Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Tbird 2016 NBA Draft Analysis #7: Denzel Valentine

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tbird 2016 NBA Draft Analysis #7: Denzel Valentine

    Here on a sunny Monday just 10 days away from draft day 2016, we take a deep dive into the intriguing game of Michigan State All-American playmaker Denzel Valentine. Known as “Zel” by his teammates and friends, Valentine is the son of 2 long time Lansing educators: Kathy, a 33 year veteran of the Lansing public schools, and Carlton, an ex-Spartan who played briefly in Europe and in the WBL, before coming back to his college town and beginning a highly successful coaching career at the high school level.

    Valentine becomes the 7th profile in the 2016 series. Previously, I have done in-depth profiles of Wade Baldwin IV, Taurean Prince, Domantas Sabonis, Demetrius Jackson, Stephen Zimmerman, and Ben Bentil. You can find those profiles, along with ones from previous years, elsewhere on this site.

    Each prospect comes from a unique background all of their own. In Valentine’s case, he grew up in a solid family with one older brother (Drew), who played at Oakland University and was eventually a graduate assistant for the Spartans. While Drew got the coaching bug from his father (he now is an assistant college coach at Oakland University), it was Denzel who became a dynamic basketball player in high school, eventually leading his father’s team to back to back state championships at JW Sexton High School in Lansing.

    Carlton Valentine, who played for the legendary high school coach Morgan Wooten at famous DeMatha High (Wooten wrote what in my mind is still the pre-eminent book about coaching basketball, in my view), was recruited to Lansing by then assistant coach Tom Izzo. Valentine maintained a strong relationship with Coach Izzo, frequently taking young Drew and Denzel to games and into the Spartan locker room through the years. Denzel grew up around the Spartan program, and was seemingly destined to be a Michigan State player from early on, and that is indeed what happened.



    Being the son of Lansing and of 2 professional educators, not finishing school was never really a consideration for Denzel, so he did it the old fashioned way: by staying in school for 4 years, continuing to improve steadily and mature, all while becoming one of the most popular athletes in the history of the storied program north of our state border.

    Valentine graduated in May with a degree in communications, and leaves Michigan State as the runner-up for the Wooden Award (to Buddy Hield), and as the recipient of both the Sports Illustrated and USA Today National Player of the Year Awards. In 33 minutes his senior year, Valentine averaged 19.2 ppg, 7.5rpg, and 7.8apg, making him the only player in the last 21 years to average 19/7/7 in college for a season. Clearly, Valentine comes into this draft as the most productive, well rounded and versatile offensive player available, but the questions, for those who have them, will come from his lack of athleticism and age.

    Valentine turns 23 years old right as next season ramps up, as he was born on November 16, 1993. He measured in at 6’5 ¾ , with a wingspan of 6’10 ¾. A no step vertical of 27.0, and a max vertical of 32.0 was what he measured at the NBA combine.

    How do those numbers, and the others I am going to present, affect his future in the NBA game? Let’s put Valentine under the microscope:

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Major production against big time opponents…...that is where we start.

    29 pts, 12 rebounds, 12 assists vs Kansas. 29/11/10 vs Boston College. 19/14/8 vs Maryland. 27/8/10 vs Purdue. 30/5/13 vs Indiana. Those are all world numbers. But does how he got them translate to the next level?

    There are about a million positive attributes to Valentine’s game, and only a few minor concerns. Let’s begin with the negatives first today, just to shake things up a bit.

    First, Valentine does lack elite NBA athleticism….there is no doubt about that. Whether you think it is vital or not, or whether you think it can be improved or not, largely dictates how positive you are about Valentine’s NBA future.

    With the ball, Valentine struggles to separate from his defender in terms of using raw speed…..which he doesn’t possess. He just simply lacks the “blow by” speed of many of your All Star level perimeter guys. He isn’t slow exactly, but he lacks “suddenness” and “burst” off the bounce. If you are looking for a wing who can blow by the defense, or bust around them with the ball in an ISO situation, Valentine isn’t your guy.




