Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #13: Justise Winslow

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #13: Justise Winslow

    With this preview of Justise Winslow we have reached the end of all of the pre-draft deep analysis pieces for 2015. In previous editions of this series, I have broken down the games of 12 other players: Kevin Looney, Tyus Jones, Jerien Grant, Frank Kaminsky, Kelly Oubre, Stanley Johnson, Myles Turner, Devin Booker, Cameron Payne, Willie Cauley-Stein, Trey Lyles, and Bobby Portis. You can find those profiles elsewhere on this site.

    Winslow will be the 13th player broken down in detail for this draft, but if Larry Bird happens to select someone who I have not broken down yet, I will do that all for you in the days following the draft. Bird has certainly stumped me before, as I didn't do Solomon Hill, Miles Plumlee, or Tyler Hansbrough in the days prior to the draft those years.

    But, if he does it again, never fear, because I will have breakdowns on whomever it will be, assuming it is someone I can get tape access to or already have in my possession.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As I dive headfirst into trying to make predictions on what other teams ahead of us may do on Thursday, I see the potential for a few players who are predicted in every mock draft I have seen to go way ahead of us to actually fall to #11.

    Devin Booker and Willie Cauley Stein both could easily fall to us with just a couple off odd selections ahead of us, or with deals that we can't predict yet. Stanley Johnson could also fall to us under certain conditions, as could Frank Kaminsky and Cameron Payne. As I have endorsed all 5 of those players for Indiana, any of those selections ultimately would be good for us in my opinion.....though some would be better than others of course.

    But, there are scenarios where teams behind us trade up and take players that I wouldn't take, pushing higher rated, unexpected players to us. I have identified 2 such players who at least have a slim possibility of crashing all the way to pick #11, either through strange circumstances, being overrated by the media, or with attitude and background problems scaring teams off.

    One such player is Mario Hezonja. I will not be previewing Hezonja unless we select him, as getting full game tape of him has taken me too long to acquire. However, I do have it now, and if we end up with him somehow I'll give it a full breakdown next weekend. Hezonja has some buyout potential issues, along with some serious attitude questions in some people's minds. With Indiana having the very best European scouting staff in the NBA, led by the very well respected Pete Philo, I would assume that Indiana has Hezonja very high on its own board, or at least knows him better than most of the other teams in the league.

    The other player I think could unexpectedly fall is Justise Winslow, and you can read his scouting report below:

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Winslow has a very interesting basketball background. His father Rickie played for one of the most famous and exciting teams college basketball ever produced, the "Phi Slamma Jamma" Houston Cougars, who lost in one of the most thrilling college basketball games ever played, the NCAA championship game in 1983 when they lost to NC State and Coach Jimmy Valvano.

    Rickie Winslow was drafted, then bounced around in Europe playing professionally for years, before finally settling down to live in Houston. Rickie served as an assistant coach for a local high school in Houston called St. John's, an elite academic school that prior to Justise attending had never been known for athletics.....but with Justise playing for the tiny school, they managed to win 3 state titles in 4 years in their class. Note that Justise COULD have attended any basketball type factory school in the country, but instead went to the very high academic institution.

    Justise's mother, Robin Davis, was a stickler for academics and wanted all of her children to be much more well rounded than the normal athletic minded teenager. She succeeded, as her youngest son has grown up with a rather eclectic personality, having a deep interest in art and history, visiting art museums while on draft workout trips and spending hours watching the History channel. He also has a deep interest in politics and sites Theodore Roosevelt as one of his heroes. His older brother Josh plays football at Dartmouth, and his older sister Bianca plays basketball for the University of Houston. He also has a brother named Brandon, who owns a marketing firm in Los Angeles, and a half brother named Cedric at home.

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Justise, if nothing else, has been a player who has experienced tremendous team success. 3 state championships in high school, an undefeated 22-0 record for Team USA, and a national championship in his one season at Duke.

    His team USA experience is interesting to me. Winslow actually played up one year out of his class, so he played on teams that included last year's group of rookies, including Elfrid Payton, Aaron Gordon, and many others. To me, that speaks highly of his talents and his popularity with teammates, as he was recruited and accepted as a member of that team.

    But, there are at least some nagging issues that I am hearing that may bother some teams. Winslow blew off a radio appearance in NYC the other day on Boomer Esiason's show and got roundly criticized for it. He also got a technical for a borderline dirty play against Virginia last year, and was ejected once and warned several other times while playing in high school.

