Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

{RUMOR} Indiana Offers George Hill for Jeff Teague

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: {RUMOR} Indiana Offers George Hill for Jeff Teague

    I want NO part of this trade...I am not in the camp that thinks Teague is some upgrade over Hill. And like many of us, I've been watching both these dudes play since they were in high school. Teague is a better 1 on 1 player, may be better at being a "traditional" PG and he's not even that much of a traditional PG. He's a shoot first PG also as far as I've seen...Plus he's having a down year and as others said, would be a horrible fit here. Just give George a bit more freedom, give him the ball more, let him run the pick and roll and make the decisions. I think he's fine in that role. He's not the one launching 10 3's a game and wasting possessions. I don't see how Teague helps that. Everybody knows G. Hill has always been a scorer at heart since he was at Broad Ripple...Its just he always gets placed in some "role" and I just think he's always conscious of not disrupting team chemistry.

    Comment


    • Re: {RUMOR} Indiana Offers George Hill for Jeff Teague

      Originally posted by Anthem View Post
      Do we know that's what happened? Seems like the most likely option is "No talks were actually in place, Bleacher Report just made up the rumor."
      We don't have a clue what is happening. Well most of us don't. I'm just saying the rumors make sense.
      Pacers needs a better PG and any offer that starts with Stuckey or Ellis for Teague needs too many assets added to it to get the Hawks interested.
      Hill is (sadly enough) the most logical player to be traded.

      And it doesn't have to stop with 1 player being traded.

      Comment


      • Re: {RUMOR} Indiana Offers George Hill for Jeff Teague

        Originally posted by Grimp View Post
        According to Hoopshype the Pacers offered G. Hill for Teague and Orlando offered Oladipo. But the Hawks RIGHT NOW want more from both teams so it looks like Indy and Orlando are not prepared to offer more. So any deal won't happen until deadline day when Atlanta's asking price comes down somewhat.
        Eff that.....Teague isn't a game changing Player for the Pacers to offer more than GH. GH+1st for a Near Elite Starting Quality Player? If it's the right Player, sure. But for Teague? Nope.....he's not that good of a Player.

        Also...about the Hawks turning down a younger Guard like Oladipo.....WTF is up with that?
        Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

        Comment


        • Re: {RUMOR} Indiana Offers George Hill for Jeff Teague

          Originally posted by MvPlumlee View Post
          So you are saying both the Hawks and Pacers management don't know what they are doing?

          The Pacers made a silly trade offer and the Hawks were silly enough to turn it down?

          Both teams are below average offensively so I'd say both managements do know what they are doing, Indiana looking to upgrade the PG position, Atlanta taking all trade proposals into consideration till the deadline approaches and making a final decision much closer to the 18th.
          Yep....that's exactly what I'm saying.

          I'm saying that I think that the Pacers made a silly offer to the Hawks for a Player that won't fit very well with the guy in your Avatar. To be clear, I'm not saying that if we are too look at this in a vacuum and simply ask "Whose the better PG or even Guard?" and/or "Who wins in this trade from a value POV?" that it can be argued that Teague is a little better than GH. I'm talking purely from a matter of fit and getting the different pieces of the puzzle ( in this case, Monta and Teague ) to fit together and complement each other.

          Now, the Hawks turning down the offer is a different story.....they seem to think that Teague has more trade value than GH ( since they are getting offers from other Teams like the Magic and the Sixers ). I can't argue with that. But from the same perspective that I am looking at Monta and Teague fitting together, I can see that pairing Schroder with GH makes better sense then pairing Schroder with Teague ( hence why I say that I can see why the Hawks may take GH ). But since they are getting more offers.....the price of Teague is going up.
          Last edited by CableKC; 02-10-2016, 06:55 PM.
          Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

          Comment


          • Re: {RUMOR} Indiana Offers George Hill for Jeff Teague

            Originally posted by CableKC View Post
            Eff that.....Teague isn't a game changing Player for the Pacers to offer more than GH. GH+1st for a Near Elite Starting Quality Player? If it's the right Player, sure. But for Teague? Nope.....he's not that good of a Player.

            Also...about the Hawks turning down a younger Guard like Oladipo.....WTF is up with that?


