Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Why returning home to play for the Lakers could come with its own risk for Paul George

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why returning home to play for the Lakers could come with its own risk for Paul George

    http://sports.yahoo.com/news/paul-george-031438769.html

    INDIANAPOLIS – Paul George got the shot he always wanted, the shot he told teammate C.J. Miles he needed to take in the closing seconds, the shot that he’s clearly rehearsed numerous times, based on his latest sports drink commercial. What George didn’t get was the desired result as his potential game-tying 3-pointer soared over the rim and off the glass, putting an end to the Indiana Pacers’ season – and, possibly, his career with the organization.

    Reality rarely lives up to fantasy, and George should take that into consideration as he ponders an uncertain future that hinges on many factors that are beyond his control. Did NBA writers vote him on to one of the three All-NBA teams and give the Pacers a nearly $80 million advantage in hopes of re-signing him to a massive extension? Has Larry Bird seen enough of his team – of George – to determine that the time has come for a franchise averse to rebuilding to move its lone All-Star and start anew? Will the Los Angeles Lakers get the top-three pick in next month’s NBA draft lottery that would likely be needed to deal for a player with whom they have mutual interest?

    As a dejected George sat at a podium after the Pacers were swept in a seven-game series for the first time in franchise history, the four-time All-Star was the most measured and coy as he’s been when asked about whether he wants to remain in the same uniform and what it would take for him to be persuaded to stay.

    “I ain’t even at that point, yet,” George said after the Pacers lost 106-102 on Sunday at Bankers Life Fieldhouse.

    Lakers president Magic Johnson jokingly made his desire to have George in a purple and gold uniform known publicly during an interview last week with late-night talk-show host Jimmy Kimmel, laughing and winking about how he was well-versed on tampering and couldn’t recruit a player under contract with another team. And one of the league’s worst-kept secrets is that the Lakers have a strong appeal for George given his affinity for Kobe Bryant and growing up a fan of that team.

    Becoming that star that Los Angeles has desired since before Bryant retired certainly is attractive, but George should pursue winning first, wherever that is. The MVP favorites aside from James Harden – Russell Westbrook, LeBron James and Kawhi Leonard – all play outside the scrutiny of major media markets and have no problem receiving endorsement opportunities. It certainly hasn’t held back George in that department because he stars in commercials and has a signature sneaker while playing in Indiana.

    George doesn’t have to look any further than the previous players who established themselves as stars in smaller markets and pushed their way toward a bigger market. Carmelo Anthony lost his prime to a bumbling franchise in New York and hasn’t come close to winning the way he did in Denver. Dwight Howard is now with his third team since forcing his way out of Orlando five years ago. Deron Williams went from being in the debate for best point guard in the league while in Utah, to questioning his desire to play basketball after joining the Nets and now is with his fourth team, in a reserve role, in Cleveland. Chris Paul remains one of the best at his craft but hasn’t gone any further with the Los Angeles Clippers than he did in New Orleans. The grass isn’t always greener. Sometimes the other side is asphalt.


    For all George endured to regain his spot among the game’s best players, languishing with an organization that remains a ways from contending would be a waste. Bird did right by George in finding a talent like Myles Turner, who has the makings of a big-time player once he matures. But the remainder of the roster is an ill fit for George, who could use a few more hungry, defensive-minded veterans. When Lance Stephenson, collected off the scrap heap before the end of the regular season, is your second-most impactful player in the playoffs then those other moves didn’t work out so well.

    “End of the day, it falls on me. I can always do things better,” George said.

    Stephenson took George back to those days before his leg snapped, when the Pacers had a toughness, a grit, and veteran leaders such as David West and George Hill. The Pacers have moved on from their most successful team since Reggie Miller retired. And, George never hid his frustrations with this season, a first in which he was to serve as the unquestioned leader of the team. He no longer had older teammates to motivate others, leaving him to just handle the scoring burden and the shutdown defense. He also had to learn so many new pieces, what made them tick and how he should assert himself without limiting their contributions. The challenge of becoming a leader was a difficult one for George to grasp, littered with moments that he labeled as “dark” – especially after his name wound up in trade speculation at the deadline. He was criticized for being pouty, for being too honest about conversations that he had with teammates. His blunt talk was sometimes misinterpreted as separating himself from the team, but he was just grappling with how to handle all of his new responsibilities.