    None of those issues bother me personally, and I totally would take Coach K's recommendations over some high school ref in Texas and a has been QB with a radio show....but still, the fact that teams are often unbelievably queasy about such things this time of year is why I think it as least worth talking about the possibility he could end up here.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Winslow, who has the reputation of being a gym rat and tape fiend, played 29 minutes per game last year at Duke, putting up 12.6 PPG and 6.5 RPG. While a struggling shooter from deep prior to last year, for the Blue Devils he shot a very healthy 41.4% from downtown. At the combine, Winslow measured in at 6'6 1/2, which was smaller than most scouts expected. He also had a 6'10 1/4 wingspan, and weighed in at 222lbs. Winslow has an NBA body right now, no question. But what kind of player does he project to be at the next level? Let's put his game under the microscope:

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Defense will be Winslow's calling card the very first step he takes on an NBA floor. He is a VERY high level defender, basically showing me NO DEFENSIVE WEAKNESSES on tape.

    Seriously, his defensive work is scary good. He can guard multiple positions on switches, and I think immediately comes in and defends the opponents best player. He matches up well with all 2 guards, all 3 men, some 4's, and some 1's depending on the matchup.

    His body helps him greatly defensively. He can power over ball screens, quickly and balanced in his stance, and has a very high motor. He can physically power through the trash and not "die" on screens, and he can recover very well if he is beaten. Winslow can guard the ball, and he can deny the wings, and he can run through screens. Winslow can use his strength to defend bigger guys in the low post, and he is very adept at stopping on a dime and contesting a pull up jumpshot. Furthermore, being left handed he usually contests higher with his left hand....which perfectly matches the right handed release of most shooters.

    Best of all, his motor is relentless. Nobody chases down plays from the backside better than Winslow in this draft, and he actually gives you a bit of rim protection as a 3/4 man/wing defender. His transition defense is excellent, and he never gives up on a play.

    On top of all that, he is an outstanding team defender. Many NBA rookies struggle with rotations and fitting in a defensive scheme.....Winslow will not have that problem. Partly because he is a gym rat and tape studier, and partly because he was just brilliantly coached by Team USA and in college, Winslow already understands complex defensive plans and rotations. His intellect and alertness stood out on tape. Winslow can defend multiple offensive actions, can anticipate screens and cuts before they happen, and makes everybody around him defensively better.

    When a superior athlete also has high IQ and a very hot motor, that adds up to a top flight NBA defender with experience, and I project that Winslow will be just that. No weaknesses defensively that I see.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Offensively, it isn't nearly as fun to watch or write about, but there are still many things to be excited about.

    Winslow is a major weapon in transition, and that is probably the best thing he does right now. What makes him more special than other wings is that he doesn't just simply fill the lanes, although he does that at an extremely high level. What makes him unique to this draft is ability to get the defensive rebound, then push the ball up the floor himself to be a creator in the middle. He is both quick and crafty with the ball, and he can either use a Eurostep to score himself, or drive and kick to open people on both sides of the floor. Pushing the ball up the floor himself is probably the most fun thing about watching him play offense.

    Winslow shot a high percentage from 3 point land in college, but I do view that as somewhat of a mirage right now. No one will fear his jump shot from deep in the NBA and no one feared it in college either.

    His form is just not very good, nor very consistent.....that is worse to try and correct, because he makes different mistakes form wise from shot to shot. His most common mistake on a catch and shoot is in his "load"....I think Winslow brings the ball up to above his head too early, forcing a small hitch and making his shot too flat. Everyone just about "dips" the ball to get momentum and timing lined up on a shot, so if I were to try and fix Winslow, the first priority would be to get him to dip the ball more consistently to the same spot and at the same speed. He also occasionally dips it to close to his chest, which forces his body to have to lean back to get his shot off. It is a myriad of poor fundamentals, some of which were fixed at Duke some of the time, but not always.

    His next mistakes on a catch and shoot are that he fails to "gooseneck" the wrist, instead occasionally turning his wrist to the right as he releases it......add to that the fact that he sometimes lets the ball be influenced off his ring finger/pinky (the pinky finger should be off the ball totally in my view at the release, and the ring finger should point right at the target) and you have a slightly hot mess as a catch and shoot guy.

    The prescription from Tbird would be to fix the dip issues first, then tackle the other issues eventually. I think he has the talent to become serviceable from the deeper NBA line, but it will take many thousands of reps, great coaching, and a lot of determination from Winslow himself.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a driver is where Winslow can potentially be dynamic, but first he will have to develop some sort of mid range game. At Duke, according to Synergy, Winslow made just 2 off the dribble jump shots all year long.....so on tape, I set out to see what exactly he is doing and how I'd recommend fixing him.

    And, I report to you some bad news, which is he has multiple problems that depend on which direction he is going to.

    Going to his right, he really struggles with the load again, particularly with trying to get the ball back to his left hand to shoot. He just looks very uncomfortable with the mechanics of doing that. Also, like many young players, he fails to really pound that last dribble hard enough, which causes his knee flex to come too late and forces him out of rhythm.

