Within the past 20 years, there have been two separate periods (of a few years each) when the Pacers were legitimate contenders. How many franchises can truly say they've had even one season in that span when they were legitimate contenders? Even for some teams like the Hawks who've made a few conference finals, was anybody apart from some sabermetric-obsessed contrarian dorks at some outlet like the Ringer seriously saying that they had a genuine chance to take home the title? No. Even when they finished first in the conference, they got stomped by Lebron. The Pacers on the other hand took the eventual champions to seven -- that gives them a legitimate claim to having been the second best team in the league. They lasted longer against the Pistons than the Lakers did too.
That doesn't sound like the middle to me; if we're saying that the middle was the most common outcome over a long period of time, then for every franchise that isn't the Lakers, over a span of decades the results are inevitably going to average out to "the middle".
That doesn't sound like the middle to me; if we're saying that the middle was the most common outcome over a long period of time, then for every franchise that isn't the Lakers, over a span of decades the results are inevitably going to average out to "the middle".
Comment