    “Every year isn’t a golden year,” George said. “It’s going to be some ups and downs in a career. I’ve learned that not every year is going to be special. You’ve got to guide your destiny when it comes to that. It was good to learn. This year, I was just able to take everything in, try to grow and try to learn from it.”

    The Pacers had to scrap just to earn the seventh seed for the second season in a row. George has been statistically brilliant in both postseason appearances since Bird decided to build around him but he has had to swallow a first-round exit each time. George can opt out of his contract and become a free agent next summer but is eligible for an extension this summer. He has repeatedly put the ball in the court of Bird and Pacers to give him a reason to stay. But now comes the hard part for a franchise not known to bottom out. Small markets have a hard time attracting secondary stars but the Pacers have to decide how far George can take them.

    The new collective bargaining agreement puts original teams at an advantage when it comes to paying their star players but it also presents another dilemma for teams to determine whether it’s best to make such a huge financial commitment to a player that’s good enough to lead you to the playoffs but is unable to do much more after that. They have to pay the stars that they develop or risk alienating their fans by not investing in their progression. Sacramento was the first team that determined that the ceiling for a team led by DeMarcus Cousins wasn’t enough to give him $200 million.

    There are 15 All-NBA players but there aren’t 15 franchise players in the league. At most, only a third of those players can put a team in contention by his mere presence. James is his own roaming championship contender, as he completed his fifth consecutive first-round sweep. He is perhaps on the tail end of his physical peak – though his chase-down block on Thad Young suggests otherwise – but has entered an unbreakable mental phase of his career. He refuses to provide much hope or be defeated and will find the smallest crack from which to ruin dreams.

    “It’s real frustrating to continue losing to the same team, or the same person. It’s what I work hard for in the summer, to try to help lead a team of my own and it’s ultimately who I’m always going to see and face. But again, came up short. Didn’t do enough,” George said. “If we want to win, that’s the team that we have to work towards stacking up against. If we want to be serious, that’s the team we’ve got to look at and figure out how can we match up against them.”

    George has had James end his season four times, but never in such emphatic fashion. Granted, the Pacers lost the series by a combined 16 points, the fewest for a four-game sweep in NBA history but they don’t give out awards for that. Before this season began, George stated that he was ready for James. He got his wish. But just like that errant shot, George couldn’t deliver in the moment he requested. If he is given his dream of returning home, George should prepare himself for the less-than-ideal outcome before getting too obsessed with the fantasy.
    Sittin on top of the world!

  • #2
    Re: Why returning home to play for the Lakers could come with its own risk for Paul George

    As a dejected George sat at a podium after the Pacers were swept in a seven-game series for the first time in franchise history, the four-time All-Star was the most measured and coy as he’s been when asked about whether he wants to remain in the same uniform and what it would take for him to be persu aded to stay.

    “I ain’t even at that point, yet,” George said after the Pacers lost 106-102 on Sunday at Bankers Life Fieldhouse.


    quit reading after that, we all know that wasn't the question and that wasn't the complete answer, wonder what interest the author has in bending his story, than again he "writes" for yahoo ..........
    So Long And Thanks For All The Fish.

    If you've done 6 impossible things today?
    Then why not have Breakfast at Milliways!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Why returning home to play for the Lakers could come with its own risk for Paul George

      Originally posted by able View Post


      quit reading after that, we all know that wasn't the question and that wasn't the complete answer, wonder what interest the author has in bending his story, than again he "writes" for yahoo ..........
      I mean, that was his entire quote. After that he said next question.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Why returning home to play for the Lakers could come with its own risk for Paul George

        Originally posted by freddielewis14 View Post
        I mean, that was his entire quote. After that he said next question.
        And people are already trying to read between the lines, thinking if PG ignores the question that means he is leaving. Russel Westbrook said the same thing last year, and he stayed. KD said the same thing last year and he left. Stop trying to make something out of nothing.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Why returning home to play for the Lakers could come with its own risk for Paul George

          I still don't really believe the LA stuff. I think it was just a smokescreen his agent put out there to scare away trade interest. If PG gets traded he and his agent lose the possibility of a ton of cash from the DPE, so no benefit to either to have been traded at the deadline.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Why returning home to play for the Lakers could come with its own risk for Paul George

