Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

So if we shopped JO...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: So if we shopped JO...

    Why isn't this thread locked? do we need this crap everytime? seriously it's a shame when a franchise player is getting trashed.

    are we spoiled????

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: So if we shopped JO...

      Originally posted by heywoode
      Yet you still found reason to read it and post in it........

      The man was asking questions, not saying we should trade him.

      JO has played well, and that was part of his point; maybe his trade value is at it's highest and if we aren't getting the feeling that he is mature or consistent enough to build around, now is the time to at least DISCUSS parting ways. I don't want to end up as the next T'wolves....a highly paid, franchise cornerstone that leads us to the first round of the playoffs every year....

      No one should be considered untouchable. It is detrimental to the team concept and makes players emotionally lazy sometimes. Bottom line, franchises are ran with business in mind, and not emotional attachments.

      I would be fine keeping him, and maybe if we finally do something with Artest and maybe another player or two heading off into the sunset, we can form a better opinion about even discussing JO in this context.

      Give me one team that has traded it's star player and come away better off for it. If I remember right, it has historically being a disastrous move.
      You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: So if we shopped JO...

        Originally posted by SoupIsGood
        I knew Bball was going to do this. Whenever JO misses a few games, he starts up a "We are better without JO" thread, or something similar.

        The idea is to get more players like JO, not to trade them away. He's played great this season. This thread is just silly.
        It's not silly at all... The window that was our championship dream has closed shut on this team as it's currently constructed. There's very little chance that Artest alone is going to bring us the piece we need nor is it going to suddenly balance our roster.

        We can pretend everything is fine and when JO gets back we'll go on a roll... or that Sjack will find his groove and we'll go on a tear... or that Tinsley is healing and will be back to take us to new heights... or that [insert player here] is about to make it happen...

        But you know what? We've been down that road before. And where are we now?

        And if you can get more players like JO, what exactly are you going to pay them? We can't afford to keep them. The better they play, the more they price themselves out of our market. JO is soaking up a huge portion of salary.

        This is a critical juncture in Pacerland. How they play their hand could have long term ramnifications. We have a chance to rethink the horse to which we've hitched our wagon. We won't have too many, if any other chances, to take mulligan on this. We better be dayumed sure we're certain JO is "the man" to lead this team.

        Are TPTB that sold on JO? Should they be?

        -Bball
        Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

        ------

        "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

        -John Wooden

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: So if we shopped JO...

          Originally posted by Bball
          It's not silly at all... The window that was our championship dream has closed shut on this team as it's currently constructed. There's very little chance that Artest alone is going to bring us the piece we need nor is it going to suddenly balance our roster.

          We can pretend everything is fine and when JO gets back we'll go on a roll... or that Sjack will find his groove and we'll go on a tear... or that Tinsley is healing and will be back to take us to new heights... or that [insert player here] is about to make it happen...

          But you know what? We've been down that road before. And where are we now?

          And if you can get more players like JO, what exactly are you going to pay them? We can't afford to keep them. The better they play, the more they price themselves out of our market. JO is soaking up a huge portion of salary.

          This is a critical juncture in Pacerland. How they play their hand could have long term ramnifications. We have a chance to rethink the horse to which we've hitched our wagon. We won't have too many, if any other chances, to take mulligan on this. We better be dayumed sure we're certain JO is "the man" to lead this team.

          Are TPTB that sold on JO? Should they be?

          -Bball

          No doubt. You've suggested that we need new owners, a new GM, a new franchise player, a new...... where does it stop? Is there anything about this team that you don't want replaced?
          You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: So if we shopped JO...

            Originally posted by SoupIsGood
            Give me one team that has traded it's star player and come away better off for it. If I remember right, it has historically being a disastrous move.
            As long as we're not over-rating JO then you could be right...
            But JO was annointed the star player. He never really earned it. And he was certainly trending upward, even tho there were always flaws. But that ascension doesn't seem so fast now, if it hasn't flatlined. The flaws are still there. Even the immaturity, that you'd think he would be totally past by now, is still there lurking in the corners.

            And we've had a bunch of games to evaluate JO's impact. Both in game and out. Is he really making the kind of difference you'd expect of a 'star' player?
            We're paying a lot of money for what JO brings.

            One last thing to consider... If we consider Detroit our biggest obstacle, or the mountain that needs climbed, is JO able to do it? So far, Detroit has had JO's number. Sheed owns him. ...Altho, Detroit seems several notches past our immediate worries.

            -Bball
            Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

            ------

            "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

            -John Wooden

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: So if we shopped JO...

              Originally posted by SoupIsGood
              Give me one team that has traded it's star player and come away better off for it. If I remember right, it has historically being a disastrous move.
              Who said he was a "star player"?

              It's not like we're talking about trading away Shaq's dominance.

              Forget I ever posted in this thread. I get so tired of trying to make the same point over and over. It is also tiring when the actual discussing of changes is what you have to defend.

              Fine. Let's keep everybody we have, sign them all to whatever they want, and just talk about whether we won or lost. Let's not expound at all on anything a little (or a lot) off the wall, just for discussion's sake.

              Heck, what we've been doing has been working so well, why even THINK of changing anything??



              RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: So if we shopped JO...

                Originally posted by SoupIsGood
                No doubt. You've suggested that we need new owners, a new GM, a new franchise player, a new...... where does it stop? Is there anything about this team that you don't want replaced?
                I really like the Popcorn wagon on the lower level of Conseco. Don't replace that!

