Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

The Rick Carlisle show Question of the Week for 2/01/07 (WE STILL NEED A CALLER!)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Rick Carlisle show Question of the Week for 2/01/07 (WE STILL NEED A CALLER!)

    Welcome to the first weekly thread for the Rick Carlisle show question of the week!

    First an explanation. This idea came about by the poster Will Galen on this thread.

    Every week following the broadcast of the Rick Carlisle show (which unless there are special circumstances, including a game that night, will air at 7PM on Thursday nights on 1070AM WIBC from Indianapolis), a new sticky thread will be posted for the following week's show.

    The purpose of this thread is for anyone who has a question for the coach to submit it here. The subjectively picked "best question" will then be asked via a call-in on the following show!

    We hope that this will be a helpful tool in getting some answers to questions we here on the Digest may have about the Indiana Pacers.

    ---

    As this is the first ever thread for this, I am also looking for something besides questions: Someone who is willing to actually make the phone call. We need someone who can be relatively reliable to not only be on time to make the call, but to of course ask the question that was selected as "the best" of the week.

    Pending Mr. Boyle's answer to Peck's inquiry, we may or may not also request that the designated PD caller mention on air that he is delivering the "Pacers Digest Question of the Week". If Mark deems that to be in poor taste, then this will not be requested. If there is no objection, then of course we would ask that you do so if you don't mind.

    I think this is a great, fun idea that Will had, and I hope this quickly becomes a new tradition on Pacers Digest. If/when Rick is no longer the coach, we will continue with whomever the next coach may be if he chooses to continue the WIBC tradition of having his own call-in show.

    Let the questions begin! (And I hope someone is able and willing to make the call!)

  • #2
    Re: The Rick Carlisle show Question of the Week for 1/11/07

    My first stab at a question.

    ************************************************** ******

    Dear Coach Carlisle

    What do you look for most from the point guard position? Taking away all of the players we currently have what one talent/skill do you look for when choosing a point guard?

    ************************************************** ******

    I was going to go longer but I think in this case brevity is probably the better way to go.

    I'll try & think of others.


    Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: The Rick Carlisle show Question of the Week for 1/11/07

      Great initiative!
      2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

      2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

      2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: The Rick Carlisle show Question of the Week for 1/11/07

        Am I on? Hello?

        Hey, coach. Hey, Mark. Hello? How you all guys doing today? Love the show.

        First time, long time. I can't believe I got through. Mega-dittos from Indy. Thanks for the vine. 5-1, 360.

        Hold on, I'll go turn it down.

        I saw your recent appearance on the Big Break All Star Challenge on the Golf Channel and it raised some serious concerns.

        1. Why the long putter?

        Do you suffer from the yips? Does it ever affect your coaching, such as having an involuntary twitch when you reach for the play card?

        2. I couldn't help but wonder if the Pacers inability to run an uptempo offense this season is related to your inability to get off 7 putts in one minute. NBA players shoot 25 balls in that same time span during the 3 point shootout.

        Is your coaching impacted by similar paralysis by analysis?

        3. What do you mean when you say you'd rather be a better player and lose the event than be a worse player and win the event? Just win, baby!


        4. Can we sign Reggie for the playoffs?

        Thanks. I'll hang up and listen.
        PSN: MRat731 XBL: MRat0731

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: The Rick Carlisle show Question of the Week for 1/11/07

          Serious questions only, please (though I do love the humor )

          Hey, coach. This one's from a fan in the dirty south...Bama country (by way of all over w/a brief stint in Naptown, USA...holla!)

          The final roster spots were filled based more on "NBA/professional basketball experience" over talent. Hence, a good prospect in James "Sky Jamma" White didn't make the cut. Early on in the season, the more "experienced" players who made the cut - Powell & Marshall, specifically - saw playing. Now, we rarely see either of them on the court. I'd like to know what are the long &/or short-term plans for these players? What do you view as their roles on the team, as well as their strengths/weakness (as in what area do they need to improve on)? How do you see them helping the team?

          Lee in Huntsville, AL

          (Good luck headed into the All-Star Break and on the rest of the season.)

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: The Rick Carlisle show Question of the Week for 1/11/07

            Hello coach, my question concerns job experience.

            NFL owners seem willing to bring in a new head coach who has college experience only. The NBA on the other hand rarely hires someone from the college ranks and seems to promote within it's own.

            From a coaches perspective what knowledge did you gather as an NBA assistant that you can not get coming straight from a college program?
            You know how hippos are made out to be sweet and silly, like big cows, but are actually extremely dangerous and can kill you with stunning brutality? The Pacers are the NBA's hippos....Matt Moore CBS Sports....

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: The Rick Carlisle show Question of the Week for 1/11/07

              I thought posters would want to know answers to the questions they argue over on here. Most of us don't like Tinsley shooting to much.

              How about, "Most posters on Pacer's digest don't like Tinsley shooting as much as he does and we want to know if that's by design?

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: The Rick Carlisle show Question of the Week for 1/11/07

                What current roster, Indiana aside, would you most enjoy coaching?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: The Rick Carlisle show Question of the Week for 1/11/07

                  Originally posted by Will Galen View Post
                  I thought posters would want to know answers to the questions they argue over on here. Most of us don't like Tinsley shooting to much.

                  How about, "Most posters on Pacer's digest don't like Tinsley shooting as much as he does and we want to know if that's by design?
                  Completely agree. I'd like to see this question, it is by far the most discussed issue around here in the past couple of weeks.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: The Rick Carlisle show Question of the Week for 1/11/07

                    Originally posted by ajbry View Post
                    Completely agree. I'd like to see this question, it is by far the most discussed issue around here in the past couple of weeks.
                    Peck's question sorta touched on that.

                    I don't have a question right now, but probably will over the next couple of days. One thing we all need to do is to ask a question that Rick will answer in an honest way

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: The Rick Carlisle show Question of the Week for 1/11/07

                      Originally posted by MagicRat View Post
                      5-1, 360.
                      I thought you'd put on a few at the party, but wow.
                      Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: The Rick Carlisle show Question of the Week for 1/11/07

                        Originally posted by Will Galen View Post
                        I thought posters would want to know answers to the questions they argue over on here. Most of us don't like Tinsley shooting to much.

                        How about, "Most posters on Pacer's digest don't like Tinsley shooting as much as he does and we want to know if that's by design?
                        And if he answers "Plans change. That's how I live my life. Please move on.", this place will shut down.
                        Narf!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: The Rick Carlisle show Question of the Week for 1/11/07

                          Originally posted by Kegboy View Post
                          I thought you'd put on a few at the party, but wow.
                          Now that Mini-Marathon training has started again I hope to get under 3 bills.......
                          PSN: MRat731 XBL: MRat0731

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: The Rick Carlisle show Question of the Week for 1/11/07

                            How about, "Have you started having 'special guests' so that you don't have to answer as many stupid questions from drunken hicks every week?"


                            Or, on a more serious note,

                            "Do you design the offense and defense based upon your personnel, or do you have a blueprint for a 'Winning Gameplan', and hope management gives you the players you need to succeed with that blueprint?"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: The Rick Carlisle show Question of the Week for 1/11/07 (WE NEED A CALLER!)

                              We're still looking for a caller. Without him (or her), this won't exactly work.

                              We have about 24+ hours before we miss this week's show, so if anyone is interested, please respond.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X