            You know how this time of year works though. As the days tick away on the calendar those high asking prices come down. You just have to be in the right place to catch them when they do. But starting bids usually are very high. That's why Markieff Morris is still a Sun. As the deadline nears people will blink or become more rational in what they're asking.

            Comment


            • Re: {RUMOR} Indiana Offers George Hill for Jeff Teague

              Originally posted by CableKC View Post
              Yep....that's exactly what I'm saying.

              I'm saying that I think that the Pacers made a silly offer to the Hawks for a Player that won't fit very well with the guy in your Avatar. To be clear, I'm not saying that if we are too look at this in a vacuum and simply ask "Whose the better PG or even Guard?" and/or "Who wins in this trade from a value POV?" that it can be argued that Teague is a little better than GH. I'm talking purely from a matter of fit and getting the different pieces of the puzzle ( in this case, Monta and Teague ) to fit together and complement each other.

              Now, the Hawks turning down the offer is a different story.....they seem to think that Teague has more trade value than GH ( since they are getting offers from other Teams like the Magic and the Sixers ). I can't argue with that. But from the same perspective that I am looking at Monta and Teague fitting together, I can see that pairing Schroder with GH makes better sense then pairing Schroder with Teague ( hence why I say that I can see why the Hawks may take GH ). But since they are getting more offers.....the price of Teague is going up.


              Sixers asked about Teague but experts don't expect them to make that move. After all they got Ish Smith back just to create more synergy with Nerlens Noel.

              Comment


              • Re: {RUMOR} Indiana Offers George Hill for Jeff Teague

                Originally posted by Grimp View Post
                Sixers asked about Teague but experts don't expect them to make that move. After all they got Ish Smith back just to create more synergy with Nerlens Noel.
                The whole point is that the Hawks are realizing that there maybe a market for the Player that they want to move and it's driving up the asking price. The Hawks are now Sellers and are more than content to wait it out.
                Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                Comment


                • Re: {RUMOR} Indiana Offers George Hill for Jeff Teague

                  Originally posted by Grimp View Post
                  You know how this time of year works though. As the days tick away on the calendar those high asking prices come down. You just have to be in the right place to catch them when they do. But starting bids usually are very high. That's why Markieff Morris is still a Sun. As the deadline nears people will blink or become more rational in what they're asking.
                  Are you going to be inserting Markieff Morris in every post that you make between now and the end of the trade deadline?

                  Grimp's post to the "Larry Bird will die young just ask him" thread : I heard that Bird said that he's not going to die til he's in his 70s. You want to know who can't die? Markieff Morris

                  Grimp's post to the "Random, Scattered Disturbed Thoughts" Thread : I bought a new car. You want to know who said that it was a good car to buy? Markieff Morris

                  Grimp's post to the "Biggest Loser 2016" thread : You want to know whose not a Loser? Markieff Morris


                  Last edited by CableKC; 02-10-2016, 07:08 PM.
                  Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                  Comment


                  • Re: {RUMOR} Indiana Offers George Hill for Jeff Teague

                    Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                    Eff that.....Teague isn't a game changing Player for the Pacers to offer more than GH. GH+1st for a Near Elite Starting Quality Player? If it's the right Player, sure. But for Teague? Nope.....he's not that good of a Player.

                    Also...about the Hawks turning down a younger Guard like Oladipo.....WTF is up with that?
                    Im guessing just because Oladipo and Schroder in backcourt together would lack consistent range. They both are around 34% I think (too lazy to look up), which isn't bad, but I'm sure Bud wants better.

                    Comment


                    • Re: {RUMOR} Indiana Offers George Hill for Jeff Teague

                      [QUOTE=CableKC;2097897]
                      Originally posted by Grimp View Post
                      You know how this time of year works though. As the days tick away on the calendar those high asking prices come down. You just have to be in the right place to catch them when they do. But starting bids usually are very high. That's why Markieff Morris is still a Sun. As the deadline nears people will blink or become more rational in what they're asking.[/QUOTE]
                      Are you going to be inserting Markieff Morris in every post that you make between now and the end of the trade deadline?

