Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

IndyStar: Paul George aims to be Indy's next great franchise cornerstone, patterns himself after Reggie

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • IndyStar: Paul George aims to be Indy's next great franchise cornerstone, patterns himself after Reggie

    http://www.indystar.com/story/sports...ller/92729336/

    NDIANAPOLIS – Basketball history has always fascinated Paul George. His goal, even as a teenager, was to be an NBA star. That meant watching Kobe Bryant, imitating Kobe Bryant and idolizing Kobe Bryant, his favorite player.

    A few years ago, after solidifying his career with the Indiana Pacers, George began studying a new player. He was told by just about everyone in Indiana that this player was a legend, a charismatic man Hoosiers will never forget, a standard for future stars from whom to learn. The more George researched the skinny, flamboyant man in the blue and gold uniform, the more he was impressed.

    An idea came to George. He started comparing himself to that man, the greatest Pacer ever: Reggie Miller.

    “I always look at weird stuff like that – like how close am I to this guy?” George said last week. “So I would look up records, look up years he’s played, scoring, how much points he put up for the Pacers. Where is he at? Where am I at? How far do I got? I’m into weird stuff like that. That’s where I really realize how big he was. It’s the reason his number is retired here.”

    With the Pacers’ season starting Wednesday, George will begin the fourth phase of his career. He has transformed himself from eager rookie to underrated starter to versatile All-Star to the franchise’s biggest superstar since Miller.

    The two men have developed their relationship the past two years, and George wants to lead the Pacers in the same manner Miller did for most of his 18-year career. George believes he can. The success of the Pacers will depend largely on George’s success. But before George begins his next quest, consider what he has already accomplished in his first six years with the Pacers. He is a three-time All-Star, an Olympic gold medalist and has appeared in the playoffs five times. Miller, by comparison, had yet to match those accomplishments entering his seventh season.

    “I think I am where he is at,” George said. “The only difference is Reggie’s done it for many more years than I’ve done it. That’s what I’m trying to get to.

    Several people in the Pacers’ organization have faith that George is ready to accept such stature and thrive. Larry Bird, the team’s president and a Hall of Fame player, is among those intrigued by what might be possible for George and the Pacers. “He’s still young and he’s still got a lot of room to grow,” Bird said of George last week. “It’s important where he wants to take this team. It’s definitely his — and it could have been his last year. This is the year it’s pretty clear to me that it is definitely his.” George reached this point much as Miller, the man he is chasing, did.

    The parallels between George and Miller are plentiful, and their journeys similar.

    Both began their careers in embarrassing fashion. In high school, Miller, as a freshman, came off the bench in a junior varsity game and forgot to put on his shorts, announcing himself to the Riverside Polytechnic High crowd with just his jockstrap and bare buttocks. George played his first organized game in jeans, which he cut and converted into jorts just before tipoff.

    Both were dominated, developed and groomed by an older sister. Miller was the understudy, and a rather difficult pupil for Cheryl, whom many then considered the greatest women's basketball player. George was defeated again and again by Teiosha, who starred at Pepperdine and played professionally overseas
    .
    Miller grew up in Riverside, Calif.; George was raised in Palmdale, Calif. The two were intoxicated with the Los Angeles Lakers’ lore and championships. College recruiters underrated Miller and George, but each blossomed the longer he played, the more he saw himself as an underdog. The Pacers drafted both players at almost the same spot in the draft — Miller at 11th overall in 1987 and George at 10th in 2010. Donnie Walsh and Bird selected Miller and George, respectively, with similar intentions and plans in mind. “Reggie was always a great shooter, but he was a much better basketball player than people gave him credit for,” said Walsh, who became the Pacers’ general manager in 1986. “Reggie was very smart and very committed and far more driven than I thought when I took him.” Miller, when he entered the NBA, was not considered destined for stardom. As a rookie, he was backup. He learned from John Long, Chuck Person and ABA legend Mel Daniels. Miller announced his arrival in his third season when he averaged 24.6 points, played all 82 games and demonstrated that he was the best shooter from the perimeter.