    Going to his left is better, slightly. Going that way he again doesn't dip the ball far enough and dips it too quickly, which causes him to raise the ball up to the firing position before he gets his body square.

    The good news is that his footwork is pretty good as a shooter, but there is a lot to fix here on the upper end of his shooting form.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At this point, he is basically a slasher/driver in the halfcourt, with streaks of being an OK spot up shooter.

    As a driver he is really good, which makes him very hard to guard still for many defenders. He gets low with his dribble, and has a very nice crossover dribble below his kneecaps and a very pretty Eurostep in traffic. He can finish with either hand in traffic, seeks out contact and can score despite being bumped with his strength and body control.

    If he can develop a consistent jumper, Winslow will be a weapon offensively due to his craftiness. He already can split the defenders when receiving a ball screen, and get by a hard hedge. He also can be a weapon right now in "iso" situations, but he has to turn his back to the defense and use a post up game to do so.....getting a pull up jumper in his arsenal would make teams have to play him honestly instead of just dropping way off him like they already do now.

    I do like him as a post player, and if you have Winslow and don't use him down there I think you are hurting yourself. He is so strong there, and has nice moves already and really good footwork. Posting up guards and smaller wings I think is the next wave of the future, and Winslow is going to be really good at doing that.

    Also, Winslow is absolute dynamite post feeder. He can make the high low pass in the paint, and he feeds it from all angles on the perimeter and with both hands. I generally think that wings who are good post players themselves make good post feeders, as they understand the importance of it. Paired with Okafor this year, Winslow was a huge help to the big man in putting up the numbers he did. Once Winslow gets a jump shot, he will even be better at this hidden art of the game, as he will have more space in which to operate as a passer.

    Last thing to mention: Winslow is a willing and active screener. If you have him on your team, I'd use him to screen all over the floor, and use him like a very active chess piece, moving him all over the board. I also like to take advantage of guys like this by using him as a point forward on certain set plays, since teams lay off of him so much.....by guarding him that way, you can creatively use him to run stuff with him at the top with the ball since he can see the entire floor unpressured.

    I'd recommend not trying to "pigeon hole" Winslow into any one thing offensively, instead move him all over the place in a variety of different roles. He would be MUCH better playing on a team who is playing small, with only one post player in the way in a more spread system and style......Winslow wouldn't fit offensively in Memphis for instance, and he won't fit very well if teams insist on pairing him with 2 bigs all the time and playing in a traditional style.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    So, what do you have in Justise Winslow?

    I think we have an extremely intelligent, high IQ, high motor, top shelf defender. He also is a work in progress offensively with a semi high ceiling, and who is still very young and learning to play. He is not a finished product yet by any stretch, but by year 2 or 3 he has the potential to be a high level 2 way player. If he improves his jump shot (no sure thing) then he is a near All Star....a guy who can be the 3rd best player or so on a great team. If he doesn't improve his jumper, he ends up being a role playing defender......either way he has a high floor and pretty high ceiling as well.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Should the Pacers pick him if he is there magically at #11?

    The short answer is probably, but let's see who else is there for sure before deciding. Likely though the answer would be yes. It would be hard to imagine how he wouldn't be the top guy on the board, or at least in the top 2 still left?

    But you are reading this and thinking....there is NO WAY he is available, right? Let's examine that!

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Let's assume these things to be true:

    1. The first 6 picks, in some order, to whoever ends up picking, are the two bigs (Okafor and Towns), the two point guards (Mudiay and Russell), and the two Europeans (Porzingas and Hezonja).

    By the way, you can use this same way of thinking to assume Hezonja slips, just put Winslow into his spot.

    2. Picks 7-10 include Johnson, Kaminsky, somebody trading up to get Turner, and Stein.

    3. In this scenario, Indiana would be faced with just about all bigs being gone, but still having Booker, Winslow, and Payne still available.

    It's unlikely, but not impossible, that it could play out like that. I see lots of teams inside of the top 10 trading with each other, moving up and back to gain extra assets and/or to get the guy they want specifically. I also think Boston eventually does get up into the top 10 to get either Turner or Stein.

    By the way, I believe that Stein "foot injury" rumor today is classic Boston smoke....but we will see.

    For now, Winslow and Hezonja I feel are the 2 most likely consensus top 7 guys that could possibly fall to us.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Winslow has a range of NBA players he could be compared to in my opinion.

    The worst case: Michael Kidd Gilchrest. I liked MKG coming out of college and in fact I still sort of do, and I think we will find out that Mark Price was an absolute awful shooting coach for him. I still think he is somewhat fixable, and we will see if they can do that down in Charlotte.

    I think Winslow, though he has some definite shooting issues, will be much better than that.

    So with that in mind, by NBA comparable for Winslow is:

    Andre Iguodala.

