also, for the reason that we are going no where with our current team, I would do this trade. We've only got 30 games or so left, we might as well do Peja part 2 with Starbury.

                          It gives us immediate future flexibility next season to resign Danny. Plus I think it increases our draft position, potentially.

                          I really think this would be a doable trade, and it would be good for both sides.

                          If only we could give them Troy somehow and get Crawford back too, I would be ecstatic. Oh well I can dream cant I? Oh yeah, knicks throw in a pick as well.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Re: Jermaine says Pacers are involved in trade talks with several teams

                            I just found another possible deal.

                            O'Neal to Minnesota for Theo Ratliff & Antoine Walker.

                            Ratliff has 11.6 coming off the books at the end of the season.

                            Walker has always been a fav of both Bird & O'Brien & is getting no love in Minnesota. His deal has another year on it after this season, then a team option.

                            The T-Wolves also own the Heats 2nd rounder, maybe we could get that too.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Re: Jermaine says Pacers are involved in trade talks with several teams

                              i'm all for practically giving jo away so long as we get a 1st rounder out of it...late lotto-early 20s is good enough for me...and btw there is no way we will be dealing with the nyk with them having NOTHING even halfway decent to offer us in return...

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Re: Jermaine says Pacers are involved in trade talks with several teams

                                Originally posted by Jose Slaughter View Post
                                I just found another possible deal.

                                O'Neal to Minnesota for Theo Ratliff & Antoine Walker.

                                Ratliff has 11.6 coming off the books at the end of the season.

                                Walker has always been a fav of both Bird & O'Brien & is getting no love in Minnesota. His deal has another year on it after this season, then a team option.

                                The T-Wolves also own the Heats 2nd rounder, maybe we could get that too.

                                I'd like to get Ratliff's contract but I don't think the Wolves want to trade it. They're rebuilding and should be happy to own Ratliff's expiring contract.

                                As for Walker, I don't know.. I never liked his game. Weak defense and jacking up too many 3s that sometimes don't even hit the rim.

                                I think you can get more out of JO.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X