    Bird felt George could have a similar progression. When considering whom to select in the 2010 draft, Bird wondered whether the 6-9 George could be a modern, upgraded shooting guard from the 6-7 Miller. “I always looked at him as a two guard,” Bird said. “If Paul’s playing the two, he’s going to score points, but not in the way that Reggie did. To me, it’s unfortunate that we had to play him at the three all the time because I think he could have been a hell of a two guard, maybe better than a three.” George improved at perhaps the most blistering rate of any player in the 2010 draft. He, just as Miller did, became an All-Star in his third season, averaging 17.4 points and 7.6 rebounds in 79 games. His meteoric ascension continued last summer. With USA Basketball, George helped the national team win the Olympic gold medal. He became the second player, following Miller in 1996, to win the gold representing the Pacers. When George received his medal in Rio de Janeiro, he smiled and acknowledged Indiana the same communal way Miller did: “This is for you, Indiana.”

    George returned to Indianapolis in September and thanked Miller for creating a path for him to follow. “I’ve been adopted here,” George said. “I feel I have birthed a new generation of basketball players. I feel like I’ve been iconic to the next generation of kids that will grow up the same way that they grew up loving Reggie and still have that admiration for Reggie. I’m a part of them and I am a Hoosier.” In Miller’s seventh season, he began to have seminal moments, signature performances and clutch game-winners. His eight-points-in-nine-seconds performance against the New York Knicks, his antics with Spike Lee in the playoffs, his buzzer-beater over Michael Jordan in Game 4, his constant trash-talking, his play, metaphorically and literally, carrying the Pacers to Eastern Conference finals and one appearance in the NBA Finals. Miller’s theatrics and heroics made the Pacers, a once beleaguered franchised, relevant again. “Playing in a small market for 18 years, you really get to know your neighbors very well,” Miller said in his 2012 Hall of Fame induction speech. (He declined interview requests for this story.) “I want to say thank you to the great state of Indiana and all the fans. … It wasn’t always pretty. I remember in 1987 running out of the tunnel at Market Square Arena and they had the black curtains down. There was only 4- or 5,000 people in the stands and I’m saying to myself, ‘What have I gotten myself into?’ But we learned to trust one another.”

    Mark Boyle, the Pacers’ radio announcer, began his time in Indiana with Miller’s rookie season in 1986-87. From his seat, Boyle witnessed and chronicled the long relationship between Miller and the fans. “Paul is a charming fellow,” Boyle said. “I get the sense that fans really like him, but the fans loved Reggie. There was something about Reggie and the fans that was symbiotic. They fed off each other. Reggie was beloved.” George, on few occasions, is reminded of the fans’ devotion to Miller. His intentions with the future of his career are clear. “The love that he had here,” George said of Miller, “it’s what I want.”

    George, despite the trajectory of his career, is, in many ways, different from Miller. Beyond playing a different position, George is not singularly known for his perimeter shooting the way Miller was. He’s had clutch playoff performances, a Miller staple, too. But George is taller, more athletic and possesses a rare NBA gift that several people in the franchise say distinguishes him from Miller: He is an elite defender. Bird believes George’s defensive skill set is what could lead the Pacers to an NBA Finals. The task for George entering this new phase, Bird said, is to accept the responsibility that comes with being the franchise’s superstar.

    “It’s a big step to take because you know every day you’re going to come in and you’ve got be the hardest worker,” said Bird, who coached Miller for three seasons. “Paul’s best attributes are on the defensive end. I think he’s a hell of a defender. Can he get these other guys to follow his lead on the defensive end? If we’re going to win big, that’s where we’re going to win.”