    All this means to me is this: he is going to need a ballscreen to get by a good NBA defender off the dribble unless he is in an advantageous situation already prior to receiving a pass. Monta Ellis of our Pacers used to have blow by speed, but now he is like this too.

    This means he likely isn’t going to be a guy you can isolate, or who can go get his own without help. If you care about that or want that, then Valentine isn’t a guy you’ll rate highly. He won’t get into the paint with suddenness, and he won’t get to the line very often, although if he does he is already an 85.3% shooter from there. Valentine also won’t jump over people and dunk on them, but instead he will rely on an already developed floater game, which he is proficient at already, though he does rely on it a bit too much.

    That is it for offensive weaknesses: a lack of elite speed and burst.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Defensively, his athletic limitations show up much more frequently, and are more alarming, and he also has some technique issues to clean up as well.

    Valentine simply, to this point in his development, lacks the “quick twitch” muscles in his lower body to become quick and explosive. This is clearly a player who has worked on his skills an insane amount of time, but who hasn’t had yet elite athletic training in speed and “torque”. He really struggles to explode out off the balls of his feet, both in a defensive slide (he covers very little ground when he slides), and when he takes off to run to close out to people. Some of it is that he isn’t low enough, and I think to date that he lacks a little flexibility in his hips….he doesn’t “drop his hips” to take off or to stop, and he often takes a little false step defensively that gets him behind the play by half a beat. He has GOT to get lower to the ground, push off the balls of his feet way better and get off his damn heels.

    Whoever gets Valentine needs to make it an organizational priority to improve his body from the waist down, and to get him some quickness training. Yes, he has to get more intense and focused defensively sometimes….I see that too. But his awareness is pretty good I thought overall, and I think he plays intelligently and with passion, but he clearly is going to have to be “trained up” to improve his athleticism.


    The great Zach Lowe wrote a piece last week about food and the NBA player, and that is important to me when reading about Valentine, because I clearly think he was playing a bit too heavy last year, when he weighed a reported 220-225lbs. The good news for me is that his trainers currently agree, as he has lost 13lbs already and continues to tone and improve his body.

    I personally believe that with intense, smartly done training, that most of his athletic limitations can be improved to the point that I am not overly concerned about them. It will take hard work though. If you are interested, you can read all over the internet about some of the extremely hard training players do to improve their bodies, players such as Kyle Korver have made their training methods legendary.

    He starts defensively with 2 high qualities: he is EXTREMELY long, and he is EXTREMELY intelligent. With dedicated training that he will get at the pro level, I think he ends up being an average to slightly above average defender through his prime years.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Offensively, Denzel Valentine was a stud at the college level, and I see no reason why he won’t be near that level in totality as a pro.

    I’ve already covered what I perceive to be his main offensive weakness a few lines up the page….he lacks blow by ability and elite speed with the ball….he can’t go one on one, and he’ll need a screen to get open. That’s it, that’s the only flaw on the Mona Lisa that is his offensive game.

    First, Valentine is an absolute sniper as a shooter. A robust 44.4% from deep as a senior, his mechanics are excellent, simple, and repeatable. I will admit to you that he doesn’t have great elevation, but I actually think that helps his accuracy, as well as this: he rarely takes bad shots from deep. His form is great and his length helps his extension to shoot over the top of the defense. Valentine can make threes off a ballscreen, as pick/pop guy screening for others (Michigan State didn’t use him as a screener enough because he had the ball so much, but that is an untapped tool for him I think), coming off “floppy” action and baseline screens, in transition, and is a “C/S” (catch and shoot) guy off others drive and kick.

