Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Jim O'Brien is new head coach

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Jim O'Brien is new head coach

    Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
    They did?

    So let's not pretend that somehow Brown or Bird made slower guys like Mullin and Jackson into these defensive studs.
    That's not what I'm saying AT ALL. I specifically said something about not suddenly turning poor individual defenders into great ones.


    With Jackson, Miller, and Smits, none of who were known as even average defenders at the time, we shouldn't have been "middle of the pack", but down in the "can't stop ANYBODY" range.


    My point with that comparison - and I think we agree on this - is that a good defensive scheme can minimize multiple defensive liabilities.


    We seem to have been very hesitant and confused on defense the past couple years - slow, tentative rotations, not knowing when to help or who to double, etc. I'm somewhat optimistic that a really good defensive coach - Harter qualifies - will take care of that problem.


    My other point to the other poster was basically just because we have a Murphy or a Dunleavy or a Tinsley we shouldn't immediately throw in the towel on playing defense and just hope we can outscore everybody.
    You're caught up in the Internet / you think it's such a great asset / but you're wrong, wrong, wrong
    All that fiber optic gear / still cannot take away the fear / like an island song

    - Jimmy Buffett

    Comment


    • Re: Jim O'Brien is new head coach

      Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
      One thing everyone must admit. Jim O'Brien was able to get the most out of Walker - no other coach has been able to get half of what O"Brien got out of him.

      The other thing I really rememeber about Jim, is he tailors his offense around the star players, he tailors his system around the star players - and he gives them a lot of freedom to play on the offensive end as long as they play defense.

      He doesn't try to plug players into his offensive system, he builds the offensive system around his players. ------- you all should like that right?
      I have been reading your posts for years, UB, and I swear that is the first time I've ever seen you use a question mark.
      “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” - Winston Churchill

      “If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to serve as a horrible warning.” - Catherine Aird

      Comment


      • Re: Jim O'Brien is new head coach

        I, for one, am not the least bit thrilled by a coach who tailors his offense so that the highest paid (star - ?) players do all of the shooting. That's what has been wrong with the Pacers for the entire Rick C era. The best teams get everyone involved in the offense, not just one or two 'options'. Am I the only NBA fan left that believes in 'team' ball? Look at the Pistons, folks. Everyone contributes. Look at San Antonio. Again, everyone contributes. UB, you're off base on this one.

        Comment


        • Re: Jim O'Brien is new head coach

          I think O'Brien's former teams roster's dictated the offense defer to them. We are talking about teams consisting of Paul Pierce and Allen Iverson. He did get his teams to win games as a head coach so it's not like he's some bum off the streets. This situation won't be new to him. He's dealt with prima donnas, bumbling management, teams in need of a face lift, unbalanced rosters and troubled players before.
          With Dick Harter on board, it feels like Larry is managing this team much like he coached. Turn to Rick then to Dick who's next if Jim/Dick don't work out? Gar Heard?
          When they brought Rick on board originally, I never got behind him. I always thought Mike Brown should have been named coach. This time around, I'll give the guy a chance before I start ripping him.
          I'm in these bands
          The Humans
          Dr. Goldfoot
          The Bar Brawlers
          ME

          Comment


          • Re: Jim O'Brien is new head coach

            i just hope that we bring in a coach that excels with developing young bigs. who is out there who might fit that role?

            hakeem? probably won't want to be a coach
            ewing? not sure what he's doing anymore
            anyone with toronto or orlando available? thinking bosh, howard, darko have developed fairly well.

            any other thoughts?
            This is the darkest timeline.

            Comment


            • Re: Jim O'Brien is new head coach

              Originally posted by DisplacedKnick View Post
              When I heard O'Brien was hired my response was, "Meh."

              Not the best, not the worst.

              After I heard he'll likely be bringing Harter with him my response now is, "Congratulations Pacers fans."

              The guy knows how to get his teams to play hard and with Harter the defense is gonna be sound. Best move the front office has made in 3 years.
              Wow, this was my exact reaction. I def agree.
              You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

              Comment


              • Re: Jim O'Brien is new head coach

                I don't know what to think right now.

                A part of me is so ****ed off.

                I just can't stop comparing Rick Carlise and Jim O'Brien and because of that I keep wondering what in gods name Larry and Donnie are thinking. They really think that JO is a better coach?

                From what I remember of JO with the Celtics, they had a good run to the Eastern Finals and I enjoyed watching them. But all they did was chuck three pointers.

                I will give him a pass on being fired in Philadelphia after one season I think it was. The rate of which NBA coaches are fired (and GMs are not) is just sad. Coaches get all the blame even though they don't put together some of these **** teams that they get to coach.

                If JO can come in here, bring a different offenseive style than Carlise, I love the Triangle (that won't happen) and the Princeton (this could happen, that is whay I wanted Rick Adelman so bad) then I will be happy with something like that.

                JO also needs to develope young guys. That is probably the most important thing.

                So there are some question marks I have but overall I just want to scream and yell because a part of me is so ****ed off right now. RC was in a bad situation here and I think highly of the job he did, I think highly of RC in general. While I have thought we need to make a change I have also wondered if that change should be in the front office. But anyways I just think there were better canidates out there. We were not going to land a better coach than RC and I just love what I have read about Brian Shaw. He would have been my ideal choice.