    The Pacers — from Bird, Walsh and coach Nate McMillan on down — want George to mature into a stronger leader. If George can master any aspect of Miller’s career, several people in the organization said, it is how Miller went from a diligent worker to a relentless one, a competitor who pushed himself harder than anyone else possibly could. “He would slash your throat,” assistant coach Dan Burke said of Miller. “I saw him punch one of his best friends in a scrimmage. He was a big guy. It elevated practice. I don’t see that (fierceness) in Paul yet.” Miller gained such an attitude because he knew the guy in the Central division of the Eastern Conference. When Bird became the coach in 1997, the Pacers, driven by Miller, wanted to dethrone Jordan’s Chicago Bulls. “We only played once and it was that epic seven-game series (in 1998),” Miller said of Jordan in a television interview in 2012. “You’re measured by your competition. He is clearly, and in my opinion, the best basketball player I’ve ever seen to date. I knew I had to bring it each and every time I stepped on the court when I was going against M.J.”

    The interviewer asked Miller a follow-up question: Were you friends? “No,” Miller responded. He later added: “I wanted what he had … the championships.” George knows the guy now in the Central division. He has already battled LeBron James three times in the playoffs — and he wants to face James again. Burke asked George to watch how James interacts with his championship teammates in Cleveland. When the Cavaliers make a substitution, Burke said, see how James makes sure everyone is organized in their assignments. Watch how James, without his coach, coaches his teammates and lets them know what is expected.

    George hopes his career will be different from Miller's as he hopes to relish a postseason series victory over James. “In order for me to win, I’ve got to take him out,” George said. “At this time, I feel more experienced. It’s now about how do I get my team to play at a higher level. That’s what I’m trying to get to.” Walsh, a consultant to Bird at age 75, has spent the past few years observing George. Last season, he noticed how George was adapting to being the Pacers’ go-to player. He was proud to see George perform under control in the first-round playoff series against the Toronto Raptors. The next stage, Walsh believes, is for George to develop his voice this season.

    George was given the opportunity Sept. 26, the day the Pacers began training camp. McMillan, during the team’s dinner, asked all the players from the team that went to consecutive Eastern Conference finals in 2013-14 to stand up. George was the only player standing — the longest-tenured Pacer. From then on, George has prioritized being more a vocal leader. “They know how good we’ve been here defensively,” George said Monday. “They believe what I’m saying is the right things. I’ve got their trust.”

    Last month, George entered Bankers Life Fieldhouse on a Sunday afternoon. Miller was there, too. The men sat in a suite and watched Tamika Catchings play her final regular season game for the Indiana Fever. “Both of them have been huge in this community,” George said, “and huge in this organization.” On that day, George saw how Catchings — a nine-time WNBA All-Star, a four-time gold medalist, a WNBA champion, the Fever’s brightest star for 15 years and a future Hall of Famer — was revered by Hoosiers. Miller explained how that day felt for him — May 19, 2005, his final game in the NBA. George has thought of a similar ending for himself. He has the chance to be a Pacer for life, never play in another uniform but endear himself to Hoosiers the same way Miller and Catchings did. One player, one team, a legacy tied to one city, one franchise. It sounds nice to George.
    Even though NBA free agency has changed since Miller retired, George thinks it’s possible for him stay in Indiana and continue to attract talented players to the Pacers. “Guys want to play with guys,” George said. “I think I have a better chance to accomplish that given Reggie and the era that he was in. My only goal is playing for a championship. As long as we’re competitive and I have something to do with that, I’m happy.”

    Bird wants George to stay with the Pacers. He spent every season of his 13-year career as the Boston Celtics’ leading man. He understands what George could encounter by playing in a spotlight that can be taxing to the point that it becomes a burden. But Bird does not expect that to happen with George. He thinks this phase, taking ownership of a franchise, could be the most rewarding in George’s career. “It could be the easiest step if he has a plan,” Bird said. “I think he’ll have more fun with it. I loved it.” Most of George’s conversation with Miller that Sunday afternoon was about elongating his career. The more years he plays, George said, the more chances he’ll have to do something — and bring something to Indiana — that Miller wasn’t able to achieve: win a championship. Miller detailed his summer workouts to George, how he extended his career by perfecting his lower-body strength. He told the training didn’t always happen in a gym. Get outside, he told George. Come mountain biking with me in California. “I’ll put you on a different way of conditioning your body,” Miller told George. “You guys are so accustomed to training and working out in the gym. That stuff gets boring.”
    George accepted Miller’s invitation. Next summer, George plans to return to California. He will learn more from Miller and he will chase the former superstar, on both the biking trails and in the record books.
    This is one of the most exciting pieces of news for this franchise that I've read in some time. If he can cultivate that same sense of ownership of the team in Turner, we're on our way to witnessing a very, very nice run in the future. Landing a top 5-10 player as a franchise cornerstone in a small market is a very hard thing to arrive at.
    Last edited by docpaul; 10-26-2016, 09:10 AM.