            I'm very annoyed with all this, "Paul grew up a Lakers fan" stuff. No, he didn't. He's repeatedly said he grew up a Clippers fan. He might want to play for the Lakers now, that's fine, but shoving that "Lakers fan growing up" line of crap into these stories makes me discount them altogether.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Why returning home to play for the Lakers could come with its own risk for Paul George

              Originally posted by cdash View Post
              I'm very annoyed with all this, "Paul grew up a Lakers fan" stuff. No, he didn't. He's repeatedly said he grew up a Clippers fan. He might want to play for the Lakers now, that's fine, but shoving that "Lakers fan growing up" line of crap into these stories makes me discount them altogether.
              Yeah, that is why I just don't really buy it. Why would a guy who grew up a Clipper fan have such a burning desire to go to a terrible Laker team that has been mostly terrible for the entire time PG has been in the league? Anything is possible but I don't think it makes sense.
              Last edited by Wage; 04-24-2017, 05:38 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Why returning home to play for the Lakers could come with its own risk for Paul George

                Originally posted by cdash View Post
                I'm very annoyed with all this, "Paul grew up a Lakers fan" stuff. No, he didn't. He's repeatedly said he grew up a Clippers fan. He might want to play for the Lakers now, that's fine, but shoving that "Lakers fan growing up" line of crap into these stories makes me discount them altogether.
                Bingo!!!

                also Dash, if PG would only leave if we cant "build a team that will compete for finals" Why in Gods name would he go to the Lakers? Their not even remotely close

                He would go to Boston, or Washington, or Houston or even Portland
                Sittin on top of the world!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Why returning home to play for the Lakers could come with its own risk for Paul George

                  Originally posted by 90'sNBARocked View Post

                  He would go to Boston, or Washington, or Houston or even Portland
                  Or the Clippers! That would make sense to me but all anyone talks about is the Lakers.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Why returning home to play for the Lakers could come with its own risk for Paul George

                    Originally posted by 90'sNBARocked View Post
                    Bingo!!!

                    also Dash, if PG would only leave if we cant "build a team that will compete for finals" Why in Gods name would he go to the Lakers? Their not even remotely close

                    He would go to Boston, or Washington, or Houston or even Portland
                    That's another thing that's always given me pause about this PG-to-the-Lakers narrative--the Lakers suck. They have some decent young guys in Randle, D'Angelo, and Ingram, but none of these guys are can't miss young guys. I don't think any of them are more than 2nd or 3rd best options on a decent team. Maybe Paul believes in Magic's team building more than Larry's, maybe Paul is full of crap about wanting to win above all else and just wants to live in LA, I don't know. But you're right that it doesn't totally add up.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Why returning home to play for the Lakers could come with its own risk for Paul George

                      I can't wait to see him play for the Lakers with all of their other stars they got in free agency. LeBron, Durant, Derozan, Dwight. Incredible team!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Why returning home to play for the Lakers could come with its own risk for Paul George

                        Originally posted by PacersHomer View Post
                        I can't wait to see him play for the Lakers with all of their other stars they got in free agency. LeBron, Durant, Derozan, Dwight. Incredible team!
                        TBH, if they happen to get a BIG-name free agent, or a blockbuster trade....that could possibly change the whole d@mn thing!

                        I mean, just think about this type of scenario:
                        What if...Serge Ibaka, Jrue Holliday (one of Paul's good buddies) or Taj Gibson talked to Paul about going to LA....meanwhile Carmelo catches wind and asks NY to trade him to join this crew...which in turns causes free agents like Nerlens Noel, Tony Allen, Tim Hardaway Jr, or hell, Jeff Teague to be attracted to there. IMO, that would be scary.

                        I'm just throwing this out there, by the way to cause discussion - unless everyone thinks this is complete BS.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Why returning home to play for the Lakers could come with its own risk for Paul George

                          Originally posted by Wage View Post
                          Or the Clippers! That would make sense to me but all anyone talks about is the Lakers.
                          If they keep CP3 and Blake..absolutely
                          Sittin on top of the world!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Why returning home to play for the Lakers could come with its own risk for Paul George

                            One of the main things that have to have factored in Lebron returning to Cleveland was the fact that the Cavs are in the East. If PG is all about winning, I don't see how it makes sense to move West.

                            Unless he is just that tired of losing to Lebron in the playoffs.
                            You Got The Tony!!!!!!

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X