    In short, he is going to be a major weapon as a shooter, even if nothing else improves or translates. He shoots from the hop, he can square up quickly in a variety of circumstances, he times his cuts well, he gets his feet set up to score as the ball is on its way to him, he has deeper than deep range, he can side/dribble once or twice and reset himself if someone recovers to him….there is literally nothing to complain about here. His elite shooting will have “gravity” to the defense, and contort it ways that make it uncomfortable, if he is surrounded by other potential weapons. He is an ideal 3rd/4th scorer I think for a dynamic team.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Valentine is also a major weapon in the low post, a place where I think he has been underutilized a little bit, but where I think he projects to be very very good.

    Valentine has a nice fadeaway over either shoulder, he has the “McHale” up and under, he has the “Sikma” pivot face up game, and he has the jump hook with either hand. I think wings, who are not accustomed to playing post defense anyway, are going to struggle to guard him on the block and in the mid/high post areas, if a coach is creative enough to put him there.

    What makes him doubly dangerous I think in the post is this: he is a brilliant passer from there! I project him to be a guy you are going to have to possibly double team in the post, and if you are forced to do that, Valentine can kill you with his outstanding vision and passing ability.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Valentine’s ballhandling is a big asset, but I think his lack of speed and burst keep him from actually playing as a “true” point guard, instead I think he is more of a ballhandling wing….if you get what I am saying.

    While he lacks the aforementioned explosion with his dribble at this time, Valentine will be an elite passer and ball mover at the NBA level. His height and intelligence enable to him to see over the top of the defense, and Valentine’s vision is already at a high level…..he sees the entire length and width of the floor already, as his handle is good enough to enable him to do that. He can thread the needle, make the drop off pocket pass, whip passes to either corner with either hand going either direction, and he is extremely unselfish. He runs your stuff, but he also reads the situation, and understands time and score…..all things an experienced, well coached kid (by Izzo and his staff and his own father) should do.

    Valentine is a guy you can trust with the ball, and a guy who his teammates will love playing with offensively.

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    His length also makes him an elite wing defemsive rebounder.

    It isn’t that he is a dynamic leaper, or that he is extremely physical or anything. But he times his jumps well, and he reads the ball off the rim well so he beats people to long rebounds quite often.

    Where he is a major weapon is when he does snag a defensive rebound, and can start his own fast break by dribbling up the court quickly and finding people. His vision is so good, and he is so unselfish, that his teammates better have their heads on a swivel and be ready, or else he will make them look bad. Valentine does occasionally turn it over by making an attempt at a “hero” type pass instead of making the simple play, but I view that as a small price to pay.

    If you want to play wide open, uptempo, spread basketball with movement and passing (i.e., the modern NBA), then you need guards who can do and excel at multiple offensive things….Valentine can do that.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We cannot finish a profile of Valentine without talking about his intangibles, which are significant and important.
    Valentine is a leader, a high character, extremely well spoken and popular player who will be highly embraced by his teammates and the community.

    This is a kid who was voted “most inspirational” as a struggling sophomore at Michigan State.

    This is a kid who sought out players on the end of their bench at Michigan State and hung out with them off court, so they could feel included and part of the team.

    This is a kid who leads, challenges teammates, pushes and prods some while inspiring others with kind words and quiet deeds.

    This is a kid who will get in your community and embrace the opportunities given, and who will infect your lockerroom with joy, fun, but also accountability and grace.

    This is a kid who is a gym rat, who refused to take time off even when his coaches insisted on it. This is a kid who makes his teammates go to the gym with him.

    This is a kid who is a charismatic, loose, forceful leader….a player who showed these traits for every team he has played for, from youth basketball all the way to team USA last summer, to the highest levels of college hoops.

    This is a kid who has been coached hard by both his father and by the hardest driving coach in college basketball, Tom Izzo.

    And this is a kid with the character to graduate college in 4 years, unlike most kids who dump their schooling as soon as draft prep approaches.