  • #2
    Re: IndyStar: Paul George aims to be Indy's next great franchise cornerstone, patterns himself after Reggie

    I thought it was interesting to read that Bird thinks PG would be better at the two, I tend to disagree but what do I know
    Sittin on top of the world!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: IndyStar: Paul George aims to be Indy's next great franchise cornerstone, patterns himself after Reggie

      Larry Bird last year wants Paul at the 4, this year laments not playing him at the 2. Larry Bird is a troll king.


      Comment


      • #4
        Re: IndyStar: Paul George aims to be Indy's next great franchise cornerstone, patterns himself after Reggie

        I think PG is getting to the Reggie Level he has certainly already achieved more than Reggie had at this point in his career. He just needs to understand that the love for Reggie was built over more than a decade.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: IndyStar: Paul George aims to be Indy's next great franchise cornerstone, patterns himself after Reggie

          As a person who watched both players since the day they were drafted I will say this.

          Paul George is already the better player and its not even close. However Reggie is the more spirited competitor and its not even close.

          Once Paul gets more fire him, I saw it develop some last season, he can claim the mantle of greatest NBA pacer.

          But until then I would say he and Reggie are on the same level and that is no small thing btw, that tells you how good Paul George is.


          Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: IndyStar: Paul George aims to be Indy's next great franchise cornerstone, patterns himself after Reggie

            If Paul George stays in Indy and doesn't win, I'll still be happy

            Sent from my Nexus 5X

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: IndyStar: Paul George aims to be Indy's next great franchise cornerstone, patterns himself after Reggie

              It may not be fair, but I think PG will need to bring Indy an NBA championship in order to be revered on the same level as Reggie. Reggie took the Pacers to a new level, but the only level that George could ascend to beyond that would be a title.


              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: IndyStar: Paul George aims to be Indy's next great franchise cornerstone, patterns himself after Reggie

                I grew up idolizing Reggie, so no one is going to ever 'replace' him for me.

                PG could lead us to 5 consecutive championships and Reggie would still be my favorite player.

                But man, I am SO proud of PG and what he is growing into with us. After some years of having very little to cheer for (outside of Danny) or having our hearts broken for various reasons (Vogel/Hibbert/West/Lance/Hill era) - I am pumped to see where Paul takes us next.

                Great article. That really made my day.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: IndyStar: Paul George aims to be Indy's next great franchise cornerstone, patterns himself after Reggie

                  Originally posted by Shade View Post
                  It may not be fair, but I think PG will need to bring Indy an NBA championship in order to be revered on the same level as Reggie. Reggie took the Pacers to a new level, but the only level that George could ascend to beyond that would be a title.


                  Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                  New generation. Think about this - kids born Reggie's last year are 11 now. Who will they idolize from the Pacers?

                  Sent from my LG-D850 using Tapatalk
                  BillS

                  A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                  Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: IndyStar: Paul George aims to be Indy's next great franchise cornerstone, patterns himself after Reggie

                    Originally posted by Shade View Post
                    It may not be fair, but I think PG will need to bring Indy an NBA championship in order to be revered on the same level as Reggie. Reggie took the Pacers to a new level, but the only level that George could ascend to beyond that would be a title.


                    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                    To surpass him? Yes to be on his level? I don't think it will take much only because Reggie retired 11 years ago there are already a generation of fans who never saw Reggie on the Pacers to them Paul George is that guy.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X