Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Odd thoughts after being trounced by Utah

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Odd thoughts after being trounced by Utah

    Originally posted by Mal View Post
    Come on, that's a cheap statement because you know very well that part of the problem is that there is NOT a lot of ball or player movement right now. No, running in a large circle around the outside of the paint, and passing it back and forth does not count. As for quick shots, personally I like them if it's an "in-rhythm" shot that's an honestly open look, especially off of a kick-out from the post or a driving player, but not when it's done just for the sake of shooting early (of which Tinsley and Murphy are quickly becoming masters).
    Mal, you are correct, it was a cheap statement, I was trying to be a a little tongue-in-cheek a little ironic. My only real point is that I'm not all that concerned about the style of the offense, as any style has its good and bad qualities. Running the type of offense this year has some drawbacks, as did the offense we ran the past 4 years - and they each have good points to them. I do reject the notion that the offense we ran under Carlisle was bad in concept as it seems many Pacers fans believe to at least a certain degree

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Odd thoughts after being trounced by Utah

      Originally posted by Peck View Post
      Cap room mean nothing & I mean nothing if you can't attract free agents to come here.

      Well here is the news on that, young big name free agents are not going to be lining up to play for a team that they consider has zero chance of winning in the very near future.
      It's curious that you say this after losing to Utah. A team, nobody, and I mean, NOBODY, wants to go to. However, they were able to get Boozer and Okur, two all-stars, via free agency. Sure, we can say that they lucked out now, but when they signed those guys, everyone was saying that they overpaid.

      Then they've rebuilt through the draft with guys like Williams, Kirilenko, and Brewer. Seems like an ok way to rebuild to me. And you don't have to be a FA hot spot to do it.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Odd thoughts after being trounced by Utah

        Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
        I don't want them to get cap room, I want them to get salary RELIEF.

        I don't buy into a big name signing, but I do think it would be nice if you could sign a KAPONO when you needed a 3pt ace rather than settling for Mark Price aka ball boy and Rush.

        This team is toast for 3-4 years unless this current group recovers somehow. If what we've seen lately is where it's headed then blowing it up is what must be done. Tins/JO for Wally, fine. Stuff like that is just to clear out the roster, not to solve anything.

        And isn't it ironic that I'm now saying "move JO" and Peck is saying "don't move him"? Try that 2 months ago.
        Okay....who stole Seth's login? I don't believe he wrote this post.
        Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Odd thoughts after being trounced by Utah

          Originally posted by Mal View Post
          Secondly, and this is a general statement not related to quoting UB, but if we're going to have an offense that treats anyone with an outside shot like their Reggie Miller (in regards to how enthusiastically they are encouraged to shoot the ball), why not set as many screens as you would for Reggie Miller? I mean it's not like this is a roster filled with shooters that can create their own shots/looks. Give Mike 2 or 3 screens along the baseline. Kareem too. Danny and Shawne.

          I mean if what Jim said is true (and I have no reason to say he's making it up) that we hit over 50% of our open shots while making only like 18% of our contested shots, then why the hell wouldn't you set more screens for these guys? They can't create their own shots and they're usually slower than the guy on the other team. They NEED this as far as I can tell.
          This a great observation and I don't know why this has not been done. OB said the defense was his the players could run the offense. Maybe they need some coaching here also.
          {o,o}
          |)__)
          -"-"-

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Odd thoughts after being trounced by Utah

            Originally posted by rexnom View Post
            It's curious that you say this after losing to Utah. A team, nobody, and I mean, NOBODY, wants to go to. However, they were able to get Boozer and Okur, two all-stars, via free agency. Sure, we can say that they lucked out now, but when they signed those guys, everyone was saying that they overpaid.

            Then they've rebuilt through the draft with guys like Williams, Kirilenko, and Brewer. Seems like an ok way to rebuild to me. And you don't have to be a FA hot spot to do it.
            Just like the Bulls did a couple of years ago when they had a boatload of $$$...the best FA that they were able to sign was Eddie Robinson. I could see the Pacers FO doing the same because I have little confidence in them that even with a huge bankroll of $$$ that they couldn't get a solid FA.

