Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Kings coach Musselman arrested on DUI charges (ESPN.com)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Kings coach Musselman arrested on DUI charges (ESPN.com)

    We aren't going to call for his head on a pike in front of the arena; we aren't going to act as though nothing happened.

    He's human. He obviously made a big mistake...and he knows it.

    FYI? The other male in the car has been reported to be none other than Darrin May, who is the executive director of media relations for Maloof Sports & Entertainment.

    ...sigh...

    Once is a mistake; as long as he admits his error, which I know he will tomorrow during the press conference at 12:15, and follows whatever punishment is meted out by the courts, I'm not going to go all "holier than thou" on his ***.

    This could have been much, much, much worse. It wasn't, thank God, and some good might actually come out of it. Our board has been talking all day about this and I think it's a timely reminder as we enter the holiday season that not only shouldn't you drink and drive, you certainly shouldn't be afraid to stop your friends from drinking and driving.

    Yes, Musselman made a mistake but I seriously doubt if he's lost the respect of the players. I think they know, perhaps better than any of us, how easy it is to get into a situation you really shouldn't have gotten into.
    NBA basketball - taking my breath away since 1963.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Kings coach Musselman arrested on DUI charges (ESPN.com)

      FYI? The other male in the car has been reported to be none other than Darrin May, who is the executive director of media relations for Maloof Sports & Entertainment.

      Taking one for the team then ehh..
      Ya Think Ya Used Enough Dynamite there Butch...

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Kings coach Musselman arrested on DUI charges (ESPN.com)

        Originally posted by Kingsfanbmiller View Post
        Give me a break. Artest hasn't done anything wrong in Sacramento. He's been the ultimate professional here. Muss made a mistake and we don't have Bonzi anymore. Pacers have done more to warrant the word "jail" than the Kings have. I aint trying to attack the Pacers but really, it's the truth.

        Artest is .... cancer in remission

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Kings coach Musselman arrested on DUI charges (ESPN.com)

          Originally posted by Kingsfanbmiller View Post
          Give me a break. Artest hasn't done anything wrong in Sacramento. He's been the ultimate professional here. Muss made a mistake and we don't have Bonzi anymore. Pacers have done more to warrant the word "jail" than the Kings have. I aint trying to attack the Pacers but really, it's the truth.
          What did Ron do in Rick's FIRST SEASON as head coach.

          Answer - nothing.

          Year 2 - suspended for asking for a month off in the season to deal with his record biz, suspended for 70+ for the brawl, a few days after the brawl was on national TV pushing the Allure CD during interviews about the brawl.


          My point isn't that the Kings are bad anyway, which you should have been able to pick up on. This is about the hypocrisy of some Pacers fans who are ignorant of just how small time the Pacers crap is in big picture.

          Get back to me when 2 men are stabbed to death at the Club Rio and Jack's limo drives off with the murderers inside. Then we can put him on the cover of NBA Live a few years later.

          Oh I forgot, if you are really, really good then you are suitable to be a national icon.


          If the competition was for the most immoral, thugged out, criminal behavior the Pacers would fare much worse than they have as a team trying to win a title. Strictly .500 ball at best.

          Or did I miss where Jack choked the hell outta Rick last week?

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Kings coach Musselman arrested on DUI charges (ESPN.com)

            Originally posted by GO!!!!! View Post
            Edit

            The 41-year-old coach failed three sobriety tests and had a blood-alcohol level of 0.11, according to the arrest report. The legal limit is 0.08.

            that could happy to anyone really, although it does seem like he wasen't totally focused on driving

            Musselman was pulled over at 2:15 a.m. about 1½ miles from the State Capitol after his car was seen making a right-hand turn from the left-hand lane and cutting off another vehicle, said California Highway Patrol spokesman Sgt. Evan Williams.

            I'd give my friends in the car a big thank you for allowing me to drive, I hope there not well paid members of the public..

            down here the limit is .05

            thats a difference and a half really...
            Personally I think the DUI laws are getting a bit too extreme, so I'm not really outraged by Musselman's bust. .15, .20, those are the people that are lethal weapons behind the wheel IMO.

            Being tired is a strong factor in traffic deaths too. Just check most of the incidents involving tractor-trailer accidents. But you aren't serving jail time for pushing it.

            Then you have the flat-out idiot drivers, or the people on prescribed meds that impare their judgement, and so on.

            I'm more concerned about that right from a left hand lane, which probably had nothing to do with the alcohol and everything to do with being a bad driver. Wouldn't be surprised to find out he's done that before while stone sober. People drive like that all the time, like they are the only ones on the road.

            Too bad smart driving can't be enforced. That's what I'd bring Muss in on at this point.