    Valentine, from many respects, reminds you a lot from an intangible point of view as Ex-Spartan Draymond Green, who worked out with Valentine all last summer, in physical workouts where Valentine didn’t stop working until he had “swished” (not just made) 200 3 pointers each day. He isn’t as boisterous as Green (no one is really), and he lacks the defensive upside and versatility of Draymond…..but those intangibles are there, and they matter.



    So, what do we have in Denzel Valentine?

    I think we have an extremely hard working, high IQ offensive weapon who perhaps isn’t “elite”, but who will play offense at a very high level, but who you will have to scheme around a bit to hide his defensive weaknesses, even though I see them improving some at this level.

    I think you see a starting guard/wing on a championship or high level team, if he is surrounded by teammates and a scheme that uses his skills in the proper way. Worst case, I think he is a high level shooter who comes off your bench and plays with your starters for big minutes.

    And I think I see a winner….a guy who makes winning plays and who helps others be better than they currently are. I see a “force multiplier” and “energy giver”....a guy who was quantifiable skills but who also has the right kind of intangibles that make anywhere he is a better place. Intelligence, by far, is the most underrated basketball attribute. Valentine has IQ for the game, and he has “emotional” IQ that enables him to make others better.

    This is a guy you can win with big time, if he is your 3rd/4th best player. Valentine will be wasted on a bad team if he has to play above his abilities, but put him on a team with other good players, and I think he is the guy who can make a good team great, and a great team a champion.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    How would Valentine fit in Indiana?

    Obviously, I think he would be outstanding eventually. Playing in between George Hill ( a defensive plus point guard who can play off the ball some) and Paul George (a brilliant 2 way player who can guard a rival’s best wing scorer) is almost perfect for Valentine, as those 2 players would mitigate his faults, and he in turn would make them both better by creating scoring opportunities for both of them, while also being a scorer in his own right.

    Playing in a “supposed” new system that will elevate the importance of spacing, ball movement, passing, and reading the defense while playing up-tempo, should ideally fit Valentine’s offensive skills. Playing in the proven Indiana defensive system should hide his flaws as well as can be expected, and his high character and charisma coming into a place that I think could use infusions of both I think would be great.

    On a slow team, a team that plays selfishly with alot of isolation basketball, with a team that isn’t tied together defensively, I think Valentine suffers.

    If available at pick #20, despite my normal inclination to pick younger guys instead of seniors, this is the way I would go. Short term and long term, I want our team to have guys like Valentine on it.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Ok, but will he be there? He might….but I doubt it.

    He makes too much sense for too many teams, in my opinion, to fall to us. I think that the Bucks should take him at #10, I think Orlando should take him at #11 (and then they could start dealing people perhaps), The Bulls at #14 and the Nuggets at #15 and even #7 should consider him strongly. Ultimately though I think he ends up with the Jazz at pick #12, which would be a great fit…..or I think perhaps someone comes up from behind us to get him somewhere along the way. Atlanta, Charlotte, Philadelphia, Golden State perhaps….all those teams might want to get up in a position to take Valentine ahead of us.

    If I am Larry Bird, I’d strongly consider moving up myself to get Valentine if the price isn’t a future 1st rounder, or someone vital to his development. I think for us, Valentine is the potential long term answer at what is one of the weaker positions in the league currently, the shooting guard position, and we have near ideal players to play around him. Something like our pick plus a marginal player (CJ Miles maybe) to move up a few spots to get Valentine makes sense to me.

    We will see. Do I think Bird sees Valentine the way I do? Bird is too unpredictable for me at this point to know.

    NBA comparables: JJ Redick (that’s his floor I think), Brandon Roy (Kevin Pritchard had him in Portland as did Nate McMillan….Roy is his ceiling I project), and Steve Smith all come to mind.

    But the closest NBA comparable for Valentine is: Jalen Rose.

    Rose is ultimately really close to how I see Valentine’s career playing out. A high level, high IQ offensive player who could flat play, but who was a defensive liability at times that needed the right coach and teammates to thrive as high as he could. Also, a very popular, intelligent and well spoken player who is doing awesome things in media and with the school he has started in Detroit, helping kids get an education.

