The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

2019 Pacers Summer League

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2019 Pacers Summer League

    Here's who/when they play.

  • #2
    This guy should be on the roster.


    • #3

      JaKeenan Gant is a 6í8Ē senior forward for the Louisiana Raginí Cajuns. Gant, a former consensus top 50 high school recruit and Mizzou commit, has grown into one of the most dynamic forwards in the country. He possesses a unique combination of shooting range, rim protection, and explosive athleticism. Gantís performance, to date, as a senior has landed him on the Lou Henson National Mid-Major Player of the Year mid-season watch list, and his dynamic skill set fits the mold of a modern NBA rim-protecting stretch four.
      Picture Tale of the Tape

      Vertical Explosiveness
      ​Gantís explosiveness in the paint pops on tape, and he projects as plus vertical athlete at the next level. Gantís defensive tenacity and quick-twitch vertical athleticism make him a perpetual restricted area hindrance to the opposition. Gant is currently fourth in the country in blocks per game, primarily thriving at utilizing his length and bounce to eat up drive attempts as a help-side rim protector. He has also proven capable of recovering as an on-ball defender on drives, showing impressive reactionary athleticism and quick-twitch vertical pop to rise and pin shots off the glass.

      Gant has notched 3+ blocks in 12 of 21 games this season, highlighted by a 10 block effort in a victory over Southern on December 1st. Gant has blocked 60 shots thus far this season, the only Raginí Cajun to have accumulated double digit blocks. He truly functions as their primary rim protector, and has shown great instinctual and athletic flashes in doing so. The dependability of Gantís help-side rim protecting prowess gives his teammates more leeway as perimeter defenders to take risks, pressure ball-handlers, and force turnovers because they can rest assured that if they get beat to the paint, they will be funneled to and met by Gant at the rim.

      Gantís vertical bounce also functionally manifests itself offensively. He gets up for lobs, is a high effort out-of-area offensive rebounder, and gets off the ground quickly to finish over taller rim protectors. His second jump explosiveness pops as a tenacious putback threat.

      Below, we will highlight Gantís vertical explosiveness and shot-blocking prowess as both a weak side and primary defender.

      Offensively, Gant could benefit from supplementing his explosive finishing with more consistent touch. He seems to have solid natural touch, but tends to rush a fair amount of his attempts.

      Defensively, improvement on attention to detail as an off-ball team defender beyond his proven acumen as an athletic help-side rim protector would help Gantís overall impact and contribution to winning as a defensive prospect.

      Contested Shooting
      Grant projects primarily as a stretch four on the offensive end. In order to ensure optimal spacing as a role player alongside NBA stars who need room to create, he will need to be able to knock down outside shots and have the gravity to pull rim protectors away from the paint. Gant has greatly extended his range as a shooter to become a lethal weapon from beyond the arc. Gant has improved his three-point efficiency each consecutive season on continually higher volume, currently shooting at a 37.5% clip on 3.8 three-point attempts per game as a senior.

      Gantís long arms and quick, smooth release make him a very capable shooter over high-hand contests. Gant ranks as a 89th percentile shooter in guarded catch-and-shoot situations, converting at a rate of 1.31 PPP.

      In the clip below, we highlight Gantís quick release and ability to knock down threes while guarded closely by opposing players.

      Gantís quick release from deep will create the opportunities for him to blow by aggressive close-outs. If Gant can polish his handle as a driver and craft as a finisher, it will go a long way in helping him carve out a well-rounded scoring package at the next level.

      Dependent on the context of Gantís eventual professional teamís offensive scheme, philosophy, and personnel fit, he will need to pick-and-choose his spots as a shooter and find the right balance of functioning as a floor spacer and an energy offensive rebounder. PBC Prediction

      Gant has yet to pick up much buzz within the NBA draft analysis community (he has yet to appear on any of our consensus big boards), but we believe this is likely to change. Gant possesses an intriguing blend of skill, size, and athleticism that make him a theoretically translatable professional prospect. Although he may not necessarily be on NBA radars as a potential draft pick, Gant seems like a prime candidate to be considered for an Exhibit 10 contract, which provides a player with a bonus up to $50,000 if he signs with the team's G League affiliate (and can be converted to a two-way contract by the first day of the regular season).


