Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Hibbert dealt to the Lakers for a future 2nd round pick

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Hibbert deal in the works with Lakers

    Originally posted by imawhat View Post
    I think Roy will have a very good season for the Lakers. This is a great trade for them.

    I don't understand what the hell we're doing. There better be another move coming, and it better not be crap like David 'Burlington Coat Factory' Lee.
    The Pacers are adjusting to a league that is changing and discarding a player who cannot sustain the mental part of competing in the NBA. I hope Roy gets that together someday but I am glad the Pacers are not going to wait for it.

    Comment


    • Re: Hibbert deal in the works with Lakers

      Pardon me if this has been brought up or if this is a crazy idea, but is it possible the front office is looking to trade monta as part of a package for a front court player?
      Lifelong pacers fan

      Comment


      • Re: Hibbert deal in the works with Lakers

        Originally posted by pacers_heath View Post
        Pardon me if this has been brought up or if this is a crazy idea, but is it possible the front office is looking to trade monta as part of a package for a front court player?
        That will only be possible 3 months after the contract is officially signed. Means mid-October. Hard to make solid plans for such trades at this time.

        Comment


        • Re: Hibbert deal in the works with Lakers

          Originally posted by diamonddave00 View Post
          I think Jordan Hill signed at about 8 mil and 7.5 for another player or split for a couple more players would make the trade look good using Roy's money to fill holes on the roster that fit a quicker game
          Ed Davis was the role player big from the Lakers worth getting this year and he got less than 7 MIL per year. I think I'd have to say no to that deal.....

          Comment


          • Re: Hibbert deal in the works with Lakers

            we're just giving the dude away? Bird's an idiot.

            Comment


            • Re: Hibbert deal in the works with Lakers

              Originally posted by Heisenberg View Post
              we're just giving the dude away? Bird's an idiot.
              Not really just giving him away. What we get in return is the cap space to either sign FA's or trade for players who will better fit the direction the team wants to go.

              We should probably wait to see what is done with this new flexibility before we fully judge this. It opens up a lot of possibilities.

              Comment


              • Re: Hibbert deal in the works with Lakers

                Originally posted by Sandman21 View Post
                Lance wasn't the problem and neither was Roy. The Problem took his no-defense playing, ball-hogging, teammate shoving talents, got the **** out and went to Boston.

                This trade is literally ****. If Bird isn't getting at least a future first round pick back (which considering the Lakers' recent history would probably be at least a DECENT pick, even if it was lottery protected for a few years), then why make the ****ing deal going into the ONE year that EVERYONE is going to have cap space?
                I think it's crystal clear why they would do this type of deal - irreconcilable differences between Bird and/or coaches, team, etc and Hibbert. Otherwise, you play it out in Hibbert's final contract year. They've known for some time his market was very low. And they've known as this deal is being negotiated that there's nothing but scraps left to target for the cap space opened up.
                I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

                -Emiliano Zapata

                Comment


                • Re: Hibbert traded to the Lakers!

                  Originally posted by Sandman21 View Post
                  Not even hold out for a lottery-protected 1st round pick?

                  Does anyone really trust Ian to be on the free throw line in the 4th quarter with the game on the line?

                  Mahinmi has one bad year shooting FT, and posters have come to the conclusion it will be that way for his career. SMH What makes you think his FT shooting last year is going to be permanent now throughout the remainder of his career?

                  Another thing: when the Pacers "D" hasn't gone down the tubes b/c Hibbert left how many of you that says it will are going to admit you were wrong? I didn't think so.
                  Last edited by Justin Tyme; 07-05-2015, 09:46 AM.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Hibbert deal in the works with Lakers

                    Originally posted by Tom White View Post
                    Not really just giving him away. What we get in return is the cap space to either sign FA's or trade for players who will better fit the direction the team wants to go.

                    We should probably wait to see what is done with this new flexibility before we fully judge this. It opens up a lot of possibilities.
                    If this had happened earlier in the summer, then I wouldn't be as pessimistic. But given the fact that there aren't any good boys left on the FA market worries me. We don't control our own destiny in terms of adding talent. We have to rely on another team trading.

                    I'm not saying we don't have ANY options, but the options that we do have aren't better than what we had previously. That's perhaps what sucks right now.

                    We will see what Bird does, but part of me thinks that this crappy frontcourt that we have right now is going to add someone else who isn't very good (Stoudemire for example) and roll with that
                    Last edited by Ace E.Anderson; 07-05-2015, 09:50 AM.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Hibbert deal in the works with Lakers

                      Considering that Roy could have opted out of his final year,
                      maybe we should be glad to be getting anything at all in
                      return.

                      Thanks LA
                      Last edited by RamBo_Lamar; 07-05-2015, 09:50 AM.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Hibbert deal in the works with Lakers

                        Welcome to knee jerk reaction world. I've seen Simons willingness to spend called into question, the merit of moving a guy who doesn't want to be here and makes a ton for a limited role. All for a 10 and 7 guy? You get true flexibility from this move and don't have the weight of Roy being unhappy in the lockeroom. Lastly, get over rim protection as an elite skill for him, the league caught up to that scheme and stopped taking it all the way to him, instead started doing floaters. I understand being wistful for two years ago, but that was long gone.

                        Funny thing, some this is coming from two guys I like their posts the most in TBird and Heisenberg. Smh.

                        Comment


                        • Re: Hibbert traded to the Lakers!

                          Originally posted by Justin Tyme View Post
                          Mahinmi has one bad year shooting FT, and posters have come to the conclusion it will be that way for his career. SMH What makes you think his FT shooting last year is going to be permanent now throughout the remainder of his career?
                          I wouldn't consider a 60% FT year, which is where Ian has historically been at the line in Indiana, to be good. I don't want a 60% shooter at the line with the game on the line, much less a guy coming off a 30% year.
                          "Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough NO BODY!" ~ Frank Vogel

                          "And David put his hand in the bag and took out a stone and slung it. And it struck the Philistine on the head and he fell to the ground. Amen. "

                          Comment


                          • Re: Hibbert deal in the works with Lakers

                            Originally posted by RamBo_Lamar View Post
                            Considering that Roy could have opted out of his final year,
                            maybe we should be glad to be getting anything at all in
                            return.

                            Thanks LA
                            The reports still vary, but it appears we will receive a 2nd-round pick for the right of paying Roy's trade kicker. That's about market value for 2nd-rounder although Lakers' one should be a good one.

                            So it ends up being roughly identical situation to a case of Roy optiong out with the difference being a few lost days when all quality FAs went elsewhere...

                            Opt-out would have been marginally better case to this.

                            Comment


                            • Re: Hibbert deal in the works with Lakers

                              Originally posted by Tom White View Post
                              Not really just giving him away. What we get in return is the cap space to either sign FA's or trade for players who will better fit the direction the team wants to go.

                              We should probably wait to see what is done with this new flexibility before we fully judge this. It opens up a lot of possibilities.

                              Regardless of who we sign, the Lakers got him for nothing. That's giving him away.

                              A separate move is just that; separate.

                              Comment


                              • Re: Hibbert traded to the Lakers!

                                Originally posted by Sollozzo View Post
                                What in the hell happened behind the scenes for the Pacers to just basically give Hibbert away when he only had one year left on his deal?

                                Like I said, I'm just in a state of shock over how quickly everything crumbled.

                                Could it be the last half of 13-14 season disaster was really caused by Hibbert, and then Hibbert didn't step up to the plate with his play last year when other players were injured? Bird had enough, thus his decision to get rid of Hibbert.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X