                Jim O'Brien isn't a bad coach. But he sure ain't the coach I wanted from what I know about him. I just hope it works out.

                Comment


                • Re: Jim O'Brien is new head coach

                  http://www.realgm.com/boards/viewtop...er=asc&start=0

                  What great things these Celtic fans have to say about JO! Not!

                  Comment


                  • Re: Jim O'Brien is new head coach

                    Originally posted by Oneal07 View Post
                    LOL. . .Reggie Miller doesn't like the idea of O'Brien Coaching the Pacers
                    No offense to Reggie, but I cannot remember the last positive thing he said about the organization as a reporter. I know it is his decision, but from what I have seen Reggie was a great basketball player and competitor. He is far from a great basketball mind.


                    Comment


                    • Re: Jim O'Brien is new head coach

                      Originally posted by indy0731 View Post
                      No offense to Reggie, but I cannot remember the last positive thing he said about the organization as a reporter. I know it is his decision, but from what I have seen Reggie was a great basketball player and competitor. He is far from a great basketball mind.
                      What is there so positive to talk about though? Just because he doesn't see anything positive with the Pacers doesn't mean that he is far from a great basketball mind.

                      And I love how JO and LB are on the same page. It's good that they will get along great, it's not good to be on the same page as LB. But yahoo for it anyways.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Jim O'Brien is new head coach

                        Originally posted by rommie View Post
                        What is there so positive to talk about though? Just because he doesn't see anything positive with the Pacers doesn't mean that he is far from a great basketball mind.

                        And I love how JO and LB are on the same page. It's good that they will get along great, it's not good to be on the same page as LB. But yahoo for it anyways.
                        Hes complaining on national TV cause the Pacers didn't call his friend about the coaching job. You know his friend that...
                        A.) Has zero coaching experience of any way, shape or form
                        and
                        B.) Said he didn't want to coach here

                        I stick by my statement. IMO Reggie sucks as a commentator.


                        Comment


                        • Re: Jim O'Brien is new head coach



                          I was gonna put a caption on this, but those of you old enough to remember this gem (and those of you youngsters with them new-fangled Dee-Vee Aruh players may recognize this scene) need no caption.

                          Okay, I'm basking in the sunshine, right? So, looks like Dick Vesace has found a new home. DoH!! Okay, I will say, that DK has a strong point about Harter.

                          Uh, yeah, I'll console myself with that thought.

                          Still basking in the sunshine. Still basking in the sunshine....
                          Hey! What're you kicking me for? You want me to ask? All right, I'll ask! Ma'am, where do the high school girls hang out in this town?

                          Comment


                          • Re: Jim O'Brien is new head coach

                            There is a lot of things that could have gone on to make Reggie say what he said. IDK and I don't really care. Either way that don't make him a bad commentator in my eyes, JMO though no need to discuss it more.

                            Anyways I just watched the press conference, here is something I am hung up on.

                            From what I get JO is flexible. He will demand defense but on offense he is flexible.

                            That is good about the defense but is that good about the offense? Is it better in the long run to say this is what we are going to run night in and night out year in and year out?

                            Another thing is that JO believes in is balance. Adjusting to the other team you are playing. Is this good or bad?

                            We say two examples of this in this years playoffs, one team lost and the other won.

                            The Mavs against the Warriors. I would say that the Mavs are flexible and the Warriors are not, they are run and gun. The Warriors won though.

                            The other example is the Spurs and Suns. The Spurs are flexible IMO but the Suns are not, they are run and gun. The Spurs won though.

                            So which one is it? I just can't figure if this is a good thing or bad thing, I guess it just depends on what you perfere.

                            One thing I forgot to say is that I am happy to be getting a quality assistant in Dick Harter. That is something I have complained about a lot about last years staff.

                            Hopefully Dick Harter, maybe this Lester Conner, I would like to keep Chuck Person, and then another one or two maybe?

                            A thread on 76er fans thoughts on OB.

                            http://www.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=667593

                            Not as many bad things. Actually mostly positive.
                            Last edited by Young; 06-01-2007, 10:15 AM.

                            Comment


                            • Re: Jim O'Brien is new head coach

                              Didn't read the whole thread, so sorry if this is redundant:

                              Didn't we play O'Brien's Celtics three playoffs in a row?

                              I remember playing them, and thinking they had two players (Pierce and Walker) who could crack our rotation, and that their offense was rather dumb looking just shooting threes but given their options it wasn't that bad. And they beat us, leading to I. Thomas' firing.

                              Hmm, my initial impression is positive, it's just so unexpected that I'm taken aback. But isnt' that what this team does most of the times? Make the move that nobod expects?

                              Comment


                              • Re: Jim O'Brien is new head coach

                                Originally posted by Los Angeles View Post
                                I have been reading your posts for years, UB, and I swear that is the first time I've ever seen you use a question mark.


                                Haha, I noticed that too.
                                The Miller Time Podcast on 8 Points, 9 Seconds:
                                http://www.eightpointsnineseconds.com/tag/miller-time-podcast/
                                RSS Feed
                                Subscribe via iTunes

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X