                      Grimp's post to the "Larry Bird will die young just ask him" thread : I heard that Bird said that he's not going to die til he's in his 70s. You want to know who can't die? Markieff Morris
                      Grimp's post to the "Random, Scattered Disturbed Thoughts" Thread : I bought a new car. You want to know who said that it was a good car to buy? Markieff Morris
                      Grimp's post to the "Biggest Loser 2016" thread : You want to know whose not a Loser? Markieff Morris


                      Nah, but I was trying to make a point. MM has been rumored as being traded since October. He's gotta be the longest tenured traded player this season. He should technically be wearing a Rockets jersey right now.

                      Comment


                      • Re: {RUMOR} Indiana Offers George Hill for Jeff Teague

                        Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                        The whole point is that the Hawks are realizing that there maybe a market for the Player that they want to move and it's driving up the asking price. The Hawks are now Sellers and are more than content to wait it out.
                        Sixers could offer more than any team I'm sure. But will Teague stay past next Summer? Probably not.

                        Comment


                        • Re: {RUMOR} Indiana Offers George Hill for Jeff Teague

                          Originally posted by Grimp View Post
                          Nah, but I was trying to make a point. MM has been rumored as being traded since October. He's gotta be the longest tenured traded player this season. He should technically be wearing a Rockets jersey right now.
                          I know...I just found it odd and not surprising. Just messing with you
                          Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                          Comment


                          • Re: {RUMOR} Indiana Offers George Hill for Jeff Teague

                            Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                            Yep....that's exactly what I'm saying.

                            I'm saying that I think that the Pacers made a silly offer to the Hawks for a Player that won't fit very well with the guy in your Avatar. To be clear, I'm not saying that if we are too look at this in a vacuum and simply ask "Whose the better PG or even Guard?" and/or "Who wins in this trade from a value POV?" that it can be argued that Teague is a little better than GH. I'm talking purely from a matter of fit and getting the different pieces of the puzzle ( in this case, Monta and Teague ) to fit together and complement each other.

                            Now, the Hawks turning down the offer is a different story.....they seem to think that Teague has more trade value than GH ( since they are getting offers from other Teams like the Magic and the Sixers ). I can't argue with that. But from the same perspective that I am looking at Monta and Teague fitting together, I can see that pairing Schroder with GH makes better sense then pairing Schroder with Teague ( hence why I say that I can see why the Hawks may take GH ). But since they are getting more offers.....the price of Teague is going up.
                            I share your concerns about possible fit but it's not like we would be breaking up something that is working out very well. Nor does it mean Ellis has to be a part of the puzzle or we can't get another starting SG and make Monta our sixth man.

                            Teague is an opportunity that presented itself and more moves can be made to make him fit.
                            I think having another playmaker on the team for 30 plus minutes outweighs the limited minutes that Teague and Ellis are not touching the ball.

                            Comment


                            • Re: {RUMOR} Indiana Offers George Hill for Jeff Teague

                              I do not like this idea at all. This idea does not make me happy. GHill's defense is so under valued. He is one of the best defensive guards in the league.
                              ***The George Hill Effect*** or "GHE". What is GHE you ask? It is a player who does not celebrate and pound his chest after he hits a big basket. It is a player who doesn't cuss, spit nails, and complain when something doesn't go his way. It is a player who doesn't get high or low emotionally. He has zero emotion, and I don't mean that in a bad way.
                              And because of this, it has a effect on fans that he doesn't do much. If GHill broke invisible boards on his legs after he made a dunk or knocked down a big shot. Fan would perceive Hill as a better offensive player.
                              Fans watch the offensive side of the ball much more than the defensive side of the ball. When a fan is talking a about how good a player is, they are talking about how good that player is on the offensive side of the ball. The defensive end is not in the picture.
                              The Vogel era has helped Indiana fans to tune in to the defensive side of the game a little more. GHill deserves much more credit then he gets.

                              Now, if this trade would have to happen. I understand what it would do for us on the offensive end of the ball. We would take a huge leap in what Bird wants to see for out offense.
                              We would be pushing the pace just like Bird wanted. And we have been a much faster team than we were a year ago. We would not get faster than we are now with this trade. But we would get faster options with more creativity. We would score more on the fast break. We would have a PG who puts points up every single game. We get a player who would be contagious on the offensive end.

                              We would get a younger player. We get a kid that Vogel can work with to strengthen his defense. I am convinced that Vogel can squeeze the most out of any player and get some sort of defensive improvement (JHill for example).

                              Teague and Monta. Omg, this does not make me happy. I see this having a lot of friction and no flow. How do we fix this and make it work? EASY!