    I loved Jalen as a player, and I think Valentine is the modern version.

    As always, the above is just my opinion……

    Tbird

  • #2
    Re: Tbird 2016 NBA Draft Analysis #7: Denzel Valentine

    Wow, you're really high on Valentine. I'm convinced if he can be trained up on defense, which seems to be his glaring weakness.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Tbird 2016 NBA Draft Analysis #7: Denzel Valentine

      Nice write-up. I think this is pretty accurate from what I saw this season (watched a lot of Michigan State because I viewed them as Purdue's biggest competition). I don't know if he will ever be as good as a Roy, but I do like him quite a bit. I admit, I still prefer Taurean.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Tbird 2016 NBA Draft Analysis #7: Denzel Valentine

        I liked what I read. I wasn't super high on him, but him between Hill and George definitely seems like a good fit.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Tbird 2016 NBA Draft Analysis #7: Denzel Valentine

          Officially excited.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Tbird 2016 NBA Draft Analysis #7: Denzel Valentine

            Plus, his name is awesome sauce.
            Time for a new sig.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Tbird 2016 NBA Draft Analysis #7: Denzel Valentine

              Wow, great review. I've been a big fan of Valentine just from watching Big Ten games this year. He seemed like a winner, a guy who took more responsibility as the game went on and the moment got bigger. I'd be ecstatic if he fell to us.
              Danger Zone

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Tbird 2016 NBA Draft Analysis #7: Denzel Valentine

                I think he would be one of the better choices if we go for a SG, but I still think our top priority should be PF.

                Plus, if he is playing between GHill and Paul George, that means we will not have a "true PG" in the lineup which is something Bird said he was looking for. I just thought I would point that out.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Tbird 2016 NBA Draft Analysis #7: Denzel Valentine

                  Liked him before reading this scouting report. Certainly like him more now.

                  Seems like a guy that Larry would really like too. Just not sure he'll be there.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Tbird 2016 NBA Draft Analysis #7: Denzel Valentine

                    If he makes it past #18 I'll be pissed.

                    It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                    Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                    Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                    NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Tbird 2016 NBA Draft Analysis #7: Denzel Valentine

                      I'm down, but if he's there (or we trade up), I'll **** a brick.
                      I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

                      -Emiliano Zapata

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Tbird 2016 NBA Draft Analysis #7: Denzel Valentine

                        His lack of defense scares me and I'm not sure him losing a few pounds is going to make as big of a difference as you do when it comes to athleticism. I also don't think he will ever be a player of Roy's caliber or even Rose's, but I do see him as a poor mans version of those players.

                        If he is there at 20, I would be pretty happy with the selection I think. The guy does bring a lot to the table offensively that I appreciate. That said, I'd still prefer McCaw who is younger and has much higher upside in my opinion.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Tbird 2016 NBA Draft Analysis #7: Denzel Valentine

                          He seems to me to be a bit of the Boston-Evan Turner in Danny Green's body.

                          As Dr. Awesome mentioned, I'd like to see what you think of Pat McCaw.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Tbird 2016 NBA Draft Analysis #7: Denzel Valentine

                            If his floor is JJ Redick he should go top 5 -- that can't be right.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Tbird 2016 NBA Draft Analysis #7: Denzel Valentine

                              Originally posted by Dr. Awesome View Post
                              His lack of defense scares me and I'm not sure him losing a few pounds is going to make as big of a difference as you do when it comes to athleticism. I also don't think he will ever be a player of Roy's caliber or even Rose's, but I do see him as a poor mans version of those players.

                              If he is there at 20, I would be pretty happy with the selection I think. The guy does bring a lot to the table offensively that I appreciate. That said, I'd still prefer McCaw who is younger and has much higher upside in my opinion.
                              So you basically think he's Evan Turner?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X