            Maybe the change that we have to look for in the coming year has to not only come from a change in the lineup....but a change in the FO.
            Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Odd thoughts after being trounced by Utah

              Originally posted by rexnom View Post
              It's curious that you say this after losing to Utah. A team, nobody, and I mean, NOBODY, wants to go to. However, they were able to get Boozer and Okur, two all-stars, via free agency. Sure, we can say that they lucked out now, but when they signed those guys, everyone was saying that they overpaid.

              Then they've rebuilt through the draft with guys like Williams, Kirilenko, and Brewer. Seems like an ok way to rebuild to me. And you don't have to be a FA hot spot to do it.
              Just like the Bulls did a couple of years ago when they had a boatload of $$$...the best FA that they were able to sign was Eddie Robinson. I could see the Pacers FO doing the same because I have little confidence in them that even with a huge bankroll of $$$ that they couldn't get a solid FA.

              Maybe the change that we have to look for in the coming year has to not only come from a change in the lineup....but a change in the FO.
              Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Odd thoughts after being trounced by Utah

                Originally posted by Mal View Post
                Come on, that's a cheap statement because you know very well that part of the problem is that there is NOT a lot of ball or player movement right now. No, running in a large circle around the outside of the paint, and passing it back and forth does not count. As for quick shots, personally I like them if it's an "in-rhythm" shot that's an honestly open look, especially off of a kick-out from the post or a driving player, but not when it's done just for the sake of shooting early (of which Tinsley and Murphy are quickly becoming masters).
                It's a cheap statement because only the coach was changed. We don't have the players to run that type of offense, which is exactly why RC didn't run one, which has been my argument for nearly 2years.

                Look at the offense RC ran under Bird, look at what he ran during the Brawl season. He isn't this mechanical robot that keeps his egg timer in his pocket like some on this board would like you to think he is.

                He's a very, very smart coach who doesn't try to fit square pegs into round holes. He evaluated what type of players he was given and ran the best offense suited for them. It just happened that the most important position was held by a pouting immature man that felt like he should be able to play like he was on the And-1 tour.

                Everyone knows it, but I'll say it again, this is a players league. That is two fold for the Indiana Pacers. They have players that want to run, but don't have the phsyical ability nor the mental ability to do so. So they got their wish, ran a coach out who saw them for what they were, and are reaping the benefits of it.

                With that said, do I believe they would be better off with Rick as the coach? Nope. I think they still would be lousy, just for different variables. They still wouldn't have the talent to be good, and they wouldn't want to play for him.

                Giving a pig a bath and placing it in a dress doesn't change the fact that it's a pig, which is what they did in the offseason. Getting rid of Rick for JOB supposedly cleaned up the situation, and Rush/Diener/Owens are the new dress.

                Retooling by changing your 12-15th men doesn't do a damn thing. The "leaders" have only lead this team into losing and legal problems. What great examples.


                I think the most telling thing about the past few years is how much this board changed. As the team sank into either legal problems or kept losing posters who were big upfront mainstays on the board have shifted to the back, we've lost the diehards who would spice things up, get banned but still find ways to come back, and the overall energy has hit rock bottom. I look at it as a pure reflection of the team. There's not much hope, and what little there is feels manufactured because we want to believe.

                Something big needs to happen, whether it turns out positive or not. Risks have to be taken because at this pace high school games will have bigger turnouts.
                Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Odd thoughts after being trounced by Utah

                  I know what our problem is, Peck. It's a lack of talent.

                  Most nights, I don't blame the lack of effort, just the lack of consistency and play-making ability.

                  We have lots of good/okay/bad players. No great players, and nobody with exceptional upside (except, maybe, Shawne Williams). Tinsley is very good (when he's healthy and playing in the right system), and is easily our best player. But he doesn't have the right players surrounding him.

                  I was never big on Ike, which is one reason I was so vehemently opposed to the GS trade.

                  We have a lot of solid guys who are also inconsistent. Granger, Dunleavy, and Quis being the most notable.

                  JO is not the same player he once was. The system doesn't really suit him, but it's not just that.