                              We trade for Korver as well. We send GHill, Monta, and a first round for Teague and Korver. Watching Korver drill 3 pointers would drive fans wild. He would be the best shooter we have had since Reggie Miller. And I would love it!

                              I don't think the Hawks will do this deal. Unless they really want the pick. If we have to do 2 picks as well, then so be it.
                              I don't want to trade Hill for Teague. But if we have to, having Korver as well would make me estatic for this deal. I think getting both players instantly makes our team better.
                              What we loose on the defensive end we make up in scoring. We have to get Korver in this deal. It is the only way it is going to work.
                              The trade value of draft picks have never been higher. One first or two picks could make this deal happen.

                              PG Jeff Teague
                              SG Kyle Korver
                              SF Paul George
                              PF Myles Turner
                              C Ian Mahinmi

                              Does that not look like a starting line up or what? The great thing about getting both of those guys is the basketball IQ. They both have a good deal of it.


                              "Pacers will win 50 games this season" 07-16-2015
                              "Ian will average 10-10 this season" 10-21-15

                              Comment


                              • Re: {RUMOR} Indiana Offers George Hill for Jeff Teague

                                Originally posted by JimmyJames View Post
                                I do not like this idea at all. This idea does not make me happy. GHill's defense is so under valued. He is one of the best defensive guards in the league.
                                ***The George Hill Effect*** or "GHE". What is GHE you ask? It is a player who does not celebrate and pound his chest after he hits a big basket. It is a player who doesn't cuss, spit nails, and complain when something doesn't go his way. It is a player who doesn't get high or low emotionally. He has zero emotion, and I don't mean that in a bad way.
                                And because of this, it has a effect on fans that he doesn't do much. If GHill broke invisible boards on his legs after he made a dunk or knocked down a big shot. Fan would perceive Hill as a better offensive player.
                                Fans watch the offensive side of the ball much more than the defensive side of the ball. When a fan is talking a about how good a player is, they are talking about how good that player is on the offensive side of the ball. The defensive end is not in the picture.
                                The Vogel era has helped Indiana fans to tune in to the defensive side of the game a little more. GHill deserves much more credit then he gets.

                                Now, if this trade would have to happen. I understand what it would do for us on the offensive end of the ball. We would take a huge leap in what Bird wants to see for out offense.
                                We would be pushing the pace just like Bird wanted. And we have been a much faster team than we were a year ago. We would not get faster than we are now with this trade. But we would get faster options with more creativity. We would score more on the fast break. We would have a PG who puts points up every single game. We get a player who would be contagious on the offensive end.

                                We would get a younger player. We get a kid that Vogel can work with to strengthen his defense. I am convinced that Vogel can squeeze the most out of any player and get some sort of defensive improvement (JHill for example).

                                Teague and Monta. Omg, this does not make me happy. I see this having a lot of friction and no flow. How do we fix this and make it work? EASY!

                                We trade for Korver as well. We send GHill, Monta, and a first round for Teague and Korver. Watching Korver drill 3 pointers would drive fans wild. He would be the best shooter we have had since Reggie Miller. And I would love it!

                                I don't think the Hawks will do this deal. Unless they really want the pick. If we have to do 2 picks as well, then so be it.
                                I don't want to trade Hill for Teague. But if we have to, having Korver as well would make me estatic for this deal. I think getting both players instantly makes our team better.
                                What we loose on the defensive end we make up in scoring. We have to get Korver in this deal. It is the only way it is going to work.
                                The trade value of draft picks have never been higher. One first or two picks could make this deal happen.

                                PG Jeff Teague
                                SG Kyle Korver
                                SF Paul George
                                PF Myles Turner
                                C Ian Mahinmi

                                Does that not look like a starting line up or what? The great thing about getting both of those guys is the basketball IQ. They both have a good deal of it.
                                Sorry, but this seems absurdly short-sighted. Korver is 34 and we are giving up Two first rounders to bring him here?? We aren't going to compete for a championship after a team-shifting deadline deal like this, so we would be counting on a 35 year old Korver next year? I don't really get it. I would personally rather dump Monta for absolutely nothing than to deal him, Hill, and two firsts just to see our defense take a big dip.
                                I like Korver btw, that deal is just horrendous in the value we bring back.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X