    Iggy is a pure winner, a guy who can guard everyone's top guys and still give you 15pts a night in his prime. Not a great shooter, but just like Winslow does, he makes "momentum" plays and big time key shots that effect the game, plus he plays the right way and does things that help you win. To get the most out of Winslow, you'll want to put as much good shooting as you can around him.

    If I am right, Winslow will continue to play on a lot of winning teams in his career and be a core guy on those squads.

    As always, the above is my opinion and my opinion only. Time will tell how accurate I turn out to be.

    Next to come in the next 3 days: My personal big board, 2nd round potential targets, a ridiculously pointless mock draft, and maybe a live Q and A on Wednesday night for a couple of hours.

    Just 3 days to go until draft night 2015!

    Tbird

  • #2
    Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #13: Justise Winslow

    Ideal scenario IMO

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #13: Justise Winslow

      I like the way you give a little background on the players!

      An observation; more and more in seems potential NBA players have a deep basketball background, meaning their dad or mom played and they have been around the game all their lives, thus high basketball IQ's.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #13: Justise Winslow

        I can't let myself start to create unrealistic expectations for the draft this year, but when we start to talk about Winslow, Johnson, and/or WCS as potentially available , it's hard not to get a little excited.


        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #13: Justise Winslow

          Yeah right when I wrote that Mario would be the possible guy to fall, I was like humm I forgot about Winslow, I could see both of these guys falling to us in different scenarios.

          I think the guy I would want to fall to us more would be Winslow, I think Mario has more potential, but I think Winslow fits better with what we have going on and the group of guys on this team. However, if we were in need of a superstar I would go with Mario for sure.
          Why so SERIOUS

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #13: Justise Winslow

            I think a high level defender next to PG would dramatically improve the team. He and Johnson are somewhat similar with Winslow maybe slightly more athletic and slightly better offensively. Johnson is definitely stronger. Do the Pacers think they have that guy already in Hill?
            {o,o}
            |)__)
            -"-"-

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #13: Justise Winslow

              Winslow is my #1 guy.

              I just don't see how he'd get to 11 though. Pacers would have to trade up.
              First time in a long time, I've been happy with the team that was constructed, and now they struggle. I blame the coach.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #13: Justise Winslow

                If he gets to 11, I would get as close to 11 as possible in my pants...then Larry would decide how good or bad my night would be...
                "It's just unfortunate that we've been penalized so much this year and nothing has happened to the Pistons, the Palace or the city of Detroit," he said. "It's almost like it's always our fault. The league knows it. They should be ashamed of themselves to let the security be as lax as it is around here."

                ----------------- Reggie Miller

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #13: Justise Winslow

                  Nah I'd be too shocked to see him at 11. I can't fathom it. He's one of my top three tier guys, aka the only guys I really want.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #13: Justise Winslow

                    If Winslow gets past Denver, there would probably be quite of few teams trying to get him. I'm more afraid of other teams jumping the Pacers and the guy who would have fell gets snatched up by the time they pick.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #13: Justise Winslow

                      Thanks again Tbird for all your solid work. Can't imagine Winslow falling that far, but would be awesome if he did.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #13: Justise Winslow

                        I know that we are talking about those so-called experts....but Winslow seems to be ranked higher than Johnson.

                        For whatever Team that is interested in drafting a SF with some defensive skill....why would they choose Winslow over Johnson or vice versa?

                        I'd think that if a Team like the Pistons were interested in drafting a SF and either Winslow or Johnson were both on the board...I'd think that they'd pick the higher rated Winslow over Johnson.
                        Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #13: Justise Winslow

                          Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                          I know that we are talking about those so-called experts....but Winslow seems to be ranked higher than Johnson.

                          For whatever Team that is interested in drafting a SF with some defensive skill....why would they choose Winslow over Johnson or vice versa?

                          I'd think that if a Team like the Pistons were interested in drafting a SF and either Winslow or Johnson were both on the board...I'd think that they'd pick the higher rated Winslow over Johnson.
                          Stanley Johnson has a slightly better developed jump shot (mechanic wise) so they might see him potentially as the better 2 way player. It's a possibility. Unlikely but a possibility.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #13: Justise Winslow

                            Perfect wing compliment to PG IMO. The Pacers should trade up to get him (within reason obviously) if he starts to fall. Particularly past six.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Tbird 2015 NBA Draft Analysis #13: Justise Winslow

                              Originally posted by Downtown Bang! View Post
                              Perfect wing compliment to PG IMO. The Pacers should trade up to get him (within reason obviously) if he starts to fall. Particularly past six.
                              One of the few instances I would favour moving up to 7 or 8... Mudiay and Hezonja... same story.
                              Last edited by Mourning; 06-23-2015, 08:03 AM.
                              2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                              2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                              2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X