      • #4
        Shizz Alston


        • #5
          Wichita Stateís Markis McDuffie will get his shot for a chance to play in the NBA.

          The former Shocker standout signed a Summer League deal with the Indiana Pacers on Friday, according to the Wichita Eagle. The deal does not promise a final roster spot for McDuffie, as his performance will determine his future. The Summer League runs from July 5-15 in Las Vegas, Nevada.


          • #6
            MiKyle McIntosh


            • #7
              For Pacers veterans I haven't seen any official announcements. But I did read a mention in a Scott Agness article (I think) that Leaf won't play. Got the impression that he was too seasoned (my term) for summer league. Sumner may sit in the same boat.

              I saw a twitter conversation that implied Aaron Holiday would play. So I assume Alize Johnson will too.

              Then there's this about Goga. Our 19 year old may be too good to showcase in summer league. I think the Pacers may not understand that they're an entertainment business and that we all want to be entertained by our shiny new draft pick.


              • #8
                This is old news but I'll add it to the thread for completeness. Brian Bowen.


                • #9
                  It hasn't been decided if he will play in the Summer League?

                  That is the kind of ignorance this organization displays that just kills me. Goga is nobody, yet. He has not played against better competition because most of the guys he has played against cant even get a shot in the NBA.

                  Put him on the floor and DEVELOP him. Please.
                  "Don't get caught watchin' the paint dry"


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Taterhead View Post
                    It hasn't been decided if he will play in the Summer League?

                    That is the kind of ignorance this organization displays that just kills me. Goga is nobody, yet. He has not played against better competition because most of the guys he has played against cant even get a shot in the NBA.

                    Put him on the floor and DEVELOP him. Please.
                    This. If Barrett and Zion are playing, Goga better damn well be on the court. If for no other reason than for Nate to actually get a chance to watch him in game action since he apparently was not in the loop at all in scouting his newest 1st round pick.
                    Last edited by Coop; 06-22-2019, 05:59 PM.


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Taterhead View Post
                      It hasn't been decided if he will play in the Summer League?

                      That is the kind of ignorance this organization displays that just kills me. Goga is nobody, yet. He has not played against better competition because most of the guys he has played against cant even get a shot in the NBA.

                      Put him on the floor and DEVELOP him. Please.
                      But if he gets hurt then, OMG, stupid organization invests a first round pick on a guy then plays him in a pointless exhibition and gets him hurt!!!!!


                      • #12
                        It's bad enough when our rookies can't get minutes to prove themselves in the regular season. Now they can't even get time in the Summer League. Unbelievable.
                        Check out my autographed 1972-73 Topps basketball project


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by kent beckley View Post

                          But if he gets hurt then, OMG, stupid organization invests a first round pick on a guy then plays him in a pointless exhibition and gets him hurt!!!!!
                          Would you rather get criticized for doing too much or not enough?

                          That's my point. The organization ALWAYS plays it safe. Always. and it always hurts us.
                          "Don't get caught watchin' the paint dry"


                          • #14
                            I wouldn't say always plays it safe but they definitely air on the side of caution. Also he may have a load management for him since he played in 51 games last year. That is according to the realgm website and that is probably a lot more than our college ball.
                            Last edited by Gamble1; 06-22-2019, 05:17 PM.


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Gamble1 View Post
                              I wouldn't say always plays it safe but they definitely air on the side of caution. Also he may have a load management for him since he played in 51 games last year. That is according to the realgm website and that is probably a lot more than our college ball.
                              The best way to condition yourself to play more games more games. I dont see how sitting him out gets him in better condition to handle a bigger work load.

                              It comes to a point where you're just creating excuses to be cautious, for the sake of being cautious. Its counterproductive.
                              "Don't get caught watchin' the paint dry"