                  It's time to rebuild, not retool.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Odd thoughts after being trounced by Utah

                    Originally posted by Will Galen View Post
                    Originally posted by Peck
                    Bird has said he won't make a move unless it improves us. He's also said he doesn't believe in tearing a team down and starting from scratch.
                    This has also been the Knicks' philosophy, and look where it has gotten them.

                    The problem with "staying the course" with an average team is that you're never good enough to win anything significant, and never bad enough to get a much-needed talent-infusion.

                    People are making fun of the Heat, but they're in a MUCH better position than we are. They won a title, and are now bad enough to get a very high draft pick next season. And they still have a very young Dwayne Wade. When Shaq's massive contract comes off the books in a couple years, Miami is going to be able to rebuild in one fell swoop ala Portland. The Blazers are the proper model for how rebuilding should be done. And if they could manage to purge those hideous contracts that they had within a couple or three years, we should be able to do the same.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Odd thoughts after being trounced by Utah

                      Originally posted by Shade View Post
                      I know what our problem is, Peck. It's a lack of talent.

                      Most nights, I don't blame the lack of effort, just the lack of consistency and play-making ability.

                      We have lots of good/okay/bad players. No great players, and nobody with exceptional upside (except, maybe, Shawne Williams). Tinsley is very good (when he's healthy and playing in the right system), and is easily our best player. But he doesn't have the right players surrounding him.

                      I was never big on Ike, which is one reason I was so vehemently opposed to the GS trade.

                      We have a lot of solid guys who are also inconsistent. Granger, Dunleavy, and Quis being the most notable.

                      JO is not the same player he once was. The system doesn't really suit him, but it's not just that.

                      It's time to rebuild, not retool.
                      I would say that the biggest downfall for the Pacers has far and away been Jermaine O'neal really falling off from what he used to be. He used to be sort of the Eastern Conf Tim Duncan.

                      Not as good as Duncan, but still probably one of the two best bigmen in the conference. He was a workhorse. A guy who could really anchor the frontcourt who made it easier to put complementary/role playing guys on the floor.

                      He's just not the same as what he used to be, which is too bad because he's not that old. Two years ago, the Pacers could have demanded premium value in return for Jermaine. They can't do that any longer, and that's definitely a blow to the franchise.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Odd thoughts after being trounced by Utah

                        [quote=Shade;640666]
                        Originally posted by Will Galen View Post

                        This has also been the Knicks' philosophy, and look where it has gotten them.

                        The problem with "staying the course" with an average team is that you're never good enough to win anything significant, and never bad enough to get a much-needed talent-infusion.
                        I agree. For four years, the Warriors won 38, 37, 34 and 34 wins. Nowhere good enough for the playoffs and nowhere near bad enough to get an impact player in the lottery.

                        Believe me, it was pretty damn tough to get out of that cycle.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Odd thoughts after being trounced by Utah

                          [QUOTE=d_c;640668]
                          Originally posted by Shade View Post

                          I agree. For four years, the Warriors won 38, 37, 34 and 34 wins. Nowhere good enough for the playoffs and nowhere near bad enough to get an impact player in the lottery.

                          Believe me, it was pretty damn tough to get out of that cycle.
                          The only cycle that is tougher to get out of is the cycle of losing and not making the playoffs at all.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Odd thoughts after being trounced by Utah

                            Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post

                            The only cycle that is tougher to get out of is the cycle of losing and not making the playoffs at all.
                            The time period I mentioned with the Warriors included losing and not making the playoffs at all. The problem with their losing was that it didn't lead to getting better talent.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Odd thoughts after being trounced by Utah

                              [quote=Unclebuck;640670]
                              Originally posted by d_c View Post

                              The only cycle that is tougher to get out of is the cycle of losing and not making the playoffs at all.
                              We could very well be headed down that road. Last year might just have been Year One...

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Odd thoughts after being trounced by Utah

                                Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                                I don't buy into a big name signing, but I do think it would be nice if you could sign a KAPONO when you needed a 3pt ace rather than settling for Mark Price aka ball boy and Rush.
                                Ummmmm...did you just put Travis Diener in the same class as Mark Price? He's closer to more like Brent Price. Mark Price was a consistent all-star player, and if Diener comes up to that, we'd be better for it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X