                I don't like the management of the team right now. We are too slow to react. The rest of the NBA is passing us by. The situation with Artest should've been headed off one way or the other before it got to the point it did. The salary situation is out of control and has been for quite some time.

                Management needs to be looking at where this team is at right now and doing something. They also need to be setting the stage for the future. The fans need a shot of adrenaline, not more of the same 'patience, patience, patience'. We've had 20 years of patience. Nobody should go without questioning right now. From the owners to management to coaching to the players. Not even the 120 million dollar man.

                This is fast becoming a lost year. Not only is it about nothing this season, but very little for next season.

                I think our franchise and franchise player could stand some scrutiny right now. Blind loyalists need not apply.

                -Bball
                Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                ------

                "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                -John Wooden

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: So if we shopped JO...

                  Originally posted by heywoode
                  Who said he was a "star player"?

                  It's not like we're talking about trading away Shaq's dominance.

                  Heck, what we've been doing has been working so well, why even THINK of changing anything??
                  It's nice when somebody understands the point of the discussion. You are correct, part of the discussion has turned into defending the question(s) instead of an indepth look at things.

                  "If we shopped JO, who would listen and who could we get?" has, instead of being answered, turned into "What a stupid question. Lock this thread"

                  -BBall
                  Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                  ------

                  "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                  -John Wooden

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: So if we shopped JO...

                    Originally posted by Bball

                    "If we shopped JO, who would listen and who could we get?" has, instead of being answered, turned into "What a stupid question. Lock this thread"

                    -BBall
                    Happens darn near every day. Panties get bunched, loyalists get riled, threads get hijacked, people wanting to discuss things get frustrated.....the list goes on and on.

                    And to answer the one word response to the original set of questions: Bosh isn't nearly ready to step into JO's shoes. He's definitely good, but he has a long way to go before I let go of JO for him...



                    RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: So if we shopped JO...

                      Originally posted by heywoode
                      Who said he was a "star player"?

                      It's not like we're talking about trading away Shaq's dominance.

                      Forget I ever posted in this thread. I get so tired of trying to make the same point over and over. It is also tiring when the actual discussing of changes is what you have to defend.

                      Fine. Let's keep everybody we have, sign them all to whatever they want, and just talk about whether we won or lost. Let's not expound at all on anything a little (or a lot) off the wall, just for discussion's sake.

                      Heck, what we've been doing has been working so well, why even THINK of changing anything??
                      Okay, just for discussion's sake, we could try not getting all overly defensive.

                      JO might not be a superstar, but he is a star. Trading your star equals a bad move. My opinion. One that (if I remember correctly) is backed up by history, for the most part.


                      My.



                      Opinion.
                      You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: So if we shopped JO...

                        Originally posted by SoupIsGood
                        Okay, just for discussion's sake, we could try not getting all overly defensive.

                        JO might not be a superstar, but he is a star. Trading your star equals a bad move. My opinion. One that (if I remember correctly) is backed up by history, for the most part.


                        My.



                        Opinion.
                        Well, I tried being a lot less succinct about it, but it didn't seem to be getting through...

                        He is definitely an all-star caliber player. I would add that if we did a couple other strategic trades, starting with finally ending the Artest fiasco, we could give JO a better chance to show what he is capable of. In all fairness to him, how much do we think he could've accomplished now that we have a little more insight into the train wreck the team has been with the current group?

                        Lastly, I respect your opinion. All my defensiveness wasn't completely directed at you...sorry if it seemed to be.



                        RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: So if we shopped JO...

                          Originally posted by Bball
                          I really like the Popcorn wagon on the lower level of Conseco. Don't replace that!

                          I don't like the management of the team right now. We are too slow to react. The rest of the NBA is passing us by. The situation with Artest should've been headed off one way or the other before it got to the point it did. The salary situation is out of control and has been for quite some time.

                          Management needs to be looking at where this team is at right now and doing something. They also need to be setting the stage for the future. The fans need a shot of adrenaline, not more of the same 'patience, patience, patience'. We've had 20 years of patience. Nobody should go without questioning right now. From the owners to management to coaching to the players. Not even the 120 million dollar man.

                          This is fast becoming a lost year. Not only is it about nothing this season, but very little for next season.

                          I think our franchise and franchise player could stand some scrutiny right now. Blind loyalists need not apply.

                          -Bball
                          Popcorn wagon?!


                          About management - I blame the management for setting us up for yet ANOTHER year where we have to watch our team play severely short-handed game in and game out. I just don't get a kick out of playing without our best SF and PG every game. After last year, I just feel that they should have made sure to get us players who will at least play in a lot of games for us. Ron (obviously) and Tins simply haven't done that this season.
                          You, Never? Did the Kenosha Kid?

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: So if we shopped JO...

                            I second the notion of trading JO... but I have never made it a secret that I don't enjoy watching JO play.
                            Here, everyone have a : on me

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: So if we shopped JO...

                              Starts with a "D", ends in an "O" the middle built by Noah himself. Trade J.O. for the next J.O.....

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: So if we shopped JO...

                                Originally posted by Fool
                                Starts with a "D", ends in an "O" the middle built by Noah himself. Trade J.O. for the next J.O.....
                                Let's see...
                                D _ARK_O

                                Can you spot me some more letters?

                                -BBall
                                Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                                ------

                                "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                                -John Wooden

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X