            PS - I was once in a position to read about many traffic accidents which is why I had the rant. People are F'n stupid a lot more than they are drunk. And unfortunately people aren't typically forced to take driving tests to renew their license...not that losing a license keeps people from getting behind the wheel anyway.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Kings coach Musselman arrested on DUI charges (ESPN.com)

              Originally posted by Kingsfanbmiller View Post
              Give me a break. Artest hasn't done anything wrong in Sacramento yet.

              Fixed.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Kings coach Musselman arrested on DUI charges (ESPN.com)

                Why did this have to turn into a Kings vs. Pacers thread, and even worse, a Ron Artest thread?

                Seriously folks, let's get a hold of ourselves.
                “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” - Winston Churchill

                “If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to serve as a horrible warning.” - Catherine Aird

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Kings coach Musselman arrested on DUI charges (ESPN.com)

                  Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                  Personally I think the DUI laws are getting a bit too extreme, so I'm not really outraged by Musselman's bust. .15, .20, those are the people that are lethal weapons behind the wheel IMO.

                  Being tired is a strong factor in traffic deaths too. Just check most of the incidents involving tractor-trailer accidents. But you aren't serving jail time for pushing it.

                  Then you have the flat-out idiot drivers, or the people on prescribed meds that impare their judgement, and so on.

                  I'm more concerned about that right from a left hand lane, which probably had nothing to do with the alcohol and everything to do with being a bad driver. Wouldn't be surprised to find out he's done that before while stone sober. People drive like that all the time, like they are the only ones on the road.

                  Too bad smart driving can't be enforced. That's what I'd bring Muss in on at this point.

                  PS - I was once in a position to read about many traffic accidents which is why I had the rant. People are F'n stupid a lot more than they are drunk. And unfortunately people aren't typically forced to take driving tests to renew their license...not that losing a license keeps people from getting behind the wheel anyway.


                  You are right driving tired (lack of sleep) is a huge problem, but I dont see how ANYONE can say the DUI laws are "extreme".

                  I guess after you work the streets and you see some of the accidents that these morons cause, most of the time to others and not themselves, you have a different perspective.

                  I dont think you have to have zero tolerance, but to see any law regarding "DUI" is "extreme" is a little crazy, IMHO

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Kings coach Musselman arrested on DUI charges (ESPN.com)

                    DUI laws need to be extreme. Drunk drivers are scum of the earth and deserve to be treated severely. They kill people.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Kings coach Musselman arrested on DUI charges (ESPN.com)

                      Originally posted by ajbry View Post
                      DUI laws need to be extreme. Drunk drivers are scum of the earth and deserve to be treated severely. They kill people.
                      Shooting guns in the air kills people too, you seem to not have a problem with that a few weeks ago. But I'm just saying

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Kings coach Musselman arrested on DUI charges (ESPN.com)

                        Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                        Too bad smart driving can't be enforced. That's what I'd bring Muss in on at this point.
                        He did get pulled over for bad driving. He just happened to be legally impaired at the time.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Kings coach Musselman arrested on DUI charges (ESPN.com)

                          Originally posted by grace View Post
                          He did get pulled over for bad driving. He just happened to be legally impaired at the time.
                          I mean beyond a ticket, at the level of POTENTIAL RISK it creates.

                          He will be punished MUCH MORE for the .11 than the dangerous lane cross. But if he had been sober he'd get a ticket and sent on his way, regardless of the fact that the move would have been equally lethal in either case if someone had been coming up the right lane at the speed limit.


                          By extreme I mean the BAC tolerance level. I researched and found good results supporting the fact that fatalities jump somewhat beyond .10 and dramatically when past .15, and that fatalities among sober drivers remain extremely high, so much in fact that a case could be made that the very low rates of .01 to .10 drivers involved in fatal wrecks were made up significantly of the same cause that created the fatal wrecks involving sober drivers.

                          Here is one place to look if you think I'm full of it.
                          http://www.cga.ct.gov/ps99/rpt/olr/htm/99-r-0154.htm
                          A study by Connecticut.

                          I deleted the rest because this is PD and a BAC/DUI debate gets boring and way too OT. Just be aware than I'm slightly anti-alcohol and consider it a much more problematic and dangerous drug than pot even. I just think that pulling .08 drivers off the road doesn't fix a real problem.

                          I'd rather they get the 40% REPEAT OFFENDERS involved in DUI fatalties off the road, and those weren't .06 drivers either. Those are your .17 people going right back out and doing it again.

                          I'd also prefer that they get the dangerously incompetent drivers off the road that are much more likely to kill me than a .08 driver is (unless he is also a bad driver anyway).

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X